a guy doing a call out on the mod in a Reddit post mentioned he had taking a writing class and on the topic of alt history his teacher said "All alt history is written about the current time it's written in, not the past."
This is so true its painful. There is nothing more tedious to a player of a mod taking place in the past than lazy psychoanalysis-from-a-distance of historical figure's motives, and today's ideological passions superimposed over the lived-through subjectivity of decision-making, fog of war, and yesterday's more spiritual passions.
I personally find it disgustingly common for modders to exchange imposing the greatest outside subjectivity understandable to the viewer, so thoroughly as to reduce the mod to mere
personal expression overriding the period's philosophical arguments, understandings, and on-going cultural progression. They cannot help themselves. How can someone want to play with and in history but never confront their modern biases? How do you wind up that doing that contradiction?
Nothing is better then to play alternative history where novel rivalries lead to caricatured ideologies by the everyday man's interpretation of events. America fighting a cold war against a surviving Fascist europe, Nazi or some sort of
royalist (Fédération nationale des Camelots du Roi) or Mediterranean
Clerical faction that fought Germany over the July Putsch in Austria heating up, would caricature Capitalism in 1960s post-war America rather differently then ours. You can play with the intellectuals refining the contradictory small-minded public sentiments together into some sort of unity, similar outcomes to OTL are described entirely from different angles, and similar descriptions to OTL refer to entirely different things.
Instead we get self-inserts and pedophiles writing about horny teenagers here and with Fallout:Frontier.