Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

[Otrium]

Oh my what an unexpected and completely unforeseeable surprise.

It's like a soap opera but you can't predict what will happen next!

 

[Hellfire]

A lynch mob is forming at the chicken coop, this time after Michaeldsuarez on crimes of concern trolling, sealioning, Just Asking Questions, supposedly doxing RW loonies, and the most egregious offence of all: updating RW's ED page to reflect the past month of antics and drama.

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/RationalWiki#Drama

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop

Over the next few days he then adds a detailed account of these & other recent events (Kiwi Farms, Vordrak's blog posts, etc.) to ED's page on RW, painting himself, Vordrak & Arisboch as heroes/victims and linking to personal info about at least two RW editors.

Weaseloid, Adam Morland, TheroadtoWiganPier, and Queex all want him banned.

David Gerard thinks Michaeldsuarez made the Shounaisha pedophile account to "concern troll" RW.

Hm, I was figuring Shouniaisha was Vordrak-related, but a Michaeldsuarez sock sounds far more plausible (one thing Vordrak doesn't have is even an ED level of humour). The account was really obviously set up for this sort of concern trolling and to manufacture a claim against RW - David Gerard (talk) 12:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

A lynch mob is forming at the chicken coop, this time after Michaeldsuarez on crimes of concern trolling, sealioning, Just Asking Questions, supposedly doxing RW loonies, and the most egregious offence of all: updating RW's ED page to reflect the past month of antics and drama.

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/RationalWiki#Drama

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop

I find it fascinating how everyone is ready to dogpile on Michaeldsuarez when the evidence presented in public is just "I said he edited ED so of course it's true" Looks like a cabal has formed in their email chains that holds court privately, outside of any pesky annoyances such as having the accused trying to defend themself.

On that note, remember when RW wouldn't permaban anyone because that's what Conservapedia (or whatever) does? Those days are long over.

 

[AnOminous]

On that note, remember when RW wouldn't permaban anyone because that's what Conservapedia (or whatever) does? Those days are long over.

"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

This is fun! Let's try another.

“No one believes more firmly than David Gerard that all editors are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?”

 

[Hellfire]

RW pedo defense squad now wants to ban the Shounaisha account.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop#Block_Japanese_pedophile_account_too

Weaseloid and Adam think it was made by Gamergate.

Given the timing, I have wondered whether Shouniaisha was a sock created by Gamergaters to manufacture a controversy, but I don't think there's compelling evidence that this is the case, & I doubt that it's Michaeldsuarez specifically. More than likely it's a legitimate user, which makes it shitty to ban them just because of the fuss Gamergate trolls are kicking up. OTOH, tensions tend to run high around the subject of pedophilia, & having an 'out' pedophile around the site may cause more drama than it's worth, whether or not they're a concern troll. The best outcome might be an account block without the usual IP block, so he can make a new account if he wants to & not talk about pedophilia. WeaseloidMethinks it is a Weasel 01:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

I would also like to make a point that these people have a long and well-documented history of manufacturing controversy in an effort to slander their opponents. It would be their MO to do something like this. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 01:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Adam is going to squeal on all of you, you don't know what he's been doing.

I might actually oppose the removal of this user if no non-circumstantial evidence is provided. Ironically, Kitsunelaine, you have become paranoid about doxxing from GGers et al. while Ryu admirably, in my eyes, tried to fight such claims on the GG page as non-sequiturs or doxxed info when people attacked various 'anti-GGers' as pedophiles.--Owlman (talk) 01:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

There are things you shouldn't expect from people when you don't know them. Poking the beehive of people like this is one of them. My method of dealing with this nowadays is mostly behind the scenes with mod contact. I've done a lot that you don't know about. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 01:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Adam is starting to feel a little cocky and making threats he can't back up

Backchannel lobbying in non-public channels. Exactly like Conservapedia and everything RationalWiki strives not to be. Carpetsmoker (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Fuck off, Carpetsmoker. The "Email user" button exists for a reason. You lack the empathy to realise the danger you put other users of this site in, and you mock them for taking reasonable actions to circumvent it. You also only appeared in this thread to sneer at me, something you have done multiple times in cases that had previously been resolved. I would very much appreciate it if you didn't go out of your way to antagonize the userbase and cause any more damage to this site. Otherwise, it'll be you who's on the chopping block next. -Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 02:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)​

​

FuzzyCatPotato comes in and archives everything because "[w]e will not be lynching anyone on circumstantial evidence today."

 

[HG 400]

FuzzyCatPotato comes in and archives everything because "[w]e will not be lynching anyone on circumstantial evidence today."

Did he miss the part where they permabanned him before even bringing it up at the coop?

Good thing they don't lynch anyone on circumstantial evidence.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Did he miss the part where they permabanned him before even bringing it up at the coop?

Good thing they don't lynch anyone on circumstantial evidence.

That only applies to accused pedophiles. Michaeldsaurez was found guilty by the email cabal of the much greater crime of posting on ED.

 

[Tsunderplane]

Michaeldsuarez on Wikipediocracy:

 

[Otrium]

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Bahar_Mustafa

Oh my god typhoon is hilarious. "Th article should be about her harassment, not the shit she said!"

 

[sgetti]

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Bahar_Mustafa
Oh my god typhoon is hilarious. "Th article should be about her harassment, not the shit she said!"

A challenger approaches:

This person is only famous BECAUSE of gamergate, or more accurately, Breitbart.com and Milo's hijacking of gamergate to push their populist conservative agenda.Petey Plane (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Bearing in mind this was after Balaam linked seven news articles about her, none of which had anything to do with Gamergate.

EDIT: Oh, he edited.

This person is only famous (outside of the UK conservative bloggosphere) BECAUSE of gamergate, or more accurately, Breitbart.com and Milo's hijacking of gamergate to push their populist conservative agenda. I'm not sure that what one college student did at a university in the UK did once is worth it's own page, aside from creating on obvious strawman. Petey Plane (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Oh Owlman

The only thing I expect in this so called anarcho-syndicalist website which prides itself on "constructive dialogue" and "rational thought" against "authoritarianism" is critical thinking and evidence to support paranoia. Let's not entertain those offsite with the idea that their are "juntas" and "cabals", as MarcusCicero would say, within rationalwiki and that such "SJWs" have infected our moderators.--Owlman (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Just because you don't want to talk about the cabal doesn't mean we're not aware that it exists. After all, FuzzyCatPotato basically announced "WE'RE FORMING A SECRET CLUB" when he went around asking a bunch of users for their email.

 

[Hellfire]

Adam Morland and Andrew "Cuckstain" Stallings are tag teaming and ooking and eeking as they chimp out towards Carpetsmoker after he called out Adam for threatening him.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_t..._be_you_who.27s_on_the_chopping_block_next.22

Anyone can post in a discussion. It's not up to you (or me) to tell who can or can't participate. This includes when you disagree with someone. I also don't appreciate threats or random accusations like "putting this site in danger". Carpetsmoker (talk) 13:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Anyone can also call someone else out for being an ignorant douchebag and warn them that if they continue, there will probably be consequences. They can also call out targeted douchebaggery. tl;dr: You have no argument. Also, it's not an "accusation". You were and are directly responsible, in part, for everything the site and it's users are now putting up with. You showed no remorse for this, and you mock the victims of your shit for taking action to prevent it and deprive it of oxygen. You are an insufferable moron, who's caused a lot of good people harm, and I really do hope you get banned some day. And if you continue the way you are, I'll have a damn fine coop case for it. I suggest you get your shit together before then, and realize what you did (and are doing) wrong. Take it as a threat if you like. But for me, this got personal long ago. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 22:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Wow ... You have some serious problems mate. Carpetsmoker (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

That's all perfectly appalling, Kitsunelaine. CS has acknowledged he erred in his assessment of the GGers and recruiting them for their POV. If it weren't for the distinct, very nasty behavior of that cohort his impulse would have been okay. As to the rest of your specifics and utter nastiness, please stop it. You are behaving like those whom you oppose.---Mona- (talk) 22:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

 

[AnOminous]

Adam Morland and Andrew "Cuckstain" Stallings are tag teaming and ooking and eeking as they chimp out towards Carpetsmoker after he called out Adam for threatening him.

Of all the responses from lolcows that amuse the most, pure shrieking hysteria and terror are just the most satisfying. Over basically nothing. These two spergs are genuinely pathetic humans. I can't imagine what it's like being so terrified of your own shadows and so hateful and stupid at the same time.

These are the spergs of "Rational" Wiki.

Yet more proof that if you have to put something like "Rational" in your name, you're probably a pure foaming nut.

 

[HG 400]

Watch out, arisboch got permabanned just for posting here.

Thanks, but Arisbosch got permabanned for encouraging doxing, not for posting here *as such*. For example this and this. Neither of those are exactly doxing, but sit very squarely in the "grey area". You must also remember the context that Arisbosch behaviour is typically abrasive and tends to hurl personal insults at people he doesn't like (like calling David "a Pinochet" here; seriously, wtf dude?) . Can you blame RW for not wanting to work alongside someone like that?

Now, making the (very occasional) small contribution to rectify a mistake or oversight here (like my previous post) may not increase some people's opinion of me, and I won't deny it's at least a bit "grey" in the sense that some RW editors *were* doxed here, but I won't be banned for it, as long as I stay away from any doxing (which I most certainly will). I, for one, trust David (& the other mods) in being fair and reasonable.

Now who's retarded, @WhoopieDoo ?

You are.

 

[AnOminous]

Now who's retarded, @WhoopieDoo ?

You are.

You have to admit Cuckstain2 does have a point. We do have a slight tendency to pedo-rape and murder people pretty much constantly for OTP KEK.

He's very brave to oppose us. . .but it's probably about time we get to the point where we literally pedo-rape and murder him.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Looks like carpetsmoker may be exiled for the crime of posting on wikiinaction

Really, Carpetsmoker. You didn't like what Kitsunelaine said to you, so you ran off to WIA to complain about it and garner support from the gators. What are you going to do next? Help Vordrak write his "articles"?
And yet, you want us to assume you operate in good faith. No, the evidence doesn't show that. --Castaigne2 (talk) 15:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Carpetsmoker has consistently shown at best the poorest imaginable judgement, then blamed others when it worked out really badly. One day he will work out that the correct answer is not "keep digging", but from the above evidence it won't be soon - David Gerard (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)​

​

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kitsunelaine&diff=1611123&oldid=1611121

 

[AnOminous]

Looks like carpetsmoker may be exiled for the crime of posting on wikiinaction

All this is funny considering David Gerard's history as a critic of Scientology.

Scientology forces its members to "disconnect" from critics of the group, as they are "Suppressive Persons."

"Rational" Wiki is openly doing just this. There are no substantive accusations against Carpetsmoker for anything he has personally done or even caused to be done. The mere association with "suppressive persons" is enough to justify expulsion from the group.

Members of the cult are not allowed to decide freely with whom they communicate.

David Gerard learned well from L. Ron Hubbard.

 

[kcbbq]

It's so delicious that they just cannot fathom that they are massive hypocrites.