"Queen Bee" sperging

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Furina said:
I just had a thought. Would Chris even recognise Megan if he met her today?

They haven't seen each other in a long time and Chris has a pretty poor ability to recognise faces as has been well documented on the Cwciki, so unless he's been following her on Facebook (which seems unlikely if he still doesn't know she's married and has a daughter) I doubt he'd know her if he saw her. He probably still sees her as her old self back as she was when they were still friends. Chris still sees himself as his high-school self so it stands to reason he'd still see Megan as the young twenty-something and not as a thirty-something woman.

OK seriously now, is Megan actually married and a mother? I keep hearing this and I don't know if it's true or not. Marvin? Alec? Bueller? Bueller?
 
Hitler said:
TL;DR Anyone suggesting this guy is ween is a nostalgiafag, Megan is not being affected by anything Chris or this new guy does and the new Star Wars movies will almost certainly be better than the prequels.
Eh, nah, there are some great trolls trolling Chris nowadays. My only problem with this guy is that they used Megan's name. Well, and his technique leaves a little to be desired, but that's not a big deal. You're assuming a bit much about Megan. She's mostly, but not entirely, disconnected from Chris.

CWCissey said:
Furina said:
I just had a thought. Would Chris even recognise Megan if he met her today?

They haven't seen each other in a long time and Chris has a pretty poor ability to recognise faces as has been well documented on the Cwciki, so unless he's been following her on Facebook (which seems unlikely if he still doesn't know she's married and has a daughter) I doubt he'd know her if he saw her. He probably still sees her as her old self back as she was when they were still friends. Chris still sees himself as his high-school self so it stands to reason he'd still see Megan as the young twenty-something and not as a thirty-something woman.

OK seriously now, is Megan actually married and a mother? I keep hearing this and I don't know if it's true or not. Marvin? Alec? Bueller? Bueller?
I don't think she's married and I'm pretty sure she's not a mother.
 
Hitler said:
TL;DR Anyone suggesting this guy is ween is a nostalgiafag, Megan is not being affected by anything Chris or this new guy does and the new Star Wars movies will almost certainly be better than the prequels.
Mein Fuhrer, I'm going to have to disagree here. I think what makes people worry about Megan specifically is that Chris has semi-recently tried to stalk her, buying her personal info (which I hope to GodJesus isn't accurate) from one of those data brokers, etc. I know it's a million-to-one against anything happening given Chris's laziness, but no one wants to see him actually try to follow up on that and cause her trouble. Let him rage against Clyde Cash, or JULAY, or Surfshack Tito, but leave the real civilians out of it.
And what's more, they're asking for nothing more than a video which Chris would half-assedly mumble in the dark. Even if we were to accept that bringing in "Megan" could possibly be OK under the right circumstances, this wouldn't count.

Another thing making Fake Megan contemptible, by the way, is that "she" brought Lucas back into this, who hasn't been an object of Chris's attention lately. I hope Chris forgot his last name.
 
I must confess I am a bit curious as to why it says "RE:" in the header of the mail. It makes it look like either he contacted the troll first or this is part of a longer conversation.

EDIT: Oh! It could be a follow-up to the first "Megan" email!
 
Hitler said:
All the trolls and all of us made Chris this inaccessible and now that someone has got Chris to take the bait again a bunch of people say he ween when he's doing the same thing as the other beloved trolls. I think a lot of people forget: calling him up and screaming JULAY!! is ween, making an obnoxious little rant on youtube is ween, creating fake facebook pages of Chris saying he is gay is ween. Inducing Chris to make his own content through deceiving him about who you are is par for the course.

It's just a matter of effectiveness. What worked 3 years ago won't work today. If Fake Megan managed to string Chris along for a few weeks, establishing a sort of rapport with him and then tried to gently and subtly coax him into making a new video, that would be one thing, and it might actually work. But this? It's stupid. Even if he was disposed to making new videos on a regular basis, the premise is all wrong. Chris's mindset is that Megan is an evil bitch who has tirelessly spent the last 6+ years trying to make his life a living hell. Why would he apologize to her for that? "She" tried to logically explain why it's not "her" fault all of these bad things have happened to him, but we all know that's not how Chris's mind works. He is always the victim, no matter what he, or anyone else, does. Those are the rules of the game and you have to play by them if you want to win. If this ween impostor was smart or had any real insight into Chris's psychology, Fake Megan would have approached Chris as seeking reconciliation or forgiveness from him, not the other way around.
 
Hitler said:
How is this person any more ween than any of these people [cwc]trolls[/cwc]?

Those other trolls had their own personas or took the names of fictional characters and obscure celebrities. It seems desperate and a bit low to pretend to be Megan, a big part of Christory. That's my take anyway.

Also, likely because they're doing the same thing as the 'classic' trolls is why the new breed are being called weens. It's shown that Chris has learnt, why would he fall for a fake sweetheart again? The only reason he believed this ween is because he's BLINDED WITH FRUSTRATION.

If someone came up with a new strategy that worked successfully in getting new content in a way that Chris goes along with without it coming across as forced or being actively harmful (BLUESPIKE!) then I bet they'll be celebrated.
 
Impersonating Meg is low. Impersonating Meg in a bid to get new content after Chris' recent tardrage against her is beyond pathetic. The ween(s) behind this are douchehammers. The last thing anyone needs to do is wind Chris up even more than he already is. His mental state seems fragile enough as it is. Whatever my thoughts and feelings are on Chris' actions, I don't want him to come to any harm.
 
I personally don't give a flying fuck if Megan did use Chris as her personal ATM machine or whatever. Most normal guys who've gone through this sort of thing just write it off as another learning experience and move on. Nothing that Megan did warrants Chris's unhealthy and ultimately psychotic obsession with her. The very idea that Megan was somehow responsible for the death of his father is absolutely ludicrous, and goes to show just how delusional Chris has become.

Maybe it's going to take Chris finally falling off the "crazy mountain" before he gets the psychological help he so desperately needs.
 
Personally I find the somewhat arbitrary faux-ethics that some in this community attempt to uphold hard to take seriously or respect.

This is a web forum for the mocking voyeurism of an extremely disturbed mentally disabled man (one regularly strewn with slur words aimed at the mentally disabled at that) I'm not saying anything should go but no mental gymnastics or code of conduct is going to make following/discussing Chris morally clean. I'm as bad as anyone on that count.

Again, I'm not saying open season on Chris or those connected with his saga but no one on here me included can really take the moral high ground with any credibility. Or the high ground of cool/non-sad behaviour.. lets be real.
 
Marvin said:
Eh, nah, there are some great trolls trolling Chris nowadays. My only problem with this guy is that they used Megan's name. Well, and his technique leaves a little to be desired, but that's not a big deal. You're assuming a bit much about Megan. She's mostly, but not entirely, disconnected from Chris.

To go along with that, I once got into contact with someone I thought was Megan (It seems unlikely that a troll would pretend to be her just to carry on a normal conversation) and she expressed disappointment that Chris hadn't changed and that she was willing to put the ugliness behind her. Guess it was a bit naive of her to think he'd change but maybe that was wishful thinking on her part. She seems to get that he's unwilling to change, though, so I can't imagine she's surprised that he's whining about her on Facebook, if she's even aware of it.
 
Targaryen said:
Personally I find the somewhat arbitrary faux-ethics that some in this community attempt to uphold hard to take seriously or respect.

This is a web forum for the mocking voyeurism of an extremely disturbed mentally disabled man (one regularly strewn with slur words aimed at the mentally disabled at that) I'm not saying anything should go but no mental gymnastics or code of conduct is going to make following/discussing Chris morally clean. I'm as bad as anyone on that count.

Again, I'm not saying open season on Chris or those connected with his saga but no one on here me included can really take the moral high ground with any credibility. Or the high ground of cool/non-sad behaviour.. lets be real.

There's a rather clear line between the ethics of discussing someone and the ethics of pushing someone with obvious problems over the edge in pursuit of "content".

The Megan impostor is exemplary of this reckless disregard for both Chris's own welfare and the welfare of others, not to mention the most retarded attempt I've ever seen at extracting favors from Chris. Hence, the reason people are taking this one rather seriously.
 
Targaryen said:
Personally I find the somewhat arbitrary faux-ethics that some in this community attempt to uphold hard to take seriously or respect.

This is a web forum for the mocking voyeurism of an extremely disturbed mentally disabled man (one regularly strewn with slur words aimed at the mentally disabled at that) I'm not saying anything should go but no mental gymnastics or code of conduct is going to make following/discussing Chris morally clean. I'm as bad as anyone on that count.

Again, I'm not saying open season on Chris or those connected with his saga but no one on here me included can really take the moral high ground with any credibility. Or the high ground of cool/non-sad behaviour.. lets be real.

It's not a matter of "high ground." The Chris of today is not the Chris of old. Feeding his delusions of a mass conspiracy is a bad idea. He never had a very good grasp of reality, but now, in his isolation and bitterness, he has completely lost it.
 
I get the feeling this Saga is gonna end quicker than last longer.
 
KatsuKitty said:
Targaryen said:
Personally I find the somewhat arbitrary faux-ethics that some in this community attempt to uphold hard to take seriously or respect.

This is a web forum for the mocking voyeurism of an extremely disturbed mentally disabled man (one regularly strewn with slur words aimed at the mentally disabled at that) I'm not saying anything should go but no mental gymnastics or code of conduct is going to make following/discussing Chris morally clean. I'm as bad as anyone on that count.

Again, I'm not saying open season on Chris or those connected with his saga but no one on here me included can really take the moral high ground with any credibility. Or the high ground of cool/non-sad behaviour.. lets be real.

There's a rather clear line between the ethics of discussing someone and the ethics of pushing someone with obvious problems over the edge in pursuit of "content".

The Megan impostor is exemplary of this reckless disregard for both Chris's own welfare and the welfare of others, not to mention the most retarded attempt I've ever seen at extracting favors from Chris. Hence, the reason people are taking this one rather seriously.

So you think an active forum dedicated to discussing every detail of Chris's personal life in a mocking/critical manner doesn't play any part in this paranoid and disturbed individual hovering close to the brink? You can argue it's Chris' fault this place and the rest of the staggering large collection of information about him online is there. I'm pretty sure he'd still be badly messed up and getting himself into trouble if it wasn't.

However at the risk of exceeding the hurtful truth level- I can't defend this faux-Megan troll's actions in good conscious, but I can't truly and without mental gymnasitics defend my voyeuristic following of Chris or the existence of this forum either. Making this taboo and not every other way we contribute to Megan and Chris's names being splatter all over the internet.. to me personally feels arbitrary and inconsistent. Certainly much of the "classic" Chris trolling doesn't seem any less malicious or irresponsible.
 
Chris is incredibly stupid. It his own fault if he believes an obvious troll.
 
The problem, atleast for most people here who have an issue with this particular sperg, isn't in Chris' reactions. If he can't see through the obvious trolling after being so paranoid about being trolled, it's kind of on him. I think the issue most people have is that it's dragging Meg into it and she didn't do anything to deserve it. As long as Meg isn't harmed in any way by this, though, it shouldn't be an issue.
 
MetroidJunkie said:
The problem, atleast for most people here who have an issue with this particular sperg, isn't in Chris' reactions. If he can't see through the obvious trolling after being so paranoid about being trolled, it's kind of on him. I think the issue most people have is that it's dragging Meg into it and she didn't do anything to deserve it. As long as Meg isn't harmed in any way by this, though, it shouldn't be an issue.

I feel like anyone truly worried about dragging Megan into this should have a problem with the details of her life (including hacked personal emails) being all over the internet including referencing her full name and details on this public forum.

I dunno guys- not meaning to cause issues or to get on people's backs. I feel like Chris watching is a wildly amoral guilty pleasure pursuit at best and I don't always understand attempting to draw moral lines out of amorality or the particular boundaries that become consensus.
 
Nothing is going to happen to Megan. Nobody knows where she is, and the select few that do know are not going to dispel to anyone.

Instead, it's gonna be Chris falling into a troll trap, ending in him finding his naive self was tricked.

All because he got too frustrated at the past. Nobody trolls himself better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom