malt ipecac
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
I don't think you realize it, but really, all you're arguing for is an idiosyncratic definition of "speciated" that's more along the lines of "phenotypically different". We don't have one objective, universally-applicable definition of "species"; instead, what we have is a generally-accepted set of criteria that in practice do a good enough job at ensuring we're talking about the same thing when we say "species" or "speciation."Also many clearly speciated animals can breed and have viable offspring. Like dogs, coyotes, and wolves. Biologists even admit that different hominid species could interbreed 30,000 or more years ago (e.g. Denisovans, Neanderthals) but can't make the leap that races are evidence of modern speciation.
Hypothetically, let's say you convince the world to employ your definition of "species". All you'd have done is replaced what's currently called "subspecies" with "species", replaced the current "species" with "genus", and bumped every other taxonomic rank down by one. So what?