Megathread Random Thoughts & Questions - ADF

This is the guy who's only involved in antifa because he thinks it will somehow bring down Kiwi Farms and give him some MUDDER FUCKIN PAYBACK. And because he loves military larp.
Starting to think it's more because he can start inserting his fascist fetishes given he was a bit of a Wehraboo from what I remember and his sped interests tend to rotate.
 
Out of curiosity, I just tried Googling “Antifa Crime Minister” to see just how redundant Phil’s disguise is, and after getting Phil’s Twitter and Vimeo, this popped up:
688488

A chilling vision of things to come.
 
Last edited:
I just started to dive into ADF lore but is there any reason as to why even after getting his pecker pickled, he still looks like a man and not made even a half ass attempt at looking like a woman? Or is this just another version of gender fluidity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syaoran Li
I just started to dive into ADF lore but is there any reason as to why even after getting his pecker pickled, he still looks like a man and not made even a half ass attempt at looking like a woman? Or is this just another version of gender fluidity.
First, we have severe doubts as to whether he undergone any genital surgery at all.

As for why he doesn't even try to look like a woman, Phil always has the idea that if you claim to be something, you automatically becomes something. No effort is necessary. He has always claim to be "Latin" (Mexican? Guatemalan? He is not consistent) despite not knowing a word in Spanish and not motivated to learn. He thinks he is a welcome member of a feminist cyclist club despite not knowing to ride the bike and can't be bothered to learn. And now he is claiming to be "supersoldier", even though he is very intent on keeping his cute porcine figure.

This is slackivism taken to its illogical extreme.

There is also a sense of perverted defiance in it. This is not limited to Phil; troons like David Muscato and Kyle Brooks claim to be women yet deliberately refuse to look feminine, in order to rile people up and invite people to "misgender" them, so they can claim "oppression"
 
Last edited:
I just started to dive into ADF lore but is there any reason as to why even after getting his pecker pickled, he still looks like a man and not made even a half ass attempt at looking like a woman? Or is this just another version of gender fluidity.
He isn’t trans and never was, he just pretends to be for asspats. So he never presented as female unless people pointed it out. Since getting his knob cut off, he makes no effort at all because he thinks he doesn’t have to now he theoretically is physically female. Also he seems to believe he passes. Where we see a disgusting fat male slob, he sees a punk Jennifer Lopez.
 
He isn’t trans and never was, he just pretends to be for asspats. So he never presented as female unless people pointed it out. Since getting his knob cut off, he makes no effort at all because he thinks he doesn’t have to now he theoretically is physically female. Also he seems to believe he passes. Where we see a disgusting fat male slob, he sees a punk Jennifer Lopez.

Man I miss when he was trying to talk with the latina accent
 
Has anyone else noted that on A-LOG's ED page, "Australatina Archive" is quoted saying "I find it highly amusing that the new lolcows are actually aspies who keep comparing themselves to retards, trying to look good in comparison. And failing in that. And when you're failing harder than Chris-chan, that's something. And all this without the slightest sense of irony..."

Which is, of course, true, and a pretty decent score off the old foxdick, but the real irony is that it's Phil who's saying this, who's worse than either of them (very, very meta.) And yet the EDfags don't actually close the loop and point out who's making the statement.

I found it hilarious that this lucid sounding (made, perhaps,, when he was less off the deep end, although given that it says "Australatina," still clearly pretty fucking derangedat the time) and on-point statement is attributed to him on ED without pointing out that "it's A-logs all the way down..."

(Also, how does one get an account to edit ED these days?)
 
After making a complete moron of myself in the daily observations thread, I do have a question. And please do forgive me if it’s a dumb question, but I’ve done seemingly all the reading there is into it, and I still don’t understand.

But, what’s the whole bike thing about? Is it related to the signs thing? Is it just a hobby or is it a fetish or what? I can understand both being a hobby, absolutely. You can make a decent few bucks being a sign maker and maps are something few are interested in, but is a vital subject to be in to. (If you ever use GPS, anyway.) But it seems like ADF hasn’t perused either of these things.

I’m much more invested in Chris’s history, way more than I should be, probably, but I do find these folks like ADF oddly interesting, and I simply want to learn more about them.

Again, I’m new here, so if anything I say or ask is dumb, please do tell me why and I’ll try to improve my postings, although I don’t plan on making many. I’m simply here to observe and learn, that’s all.
 
Back