Ralph <3 Keffals - Unlikely lolcow friends form an alliance against Null

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I like how Jim termed it: "a flesh apron." LMAO
He got that from here. I saw people here calling it a Flesh Apron way before Jim first mentioned it.
It's a sickeningly accurate description, during the the Riley fight at one point the Gunt was the only thing holding up Ralph's pants.
 
I'd give doxing Gator a pass legally because you could argue he's been public figure due to his online presence. He's using a consistent name and has shows. That alone could be wishy-washy but now that he's done an irl event under the Gator moniker, I think Ralph can say his name from here on without it being legally questionable. Now the threats about going to Gators town to smear him irl, that's more damning than the doxing.

I think the closest he's gone to illegal doxing recently was the guy he tried getting fired from an aquarium. I dunno the whole story on how his info got out there but I can't imagine it not being he posted about Pantsu on KF, Ralph got his info from Pantsu, and Ralph published it as "Amanda Ralph".

That last part about it being "Amanda Ralph" may be sketchy pinning it on Ralph, but with the writing style being similar and the fact that Pantsu isn't married, "Amanda Ralph" doesn't exist. A jury would at least find that questionable.
Public figure doesn't matter. Read this: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-186.4/

Nothing in there says public figure. That's not going to hold up in court. There's also a push after Kavanaugh was doxed and threatened to make doxing illegal on the federal level.

Not saying the feds will raid this place for all the doxes that are on the database, but it will make lolcows have precedent to sue the place for said federal law violation. You can't even dox someone on 4chan without being banned.

Not trying to be a moral fag but Ralph has violated the law many times and continues to when he identifies anyone's real name or location in a hostile matter. Every time he screams Gator's name its a Misdemeanor = to the revenge porn case.

How does Keffals pass better than Pantsu Ralpha sisters I don't feel so good...
Does Pantsu have a sister? I'm wondering if she's as ugly as her. It would be hilarious if it turns out she had a drop dead gorgeous sister and she just got beat with the ugly stick LOL
 
Last edited:
Public figure doesn't matter. Read this: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-186.4/

Nothing in there says public figure. That's not going to hold up in court. There's also a push after Kavanaugh was doxed and threatened to make doxing illegal on the federal level.

Not saying the feds will raid this place for all the doxes that are on the database, but it will make lolcows have precedent to sue the place for said federal law violation. You can't even dox someone on 4chan without being banned.

Not trying to be a moral fag but Ralph has violated the law many times and continues to when he identifies anyone's real name or location in a hostile matter. Every time he screams Gator's name its a Misdemeanor = to the revenge porn case.


Does Pantsu have a sister? I'm wondering if she's as ugly as her. It would be hilarious if it turns out she had a drop dead gorgeous sister and she just got beat with the ugly stick LOL
For doxing to be illegal it has to include private information that is not publically available such as Social Security numbers, Bank or Credit Card details, medical records etc.
Gathering a persons name, phone number, and address from other publically available sources and publishing it is not illegal, if it was Phone Books would be illegal.
 
Does Pantsu have a sister? I'm wondering if she's as ugly as her. It would be hilarious if it turns out she had a drop dead gorgeous sister and she just got beat with the ugly stick LOL
If so, Ralph would certainly know and talk about it because we know how he views people's sisters. You can just imagine what sort of shit would fill his head if that were the case.
 
Does Pantsu have a sister? I'm wondering if she's as ugly as her. It would be hilarious if it turns out she had a drop dead gorgeous sister and she just got beat with the ugly stick LOL
Yes she does and Alanna mogs her. Also caught a charge for stabbing a bitch with her BF or something like that so you know she’s ride or die, very much unlike her sister who cheats on phimosis cock with bifurcated gunts.
 
I see this as an out for him from America First. It’s the perfect transition for Ralph to jump ship from Nick who has been dabbing on him to rejoin his democrat party roots of white trash handouts. He gains new viewers by giving Keffals AF info. New superchat money. Maybe new paypigs.
Ralph pulling a Brett Keane-esque switcheroo and joining the opposing team is exactly the kind of poorly written WWE tier bullshit this story needs. Do it Ralph, it would be like your favorite wrassle wrassle shows.
 
Wasnt Ralph making fun of Tardski with a video of him kissing a tranny? Now he wants to team up with one?
Thats some Ralphamale logic right there.
That's the Ralphamale mindset, no better standards than double standards
 
Wasnt Ralph making fun of Tardski with a video of him kissing a tranny? Now he wants to team up with one?
Now he wants to team up with 2. Maybe 3 if you count Chris Chan.
mantsu_sunset.jpg
 
For doxing to be illegal it has to include private information that is not publically available such as Social Security numbers, Bank or Credit Card details, medical records etc.
Gathering a persons name, phone number, and address from other publically available sources and publishing it is not illegal, if it was Phone Books would be illegal.
Honestly, phonebooks were essentially extortion companies. You had to pay them to not publish your information
 
For doxing to be illegal it has to include private information that is not publically available such as Social Security numbers, Bank or Credit Card details, medical records etc.
Gathering a persons name, phone number, and address from other publically available sources and publishing it is not illegal, if it was Phone Books would be illegal.
I'm not trying to argue or start shit but the law in Virginia literally says

"to publish the person's name or photograph along with identifying information as defined in clauses (iii) through (ix), or clause (xii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3, or identification of the person's primary residence address. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor."

It doesn't matter where you got it, or if it was public or in a phone book or if you got the SSN. Name is already enough in Virginia. It's illegal to use the info period to "intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass another person"

It's all right here https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-186.4/

Doxing is illegal period in VA. Ralph has a ton of revenge porn level charges people could bring against him. Ralph could scream his own dox and if someone took that dox, while in virginia, and use that to fuck with him they will have a charge over their head.

Before anyone says "the cops don't give a shit about doxing" they gave a shit about revenge porn of a chick that lived 3000 miles away and convicted him.
 
I'm not trying to argue or start shit but the law in Virginia literally says

"to publish the person's name or photograph along with identifying information as defined in clauses (iii) through (ix), or clause (xii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3, or identification of the person's primary residence address. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor."

It doesn't matter where you got it, or if it was public or in a phone book or if you got the SSN. Name is already enough in Virginia. It's illegal to use the info period to "intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass another person"

It's all right here https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-186.4/

Doxing is illegal period in VA. Ralph has a ton of revenge porn level charges people could bring against him. Ralph could scream his own dox and if someone took that dox, while in virginia, and use that to fuck with him they will have a charge over their head.

Before anyone says "the cops don't give a shit about doxing" they gave a shit about revenge porn of a chick that lived 3000 miles away and convicted him.
Totally. I saw the news that they rounding up the board of elections, the office of professions, the media, numerous federal agencies, the entire court system, the department of corrections, and practically every business that collects customer data.

Proving "intent to intimidate, coerce or harass" is the key phrase. It's difficult to prove and on a site filled to the brim with warnings not to do so, good luck. This is also something news orgs who have made it their jobs to intimidate and harass get away with with impunity.
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying to argue or start shit but the law in Virginia literally says

"to publish the person's name or photograph along with identifying information as defined in clauses (iii) through (ix), or clause (xii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3, or identification of the person's primary residence address. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor."

It doesn't matter where you got it, or if it was public or in a phone book or if you got the SSN. Name is already enough in Virginia. It's illegal to use the info period to "intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass another person"

It's all right here https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-186.4/

Doxing is illegal period in VA. Ralph has a ton of revenge porn level charges people could bring against him. Ralph could scream his own dox and if someone took that dox, while in virginia, and use that to fuck with him they will have a charge over their head.

Before anyone says "the cops don't give a shit about doxing" they gave a shit about revenge porn of a chick that lived 3000 miles away and convicted him.
what you didn't include and is the most important part of this "along with identifying information" as defined in clauses (iii) through (ix), or clause (xii)

C. As used in this section, "identifying information" shall include but not be limited to: (i) name; (ii) date of birth; (iii) social security number; (iv) driver's license number; (v) bank account numbers; (vi) credit or debit card numbers; (vii) personal identification numbers (PIN); (viii) electronic identification codes; (ix) automated or electronic signatures; (x) biometric data; (xi) fingerprints; (xii) passwords; or (xiii) any other numbers or information that can be used to access a person's financial resources, obtain identification, act as identification, or obtain money, credit, loans, goods, or services.
 
Before anyone says "the cops don't give a shit about doxing" they gave a shit about revenge porn of a chick that lived 3000 miles away and convicted him.
theres a big difference between "heres this girl getting FUCKED" in a society where that can ruin your reputation and career and someone posting just who you are. not that ralph isnt a pos for doxing his own friend using confidential convos but still.
 
theres a big difference between "heres this girl getting FUCKED" in a society where that can ruin your reputation and career and someone posting just who you are. not that ralph isnt a pos for doxing his own friend using confidential convos but still.
It's more than that. It's a sex crime that involves the violation of consent in the act of recording. Legally, convicted sex offender Ralph didn't even need to disseminate it. The mere production and possession of it was the sex crime. His dissemination of it provided the evidence(because Ralph is a retard). The video itself could be constituted as an offense against nature and God and Ralph should be paying restitution to all parties exposed to it. Again, Ralph is a convicted sex offender.
 
It's more than that. It's a sex crime that involves the violation of consent in the act of recording. Legally, convicted sex offender Ralph didn't even need to disseminate it. The mere production and possession of it was the sex crime. His dissemination of it provided the evidence(because Ralph is a retard). The video itself could be constituted as an offense against nature and God and Ralph should be paying restitution to all parties exposed to it. Again, Ralph is a convicted sex offender.
iirc she consented to recording (albeit she says she was drugged and boozed up by ralph the whole time which is true but i dont know if shes ever said she was when the gunt tape was being recorded) but releasing it yeah he didnt have permission to do that. also yeah he just forced thousands to watch him release it live. if anything hes sexually assaulted all of us.
 
I'm not trying to argue or start shit but the law in Virginia literally says

"to publish the person's name or photograph along with identifying information as defined in clauses (iii) through (ix), or clause (xii) of subsection C of § 18.2-186.3, or identification of the person's primary residence address. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor."

It doesn't matter where you got it, or if it was public or in a phone book or if you got the SSN. Name is already enough in Virginia. It's illegal to use the info period to "intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass another person"

It's all right here https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-186.4/

Doxing is illegal period in VA. Ralph has a ton of revenge porn level charges people could bring against him. Ralph could scream his own dox and if someone took that dox, while in virginia, and use that to fuck with him they will have a charge over their head.

Before anyone says "the cops don't give a shit about doxing" they gave a shit about revenge porn of a chick that lived 3000 miles away and convicted him.
Look at the exact clauses of the law you're stating, it confirms what I said, simple names and addresses don't meet the bar for illegality, plus the key phrase "intent to coerce, harrass blah blah" is what has to be proven to make it a crime.
what you didn't include and is the most important part of this "along with identifying information" as defined in clauses (iii) through (ix), or clause (xii)
Exactly what I was saying, its aimed at preventing identity fraud and harassment. Simply posting someones name and address doesn't meet the requirement, its publically available information.
 
Back
Top Bottom