- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
So does that mean it’ll soon disappear from the internet forever?RW is definitely reaching that late stage wiki phase where it's still popular but in zombie, poor-tech-support mode from countless hijackings.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So does that mean it’ll soon disappear from the internet forever?RW is definitely reaching that late stage wiki phase where it's still popular but in zombie, poor-tech-support mode from countless hijackings.
The problem with all of that is that it all got so tied up in the politics. This is when Trump insisted on calling it the "Kung Flu" or "China Virus", and Asian people were getting attacked on the street. I can understand the emotional hesitancy to give credence to all of that.
Wikis of this size and traffic cost $5/month to host. Paying any more than that would be overkill as a <50k Alexa Mediawiki site can easily get by on just 512-1GB of RAM.So does that mean it’ll soon disappear from the internet forever?![]()
Pretty sure RatWiki asks for 4-figure sums like twice a year, and people gladly pay up since if you don't donate to them, then the creationists will win and destroy all Science and Logical Thought in America.Wikis of this size and traffic cost $5/month to host. Paying any more than that would be overkill as a <50k Alexa Mediawiki site can easily get by on just 512-1GB of RAM.
As long as someone exists willing to pay that measly amount, it'll probably exist for a long time
Translation: “Political correctness is good and effective only when our side does it!”https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservative_correctness (Archive)
View attachment 3126660
I don't think I'ver seen a bigger example of deflection & whataboutism than this article.
like does david even check on his own site anymore. what is this shit
What?This user supports state atheism but would allow believers to practice their religion, build places of worship, etc.
This user supports state atheism but would allow believers to practice their religion, build places of worship, etc.
What "what"? This is probably the only sane thing on the page (albeit stupidly expressed in every aspect, from "this user" to open-endedness of "practice their religion" and "etc", to trying to fit his views in the infobox, to putting his retarded views on display at all, to thinking his ideology would benefit from promoting it next to his baby luigi fetish). At the minimum, he doesn't want ceremonial deism. It can also mean treating religion like (otherWhat?
Is there any way to see which articles the most edits were made to?Editor traffic on RationalWiki increased dramatically last few months
Lmao "But WHAT if they did it!?", they do not realize that this is still inadvertently the best critique of political correctness.https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservative_correctness (Archive)
View attachment 3126660
I don't think I'ver seen a bigger example of deflection & whataboutism than this article.
Despite lots of user activity, they often almost forget to pay the server bill, the founder is MIA, and the guys in charge of tech are MIA and spend all day on TwitterIt baffles me that this still exists.
MediaWiki 1.27 is an obsolete long-term support release of MediaWiki. Consult the RELEASE NOTES file for the full list of changes. It was deployed on Wikimedia Foundation wikis through incremental "1.27.0-wmf.NN" branches from 29 September 2015 to March 2016 (see details of each branch). The 1.27.0 stable release came out on 28 June 2016[1], and was a Long Term Support release (LTS) which was supported for three years until June 2019.
When your version is that far out of date the automated updates don't work anymore and you need to do a lot of troubleshooting to keep things together. With MediaWiki is if you drop the ball for a year or two it quadruples the work you need to do to catch back up, so their inattention is biting them in the ass and they probably don't want to do it anymore.What's amusing is that a company is allegedly set up to operate this wiki. And yet it appears to have no activity outside popping out of the woodwork for a day every 5 years. Only being on Mediawiki 1.27.7 is really something special lol. It only takes an hour at most to upgrade.
Mediawiki doesn't have auto-updatesWhen your version is that far out of date the automated updates don't work anymore and you need to do a lot of troubleshooting to keep things together. With MediaWiki is if you drop the ball for a year or two it quadruples the work you need to do to catch back up, so their inattention is biting them in the ass and they probably don't want to do it anymore.
They give you installers that will (mostly) do the update for you unless you're X versions out of date, rather than manually fucking with your install or doing a reinstall.Mediawiki doesn't have auto-updates
Although it's true that they might have to do a lot of work if they are unwilling to do a fast update via an XML backup and an XML and image import to a fresh install. For example, if forcing users to recreate passwords is too much. ED and other internet relics at some point chose this fast update route. Did it work out for them well? Not really... But it got the job done.
What does Jesus have to do with 2010's political drama?
i don't think this is what you mean but still, gamergate has the most edits having 3609 edits:
View attachment 3326814
They're afraid of His returnWhat does Jesus have to do with 2010's political drama?