Pyrocynical / Niall Comas - Inflation / Furshit / Weird Allegations

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
This is becoming one of these internet battles where it's difficult to understand nuance when in the end it's just a story of a guy who dun gooffed on the internet. The original accusation was that Pyro was a pedo groomer. But before Turk Tommy jumping in, that was disproved even by Ivory. The revelations that Pyro may have lied about knowing Ivory's age doesn't really give credence to the original claim (even the infamous document doesn't outright make that claim).

TBH, even with this response, there's still gonna be some die hards who will think otherwise (they already came out) and I bet Turk Tommy and co. are cooking up something in response. Prepare for flame war if they continue to push it further. Will it ultimately kill Pyro's career beyond repair, time will tell. But until I see definitive evidence to the original claim, I will just see this as the story of a young but degenerate dude who didn't realize the moral gravity of saying degenerate stuff to a younger dude until it was too late. But he own up to that and will leave it at that.

What have we learned kids: never be an eceleb. But if you do, never fucking have e-relationships.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: ThatOneLurker, sanjuro, Abarefiller and 19 others
Another annoying fact about the video is how Pyro claims he has evidence he never knew Ivory's age (he hasn't) and claims his opposition doesn't have evidence, while true conclusive evidence has not been shown much of the circumstantial evidence does not lean in Pyro's favor. Plausible deniability is not a good argument in this case. The time line goes:

1. Ivory provides the initial screenshots showing Pyro doing ERP and sending porn to him when he is 15.
2. Pyro responds on Reddit confirming the screens are real, claiming he didn't no Ivory was underaged (no screens provided showing Pyro addressing Ivory as an adult), and that Ivory is clout chasing
3. Tom, Ivory, and others dig up more screens showing that while Pyro may have not known Ivory's age that Ivory was open about being 15 making that unlikely.
4. Pyro responds simply using plausible deniability. He claims for instance that Ida would have no reason to tell him Ivory's age even though Ivory is clearly talking about Pyro to Ida. This may be true but then casts doubt onto Ida someone he likes enough to be dating. Why would you date someone who didn't tell you you were sexualizing a minor?

Pyro has only truly debunked one claim that he was planning on bringing Ivory to the UK for sex. He still however invited a minor to a bar (where they discuss fake IDs) which is very odd. He just lies though the whole video claiming he has proved his innocence even though he hasn't, and while his innocence hasn't been disproven his opposition has far more evidence then him. Maybe Pyro could pull up some miracle screens and prove his critics wrong, but as it stands he has not truly addressed anything. The condescending and manipulative nature of his response speaks volumes.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: ThatOneLurker, albert chan, itsoktobewhite and 12 others
Solid Hyrax said:
for ERPing without checking partner's age first
Click to expand...
He knew he was a minor, there is plausible deniability that he didn't known Ivory was 15 when they started talking but he admits to later finding out when he was 16 and says that in retrospect he should have stopped talking to him there, but them immediately starts talking about how it's okay because age of consent and how he didn't think the age gap was a problem because he didn't see the furry RP as something sexual (lmao)
So as i said taking full responsibility while claiming he did nothing wrong, and thats just not a good enough response or reasoning
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: ThatOneLurker, sanjuro, Abarefiller and 13 others
Diabolical diabetic said:
He knew he was a minor, there is plausible deniability that he didn't known Ivory was 15 when they started talking but he admits to later finding out when he was 16 and says that in retrospect he should have stopped talking to him there, but them immediately starts talking about how it's okay because age of consent and how he didn't think the age gap was a problem because he didn't see the furry RP as something sexual (lmao)
So as i said taking full responsibility while claiming he did nothing wrong, and thats just not a good enough response or reasoning
Click to expand...
Ok so he will never please you with his defense, what do you want to do now?
 
  • Autistic
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: ThatOneLurker, sanjuro, Dunxe and 9 others
Since it's probably the opportune time, here's some rare cringe of a teenage girl awkwardly walking around with a Pyro body pillow in public and trying to feed it spaghetti


This is her 3 years from that video in a "Saint Tarrant" t-shirt at her high school
1555532875368.jpg
 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: KKKaan, Fentanyl Floyd, Windmill and 23 others
Solid Hyrax said:
Ok so he will never please you with his defense
Click to expand...
Not at all, i would be fine with him just admitting to have fucked up in still talking to ivory after finding put he was a minor, i still see that as pretty fucked but if that was it them sure, it's the "claiming he did nothing wrong" part that I'm complaining about
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: albert chan, Nancompoop, White bubblegum and 7 others
Diabolical diabetic said:
Not at all, i would be fine with him just admitting to have fucked up in still talking to ivory after finding put he was a minor, i still see that as pretty fucked but if that was it them sure, it's the "claiming he did nothing wrong" part that I'm complaining about
Click to expand...
He never said “he did nothing wrong”. In fact, he admitted guilt to unknowingly RPing with a minor and admitted it was wrong, he just rejects the claims that he was intentionally grooming Ivory and that he is now actively trying to hide said attempts at grooming.

Whether or not he knowingly RP’d with a minor is irrelevant because as far as public knowledge goes, we don’t know wether or not he did for a fact, and can only speculate and make assumptions based on what we’ve been shown, which hasn’t been enough to set his verdict in stone.

As of today, only Pyro truly knows whether or not he knew he was having a sexual conversation with a minor.
 
  • Disagree
  • Agree
Reactions: Dunxe, AnAccount, Struggler and 7 others
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: ThatOneLurker, Jah Hates Kaffirs and Bean5
Aum said:
Is there supposed to be a difference between those two things? Is that not grooming?
Click to expand...
Pretending to be a deathfat dragon that brapps and cooms is different from directly doing it as your 'virtual' irl self, imo. But it depends? Some people do rp as themselves or self insert, some people do separate and the actions are done by a character in third person. Its all semantics and personal view i guess.

Cringer of troons said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0CUxVY66CI :story: classic video.
Click to expand...
Bless, thank you
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cringer of troons and Unhindered Clown
KidSparrow said:
Pretending to be a deathfat dragon that brapps and cooms is different from directly doing it as your 'virtual' irl self, imo. But it depends? Some people do rp as themselves or self insert, some people do separate and the actions are done by a character in third person. Its all semantics and personal view i guess.
Click to expand...
Pretending to be a fat dragon while you groom a kid is still grooming a kid
 
  • Agree
  • Autistic
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Abarefiller, Dunxe, albert chan and 5 others
Aum said:
Is there supposed to be a difference between those two things? Is that not grooming?
Click to expand...
Yes and no.

Grooming implies someone explicitly seeking a minor to satisfy them sexually.

The keyword is “unknowingly”. Pyro did not, as far as public knowledge goes, intentionally seek a minor to have a sexual conversation with. There is no concrete evidence he was presented with the fact Ivory was 15 when they were talking as of yet.

I’m not defending Pyro, but I’m not vilifying him either; I’m simply stating the fact that there is not enough evidence on either side to say “definitely yes” or “definitely no”.

That could definitely change, but as of today, there is no evidence that Pyrocynical is definitely a groomer.

(Of course, he is a self-admitted degenerate and a trap on insta, so I wouldn’t be too surprised if it was shown he is, but I’m trying to write this unbiased as possible.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: GooglePuppet, Cryogonal, albert chan and 11 others
All the Pyro fans are dog piling Ivory because of Pyrocynical's response, which ironically said to not harass Ivory and take some sort of middle ground on the whole situation since Pyro is the degenerate who started this whole thing, Ivory merely reciprocated because he was horny. He even admits that he did it to a large sum of individuals regardless of age. So, yeah. You can't control your fanbase as much as some people want to. For better or for worse. In this case, his fans are just sperging out posting gore anywhere on Ivory's Twitter. Makes Pyros fans look worse than he does.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: sanjuro, Abarefiller, albert chan and 9 others
It was nice watching Pyrocynical while I still could, I really did enjoy his content and I've watched his videos since he first started doing commentary videos. But now, all I see is Niall, and I just can't see past all of this no matter what videos he makes. To be a e-celeb, you have to put on a mask to distract everyone from all the skeletons in your closet, Niall better put on quite the show before his fans begin seeing who he really is.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: albert chan, BooletProof, Toolbox and 9 others
Systemic Shock said:
It was nice watching Pyrocynical while I still could, I really did enjoy his content and I've watched his videos since he first started doing commentary videos. But now, all I see is Niall, and I just can't see past all of this no matter what videos he makes. To be a e-celeb, you have to put on a mask to distract everyone from all the skeletons in your closet, Niall better put on quite the show before his fans begin seeing who he really is.
Click to expand...

I doubt they'll care, i doubt most people that watch him care tbqh
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: albert chan, Toolbox, Systemic Shock and 3 others
To me, the worst lie he said in that response video was "I'm actually straight! haha I'm not ghey. It's just a fantasy roleplay!"

Um....ya ok. Just say you're bisexual and a furry ok? I don't know many straight men who RP gay porn WITHOUT being a little gay themselves....Pyro really is delusional...

Systemic Shock said:
It was nice watching Pyrocynical while I still could, I really did enjoy his content and I've watched his videos since he first started doing commentary videos. But now, all I see is Niall, and I just can't see past all of this no matter what videos he makes. To be a e-celeb, you have to put on a mask to distract everyone from all the skeletons in your closet, Niall better put on quite the show before his fans begin seeing who he really is.
Click to expand...
Hey there are hundreds of channels on youtube that do exactly what he does and more....I liked Pyro's videos during 2015-2018 because the edits weren't too distracting and he actually had good points on things.

Now his stuff feels scripted, like he's staring at a google doc and borrows WAY to much editing styles from Internet Historian. Hell he used Podel's sound effects and editing stuff in his old things but fuck it, now he has a new victim in that case.

Imagine having your style of video editing and humor straight up copied? I honestly wonder how IH views pyro....
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: ThatOneLurker, Woke Blue Muttlema, sanjuro and 26 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back