Pyrocynical / Niall Comas - Inflation / Furshit / Weird Allegations

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Anderson's Phone said:
Turkey Tom really does like trying to defend a minor who happily did sexual roleplays with an adult. Seems like that fact just slips his mind.
Click to expand...
Well when you put it like that.....
That sounds completely retarded.


Also when the fuck did Ida speak for Pyro?

Lizard Machine Bugs said:
diesel patches made a vid
link: https://youtu.be/4vHDMaxBtqU
Click to expand...
I like how fucking worthless that video is. Just rehashing information...

He really needs some money doesn't he?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: albert chan, Cowboy Kim, Dood. and 1 other person
Warren Ampersand said:
Deleted User messages on Discord are stacked together with other Deleted Users due to the way Discord formats deleted user messages. Since Discord uses only one user account to display Deleted User messages.
Click to expand...
I just find it funny that Pyro, his GF, and everyone in between all deleted their accounts.

Grape_Soda said:
Well when you put it like that.....
That sounds completely retarded.


Also when the fuck did Ida speak for Pyro?
Click to expand...
Correct me if I'm wrong but did Turkey Tom ever actually touch up on the fact that apparently Ivory was groomed by others but he just decided to leave them out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Late
Reactions: Dood.
Systemic Shock said:
Everybody began bashing Ivory when he initially messed up, and they continued bashing him even when he gave better evidence. Of course he'd give more evidence to someone with more credibility and a bigger platform if he was sincere with warning people about Niall.
Click to expand...
He had a platform on Tommy C's podcast to discuss the initial accusations and argue back and forth about Tommy C's credibility and such. It would've been the right time to bring up important stuff like this especially with the conclusion drawn from that interview (Pyro Is not a groomer just an idiot) contradicting Turkey Tom's conclusion of "I Don't feel comfortable saying Pyro isn't a groomer given this new information"
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Systemic Shock and Dood.
Anderson's Phone said:
Correct me if I'm wrong but did Turkey Tom ever actually touch up on the fact that apparently Ivory was groomed by others but he just decided to leave them out.
Click to expand...
He did. Quote from his Google Doc:

"Another argument Pyrocynical made lies in the idea that Ivory messages other people of a similar age around the same time.

‘After Ivory alleged that I “groomed” him, this individual then reached out to him to apologise for any hurt he may have inadvertently caused him. To which Ivory responded: “no ur fine idc”.

https://imgur.com/a/K7Kyd6y

Why does he not care in this instance? Why does he remain unaffected by a similar interaction with others, yet feel the need to single me out and character assassinate only me on social media?’

This may be a little harder to nail down. Why wouldn’t Ivory be upset at this guy if he was so angry at Pyrocynical? This becomes obvious when you read Ivory’s original twitlongers, where he says that the biggest reason for him putting all of this information out there is because Pyro has influence. And he’d be right.

Pyrocynical has more than 4 million subscribers, and is easily one of the most respected people in the commentary community. It is no surprise that people are so unwilling to believe these allegations - most people don’t even seem to watch videos about it before passing judgement. After YouTuber Bowblax put out a video including evidence that mostly supported Ivory, his comments were flooded with people claiming that he ‘made it all up.’"
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Burning Fanatic, Cringer of troons, Nancompoop and 3 others
Regardless, Ivory’s got issues for fucking sure but Pyro shouldn’t have been roleplaying farting deathfat dragon bdsm bullshit with someone without covering his bases and making sure he asked for their age. They’re both fucking morons, and I feel like Ivory did want some sort of clout, but Pyro was the adult in the situation and should’ve taken proper precautions to avoid lewd shit with kids.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: sanjuro, albert chan, Mountain Dew and 8 others
If Pyrocynical knew Ivory was 15 or did not have a reasonable belief Ivory was 16+, he is in violation of UK law.

Serious Crime Act 2015

An Act to amend the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the Computer Misuse Act 1990, Part 4 of the Policing and Crime Act 2009, section 1 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933, the Sexual Offences Act 2003, the Street Offences Act 1959, the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, the Prohibition of...
www.legislation.gov.uk www.legislation.gov.uk
67Sexual communication with a child
After section 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 insert—
“15ASexual communication with a child
(1)A person aged 18 or over (A) commits an offence if—
(a)for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, A intentionally communicates with another person (B),
(b)the communication is sexual or is intended to encourage B to make (whether to A or to another) a communication that is sexual, and
(c)B is under 16 and A does not reasonably believe that B is 16 or over.
(2)For the purposes of this section, a communication is sexual if—
(a)any part of it relates to sexual activity, or
(b)a reasonable person would, in all the circumstances but regardless of any person’s purpose, consider any part of the communication to be sexual;and in paragraph (a) “sexual activity” means an activity that a reasonable person would, in all the circumstances but regardless of any person’s purpose, consider to be sexual.
(3)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine or both;
(b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years.”
Click to expand...
Pyro: it eat your cock up with my ass tbh idk fart so long and hard on your lap you wouldn't be able to breath
Click to expand...
Pyro: My ass would kiss you tbh and I'd eat just to fart it out, and the farts would be really messy aswell like I'd be pushing sweat out of my ass for you to lick
Like all the sweat in my ass crack would make my farts really wet so it'd make a long wet fart sound when I farted I bet that turns you on~
Click to expand...
Pyro: mmmm my farts would make a really disgusting squelch sound when they left my ass and would stink so badly with sweat spraying from my ass, I bet your cock is so hard from imagining that
Click to expand...
This law went into effect just three days before Pyro sent those messages.
OHNOUHOH.png
Since Pyro has confessed to the chats being real and his only excuse was "Ivory didn't tell me he was 15 (but I'm not saying he lied either) and I was banned from Twitter (please don't question why I didn't ask for his age over Discord or Skype)," and the current evidence shows he knew Ivory was 15 or at the absolute least had no reason to think Ivory was of legal age, Ivory may want to look into giving the coppers across the pond a call.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: sanjuro, Gainas, albert chan and 12 others
Buttafucco Fiber said:
He had a platform on Tommy C's podcast to discuss the initial accusations and argue back and forth about Tommy C's credibility and such. It would've been the right time to bring up important stuff like this especially with the conclusion drawn from that interview (Pyro Is not a groomer just an idiot) contradicting Turkey Tom's conclusion of "I Don't feel comfortable saying Pyro isn't a groomer given this new information"
Click to expand...
You do have a fair point, I'm not saying Ivory's the brightest considering how he initially tweeted out the allegations, but the evidence he gave as of now is pretty damning. Tom's conclusion of Pyro being a potential groomer comes from the new set of evidence shared in the Google doc that wasn't available at the time of Tommy C's interview. This new evidence reveals that Niall would have to know Ivory was a minor and that Niall seemed to have a sexual interest in Ivory that goes beyond furry ERP. At best, Niall had sexually explicit conversations with a minor.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Stay safe and Karamel
Systemic Shock said:
You do have a fair point, I'm not saying Ivory's the brightest considering how he initially tweeted out the allegations, but the evidence he gave as of now is pretty damning. Tom's conclusion of Pyro being a potential groomer comes from the new set of evidence shared in the Google doc that wasn't available at the time of Tommy C's interview. This new evidence reveals that Niall would have to know Ivory was a minor and that Niall seemed to have a sexual interest in Ivory that goes beyond furry ERP. At best, Niall had sexually explicit conversations with a minor.
Click to expand...
I mean you aren't wrong either. Turkey Tom by his own admission wouldn't have made the initial video on pyro if people didn't say Pyro disproved the allegations and Ivory was a clout chaser. So Ivory might not be smart they are lucky.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Systemic Shock
Looking at everything, Pyro isn't exactly entirely innocent. His own admission to the conversations being real and his gf's dms to Ivory on twitter REALLY don't help him. Looking through the Turkey Tom docs, it was confirmed Ivory did reveal their age to be 16 but no evidence or chats of them being 15 at the time cropped up yet. I know 16 is the age of consent in the brit bong LOICENCE nation but this just still makes Pyro look like a creep. I know it's like a 3 year difference but that just doesn't sit well with me still.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Brown Bricks
BASED-GROYPER-REDDIT-XX29 said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq1HQmjHWc4&t=5s he made s shorter video debunking turkey tom
Click to expand...
4:03
When did Turkey Tom highlight that tweet by @draywo? What was the context of him highlighting it? It's not in the document. Was he saying @draywo was 100% true despite the lack of evidence? Was he using it in comparison to the DM from Pyro where he says he ERPed and sent fetish shit to so many people he'd lost count? Was he using it in comparison to Ivory saying he knew Pyro had done this with other people?

5:30
The age of consent in UK and Pennsylvania being 16 doesn't change the fact Pyro was doing ERP and showing off fetish art to Ivory when we was 15. It doesn't make that any less illegal in either location. As I demonstrated earlier in the UK it is illegal to engage sexually in any way with someone 15 or younger. In Pennsylvania it is illegal to send pornography to anyone 17 or younger. So Pyro fucked up no matter which country's laws you apply.

7:32
Morally Pyro was wrong because he was engaging in sexual conversations with a minor while either knowing the minor was underage or not bothering to check despite having no reason to assume the minor was an adult. I cannot fathom why so many of these faggots refuse to acknowledge this. That's the problem. An adult. Sexually engaging. With a minor. Say it however many times it takes for it to sink in to the empty cavern between your ears. If Pyro was only caught having a private FA or F-list full of fatty farty sweaty furry shit nobody would care beyond laughing our asses off.

9:09
Ivory pinning a tweet about his SoundCloud during the accusations doesn't change the fact that PYRO WAS ENGAGING IN SEXUAL CONVERSATIONS WITH A MINOR WHILE EITHER KNOWING THE MINOR WAS UNDERAGE OR NOT BOTHERING TO CHECK DESPITE HAVING NO REASON TO ASSUME THE MINOR WAS AN ADULT. One of those things is both a crime and far more morally reprehensible and I'll give you a hint it's not the fucking part that involves SoundCloud.

10:50
Pyro did break the law. Even if he hadn't that wouldn't make it okay for him to ask a 15 year old how hard his dick got from looking at pictures of furries with more fat folds than puff pastry.

I also skipped around the full stream a bit and he thinks HTMLRandomDude and RedditMoments took down their accusations against Ivory because they "got jumped by the commentary community?" Maybe if he put down the bong and didn't have smoke in his eyes all the time he'd see RedditMoments privately reached out to Ivory to apologize and take back his statement on November 1 and HTMLRandomDude apologized and deleted his tweets on November 12.
Between Ivory's first posts on October 29 and the release of Turkey Tom's video on December 1 there was little to no pushback against Pyro in the commentary community. They were skeptical until Pyro made his dogshit Reddit response on November 10, at which point they deepthroated themselves on his dick until they were vomiting up praise for how he "completely debunked" the entire situation. It wasn't until Tom stepped in that opinions started seriously shifting in the commentary community. Weeks after RedditMoments and HTMLRandomDude took back their accusations.

How the fuck did this sentient cumsock survive to be 30 years old.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Dumb
Reactions: lolcow argonaut, Woke Blue Muttlema, sanjuro and 19 others
To be honest and in my opinion, by looking at the new evidence that Tom showed, it makes Pyro's current girlfriend, Ida, sounded like an enabler to let Ivory and Pyro to converse with each other inappropriately and didn't bother to stop Ivory or warned Pyro before hand. It makes me question about Pyro's online co-workers/friends knew about this and if they are the same as Ida, who are enablers that let Pyro do whatever he wants and continue to be friends with him because he has an online status.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Helvetia, KKKaan, Reshiram Battle.mp3 and 18 others
r/pyrocynical is just taking the piss out of him right now, Safe to say he's probably not gonna recover from this unless he pulls off the apology of a lifetime (not likely)

As for UK law like somebody mentioned here before he hasn't got a leg to stand on no matter how he tries to frame it's way too clear what the intention here was grooming or no grooming, this isn't just him using Curse words in the sense of insults or something this is full blown sexual communication about... fat dragon vore sex to somebody who should not have been spoken too about fat dragon vore sex.

Something I also want to mention is that there is no statute of limitations for crimes like the nature of pyros so unless he bails out of the UK at this point he'll probably face legal action at some point whether it be sooner or later should ivory or the appropriate people notify the relevant law enforcement in the UK about this.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: PYSMA, albert chan, Mountain Dew and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back