- Joined
- Jan 4, 2019
They never learn, whether its supreme autists like ryulong or loony troons like laurelai
This latest one seems to be some combination of both
This latest one seems to be some combination of both
Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2019
Just something from RW about Thomas Sowell that I noticed.
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
The clowns of Rationalwiki ask for financing again. https://archive.vn/3SJSR
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
Most of the way there too. They still have their devotees.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
I wonder if they get into Match me Bro contests. Since I don't think a lot of people use that shitty site anymore; I know I stopped hearing about it by 2012.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I can't believe we hit a point where conservapedia is less retarded.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
From some of the articles I read on different political ideologies Rational Wiki seems to have no principles at all, are the pro ancom? are they pro socdem? are they pro liberal? They seem to hate marxist leninism and fascism. I used to go on there when it was more of a site that debunked religious nutjobs. At this point I think they have earned the royal seal of gayness.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Consider this: RatWiki started out to mock Conservapedia, an absolutely ludicrous Wikipedia attempt that failed on every level to be an alternative right-wing Wikipedia.
Now RatWiki is even more pathetic than Conservapedia.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
RationalWiki hates communism because it makes SANE and RATIONAL leftists like them look bad.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
They went all out on their Joseph Stalin article, their Vietnam article on the other hand is absent of information other than them complaining the Vietnamese are racist against China. Knowing the internet as well as I do most folks will say communist leaders were based for killing and imprisoning SJW's.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
And somehow Conservapedia is getting more credible than main-line Wikipedia on some issues. It's a mad world out there.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
The body count is starting to pick up, all the recent cases have been absent on Unrational Wiki.
IrrationalWiki
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2020
New drama on RationalWiki concerning Nathan Larson's article recently created.
To summarise the situation: the user who created the page was blocked by RationalWiki sysop Arthur Kerensa (Judge Dredd, formerly known as dysklyver/D) who also probably wants the article deleted (at least one deletion request was made, but that page was removed - the deletion request however was not made by Kerensa but @Mikemikev).
It turns out Arthur Kerensa is friends with Larson and has defended him off-wiki including on Reddit.
archive.is
www.reddit.com
Kerensa has described Larson as a "cool and chill" guy who is "honest" and defended him on a Reddit thread after multiple users requested for his ban after Larson was caught posting child pornography and posting pedophilic comments.
genderdesk.wordpress.com
Once again RationalWiki jumps to defend pedophiles. Anyone who points out Kerensa is Larson's friend and blocked the article creator to defend Larson (like he did on Reddit) is immediately blocked and has their edits reverted:
rationalwiki.org
To summarise the situation: the user who created the page was blocked by RationalWiki sysop Arthur Kerensa (Judge Dredd, formerly known as dysklyver/D) who also probably wants the article deleted (at least one deletion request was made, but that page was removed - the deletion request however was not made by Kerensa but @Mikemikev).
It turns out Arthur Kerensa is friends with Larson and has defended him off-wiki including on Reddit.
Dysklyver comments on setian1024 is Nathan Larson, he should be banne…
archived 9 Nov 2020 16:12:26 UTC
r/WikiInAction - Comment by u/Dysklyver on ”setian1024 is Nathan Larson, he should be banned from posting on this Reddit board”
0 votes and 31 comments so far on Reddit
www.reddit.com
Kerensa has described Larson as a "cool and chill" guy who is "honest" and defended him on a Reddit thread after multiple users requested for his ban after Larson was caught posting child pornography and posting pedophilic comments.
Nathan Larson has been busy again
Background: You may remember that the old subreddit WikInAction was taken down after Nathan Larson, who had been hanging out on one of Abd’s websites, followed him to the site and started adv…
genderdesk.wordpress.com
Once again RationalWiki jumps to defend pedophiles. Anyone who points out Kerensa is Larson's friend and blocked the article creator to defend Larson (like he did on Reddit) is immediately blocked and has their edits reverted:
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nathan Larson" - RationalWiki
Last edited:
IrrationalWiki
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2020
@Mikemikev / Michael Coombs is still on his sockpuppet spree:
Several of these have had their name changes, see the rename log.
Mikemikev is again complaining about the Nathan Larson article and wants it deleted:
Karlin is a Russian white nationalist who claims to be sexually attracted to 14 year olds.
Several of these have had their name changes, see the rename log.
Mikemikev is again complaining about the Nathan Larson article and wants it deleted:
- 18:30, 12 November 2020 CircularReasoning (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Nathan Larson: edit summary hidden and username hidden (Personal or potentially identifying information: Again, fuck off Mikey)
Karlin is a Russian white nationalist who claims to be sexually attracted to 14 year olds.
Last edited:
Dude did you see where the guy with the fuckin Nick Bougas cartoon linked to more awesome damning stuff about people who long since stopped paying attention to your existence?? God you're so good at being a NOT NAZI CENTRIST Huh
IrrationalWiki
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2020
@Mikemikev / Michael Coombs is still socking -
On another note, I looked at the page history of the Kiwi Farms / Joshua Conner Moon article on RationalWiki. The talk page I suspect also has some of Coombs' sockpuppets on it, but the comments were made years back. Another lolcow who commented on it in 2017 was Nate Spidgewood.
- 17:06, 14 November 2020 Knight Commander (talk | contribs) blocked GrammarCommie AntiWhite (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of π×infinity! (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Ban evasion: And unnacceptable username. Mikemikev again being a wanker and a cunt.)
- 17:05, 14 November 2020 Knight Commander (talk | contribs) blocked Himmler (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of π×infinity! (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Ban evasion: And unnacceptable username. Does anyone need more evidence that Mikemikev is a filthy antisemite cunt?)
- 14:58, 14 November 2020 Knight Commander (talk | contribs) blocked Anti-White RW (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of π×infinity! (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Ban evasion: Nurse, Mike's out of bed again.)
- https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anatoly_Karlin&action=history (half-a-dozen more Mikemikev socks got blocked on the Anatoly Karlin article talk-page within last 24 hours)
On another note, I looked at the page history of the Kiwi Farms / Joshua Conner Moon article on RationalWiki. The talk page I suspect also has some of Coombs' sockpuppets on it, but the comments were made years back. Another lolcow who commented on it in 2017 was Nate Spidgewood.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
I'm amazed RatWiki allows their userbase to say "cunt" when crazies have deemed it an inherently sexist word and it will usually get you booted from Twitter just like saying "nigger" would.
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
They'd probably let you say nigger too if your target was a black global warming skeptic.
IrrationalWiki
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2020
Lolcow @Abd / Abd ul-Rahman Lomax (real name: Dennis George Lomax) threatened David Gerard and RationalWiki with a libel suit:
http://archive.md/6cqdD
The lawsuit never happened, but instead Lomax filed a libel suit against the WMF (Wikimedia Foundation) who own Wikipedia, originally claiming $200,000 in damages, later which he amended to $2,000,000 for "libel and harassment of family".
During his libel suit with the WMF, Lomax complained RationalWiki had libelled him (even though the WMF has nothing to do with RationalWiki): "October 5,2017. a defamatory article about Lomax appeared, on RationalWiki (not affiliated with the WMF), written with malice by DLS." Lomax presented no evidence this person wrote his RationalWiki article - his allegations are unsubstantiated. One might ask why Lomax mentioned this since it's unrelated to the WMF and his lawsuit - he later admitted he wanted purely to attack people he dislikes by mentioning them in the lawsuit and since it's a legal document he thinks this makes them look bad, so this explains why in his amended complaint he extended the lawsuit to sue no fewer than 9 separate people with unfounded claims of libel, including some random Wikipedia and Wikiversity editors he got into heated arguments with such as Michael Umbrecht.
According to Lomax, virtually the whole world is against him and anyone who dares criticise him online is said (without any evidence) to have "libelled and harassed" him or his family. So his lawsuit was filed against 9 separate editors on Wikipedia and Wikiversity, as well as the WMF for merely publishing his ban on the global block list. In reality, contrary to Lomax's delusions of defamation - he was globally banned from all WMF wikis (Wikipedia, Meta-Wiki, Wikiversity) for harassment and persistent disruptive behaviour; he was also banned from RationalWiki for the same thing. After kicked off of all these wikis, in a fit of rage he began digitally stalking individuals (including admins) he blames for his ban, thus his blog is pretty much dedicated to doxing and stalking Wikipedia and RationalWiki admins as well as character assassinating anyone who criticises his online behaviour.
The lawsuit of course was a lolsuit. It was dismissed by a judge for failure to state a claim. He won no damages and lost $400 on a court filing fee.
http://archive.md/6cqdD
The lawsuit never happened, but instead Lomax filed a libel suit against the WMF (Wikimedia Foundation) who own Wikipedia, originally claiming $200,000 in damages, later which he amended to $2,000,000 for "libel and harassment of family".
During his libel suit with the WMF, Lomax complained RationalWiki had libelled him (even though the WMF has nothing to do with RationalWiki): "October 5,2017. a defamatory article about Lomax appeared, on RationalWiki (not affiliated with the WMF), written with malice by DLS." Lomax presented no evidence this person wrote his RationalWiki article - his allegations are unsubstantiated. One might ask why Lomax mentioned this since it's unrelated to the WMF and his lawsuit - he later admitted he wanted purely to attack people he dislikes by mentioning them in the lawsuit and since it's a legal document he thinks this makes them look bad, so this explains why in his amended complaint he extended the lawsuit to sue no fewer than 9 separate people with unfounded claims of libel, including some random Wikipedia and Wikiversity editors he got into heated arguments with such as Michael Umbrecht.
According to Lomax, virtually the whole world is against him and anyone who dares criticise him online is said (without any evidence) to have "libelled and harassed" him or his family. So his lawsuit was filed against 9 separate editors on Wikipedia and Wikiversity, as well as the WMF for merely publishing his ban on the global block list. In reality, contrary to Lomax's delusions of defamation - he was globally banned from all WMF wikis (Wikipedia, Meta-Wiki, Wikiversity) for harassment and persistent disruptive behaviour; he was also banned from RationalWiki for the same thing. After kicked off of all these wikis, in a fit of rage he began digitally stalking individuals (including admins) he blames for his ban, thus his blog is pretty much dedicated to doxing and stalking Wikipedia and RationalWiki admins as well as character assassinating anyone who criticises his online behaviour.
The lawsuit of course was a lolsuit. It was dismissed by a judge for failure to state a claim. He won no damages and lost $400 on a court filing fee.
Last edited: