Infected RationalWiki - Whiny hugbox for spergs and a clusterfuck of neverending drama on a rapidly declining website.

Is she aware that Sanders is jewish? Or is h just one of the good ones?
Trust me, anti-Zionists are hyperaware of the Jewishness of every single "critic of Israel" they can trot out. That's why they like pushing them forward, quoting them and showering them with prices. To prove just how "totally not anti-semitic" their Jew-hatred is. It's kind of the same like the "Some of my best friends are...." argument, only more disgusting.
 
Trust me, anti-Zionists are hyperaware of the Jewishness of every single "critic of Israel" they can trot out. That's why they like pushing them forward, quoting them and showering them with prices. To prove just how "totally not anti-semitic" their Jew-hatred is. It's kind of the same like the "Some of my best friends are...." argument, only more disgusting.

tl;dr he's one of the good ones.
 
Mona does not care about anything besides shutting down any and all opposition of her myopic hatred of Israel. The bans of Pizzameister, Arisboch, Avenger and the attempted bans against Sorte Slyngel and Kugelschreiber are ample evidence for this.

And the thing is: Even some of her correligionists are disgusted by her methods and the drama she likes to stir. Unfortunately they have not yet had the balls to ban her.

A reminder that Mona has her own lolcow thread.... I would contend that she cares a lot about many things other than Israel and Da Jews.

As for the other usernames you mention, it is pretty clear that only 3 individuals are involved, one of whom was dumb enough to get banned here also. RW would be a better place if it banned more people, not less.

Who are these coreligionists who have not had the balls to ban Mona yet?
 
Another editor backed up by Hipocrite and David Gerard has to be subjected to a coop to remove tools they are abusing.

upload_2016-4-16_6-27-0.png


http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop#Desysop.2C_deautopatrol_Sandflapjack
 
Who is that guy?

A psycho who got topic-banned from GamerGate shit on Wikipedia for being an even bigger sperg than Ryulong who has spent every waking moment since shrieking about how it's another shoah and GamerGate articles not saying exactly what he wants is literally destroying the entire human race.
 
A psycho who got topic-banned from GamerGate shit on Wikipedia for being an even bigger sperg than Ryulong who has spent every waking moment since shrieking about how it's another shoah and GamerGate articles not saying exactly what he wants is literally destroying the entire human race.
Sounds like a prized member of Ratwiki in the making...
 
FuzzyCuck decided enough was enough and removed sysop and autopatrol from Sandflapjack, who got butthurt.

upload_2016-4-17_3-35-46.png
 
A stupid question and please answer honestly:

Do you think most bannings on Ratwiki are based on actual behavior or on ideology?

Does e.g. a well behaved Zionist stand a better chance of not getting banned than an edit warring antisemite?
 
A stupid question and please answer honestly:

Do you think most bannings on Ratwiki are based on actual behavior or on ideology?

Does e.g. a well behaved Zionist stand a better chance of not getting banned than an edit warring antisemite?

It's certainly a very important factor, and I also think much of it happens unconsciously and not consciously.

And this is really not so strange. If you're a community with a wiki which has a certain set of ideas and viewpoints about something, and then someone comes in and disruptively edits in other viewpoints considered invalid by the community, then you're not going to be liked very much... Consider a homeopath coming in and editing in all sorts of alt-med crap, or some Christian editing in all sort of fundie crap. From RW's point of view, that's sort of what's happening...

This is also fine, as long as those viewpoints make sense, and as long as people *are* treated with respect if their behaviour is reasonable. For example, that fundie Christian might do some really good pages on alt-med...

The problem now is that some of "RW's viewpoints", so to speak, are very much devoid of some sense of balance. In some cases this is just an oversight and can be corrected. This is the case on the religious pages, alt-med pages, etc. As I've said many times before: there is some crap there, but much of it is really quite good.

On other pages, adding a more reasonable discussion and balanced viewpoint is a crime against humanity and will make you an outlaw by some viewpoints.

Again, this is only in the viewpoint is a fairly small number of people. We all know who. But the way RW is set up (no real enforceable rules) means those few people can bully and crap all over people until they give up...
 
The coop against Kugelschreiber has been closed as "inconclusive" after the RW autists started tard raging about it still being open. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...This_has_been_going_on_for_5_fucking_days_now...

View attachment 85850

View attachment 85852

FuzzyCuck now wants to desysop and remove autopatrol from Mona.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Chicken_coop#Desysop.2C_deautopatrol_-Mona-

View attachment 85853

FuzzyCuck was astounded by this remark by Mona:

View attachment 85854
Thanks for the update... Interesting developments...
 
Kudos to FuzzyCuck for allowing the Ryulong-Arisboch grudges and harassment against Mona to continue to fester by cooping Mona.

Sandflapjack, who you might recall is a Ryulong buddyloid, votes for vengeance against that "insufferable holier-than-thou bitch" Mona. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=1657166

upload_2016-4-17_20-56-35.png


Meanwhile at the Saloon Bar, votes have been started to try and resolve the "Is Kugel really Arisboch??" coop. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Saloon_bar#Votes_on_unresolved_matters
 
Last edited:
Back