- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The list is "almost all of them made by anyone with any money". My previous post was jokey but the Red Cross is actually pretty litigious and the current meme of "using le red cross is le war crimy :^)" is the direct result of them suing the fuck out of tons of media outlets for intellectual property violations.Is there a list of games that cucked out to the red cross and removed it from their games? I wanna laugh at these pathetic cuck devs
Right, but most games I remember playing had red crosses in them so I am thinking of the biggest cases where they cucked out. I know that a niche Xbox 360 Tactical JRPG "Operation Darkness" censored not just swastikas(WW2 game) but also removed the red cross from the medic character's armband, which means he just wears a white armband for no reason. Stupid shit, I also know re-releases of Serious Sam and Doom lack red cross on their medkits. Can't think of anything else major at the moment.The list is "almost all of them made by anyone with any money". My previous post was jokey but the Red Cross is actually pretty litigious and the current meme of "using le red cross is le war crimy :^)" is the direct result of them suing the fuck out of tons of media outlets for intellectual property violations.
The Red Cross is almost Nintento-tier in issuing C&Ds over anything that even looks like something they own. I think they only don't do it for religious symbols that are red-on-white because islamic crescents are traditionally red anyway, red stars of david are too rare, and I don't think they actually have legal power over any other religious symbols.
I had to look this up and initially lol'd but it looks like not really but they still made some strange decisions?Didn't the arma devs have to change all of the first aid icons in game?
After that started happening, a lot of devs just didn't bother putting red crosses in because they knew they'd get sued/users would meme on them for THIS IS LE WARCRYME LOL.Right, but most games I remember playing had red crosses in them so I am thinking of the biggest cases where they cucked out. I know that a niche Xbox 360 Tactical JRPG "Operation Darkness" censored not just swastikas(WW2 game) but also removed the red cross from the medic character's armband, which means he just wears a white armband for no reason. Stupid shit, I also know re-releases of Serious Sam and Doom lack red cross on their medkits. Can't think of anything else major at the moment.
In this particular instance it is because the devs are cucked. There is an interview about how the localizers were watching a holohoax documentary around that time that literally made them cry, supposedly, so they decided to ask the devs to add an entire cutscene where the game stops just so that the characters can hysterically whine about muh 6 gorillion and they did. For reference, the game is normally a JRPG about allied supersoldiers casting spells and werewolves hunting down nazi vampires, with a guest appearance from Jack The Ripper himself and Jin-Roh looking Powered Armored nazis later on if you're wandering what sort of tone the game has. This is why them cucking out on swastikas and the red cross stands out. I was wondering if there was an even more ridiculous example, modern day shooters taking a red cross out of medkits is a pretty boring one for example.As a sidenote on swastikas, Germany's censorship laws prohibit featuring them at all. It's not super common to remove them entirely from all releases but I could see a studio just not wanting to bother with having a separate German release from an overall PAL one.
For the most part, not putting in red crosses is more out of fear of getting sued, or genuine belief in the fuddlore that it is indeed a war crime to use it without authorization. "Cucked" in a sense, but not the sense you're using.In this particular instance it is because the devs are cucked
AIEEEEEETF2 never cucked to it.
I hate this "hurr durr I'm commiting war crimes in xyz video game/the devs are committing warcrimes by adding the red cross" joke. You can't commit fucking war crimes during peace time moron, otherwise every civillian that has ever worn military fatigues or used a hollow point in self defense would be a war criminal.IT'S NOT A WARCRIME (unless you are a uniformed combatant) IT'S JUST COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT REEEEEEEE
Na, it also specifies any Geneva-protected medical personnel in addition to their transports and work areas. Which means you'd not be allowed to carry a gun or shoot at anyone if you bore anything with a red cross in a milsim, but on the bright side you'd count as a war crime when someone shot you to try and prevent a rescue or revive. So the star of life is a perfect fit for a medical kit carried by an armed combatant.since in a milsim game a red cross would imply a literal Red Cross aid station
I did forget about that aspect; ArmA is truly a proper milsim.Na, it also specifies any Geneva-protected medical personnel in addition to their transports and work areas.
This is actually an incredibly important concept in vexillology(muh flag study); a red cross on a white background is trivially easy to make. The ease of constructing a flag influenced a lot of old designs, since they're battle standards. Literally shit that a knight might be wearing as a smock to identify himself so some armed retard knows that the sound coming from his direction is the proper marching tune. And just like the Red Cross is super litigious, if it was a more complicated symbol, someone might light them up after misidentifying it or thinking they can get away with saying they misidentified it, and it might fly in court later if that symbol was hard enough to draw that someone fucked it up.If they want to make that cross a "restricted symbol", they should make it something more elaborate instead of a simple red plus sign.
Honestly if SWAT4 had a "surrender" button in multiplayer it would have been a lot more interesting. In general the concept of being able to surrender or at least a rout not being "slaughter them to the man" in a normally violent game would be fun to play with as a designer/writer.They were encouraging gamers not to shoot enemies who were down but not dead, etc (so teammates could revive them and you'd lose when they came back to murder you).