reddit General

A bunch of Democrat policy positions from 1994, but now it means they're going to line women and blacks and gays and trannies up coast-to-coast while Donald Trump personally runs them over with a steamroller don't laugh this is very very serious and real and totally going to happen unless you vote for whatever shitlib the DNC trots out at the eleventh hour.
i think a comparison of the actual political similarities between old democrat policies and what project 2025 suggests would be a really powerful 'forum weapon' against these kinds of people, even if they just close their eyes, plug their ears and screech to the heavens. you never know what onlooker you might convert.
 
the tranny assistant for the spy x family manga creates anti-tranny manga and the creator promotes and supports "fascist" government policies

from r/animecirclejerks "Most transphobic manga from literally the least expected person" https://www.reddit.com/r/animecircl...t_transphobic_manga_from_literally_the_least/
mainredditfag.png

2nd page posted by OP
51251789892.png

healthy behavior
unhealthyfgs.png

o21354.png
8658543.png

more details concerning the creator
spyfags.pngspyfags2.png

some tranny tried to bring the outrage to the main spyxfamily reddit but no one really cared

spyfaggot.png
 

Attachments

  • 8658543.png
    8658543.png
    68 KB · Views: 133
Last edited by a moderator:
My parents used to work with a fair amount of Indian people in the 80s or 90s. All of them were very nice, well-adjusted people, I'm told.

They all also agreed: never go to India. Ever. Even the ones who were already wealthy high caste hated it there. I can only assume that the few normal people born in India get the duck out as soon as possible.
You see this a lot with older/first generation immigrants who came over to Europe, those that arrived in the 70's and 80's mostly. I heard incredibly racist stuff, even against their own kind, from 50+ years old turks and arabs before, much to my amusement. These are usually the kind of immigrants that also made an effort at learning the language of the country they reside in, the newer immigrants who are just here for the gibs speak fuck all german and rather have their born-here children translate, it's shameful. There's simply no excuse for not speaking the language if you stayed 10+ years in a country (that applies to white weebs in Japan as much as to shitskins in Europe), then again most european countries make it very easy for them to build their enclaves where they don't need to learn a new language to get around.
 
There's simply no excuse for not speaking the language if you stayed 10+ years in a country (that applies to white weebs in Japan
Not a weeb but you'd be surprised to know that I met several Jappo women while living there who specifically preferred men who didn't learn Japanese. They said they felt it changed a man's entire behavior/thinking due to the honorifics/politeness and 'turned you more feminine'.
 
Not a weeb but you'd be surprised to know that I met several Jappo women while living there who specifically preferred men who didn't learn Japanese. They said they felt it changed a man's entire behavior/thinking due to the honorifics/politeness and 'turned you more feminine'.
Was meant more in regards to the general every day life of course. I had a relative living in country and he told me something similar to the "being perceived as feminine" thing, had something to do with how westerners learn the language IIRC. Funnily enough, it was the men more than the women that thought he was kind of fruity by the way he spoke japanese from what he has told me :story:
 
I had a relative living in country and he told me something similar to the "being perceived as feminine" thing, had something to do with how westerners learn the language IIRC.
Also not a weeb, but I understand that Westerners tend to be taught that the first-person pronoun in Japanese is watashi. In practice, it's pretty female-coded and men should probably use boku. It's a silly language.
 
Redditors don't (or, more accurately, willingly do not) understand statistics and seethe when confronted on it. Bonus - this acolyte guy is one of the most chronically online redditors I've ever seen and always has insane and plain untrue takes such as this, arguing for hours while being wrong the entire time. Thus the -20 downvotes from me, a user who doesn't even bother to up/downvote very often. His history is good for a laugh, though extremely repetitive.

The post. The comment chain. Top of controversal... of course. The user with the correct take didn't even get into native american statistics, their total proportion is pretty insanely high. That's probably what I would have gone with to drive home the fact the original comment (whites are #1 rapist demographic) is horribly wrong.

Oh, and here is the link mr. acolyte provided that proves himself wrong.
 

Attachments

  • 1721903661464.png
    1721903661464.png
    212.4 KB · Views: 82
  • 1721903755729.png
    1721903755729.png
    67.5 KB · Views: 80
  • 1721903786160.png
    1721903786160.png
    90.3 KB · Views: 68
  • 1721903810376.png
    1721903810376.png
    210 KB · Views: 83
Last edited:
the tranny assistant for the spy x family manga creates anti-tranny manga and the creator promotes and supports "fascist" government policies

from r/animecirclejerks "Most transphobic manga from literally the least expected person" https://www.reddit.com/r/animecircl...t_transphobic_manga_from_literally_the_least/
View attachment 6230181

2nd page posted by OP
View attachment 6230192

healthy behavior
View attachment 6230200

View attachment 6230203
View attachment 6230206

more details concerning the creator
View attachment 6230211View attachment 6230233

some tranny tried to bring the outrage to the main spyxfamily reddit but no one really cared

View attachment 6230220
Trannies backstabbed by their moeshit. The great betrayal
 
A mix of bots and man hating.
Don’t forget all the munchie cunts that took over random support subs like r/raisedbynarcissists just to spam their rape and incest fantasies while humblebragging about their otherwise normal abuse free life where everything goes their way. No one asks about their marital status yet they feel compelled to bring it up in nearly every other post.

Most of the subs around “narcissism” are just munchie cunts whining about their bad boy ex and shitposting them into glorifed dating advice subreddits.

Go back 8-10 years into the archives and you’ll see none of this bullshit and actual helpful posters talking about more legitimate issues like how to go about removing negative people from your life. It’s not just this sub but most of them.

I don’t doubt that shit happens in first world countries, but it’s not THAT common to where just walking down the street is an active warzone according to their bullshit hysterics.

Redditors don’t live in reality and truly aren’t real people.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6197520
Source

Redditor's wife leaves town for 3 days, makes him food for the time she's gone, husband appreciates it and posts it on MadeMeSmile sub. Instead of realizing this is completely normal behavior in 90% of the world and likely even 30% of the U.S., and the type of woman who would do this is almost certainly a stay at home wife, they still melt the fuck down insulting him. Jannies have to lock the post.

This really isn't helping fight back the "redditors have never been in a loving relationship" stigma.
Growing up I knew many mothers who were working women but also split their time as housewives (50/50 split). These were professional women (with fancy degrees) and many children (from one husband). I think it has to do with the culture and society the women grow up in. If you live in a community which promotes good schools, good morals (low crime), good community and a good (but varied) religious community of whatever your flavor of religion might be (by varied I mean many different churches but they all generally believe in the same crap just slight difference in interpretation or background (latin mass vs english mass or a jewish community that has different types of synagogues for different types of jews). You will be fine. I think the community can be democratic but it can't be LIBERAL, the second they become lefty retards the town falls apart same as if everyone was a MAGA guy.
 
The nicest, whitest and wealthiest areas in the US vote blue every single election. I would like to be proven wrong.
There are two types of super white super wealthy that vote blue. You have the artsy type and the money type. The artsy type (think actors, artists, muscians, people in Broadway and fashion design) tend to be your super liberal. Everything from these "creatives" is looked through your lens of drama. They also tend to be your women's study's professors and hyper liberal stupid professors. They exists in their own bubble. Artsy people tend not to interact with other non artsy people and so get swept up in group and nonsense extremist stuff (this is where troons come from). What they know of the world is at most superficial or looked at through the lens of drama. They vote dem because they believe everyone should "do what they want" because in their world you can. All they have to do is go on stage, pretend to be someone and get a paycheck.

The second type of dem I will call "the money type" these are your scientists, doctors, lawyers, professors (depends on what college and what they teach), business owners etc. These people due to their professions must interact with various members of society regularly. They know that the real world is full of different types of people but to them the only thing that matters is that people leave them alone and let them make money. This is why immigrants and Jews traditionally vote dem. They want to be able to participate in society and run away from the persecution which exists from the old world. They don't like Republicans because either they view them as too religious (the abortion bans and cozy with the evangelicals are some examples)- and either reminds them of the land they left behind (ie: state religions or laws which promote one religion over another) or threats to their faith. For the more educated ones, people would vote dem because they saw the Republicans as rejecting scientific fact. Scientists would say "hey so this chemical kills birds we shouldn't use it anymore" and big business (which the Republicans support) would not care because that chemical not only kills bugs but is cheaper than making a chemical that doesn't kill birds. I will double post to continue 1/2

2/2

people also tend to vote Democrat because Democrat was pro-union. it doesn't particularly matter so much now because America is industrial based doesn't really exist, but for many immigrants, unions were a way to establish yourself in a country. unions provided the social Security net that was necessary in order to save up money. sure. unions were corrupt and have their fair share of problems but in general they make sense. unions paid for life insurance, death insurance and health Care and insured. you had a job which meant that your children could get a better job and achieve the American dream. because unions tended to be Democrat, the children picked up from their parents and also voted Democrat. it's not unfair to think that since the unions don't exist, the government should take place of the unions. this business type I was talking about believes that this is okay to an extent, they don't believe in the social nonsense, but they believe that things like Medicare, Medicaid, social Security, and universal health Care are fine. another reason why is that Democrats tend to be anti-war generally and this take comes from different areas either. they are refugees or artsy types or whatever.


in short, the more artsy Democrats who are insulated from the larger world tend to vote Democrat because the Democrats align with their worldview. these are people who don't really work for their living and these tend to be your Communists and marxists, they exist by handout and thus assume everyone else should. the more business type believes it being a Democrat is good for society and good for business. they believe that the Republicans being the party of Business prevents growth, by not destroying monopolies and going after things such as Unions and regulation. these groups of people believe that the government should get involved in order to stop corporations and people from taking advantage and killing each other. they also tend to be pro-union and do not support the religious bias which exists within the Republican party. they think that relationships completely and that the government should not pass a law that even mentions religion.

I can explain more if you want.
 
Back