reddit General

it's almost unbelievable they're still pretending the communist in a tranny polycule was maga
I'd bet the majority know he probably isn't, they just believe what they want to believe, to pad the scoreboard that doesn't matter for shit.

At best, he's apolitical, and has probably never voted in his few years of adulthood. That's just my hunch, though. I just can't shake the feeling that a terminally online kid who moved out of a Republican Mormon household so he could fuck his neurotic tranny roommate in the ass isn't voting R on much of anything.
 
Capture.PNG
archive

Fucking autists.
 
Over the last fifteen years, Reddit's relationship advice has shifted towards recommending

-Breakups
-Boundaries
-Therapy

And against compromise, communication, and letting people have their space.
View attachment 8058182


Full pic

View attachment 8058185

I'm not shocked by this because I swear that every time I did see a thread from r/ relationshipadvice , its always telling a woman to break up with her boyfriend even when there's no reason for her not to. Whatever advice /relationshipadvice tells you, do the opposite.
except when the partner is a creepy troon, then OP has to cater to their every wim
 
Last edited:
it's almost unbelievable they're still pretending the communist in a tranny polycule was maga
The only saving grace to this is, possibly, other potential shooters see that they won't get showered in glory for committing violence. The left, wildly, disowns their shooters while lionizing the violence itself.
 
The only saving grace to this is, possibly, other potential shooters see that they won't get showered in glory for committing violence. The left, wildly, disowns their shooters while lionizing the violence itself.
Counterpoint: Luigi. Who isn't really a leftist but probably driven by Effective Altruism.
 
Counterpoint: Luigi. Who isn't really a leftist but probably driven by Effective Altruism.
I'm pretty far-right myself and I think Luigi did nothing wrong. United are a company of damned thieves abusing the system and using vast fortunes to keep the broken system broken. Everyone in their executive suite is ethically responsible for a great number of excess deaths, all for the pursuit of impossible, unsustainable perpetual growth for the (((shareholders))) in the face of all reason. The only justice we can expect for a group of deeply politically-entrenched interlopers in the healthcare process is vigilante justice.
 
Last edited:
Counterpoint: Luigi. Who isn't really a leftist but probably driven by Effective Altruism.
Well that doesn't really refute my point. There's a decent amount of evidence pointing to the fact that Luigi wasn't /their guy/, but they try to own him anyway. It's, again, embracing the violence and alienating the shooter.
 

Thread title: Why Is The News So Pro-Israel? (2025) [21:11]
Pretty much every comment got deleted. Lmao.
Why? Here's the answer, from a mod:
Y'all, we do not allow anti-Jewish comments, even if they are dogwhistles. The number of people who have been saying "because Jews own the media" or even "because they own the media" is ridiculous. This is an anti-Jewish conspiracy theory and is a bannable offense on this subreddit and also a violation of the TOS.

If you want to talk about how Zionists, who are not necessarily Jewish, are over-represented in ownership of the media, you are going to have to make clear that is what you are saying, because being vague about it means that you want people to know what you mean without saying it, which shows you are being anti-Jewish. Somehow, way too many people seem to think we allow this. We do not. Being anti Israel is not the same as being anti Jewish. Don't be those people who are spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories. It's not edgy or cool, it's just bigoted.

Edit: okay Op since people cannot seem to behave, I am having to get rid of all of the comments and lock the thread. Sorry, obviously this crowd cannot handle not being bigoted asshats.

Edit 2. The people that are reporting this comment and calling me a Zionist are stupid as fuck. Look at my profile for fuck's sake and look how many posts I have made in the past year that are exposing what Israel has been doing. All the mods here are pro Palestine. That does not mean we are going to allow hateful comments about JEWS you ridiculous people.
Thank you, Kumquat_conniption, very cool
 
I expected reddit to be really really pissed about total nigger death aka food stamps getting cutoff but all the politics subs seem to be a lot more upset over Orange Man building a ballroom or some shit.
 
The irony of a hammer and sickle background for a smartphone is laughable. Consumer electronics under Marxism are consistently in short supply and far behind the curve, to the point that they are notorious for being knockoffs of Western products. Tetris was conceived as a program to run on the Russian clone of an American minicomputer at a government-run computing center. North Korea used a modified version of Windows until switching to Linux in 2008. Marxist nations' computing industries only function by exploiting the labor of proletariat code-writers and engineers.

The Tetris guy was given a IBM PC as a reward from the Politburo for his role in Tetris. A ordinary computer that was outdated and normie in the west, but in the USSR it was top of the line.

Soviet computer industry was so kneecapped by central planning their few factories for such usually had to start by building their own power plants so they could guarantee that they would have stable electricity supplies. They would have computer classes in the 80s where they would do tests for the students by having them write programs on paper because there was no way to supply enough PCs for a entire class. And of course the idea of "don't copy that floppy" was extremely strong in the USSR because the Government was scared shitless of the idea of entire books worth of censored info being passed around that there was a tight control on TYPEWRITERS!

That's right, to buy a typewriter you had to go through a process eerily similar to buying a gun. Explain why you wanted one, have a serial number on it and such. All this to stop samizdats (underground illegal newspapers and zines) from spreading. Computers were a much worse version of that, allowing you to seamlessly copy the same text file millions of times.

Tl;dr Commies can into aesthetics and literally nothing else, the failed liberal arts majors

Counterpoint: Luigi. Who isn't really a leftist but probably driven by Effective Altruism.

I'm pretty far-right myself and I think Luigi did nothing wrong. United are a company of damned thieves abusing the system and using vast fortunes to keep the broken system broken. Everyone in their executive suite is ethically responsible for a great number of excess deaths, all for the pursuit of impossible, unsustainable perpetual growth for the (((shareholders))) in the face of all reason. The only justice we can expect for a group of deeply politically-entrenched interlopers in the healthcare process is vigilante justice.

The thing I see a lot of people misunderstand about Luigi is you don't have to agree with him to see his point and why people cheered him on. Furthermore people really don't wanna talk about the fact that at its core vigilantism like what he did is not a problem, but a SYMPTOM of the problem.

Vigilantism happens when social cohesion is broken, when the system cannot enforce the social law so other means have to be found. People argue about if Luigi was right but here is the thing: what were his opitions to put the fear of God on the healthcare industry outside literally noscoping the CEO? A lawsuit? Would go nowhere. Lobbying? Would go nowhere + would never be able to come even close to the money needed to make a dent. Directly speaking to people? Nothing. Talking to the CEO? He would call security and nothing would happen.
 
Last edited:
I expected reddit to be really really pissed about total nigger death aka food stamps getting cutoff but all the politics subs seem to be a lot more upset over Orange Man building a ballroom or some shit.
They're really up in arms about the ballroom, it's weird. Plenty of actual things to be mad about but the bot farms are tuned on the White House renovations.
 
Well that doesn't really refute my point. There's a decent amount of evidence pointing to the fact that Luigi wasn't /their guy/, but they try to own him anyway. It's, again, embracing the violence and alienating the shooter.
a good chunk of his appeal is that they find him attractive. It's like che Guevara, the main reason he is so famous is because he was photogenic. People are extremely shallow.

They don't really have anything else they can use.
I was listening to an economic podcast that's a little bit leftist , they found the louvre heist hilarious( where a bunch of beautiful pieces of jewelry and part of french history are probably getting destroyed by a bunch of gypsies as we speak) but the white house getting renovated is awful and against history or whatever.
 
Last edited:
These niggers will try to connect anything to tranny euphoria, it makes me sick. In reality the faggot is either cope larping or had his SSRIs adjusted and his brain isn't in total lockdown now.
He's straight-up lying about it to get tranny ass pats from his new gal pals, that post is such bullshit. Autist brains are not working like this, if you could just take a pill or get injections to fix their slow-in-the-mindness it would be a medical revolution. 100% a self-diagnosed and/or groomed spastic who fell for the troon shit.
Thread title: Why Is The News So Pro-Israel?
"because they own the media" is ridiculous. This is an anti-Jewish conspiracy theory
If you want to talk about how Zionists, who are not necessarily Jewish, are over-represented in ownership of the media, you are going to have to make clear that is what you are saying
How is the second one any different from the first?! Also, non-jewish Zionists? :story: That's some profound mental retardation on display.
okay Op since people cannot seem to behave
"Say the line, Bart!"
 
Last edited:
The political application of this is "who has the power to define reality?" That's why they'll say things as "people racialized as Black" or "identifying as a woman." The belief is that, because nothing is real, categories defining humans are also entirely socially constructed. People with power invented the concept of sex, defined themselves as male, defined others as female, and granted themselves privileges based on this (to them) arbitrary assignment.
I have looked into this before. This is why many definitions given by critical theorists tend to be circular. They will define things based on how they are perceived rather than what they actually are.

For example, when asked the question 'What is Islam?', they will usually respond with 'Islam is the religion that Muslims believe and follow'. It is easy to see how this definition can easily be shown to be circular. It references the very thing it is trying to define without giving external criteria for identification.

In other words, they define things based on an idea of 'lived experience' rather than literal or metaphysical/transcendental truth.

For obvious reasons, this branch of philosophy does not play well with formal logic, which is why most analytical philosophers do not take it seriously.
 
Back
Top Bottom