Racemixing Debate - Do you support it? Are you again it?

[Pissmaster]

REEEEEEEE, strangers are hurting my fee fee's by fucking a brown girl!

And you call other people Redditors?

YWNFABG

 

[Wormy]

Jewish masters

Since when were Antebellum upper crust Jewish? Scarlett O' Hara didn't eat no bagels.

YWNFABG

English motherfucker do you speak it?

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Since when were Antebellum upper crust Jewish? Scarlett O' Hara didn't eat no bagels.

True, they mostly just ran the slave trade and financed the Confederacy (thanks Judah P. Benjamin) so didn't own too many slaves themselves.

 

[Brahma]

Mixed race children are far more likely to be on trouble with the law.

I don't know why you'd want to risk that for your children

 

[Mister Uno]

I just want my kids to look like me and my potential wife and share a similar heritage. I say this as someone who loves Asian and Hispanic women. As simple as that. Mutt children rarely look good ESPECIALLY with niggers.

 

[Spud]

If you do it, just remember that your kids will be genetically different from you and will cause issues if they are in need of donations, like blood, bone marrow and the sort

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Cute petite brown skinned wavy black-haired Aryan women

Endogamy is for conflict-averse sissy cucks. Real champions have a conquistador mentality, seizing the women of rival tribes to breed out their genes and create vigorous new strains of humanity.

You all think about it this way:

You know how mad it makes you when Becky fucks Tyrone instead of you?
Imagine the rage it would drive Chang, Rajesh, Miguel, or Trayvon to when you're plowing his women.

 

[Tetragrammaton]

if you wanna be scientific about it racemixing is fine because the only reason other races exist are because the planet has different types of weather in different places and humans simply adapted. so racemixing itself is fine because its whatever if you find someone attractive who gives a fuck. the issue i think people have with it is more related to culture. you might be attracted to asians for example but you might hate asian culture or maybe you are into blacks but despise black culture. when it comes to that stuff though just find someone who acts the way you want.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

Racemixing is fine.

Making a fetish out of it is disgusting.

The real issue is culture. It always boils down to culture.

 

[TyrasGuard]

I thought the point was to pick the best partner

 

[DeadwastePrime]

race mixing is based

 

[Mojo Thief]

Race mixing is based if the man is white

 

[Linako 2.0]

I read this thread and a bunch of people are going on about the two consenting adults loving eachother.
but no one brings up the child that comes with such a relationship and the identity issues that potentially comes with it.

 

[Mothra1988]

I read this thread and a bunch of people are going on about the two consenting adults loving eachother.
but no one brings up the child that comes with such a relationship and the identity issues that potentially comes with it.

I know plenty of people like that, all are very well adjusted kids/adults. I don't think anyone really cares about this shit anymore, it's not 1928 anymore. You need to ignore the mad /pol/ virgins who thinks some shooter they wish they were represents all mixed race children, they're brains are broken and also believe things like basic hygiene is bad for you.

 

[Pissmaster]

I know plenty of people like that, all are very well adjusted kids/adults. I don't think anyone really cares about this shit anymore, it's not 1928 anymore. You need to ignore the mad /pol/ virgins who thinks some shooter they wish they were represents all mixed race children, they're brains are broken and also believe things like basic hygiene are bad for you.

>what you write when Tyrone lets you take your laptop into the closet

 

[Stabmaster Arson II]

For some reason, I'm unable to quote my post from this thread where this discussion was already floated.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/will-this-board-prove-segregation-works.121902/

So have a copy/paste

Some people's idea of a good time, a good act or a good idea are too diametrically opposed for them to ever live together in harmony. Segregation is the only way to peace.

This is why Afrika must be retaken for only the black race, and all white people banished to Europe. Whites can not be allowed to live around blacks and drag them down any longer.

People talk about black crime rate being high. There is a way to drop it to 0%. If all black people are released from their western chains and go home to Afrika, there will be no black crime rate there, because everyone is black. It will just be a crime rate then rather than a black crime rate, and this ridiculous strawman aimed at our communities will no longer be used.

 

[Unnamed Source]

I also like to think of countries as a byproduct of the races and peoples who make up the country. America’s wealth and power is rooted in its Anglo-Saxon or Celto-Germanic heritage, and only recently did other races come en masse since 1965.

Likewise looking at Britain, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Scandinavia, Belgium, Switzerland or Denmark and you’ll see the same advance high tier cultures as what their diasporas did in the US

The poverty of Afro Americans is also reflective of the poverty of black nations or Black Brazilians

Speaking of Brazil, I’ve noticed South Brazil is largely White, and the most developed. Black Brazil is impoverished and underdeveloped

I agree that ethnicity matters to a degree when it comes to a country's society, but I would caution against an essentialized view of "ethnic character" that views ethnicities as unchanging and population genetics as a one way road - environmental and cultural factors can also have huge effects on populations within a matter of centuries.

For example, there are theories suggesting that some of the traits which made the English specifically and Northwest Europeans generally especially "civilisationally capable" only arose during the Middle Ages, because of different mating patterns and family structures that changed the society and perhaps (more controversially) the genetic makeup of these populations.

In antiquity and up to the early medieval period, most Germanic cultures had very close-knit kinship systems inclusing endogamous (cousin) marriages - society was relatively focused around extended families, tribes and clans the way it still is in many societies around the world. With the advent of Christianity in Western Europe and the tabooization of endogamous marriage, these family lineage ties were weakened and spousal ties strengthened - families became smaller and more 'nuclear'. Arranged marriages were also increasingly tabooized and people, at least those outside the nobility, enjoyed larger self-determination in terms of partner choice and often married later.

According to some scholars, the social effects of this were that the kind of familial nepotism that characterises clan societies began to disappear - people's attitudes became more "individualistic" and "universalist", identifying more with a religious, cultural or ethnic identity than a tribal lineage one. Corruption declined, social trust among strangers increased, society became more open and "corporate" as the church, the state and the market increasingly became the center of people's lives. Later cultural developments towards increased universalism and individualism, like Protestantism and Liberalism, might ultimately have their root in this divergence too.

(Some books on this really interesting topic are 'Why Europe?: The Medieval Origins of Its Special Path' by Michael Mitterauer and 'The Origins of English Individualism: The Family, Property and Social Transition' by Alan MacFarlane)

Another example would be the Ashkenazi Jews - as a culture and ethnicity they've only existed for slightly more than 1000 years, but due to the social exclusion and occupational specialisation largely forced on them they grew culturally and also genetically divergent from both their Oriental Jewish "relatives" and the Europeans they lived around. (An interesting but obviously controversial study on this is 'Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence' by Cochran et al)

So "ethnic character" can change as a result of environmental and social changes, it can even be incentivized to - the Catholic Church that banned cousin marriage and the Europeans who banned Jews from farming and crafts guilds were doing social engineering on a huge scale without even knowing it.

 

[Climaxing Sunset]

I agree that ethnicity matters to a degree when it comes to a country's society, but I would caution against an essentialized view of "ethnic character" that views ethnicities as unchanging and population genetics as a one way road - environmental and cultural factors can also have huge effects on populations within a matter of centuries.

For example, there are theories suggesting that some of the traits which made the English specifically and Northwest Europeans generally especially "civilisationally capable" only arose during the Middle Ages, because of different mating patterns and family structures that changed the society and perhaps (more controversially) the genetic makeup of these populations.

In antiquity and up to the early medieval period, most Germanic cultures had very close-knit kinship systems inclusing endogamous (cousin) marriages - society was relatively focused around extended families, tribes and clans the way it still is in many societies around the world. With the advent of Christianity in Western Europe and the tabooization of endogamous marriage, these family lineage ties were weakened and spousal ties strengthened - families became smaller and more 'nuclear'. Arranged marriages were also increasingly tabooized and people, at least those outside the nobility, enjoyed larger self-determination in terms of partner choice and often married later.

According to some scholars, the social effects of this were that the kind of familial nepotism that characterises clan societies began to disappear - people's attitudes became more "individualistic" and "universalist", identifying more with a religious, cultural or ethnic identity than a tribal lineage one. Corruption declined, social trust among strangers increased, society became more open and "corporate" as the church, the state and the market increasingly became the center of people's lives. Later cultural developments towards increased universalism and individualism, like Protestantism and Liberalism, might ultimately have their root in this divergence too.

(Some books on this really interesting topic are 'Why Europe?: The Medieval Origins of Its Special Path' by Michael Mitterauer and 'The Origins of English Individualism: The Family, Property and Social Transition' by Alan MacFarlane)

Another example would be the Ashkenazi Jews - as a culture and ethnicity they've only existed for slightly more than 1000 years, but due to the social exclusion and occupational specialisation largely forced on them they grew culturally and also genetically divergent from both their Oriental Jewish "relatives" and the Europeans they lived around. (An interesting but obviously controversial study on this is 'Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence' by Cochran et al)

So "ethnic character" can change as a result of environmental and social changes, it can even be incentivized to - the Catholic Church that banned cousin marriage and the Europeans who banned Jews from farming and crafts guilds were doing social engineering on a huge scale without even knowing it.

Jews similar to Arabs also are engaged in cousin marriages. I read that all Ashkenazis are basically 12th cousins, and that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from 330 Jews from 1,000 years ago.

Also similar to their Semitic cousins, Jews have no concept of real “liberty”, they have an authoritarian collectivistic mindset. I think Marx touched upon this by calling it asiatic despotism

 

[Unnamed Source]

Jews similar to Arabs also are engaged in cousin marriages. I read that all Ashkenazis are basically 12th cousins, and that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from 330 Jews from 1,000 years ago.

Also similar to their Semitic cousins, Jews have no concept of real “liberty”, they have an authoritarian collectivistic mindset. I think Marx touched upon this by calling it asiatic despotism

Yeah, they went through a genetic bottleneck at some point in the early middle ages, I think I read a number something like 400 families. From what I remember, there were notable regional differences in terms of cousin marriages though - just like with non-Jews, they were more common in the East (Russia, Poland) than the West (France, Germany). In general, there's differences between the Ashkenazim populations in the Pale of Settlement (which were more populous, poorer and less educated on average) and those in the Western European countries and their colonies.

My personal take is that while Ashkenazi Jews do have a familial/tribal culture, it's markedly different from most other clan societies (at least in Western Europe/America) because of their history as a perpetual diaspora minority population, and also their relatively high level of education and wealth. They are internally clannish, but outwardly cosmopolitan and universalist - the fascists called them "rootless", but maybe "epiphytic" is better since their culture blossomed anywhere it could build on an existing civilisational framework and benefit from tolerant, universalist cultural norms.

I think they have a certain ethnic solidarity that transcends ideology, but beyond that they're also a culture that can tolerate a lot of self-expression and dissent. (Western) Jewish culture is very 'discursive', placing high esteem on debate, argument and critique going back to Talmudic law, and that is also reflected in it's philosophical and artistic output. So they're tribal in the sense of feeling a strong cultural kinship with each other and closing rank against outside threats, but I wouldn't call Western Ashkenazim collectivistic or authoritarian as a whole - it's a culture that produced tons of dissidents, revolutionaries and excentrics.

I know about Marx's writing's on the Asiatic mode of production and Wittfoegel's theory of Oriental Despotism, but I did not know either of them connected it to Jewish culture. The only writing from Marx on Jewish culture I know (in *'On the Jewish Question'*) is mostly about how the Jewish people had become tied to the bourgeois/capitalist economic system.

 

[Pissmaster]

Halle Berry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Early life​

Berry was born Maria Halle Berry in Cleveland, Ohio,[1] on August 14, 1966,[2] to Judith Ann (née Hawkins), a white English immigrant from Liverpool,[3] and Jerome Jesse Berry, an African-American man.[1]

They divorced when Berry was four years old, and she and her older sister Heidi Berry-Henderson[5] were raised exclusively by their mother.[1] She has been estranged from her father since childhood,[1][6] noting in 1992 that she did not even know if he was still alive.[5] Her father was abusive to her mother, and Berry has recalled witnessing her mother being beaten daily, kicked down stairs, and hit in the head with a wine bottle.[7]