Raymond Spencer Streams Shooting on 4chan and gets 6 Replies - Found an-heroed after 4 hits with 0 deaths. Also is a Sea Mexican

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Just saw it on some news site, thought to my self, oh, another one, no kills, just wounded. LEARN TO HOLD A FUCKING FIREARM BLACKS.

It's not that fucking hard to aim down sights, shove your gangsta pride up your ass, seems it get's you fuck all but failed drive-bys, mass shootings with zero kills and getting arrested.

Spics can get higher score than ZERO.
Before Shaka Zulu the Bantu tribes would just square off against one another, throw javelins and holler till one side breaks. I wonder if it's that kind of thing.
 
This is why you target practice; all it takes is a bit of research, some dry firing, and then an hour or two on range and then as long as you have a good coach you literally have to be disabled to not hit a target at under 100m. the military arrests the recruiter if you can't hit shit even with the flimsy amount of bullshit training they give recruits nowadays because it would mean you were literally too retarded to be useful to the forces and were clearly fraudulently signed up.

with the guns he used you could hit 500m easily. beyond that the preparation, every hoodrat is always on edge during the end of the school day specifically because of how easy of a target for drive-bys people are. that usually coinciding with the start of rush hour traffic

Before Shaka Zulu the Bantu tribes would just square off against one another, throw javelins and holler till one side breaks. I wonder if it's that kind of thing.
sorry for the double post but before guns and artillery could effectively kill at a quick enough rate, most battles were just that, the guns used as shock weapons to cause a break, most casualties were caused during routs.
 
I see the window, but I also see it is a straight line. You can clearly see the curve in every other pictured magazine. Here's an autistic image I made with size comparisons and an example of the kind of monocular/camera I am thinking of
i get what you're going for, but that is an ATI Schmeisser MLE G2 with a window. here is the same angle more or less, and much clearer.

Screenshot 2022-04-24 090902.jpg
 
It is amazing that we have such a huge amount of mass shooters these days, and yet we never hear about anybody assassinating elites or driving a truck through a pride parade. They always go after innocent civilians that have nothing to do with whatever they are bitching about. All these morons that shoot places up for no reason are just making excuses for wanting to be a sperg murderer and get a lot of attention. I blame this on the media for sensationalizing violence as a platform to make a statement and garner attention.
For the elites you need to know where they are and then get near enough, while the pride parade is once a year; to do something like this you need to snap and if you snap you feel the need to act in that instant.
Going to a random place and blasting away is the easiest and quickest route
 
In such a system in which there are no real ideological struggles and conflicts for wayward, sociopathic men to throw themselves into, in such an environment where the world-at-large is obsessed with small and minor little technical problems, going postal is really all the more you can expect when a convictionless, faithless basket case has an episode.
That "going postal" is a byproduct of these many successes, marginal in scale and ultimately just another little technical problem to solve. I would consider these shooters to be an externality of the rise of the internet and onward march of technology into the human mind.
We have not properly integrated this modern tech-infused landscape of ours into society in any meaningful way. It is clear that guns + internet can lead to happenings like this - so what, ban guns, like most of Europe? Ban the internet instead? I mean, there's a right to firearms and no such right for the internet, so the correct answer answer should be clear... No, obviously you shouldn't ban either.

This is an extreme outside case that kills and maims fewer people than cow-tipping does on a yearly basis. Distill what the average shooter is like, narrow in on and address their concerns, looney bin the ones that can't be therapized and medicated to a state of complacency, and implement safe-guards against bad actors that try to rile them up.
No seismic shifts are required, the liberal order was built to last. By nature and definition it can and must integrate these technological changes, not reject them or abuse them. We are just currently slow-walking that process, since most politicians are so old and detached they see the root of the problem as new and alien and do not comprehend where to begin. The cycle will turn over to the young and then the bigger war will be fought and, by design, the most decent and uncontroversial answers will win out.

On the topic of bad actors riling up sociopaths, tamping down on the media "crisis reporting" is a great start. The United States has an extremely long and unique history with yellow or sensational journalism. The fact that this shooter was Filipino is particularly relevant... There is also a strong element of desire to be a public figure for most shooters, with all of these sociopathic losers invariably aping for attention or trying to share their manifesto. That's an honor which the average US media coverage is only too happy to provide, and in doing so they provide a narrative that shootings and shooters are common, a normal result of US domestic policy alone, and you should be worried about them, none of which is true.
Regardless of if the interventions or policy changes driven by yellow journalism are correct or incorrect, they invariably cause US citizens a headache. There are things you can report in other countries that don't even make people blink, but you report them in the US and that lead to every man, woman, and child here calling for a new holy war.
Televised/digital journalism is uncharted territory, if you think a few decades is enough to set "responsible standards" when it took thousands of years to metastasize honest journalism you're retarded, so it's simply another factor of those tech externalities that should be addressed.
 
(Why he thinks we mock cows because we’re “offended,” I have no idea. Cows get threads because they’re funny)
As soy as he is, he actually may have a point there. Cow threads used to be fun, years ago, but now they're mostly spergs seething because some internet nobody did something that doesn't matter. "RRRRRRRR DID YOU SEE RALPH WENT BOWLING AGAIN GOD I HATE HIM SO MUCH" or "LET ME SPEND 50 PARAGRAPHS DETAILING WHY A TWO PIXEL REFLECTION ON DSP'S EYE PROVES HE'S A PEDOPHILE". Half of it crosses well into schizoposting territory.

It's not interesting and it's certainly not funny. Why else would people act that way unless they're offended by the existence of someone they don't like? Calling out A-Logs is a lost art that needs to come back.
 
So what was his motive? Didn't wanna wear a mask or was he a virgin with rage?
I think this is an easy solve. He's a /pol/ user and Phillipino.

He clearly had a micropenis like every other /pol/ user. And was angry about being brown. Clearly he hopes for reincarnation and wishes to reroll. And given how /pol/ users remain maidenless for life, and the ones that do find a maiden end up raising babies that are not theirs, I can't blame him.
 
Are Filipinos basically crazier Mexicans?
Filipino-Americans are a weird group that's a lot larger than most people think mainly because they're almost exclusively on the West Coast. I have a lot of experience with them so I'll opine.

Most 3rd generation Millennial/Zoomer Filipinos (so their grandparents were born in the Philippines and their parents born in America) are extremely "social justice" obsessed. They often think they're just as oppressed as black people and are often the driver of BLM movements and the like on campuses in the west coast (where there are barely any black people). They also I think are mainly responsible for separating "Pacific Islander" as a separate race from "Asian" so that they can avoid the anti-Asian bias in regards to universities/scholarships/diversity hires. Again, they think they're so oppressed when they are the 2nd highest average earning ethnicity in the US. So yeah, haven't really met any non-leftist Millennial/Zoomer Flips.
1650828974270.png
 
Filipino-Americans are a weird group that's a lot larger than most people think mainly because they're almost exclusively on the West Coast. I have a lot of experience with them so I'll opine.

Most 3rd generation Millennial/Zoomer Filipinos (so their grandparents were born in the Philippines and their parents born in America) are extremely "social justice" obsessed. They often think they're just as oppressed as black people and are often the driver of BLM movements and the like on campuses in the west coast (where there are barely any black people). They also I think are mainly responsible for separating "Pacific Islander" as a separate race from "Asian" so that they can avoid the anti-Asian bias in regards to universities/scholarships/diversity hires. Again, they think they're so oppressed when they are the 2nd highest average earning ethnicity in the US. So yeah, haven't really met any non-leftist Millennial/Zoomer Flips.
View attachment 3212551
Why are blacks so bad at making money?
 
Back