reddit General

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
glue eater said:
Fox News tells you to kill minorities and brainwashes you into TND. These people are for real.
Click to expand...
That is probably one of the worst types of posts on Reddit. Just absolutely insane delusion and projection about something they speak on with such authority but have absolutely no idea about. They're always such typical soy faggots too, with public profiles going back a decade that tells almost every personal detail about their lives, yet are so generic and boring there is no point in doxing them.

Yes, nine years of posting generic and bland garbage. Not one single original thought. Speaking in such a demeaning and authoritative tone while saying absolutely nothing for the sole purpose of getting points that don't matter.

Find one interesting thought:

Also note that he's only posting on default subs that show up in everyone's home page. He isn't even posting in special hobby subs or nothing.
 
Last edited:
glue eater said:
1718553626514.png


NOOOOO NOT MY HECKIN COOM
Click to expand...
Are these predditors unironically using Pornhub's arguments as a source on why banning porn is bad. Ignoring the obvious bias that may come with citing those directly involved, how does Reddit, who constantly circlejerks about how evil corporations are, doesn't know how grimy of a business the porn industry is. Pornhub allowed blatant sexual abuse content on their platform for years before finally adding a verification system that didn't even solve the problem. If you watch porn, I personally don't recommend you use pornhub because if the women never shows her face, there is a chance that it is sexual abuse content. Pornhub has known about this loophole for years too, but they still don't patch it up. I seriously doubt pornhub is citing device-based age verification to protect the children but is rather suggesting it to make people distrust any ban that happens (I seriously doubt that the boomers in office know what device-based age verification is and just decided on drivers license because that is what is used for cigarettes and alcohol). If pornhub had their way, they would have child porn on their platform. They are not a reliable source. Guess Reddit doesn't care about how evil a business is the second they benefit from it.
 
Lankybox Enjoyer said:
Are these predditors unironically using Pornhub's arguments as a source on why banning porn is bad. Ignoring the obvious bias that may come with citing those directly involved, how does Reddit, who constantly circlejerks about how evil corporations are, doesn't know how grimy of a business the porn industry is. Pornhub allowed blatant sexual abuse content on their platform for years before finally adding a verification system that didn't even solve the problem. If you watch porn, I personally don't recommend you use pornhub because if the women never shows her face, there is a chance that it is sexual abuse content. Pornhub has known about this loophole for years too, but they still don't patch it up. I seriously doubt pornhub is citing device-based age verification to protect the children but is rather suggesting it to make people distrust any ban that happens (I seriously doubt that the boomers in office know what device-based age verification is and just decided on drivers license because that is what is used for cigarettes and alcohol). If pornhub had their way, they would have child porn on their platform. They are not a reliable source. Guess Reddit doesn't care about how evil a business is the second they benefit from it.
Click to expand...
Redditors don't care about any real world issue thats affecting people or causing harm to society, they care about cooming and consooming.
 
Reminder that the convicted pedophile and registered sex offender who brutally raped and murdered Cherish Perrywinkle had been out of jail for just three weeks before committing the crime. He had repeated behaviors going back to the 70s.

There is no rehabilitating a pedophile. Recidivism is practically a guarantee. They should be shot on sight and instead Reddit gives them a safe space, meanwhile r/ItsAFetish did nothing but repost screenshots of troons admitting that they were just playing dress-up to get their dick hard and they get banned for "transphobia."
 
biggnigghog said:
Pedo pulls a pity party about how nobody wants to hire a pedo like him (cry me a river) .

View attachment 6095362Source: https://web.archive.org/web/2023101...iety_wants_me_jobless_and_homeless/?rdt=65000

Soem replies:


View attachment 6095371
View attachment 6095382
Post from this person : https://www.reddit.com/r/SexOffende...gef7/background_check_question_pertaining_to/

View attachment 6095384
View attachment 6095374
View attachment 6095379
Click to expand...
no sweaty, if you're homeless and jobless we have to pay to feed your pedophile ass. we'd prefer you were dead. also that chick with the pedophile boyfriend is mad pathetic and better off dead too.
 
Last edited:
Lankybox Enjoyer said:
Are these predditors unironically using Pornhub's arguments as a source on why banning porn is bad. Ignoring the obvious bias that may come with citing those directly involved, how does Reddit, who constantly circlejerks about how evil corporations are, doesn't know how grimy of a business the porn industry is. Pornhub allowed blatant sexual abuse content on their platform for years before finally adding a verification system that didn't even solve the problem. If you watch porn, I personally don't recommend you use pornhub because if the women never shows her face, there is a chance that it is sexual abuse content. Pornhub has known about this loophole for years too, but they still don't patch it up. I seriously doubt pornhub is citing device-based age verification to protect the children but is rather suggesting it to make people distrust any ban that happens (I seriously doubt that the boomers in office know what device-based age verification is and just decided on drivers license because that is what is used for cigarettes and alcohol). If pornhub had their way, they would have child porn on their platform. They are not a reliable source. Guess Reddit doesn't care about how evil a business is the second they benefit from it.
Click to expand...
I don't use pornhub at all because everything about it feels so sleazy to me. Which is saying a lot since it's already a porn site. Knowing that they had genuine CP on their platform for huge stretches of time before anyone noticed or cared is the line. I don't need that hellhole to get my rocks off, and shame on anyone who does
 
Gondolindrim said:
Knowing that they had genuine CP on their platform for huge stretches of time before anyone noticed or cared is the line.
Click to expand...
to be fair, that can probably be said for every single porn site ever
if it allows user uploaded content, then the chance that at some point some throwaway account ends up uploading cp or other criminal content is basically 100%
 
UnsufficentBoobage said:
What it did instead is flush a lot of straight male porn.
Click to expand...
because the "straight male porn" you were gooning too was illegal material.
luigismanslave said:
no sweaty, if you're homeless and jobless we have to pay to feed your pedophile ass. we'd prefer you were dead. also that chick with the pedophile boyfriend is mad pathetic and better off dead too.
Click to expand...
the government's aversion to the death penalty is so retarded. if we just killed sex criminals, the sex crime rate would drop like 95%. but that would be heckin' mean and heckin' undemocratic so we just let rapists back out on the street so they can rape more women and children.
 
Screenshot_22.png

Screenshot_23.png
Screenshot_24.png
Screenshot_25.png

I love checking in on all the Jewish subreddits especially when the clearly conservative Jews and the reformed Jews getting slap fights.

Here we have a conservative Jew clearly being dog piled by a bunch of liberal Jews from New York but daring to suggest that maybe those other victims of the Holocaust and hating Polish people who had no control over the government when it was being occupied by a foreign power and blaming them for the Holocaust is morally reprehensible.

But clearly he is downplaying the Holocaust by pointing out historical facts that interfere with Jewish liberals worldview
 
Lankybox Enjoyer said:
I seriously doubt pornhub is citing device-based age verification to protect the children but is rather suggesting it to make people distrust any ban that happens (I seriously doubt that the boomers in office know what device-based age verification is and just decided on drivers license because that is what is used for cigarettes and alcohol)
Click to expand...
I don't want the government or corporations keeping logs of people's porn use. If you want kids not to look at porn keep them off the internet.
 
Blackhole said:
because the "straight male porn" you were gooning too was illegal material.
Click to expand...
Nah, it 100% was adults, it just was from unverified accounts.

I should have clarified it was mostly not sexual-sexual, but fetish crap with nary a dick in frame.
Blackhole said:
we just let rapists back out on the street so they can rape more women and children.
Click to expand...
You know that a lot of those rape other men?
Do you even care?
 
Evil Peter Griffin said:
I don't want the government or corporations keeping logs of people's porn use. If you want kids not to look at porn keep them off the internet.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's fair. There are definitely a lot of good arguments against banning porn, many of which I agree with. I'm just saying that Pornhub is definitely not thinking about that when they discourage porn bans. You should be healthily skeptical of both the government and shady businesses like Pornhub if you want a good outlook on the world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom