Containment Random Thoughts & Questions

It depends. From what I gather, he can be motivated to work, if the motivation is good. I think Borb wanted him to work, obviously as part of their mainstreaming of his up bringing (which failed, see Wendy's and CutCo); however Bob decided to enroll Chris for SSID. To add on to that, I may be mistaken, but originally Chris did not want to go to college; his parents made him. When he had the choice, he wanted to take marketing courses, but Bob made him take classes for the CADD instead. The rest is history.

I believe that Chris started taking "marketing classes" in college because autism, but then Bob switched him over to a CADD degree because back then Bob actually thought that CADD would be an obtainable job for Chris.
 
Yesterday one of my clients brought his 8 year old son into the office. He was doing his English homework and he was practicing "Ch" sounds. So I helped and said "repeat after me"
"Chair"
"Chain"
"Chase"
"Pikachu"
"Sonichu"

Then he started laughing hysterically about sonichu because I said "sonic, pikachu, sonichu". He asked his dad about sonichu several times in the office I'm quite honestly afraid his parents are going to Google sonichu and find a bunch of homoerotic hedgehog r34.
 
I believe that Chris started taking "marketing classes" in college because autism, but then Bob switched him over to a CADD degree because back then Bob actually thought that CADD would be an obtainable job for Chris.

And look where that got Chris. Realistically, for a high level profession as engineering, an associates for /CADD wouldn't get one far. One would have to have at least a masters, and no way Chris could go that far. To be fair to CWC, he used some knowledge of CADD to create the layout for CWCville. Whether that's good or bad is up to interpretation.
 
I wonder what will happen if some counselor person could go a little bit harsh on Chris, telling him that Sonic the Hedgehog should not be a part of his life anymore. Makes me curious how Chris will react to that statement and if that one little statement would be interpreted as something really that gigantic in Chris's perspective.
 
I wonder what will happen if some counselor person could go a little bit harsh on Chris, telling him that Sonic the Hedgehog should not be a part of his life anymore. Makes me curious how Chris will react to that statement and if that one little statement would be interpreted as something really that gigantic in Chris's perspective.

He'd just dismiss what the therapist said, like he does any "hurtful truth"
 
Wouldn't it be funny if Chris forgets about Bronycon because he was "astral projecting in the 5th dimension" to make the merge happen?

It'd be like that Family Ties episode where Alex takes Speed thinking it help him ace the test, only for it to cause an epic crash and he sleeps through it.
 
WHAT THE FUCK WAS HE PISSING ON THE FLOOR?

DID I MISS SOMETHING!?

When the fuck did he start that? WHY THE FUCK DID HE START DOING THAT!? And most importantly why am I surprised? I really shouldn't be at this point but he still somehow finds ways to do it. Fuck me. . .
Idea Guy told him to piss and shit on the floor.
 
I wonder what will happen if some counselor person could go a little bit harsh on Chris, telling him that Sonic the Hedgehog should not be a part of his life anymore. Makes me curious how Chris will react to that statement and if that one little statement would be interpreted as something really that gigantic in Chris's perspective.
Sonic is grafted on to Chris, at this point removal is impossible. Maybe if you caught it when he was like 7 but advanced Sonic lust is irreversible.
 
I've been thinking. Why "deities" and not "gods". He called himself a godess and yet he call a collective of gods "deities".
Potential answer: gods, like actors, are affiliated with men when it's singular (actor, duke, king) while there's a female equivalent (godess, actress, dutchess, queen), and with a bit of misandry, he would prefer a group of gods and godesses to be gender neutral as "deities".
 
I've been thinking. Why "deities" and not "gods". He called himself a godess and yet he call a collective of gods "deities".
Potential answer: gods, like actors, are affiliated with men when it's singular (actor, duke, king) while there's a female equivalent (godess, actress, dutchess, queen), and with a bit of misandry, he would prefer a group of gods and godesses to be gender neutral as "deities".

My possible answer - it's a gender-neutral term? He gets the special term and everyone else gets a less specific title?
 
Back