"Queen Bee" sperging

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
My two cents on the morality argument. I know I am new here, so feel free to disregard it.

Firstly amoral and immoral have completely different meanings, but are used interchangeably in this thread.

On the one hand, if no one had ever done any trolling, there would be much material, which is the main reason most of us are here.

One the other hand I think it is a reasonable moral distinction to say you can follow Chris and participate in this forum, but you shouldn't actively interact with him in a way he would not want.

My personal stance on "Megan" hinges on one thing. Was this recent Megan kick the result of an unreleased contact by "Megan", or the other way round.

If a troll kicked of this most recent round of obsession, he is potentially putting Megan at risk of being in an unpleasant or even dangerous situation. I think that is a no-no.

If this message was the first one, and a response to the obsession, it seems a little more grey to me. Has Megan (the real one), really been brought more into it than she was before? She is already an unfortunate victim of this situation, and I don't see that the email really made things worse.

There is a risk it will escalate things, and actually bring Megan into it, which would be a negative outcome. There is also the possibility he was going to write or say something nasty to her for real at some point, and now he has an outlet that doesn't actually involve her. Both of these seem unlikely, it probably doesn't make the slightest bit of difference.

So well I don't think I would do something like this, I don't feel as strongly about it as some of you do.
 
Dr RobotDick said:
Cwckifan said:
Pikonic, if it really is true that we like something more when we have to work for it, then isn't it possible that adding some anonymity to Megan would inspire more prying, if just out of curiosity? Really, whoever's interested is interested, so how would removing information (that someone might really want to know) be any help?

Dr RobotDick said:
It really upsets me that if you do a google search of Megan's name, literally the first thing that comes up is a link to her CWCki article. People act like her non-involvement in Chris's current escapades means that she's immune from harm, but that alone has to fuck with her life at least a little bit.

Yeah, I just quoted myself, but fuck it.

It's one thing if creepy assholes on the internet want to stalk her, that's just the fucked up world we live in nowadays. But it's another thing if any potential employers, or god forbid her future kids can have access to all this shit with very minimal effort.

Waa waa waa embarrassing things about people pop up on google searches, let's cut the internet down :roll:

The first two entries are the cwciki, and the next hundred are various people all with the same name posting about kids, interests, their blogs, twitter accounts, Facebook pages, whatever.

Megan doesn't have a record that we know of. She's not in crippling debt that we're aware of. I don't believe she owns property that's tied to her name. She doesn't have a blog (tied to her name) that has antisemitic rantings. So what's tied to her, specifically, that some mysterious and all-powerful employer may find? A single entry about a fat manchild who harassed her a decade ago. The only - and to really stress here that it's the only point that should be belabored - thing that could affect Megan negatively is if a bunch of idiot kids on the internet find her and call her cellphone and harass her.

But no one here is doing that. And the ween kids trying to troll Chris are more focused on him and pretending to BE her, not trying to harass her too. Michael Snyder has WAY more stuff posted about him on the internet and he owns a business! If anything all this Snyder talk is actually impacting him for any parent that may want to drop off kids at a place that gets all this drama, but I don't hear anyone moaning about the poor Jew.

I agree with a lot of other posters that it's very amusing that a forum full of people dedicated to publicly following someone can turn into a bunch of moralfags over a single girl who's honor is besmirched because of the same actions that they've endorsed for years.

Edit and addendum: Please don't think I'm calling you out specifically Dr RobotDick, I've just been reading these things all weekend and it's all finally boiled over for me.
 
Please divert all discussion on the ethics of trolling Chris into this thread: Ethical Concerns and only discuss topics relevant to Chris's post/impostor Megan here. Thankies.
 
Anna Elizabeth McLerran said:
Or maybe he had contacted her to get more information about her and that's why she knows how to get ahold of him. You definitely can't blame her completely for everything that's happened, I think she played a very small role. The real blame lies with all the scumbags that have continuously trolled you through the years.

Yeah... like you, and more importantly, Chris himself.
 
FemboiBunny said:
Anna Elizabeth McLerran said:
Or maybe he had contacted her to get more information about her and that's why she knows how to get ahold of him. You definitely can't blame her completely for everything that's happened, I think she played a very small role. The real blame lies with all the scumbags that have continuously trolled you through the years.

Yeah... like you, and more importantly, Chris himself.


Anna's feminazism is so anoying, but more anoying is that she is dense enought not to realize is just a troll posing as Megan.

Anna is like Chris in that she thinks that women are perfect angels devoid of all evill and men are pure trolling scum only, with the exception of her little pet-tard
 
FemboiBunny said:
Anna Elizabeth McLerran said:
Or maybe he had contacted her to get more information about her and that's why she knows how to get ahold of him. You definitely can't blame her completely for everything that's happened, I think she played a very small role. The real blame lies with all the scumbags that have continuously trolled you through the years.

Yeah... like you, and more importantly, Chris himself.
Yeah, I forgot I'm the one who hit Synder and vandalized a Wal Mart display.
 
Smutley said:
I agree with a lot of other posters that it's very amusing that a forum full of people dedicated to publicly following someone can turn into a bunch of moralfags over a single girl who's honor is besmirched because of the same actions that they've endorsed for years.

We're not bad people. We just like to watch bad things. :D

Personally, I don't care about people in Chris's life that don't choose to keep interacting with him. Fake Megan, for example, is just a tool to get a few more interesting things milked from the lulcow. It sucks that real Megan might get a few weeners after her but if she's even a little smarter then OPL and just ignores them they'll get bored with her.
 
I'm late to the party but did we ever find out if the person posing as Megan was one of us?
 
Iamthatis said:
Did nobody else notice the whole "I wasn't faking romance that was real" part? That's a big troll red flag there.

I'm pretty sure she's talking about her and Christopher - the guy Chris tard raged at when he saw her sitting on his lap.
 
Targaryen said:
Personally I find the somewhat arbitrary faux-ethics that some in this community attempt to uphold hard to take seriously or respect.

This is a web forum for the mocking voyeurism of an extremely disturbed mentally disabled man (one regularly strewn with slur words aimed at the mentally disabled at that) I'm not saying anything should go but no mental gymnastics or code of conduct is going to make following/discussing Chris morally clean. I'm as bad as anyone on that count.

Again, I'm not saying open season on Chris or those connected with his saga but no one on here me included can really take the moral high ground with any credibility. Or the high ground of cool/non-sad behaviour.. lets be real.

You're entitled to your opinion friend, but you're displaying a black and white view of a situation that's pretty close to the way Chris would see something.

Now obviously, this community is made up of a varied collection of personalities, some more pleasant than others, but overall all we do is watch and comment; I see nothing wrong with this.
 
Satoru182 said:
FemboiBunny said:
Anna Elizabeth McLerran said:
Or maybe he had contacted her to get more information about her and that's why she knows how to get ahold of him. You definitely can't blame her completely for everything that's happened, I think she played a very small role. The real blame lies with all the scumbags that have continuously trolled you through the years.

Yeah... like you, and more importantly, Chris himself.


Anna's feminazism is so anoying, but more anoying is that she is dense enought not to realize is just a troll posing as Megan.

Anna is like Chris in that she thinks that women are perfect angels devoid of all evill and men are pure trolling scum only, with the exception of her little pet-tard

And that makes me wonder... who the fuck liked anna's comment? seriously ._.
 
Oh great. I really do doubt this is real. The fact being that Megan already said to Chris she wants nothing to do with him. Whoever did this, however, makes me wonder....... if anybody could pretend to be Megan to get Chris to post a video, why the fuck would they?!
 
Targaryen said:
I dunno guys- not meaning to cause issues or to get on people's backs. I feel like Chris watching is a wildly amoral guilty pleasure pursuit at best and I don't always understand attempting to draw moral lines out of amorality or the particular boundaries that become consensus.

I think it's more tribalism than anything else. The intarwebs cause people to go through some strange moral gymnastics - and that's from a guy who was a regular on alt.flame.jesus.christ.
 
Smutley said:
Edit and addendum: Please don't think I'm calling you out specifically Dr RobotDick, I've just been reading these things all weekend and it's all finally boiled over for me.

No offense taken. While I disagree with you, at least you had a thought-out response instead of just outright calling me a fag. I'm just perplexed by some of the bizarre moral standards some people have. There's intense, vehement hatred for some idiot leaving an inane "JULAAAY!" comment, while other much more insidious acts gain respect and praise. But, I'll just leave it at that and direct any future thoughts I have to the appropriate thread.
 
Lady Houligan said:
HealthyMcWrap said:
Isn't is obivous? Siri has become self-aware.

And it wants to troll.

It's like Stephen King's "Cell" except instead of the pulse turning everyone into a zombie it's a single iPhone gaining both sentience and raging hatred for its owner. Just imagine the Siri voice going "STOP TOUCHING MY SCREEN WITH THOSE FAT GREASY FINGERS YOU UGLY FUCKFACE."
Reading this makes me wonder if it would possible the iPhone could be like AM from "I have No Mouth and I Must Scream."
img-2.gif
 
How does Chris think Megan caused Bob's death exactly? Did she inject his with a slow acting poison that eventually cause heart failure or whatever Chris thinks he died of?
 
revengeofphil said:
How does Chris think Megan caused Bob's death exactly? Did she inject his with a slow acting poison that eventually cause heart failure or whatever Chris thinks he died of?

Clearly it's her fault that Chris tard rages and stresses out his father.
 
FemboiBunny said:
And that makes me wonder... who the fuck liked anna's comment? seriously ._.

Why trolls.... silly! :D
 
revengeofphil said:
How does Chris think Megan caused Bob's death exactly?
It just broke Bob's heart to see his TRUE AND HONEST autistic son going through life without a sweetbolt to call his own.
 
revengeofphil said:
How does Chris think Megan caused Bob's death exactly? Did she inject his with a slow acting poison that eventually cause heart failure or whatever Chris thinks he died of?

Meg hired the Illuminati to infest Chris' house with bugs and also inject slow acting poison in Bob's Burger King food. It's a huge conspiracy, man.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom