Random Tumblr posts

Same blog, new horridness. I swear if I was actually competent I'd make a thread on the RQ community


Screenshot_20231207-223612_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20231207-223554_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20231207-223544_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20231207-223521_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20231207-223442_Chrome.jpg
 
Have a look at this whackjob larper. Lovablylethal posts like a fed if the feds gave up on having a believable persona.
ll0.jpg
ll1.jpgll2.jpgll3.jpg
Literally who?
ll4.jpg
ll5.jpg
omg guys isn't The Enemy just so monstrous and inhuman? Life would just be so cute and fun if you went a-murderin'. Hey, wanna do a terrorism?
ll6.jpgll7.jpgll8.jpg
People are after her life. It's a dangerous job being a scrote stabber!
ll9.jpg
The "keep reading" is just this picture:
tumblr.jpg
 
IMG_5320.jpeg
IMG_5321.jpeg
IMG_5322.jpeg
Normal people: “Wow, that guy is fucking insane, thank god his mother is alright”
Radfems already filling up the notes: “CLEARLY THIS IS WHY WOMYN SHOULD NOT BE GIVING BIRTH TO THOSE VILE MEN”
Radfemmayy also responded to that reblog, calling them a clown and tagging “girl or abortion”. Madness.
 
>a common mantra in alt-right circles is "feels over reals"
I can only find it being used dismissively, with the sole exception of some guy on /his/ comparing and contrasting Aristotle and Plato where he just uses it to describe Plato's philosophy.
In fact, I can't find any example anywhere of "feels over reals" being used as anything other than an insult to describe the philosophy/ideology of someone you disagree with (and for that matter, people on the left use it, too). Even Urban Dictionary and Wiktionary label it as derogatory/insult, not something you unironically call yourself. I think this person might've just seen the term posted a few times without really reading any of the posts it was attached to, and then poorly attempted to extrapolate its significance/usage when recalling the term later.

Tax:
Screenshot_20231228-094633.png
 
In fact, I can't find any example anywhere of "feels over reals" being used as anything other than an insult to describe the philosophy/ideology of someone you disagree with (and for that matter, people on the left use it, too). Even Urban Dictionary and Wiktionary label it as derogatory/insult, not something you unironically call yourself. I think this person might've just seen the term posted a few times without really reading any of the posts it was attached to, and then poorly attempted to extrapolate its significance/usage when recalling the term later.
That is why I posted it, it was a "wait, it is either projection or outright lie" moment. Couldn't think of good text.

Awesome how that person knew trannies in such a young age, but not Charlie fucking Chaplin
 
Awesome how that person knew trannies in such a young age, but not Charlie fucking Chaplin
It's absolutely fucking maddening. Chaplin had the same small, delicate frame as my own grandfather... because the both of them spent their childhood and teens in a permanent state of malnutrition. Chaplin and his family fucking starved, and he was permanently stunted as a result. He also had four wives and eleven (known) children, and worked like a dog his entire life, and was both fortunate and cunning enough to find considerable success. He may have not looked it to the overfed modern eye, but he was a highly intelligent, creative, driven individual who fought for every last scrap he owned. I've no doubt that he was a royal prick irl, but he was not in drag to get a thrill, he was in drag to sell a fucking product: himself.
 
It's absolutely fucking maddening. Chaplin had the same small, delicate frame as my own grandfather... because the both of them spent their childhood and teens in a permanent state of malnutrition. Chaplin and his family fucking starved, and he was permanently stunted as a result. He also had four wives and eleven (known) children, and worked like a dog his entire life, and was both fortunate and cunning enough to find considerable success. He may have not looked it to the overfed modern eye, but he was a highly intelligent, creative, driven individual who fought for every last scrap he owned. I've no doubt that he was a royal prick irl, but he was not in drag to get a thrill, he was in drag to sell a fucking product: himself.
A lot of early comedians were pretty short and scrawny. Buster Keaton and Harold Lloyd were usually portrayed as runts up against larger opponents:
vlcsnap-2024-01-11-01h45m47s069.jpgec8e9358549f18ead94aec7ae02837fd.jpg
And the Marx Brothers and the Three Stooges were often the same height or shorter than the women they were cast with:
ca-times.brightspotcdn.jpgvlcsnap-2024-01-12-23h23m07s755.jpg
This wasn't just for comic effect, it was also to show them as underdogs that had to overcome obstacles either through smarts or sheer guts. But she sees being short as inherently feminine and coos over how cute Charlie Chaplin is.
What I'm saying is, she unironically has a more sexist and narrow view of manhood than people in the 30's did.
 
Back