don't want to be a contrarian for the sake of it, but TFR's Russia feels like a massively missed opportunity. It's definitely a product of its time in terms of its setup - The content is based off the idea that the only way for things to happen in Russia is for Putin to die and that Putinism is somehow anti-nationalist and definitely not authoritarian (both entirely understandable premises before 2022). United Russia and Putin's circle is treated as this one amalgous blob that all rally behind Medvedev as their guy who they back until the end where the really interesting part of a post-Putin Russia would be the various power struggles inside YR. Instead of one Medvedev path with various "endings" that have other leaders, the main paths for Russia should branch off figures like Mistushin, Zolotov, Shoigu, Naryshkin, Bortnikov (reshuffle the deck with others as needed) and that's if Putin doesn't die (Putin should be the primary path for Russia IMO). Honestly, the opposition (especially the systemic opposition like KPRF and LDPR) shouldn't get paths before 1EW. Liberal opposition would prevent the European Wars and other forms are too weak, systemic opposition wouldn't even factor into anything really. KPRF, LDPR and SR are only capable of influencing and steering Putin's policy, but not replacing Putin. SR even essentially gave up the idea of replacing Putin, instead seeking to replace YR because the YR's and Putin's dominance is so cemented. Maybe a SR-led Putin path would be a cool idea as a way to have an alternative Putin.
Now, FWIW, TFR has executed its flawed setup extremely well and is obviously based on different ideals than what I would make in a TFR - I probably wouldn't bother with making Svetov and Dugin paths at all, but I can't deny that TFR has managed to make it more interesting than I would first think.