r/polyamory

Over the years I've heard stories from multiple girls raised by single moms about being molested/raped by mom's boyfriend, so I completely believe this.
It's not just molestation. Look up children killed by their mothers boyfriend. Try not to have eaten first.

Women who intentionally choose single parenthood then take up with the first bit of dick that stiffens near then should be sterilised. A perpetual merry go round if mummy's boyfriend will fuck a,kid right up
 
It's not just molestation. Look up children killed by their mothers boyfriend. Try not to have eaten first.

Women who intentionally choose single parenthood then take up with the first bit of dick that stiffens near then should be sterilised. A perpetual merry go round if mummy's boyfriend will fuck a,kid right up
WOW google OK, I see how you feel about BLM

1599835920177.png
 
WOW google OK, I see how you feel about BLM

I was thinking specifically of this case in the UK, if I'm honest. A seventeen month old boy, killed by his "Mother" and her boyfriend.


Abortion and contraception are free at the point of use in the UK. And putting a child up for adoption, while lengthy, is not impossible. If Tracy Connolly, his parent, really wanted to go out and get the dick more than raise the child she chose to bring to term then there were options. That's the problem with a welfare state that incentivises single parent hood though.


Personally, I've had difficult financial periods, and I didn't care if the help I got was financial or material, so long as I was able to eat and live in a place until I got back on my feet (the caveat being I have been fortunate and not had things that badly or for too long). Perhaps if we removed the financial element of it, and stopped giving cashmonies, there would be a drop in wholly unfit women cashing in on their poor choices?
 
Perhaps if we removed the financial element of it, and stopped giving cashmonies, there would be a drop in wholly unfit women cashing in on their poor choices?
this applies to all forms of welfare
"we cant let people go homeless and hungry" is usually the argument for it - so put them in dedicated communal housing. bunk beds, communal kitchen and cafeteria, regimented 9 to 5 work day, that kind of thing. limiting public welfare to this kind of arrangement would quickly eliminate all the lazy fucks who leech off it.

as long as welfare literally means that the taxpayer foots the bill for providing high class living standards to parasites free of charge, it will always be abused on a large scale. do nothing and get a better life for it than a lot of the people who pay taxes to finance that shit? that's simply WAY too good of a deal to pass up for shameless lowlifes.
 
this applies to all forms of welfare
"we cant let people go homeless and hungry" is usually the argument for it - so put them in dedicated communal housing. bunk beds, communal kitchen and cafeteria, regimented 9 to 5 work day, that kind of thing. limiting public welfare to this kind of arrangement would quickly eliminate all the lazy fucks who leech off it.

as long as welfare literally means that the taxpayer foots the bill for providing high class living standards to parasites free of charge, it will always be abused on a large scale. do nothing and get a better life for it than a lot of the people who pay taxes to finance that shit? that's simply WAY too good of a deal to pass up for shameless lowlifes.
To be honest, I agree with that for the people who refuse to get themselves out of work. However, there's a world of difference between, say, person laid off with two weeks, to a month in between jobs, who actively spends their time looking for a new job or other work. It's inevitable - more so these days given BLMs proepnsity for burnign shit down - that people will be paid off at least once in their lives. And if a person's reaction to that is "well, I'll work at finding a new job" then I see no need to limit their freedoms.

For me, the perpetual and habitual unemployed, who refuse to seek work, who are a massive issue. Thy've no drive to even find work because the gibsmedat mentality has been fostered and ingrained in them since childhood.
 
as long as welfare literally means that the taxpayer foots the bill for providing high class living standards to parasites free of charge, it will always be abused on a large scale. do nothing and get a better life for it than a lot of the people who pay taxes to finance that shit? that's simply WAY too good of a deal to pass up for shameless lowlifes.
It should be two hots and a cot, anything else is too much and incentivizes being a parasite.
 
For me, the perpetual and habitual unemployed, who refuse to seek work, who are a massive issue. Thy've no drive to even find work because the gibsmedat mentality has been fostered and ingrained in them since childhood.
and the worst part about this situation is that their choice is rational and correct. if such a person were to get off welfare and take up a shitty job instead, their living standards and disposable income would go down significantly.
for a lot of people, welfare literally pays better than work, and on top of that it comes with a fuckton of free time. when those are your options, then you'd have to be a fucking masochist to not choose welfare. that is the reason why this underclass of parasitic leeches exists in such large numbers today.
 
My immediate thought is, that one gay couple who were praised for adopting a boy in the news, and then like 2 years later were caught pimping out their adopted baby.
The forst gay male couple to adopt in the UK? They've now divorced because one of them is now fucking one of their children's exes. I wish I was fucking making this up, What sort of creature goes for their teen kids sloppy seconds????


Apparently, Saffron, the ex girlfriend of the boy involved has "given her blessing". Some people might go "aaaawww, so cute!!" but to me all that says is the fucking degeneracy has been passed down to her. Utterly disgusting, the nerve and gall of these grotesque beings knows no limits. The fact they went to the press is even worse.
 
On tonight’s episode of polyamerous deviants: Poly adoption!

View attachment 1585768

Three gay men want to adopt a child.

(And here I thought adoption was all about giving an unwanted child a family, guess I was wrong all along. It’s about equipping gay “triads” with an accessory.)

Hold on, I've seen the documentary about this, highly recommend it for Kiwis:

three_men_and_a_baby.jpg
 
You know, some people are born gay, some people are born bisexual. Some people are born asexual. And some people are born with the urge to slam new and unexplored vaginas without going through a messy divorce! Don’t be a bigot!

It infuriates me. The past couple years have been the first time I’ve felt ashamed about being gay since I graduated high school in the mid 00s. If someone compared “polyamory” to homosexuality back then, the “progressive” left would have called him a homophobe. Now, they’d praise him for his “tolerance.” It’s the same way that separate events for different races used to be considered segregation; but this summer, in Seattle, white “allies“ formed a human chain around a park space “reserved” for “people of color.”

It’s not a coincidence that all of this started around the same time as Black Lives Matter. In a 2015 video, Patrice Cullors said she and the other two organizers are “trained Marxists” intent on “disrupt[ing] the Western-prescribed nuclear-family-structure requirement [sic].” A couple weeks ago, progressives mocked a speaker at the Republican National Convention for pointing it out, but anyone familiar with critical race theory, “queer” theory, and intersectional feminism knows Cullors really meant what she said.

If you’re not familiar with this stuff and want to learn more, read The Victims’ Revolution by Bruce Bawer, a gay conservative commentator. It’s eye-opening. James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose, two liberals, just released a new book, Cynical Theories, on the same topic, but I haven’t read it yet.

Incidentally, Bawer, Andrew Sullivan, Jonathan Rauch, and other politically heterodox gay writers are the ones responsible for redirecting gay activists’ focus to marriage equality in the 90s, which enraged radical leftists. (Google “same-sex marriage” and “cis gay white men” to see what I mean.) Nobody paid much attention to their criticism because they were holed up in obscure university departments.
 
On tonight’s episode of polyamerous deviants: Poly adoption!

View attachment 1585768

Three gay men want to adopt a child.

(And here I thought adoption was all about giving an unwanted child a family, guess I was wrong all along. It’s about equipping gay “triads” with an accessory.)

Giving a group of gay men a child, what could go wrong?
 
The forst gay male couple to adopt in the UK? They've now divorced because one of them is now fucking one of their children's exes. I wish I was fucking making this up, What sort of creature goes for their teen kids sloppy seconds????


Apparently, Saffron, the ex girlfriend of the boy involved has "given her blessing". Some people might go "aaaawww, so cute!!" but to me all that says is the fucking degeneracy has been passed down to her. Utterly disgusting, the nerve and gall of these grotesque beings knows no limits. The fact they went to the press is even worse.
Idk she might be saying that to save face and prob hates that parent's guts. It takes a really low level of empathy to not realize how fucked up that is.
 
You know, I was reading a manga awhile back and though it wasn't a main part of the story the main character found out that her single dad had been seeing someone for over a year and she wasn't aware. It wasn't done out of secrecy, just because the dad didn't want to confuse and make things awkward for his daughter until he knew his relationship was strong enough to want to get married. I feel like that's at least a better option than having a parent have new people over to your house constantly for hookups. I had a friend with a mom like that and while she wasn't abused or anything, she struggled with relationships for a bit as an adult.

depends on the situation really
the 'winner' is usually the person who wants to open the relationship in the first place because that one usually has some prospective fuckbuddy lined up and ready to go in advance, and the other partner often isn't all that interested in going out dating again

but yes in general women tend to have an easier time looking for hookups than men
I do think the winner is the one who wants to open the relationship. They selfishly want to bang more people while the monogamous partner is stuck feeling like shit and wouldn't have wanted to find another partner to begin with.
I have a sneaking suspicion he won't go down on his wife and he's unforgivably bad at sex. I noticed he did not mention anything about "I asked my wife why she won't fuck me, and this is what she said."

There has go to be something going on that killed the bedroom, which he's avoiding. Maybe he let himself go and is fat now. Maybe his hygiene has gotten awful. Maybe he makes no effort to be sexy and fashionable. Maybe he doesn't take his wife out on dates. Maybe his wife is depressed. Maybe his kinks are disgusting. Whatever it is, he didn't "learn" he's poly. He came to the conclusion poly might be good because the bedroom is dead and he wants sex.
That hits close to home. I mentioned someone like that pages ago. Slacked on hygiene. Didn't seem to realize that bedroom time meant helping a woman feel good too. No idea what foreplay was. Let himself go in terms of weight. Claimed to know how depression felt but then got angry at me when I had depressive moments and would always leave me on read but didn't understand why I never texted him much. When he proposed an open relationship at the start of us going serious it felt like a fucking joke. He was shit with one woman, how did he think he would attract and keep another one? People like that are baffling. They never work on themselves but think they are perfect.
 
@Coffee Druid Not all men are trash, but definitely that guy. Sadly, I've seen a lot of women who end up with some narcissist type "man" who doesn't realize women have needs. Said men conclude the "solution" to their GF's having-needs "problem" must be to find another woman who has less needs. (which never works and never happens, they just get continually dumped)

Usually those guys are the unmarried semi-employed, barfly college-dropout types by 40 who never shut the fuck up about how no one understands them. A lucky few even achieve a full police record for domestic abuse!
 
@Coffee Druid Not all men are trash, but definitely that guy. Sadly, I've seen a lot of women who end up with some narcissist type "man" who doesn't realize women have needs. Said men conclude the "solution" to their GF's having-needs "problem" must be to find another woman who has less needs. (which never works and never happens, they just get continually dumped)

Usually those guys are the unmarried semi-employed, barfly college-dropout types by 40 who never shut the fuck up about how no one understands them. A lucky few even achieve a full police record for domestic abuse!
Oh, I know now. That was several years ago, and I ended up taking time out of the dating scene and tried working on myself/my hobbies and making friends. At least now I know what red flags to look out for.

Like, I'm not 100% anti-poly for other people if they truly make it work and care about each other. It's just...almost nonexistent. I think a closed triad sort of relationship (without kids in the picture) has the better chance of working out compared to open types. At least from what I've seen of other people. I will never do it myself; if I want a lot of people to (platonically) love I have friends for that. The more I read about poly, the more I figure that 99% of people in the scene have personality problems or commitment issues.
 
ashamed about being gay since I graduated high school in the mid 00s.
Don't be ashamed about who you want to fuck just because of this shit. That's like being ashamed of where you happen to live just because meth-head hobos are camping under the interstate.
 
Oh, I know now. That was several years ago, and I ended up taking time out of the dating scene and tried working on myself/my hobbies and making friends. At least now I know what red flags to look out for.

Like, I'm not 100% anti-poly for other people if they truly make it work and care about each other. It's just...almost nonexistent. I think a closed triad sort of relationship (without kids in the picture) has the better chance of working out compared to open types. At least from what I've seen of other people. I will never do it myself; if I want a lot of people to (platonically) love I have friends for that. The more I read about poly, the more I figure that 99% of people in the scene have personality problems or commitment issues.
From what I've seen of it- friends who have fallen into it- a large part is also being too scared and immature to countenance the idea of being alone. People who are poly like to have a back up if things don't work out. Which I guess further removes any incentive not to be a terrible partner.

It annoys me because polyandry and polygamy are non white in origin mostly. Like there's other cultures what practise it be sure it's been part of their society for a long time and it mostly works for them.

But these morons from a western society appropriate it for their own stupid, petty and selfish ends. Given the tendency for people who like poly to be raging SJWtards, their mental blind spot for their own "cultural appropriation" really pisses me off.

I had a friend who I found out was super into it. He had a "partner" but was also seeing a woman- a blue haired, abrasive, shrill, "I'm a vegan because I'm a feminist and it's payytreeeearkeeee to use animals for milk and meat!!!!", "China and the CCP are amazing" type.


The main reason I stopped having anything to do with him was he was falling into that mindset himself, but also, k found out he would often go to this woman's house, and her "nesting partner" would look after her 8 year old kid- goes without saying it wasn't the "nesting partners" kid, but another man's child- downstairs while my former friend would fuck the kids mum upstairs in her and her partner's bed.

It really bothered me and filled me with revulsion, knowing that, to the point where I could not look at him.
 
Back