🐱 Reddit Moderator Getting a PhD in Online Moderation

CatParty
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/...-moderator-getting-a-phd-in-online-moderation

Much of the internet runs on volunteer labor performed by people who are often unnoticed, such as online community moderators. When these people are recognized, it’s usually because they’ve become a target of harassment, are involved in a flamewar, or are accused of abusing their power.

Moderators make message boards, Reddit, Facebook groups, email listservs, and many other online communities function, and yet not a whole lot of time has been spent by mainstream academics understanding good internet moderation, or the psyche of a moderator. Kat Lo, a PhD student at the University of California Irvine, is bridging that gap by researching online communities at a time when most major platforms are trying reckon with widespread harassment.


“Eight years ago I started moderating communities, especially the girlgamer subreddit,” Lo told me. “I was so interested in thinking about making policies that people can believe in and helping people enforce those policies in their own communities so it’s not a top-down decree.”

There is no unified theory of community management or moderation, but platforms are currently trying to balance keeping themselves open and as impartial as possible, while reckoning with various harassment campaigns, be they GamerGate, the alt-right, neo-Nazis, or more run-of-the-mill flamewars that have long been a part of internet culture.

What’s largely happened is that people who have traditionally been marginalized by society have been marginalized online, too.

On large online platforms, harassers “feel safe because they are safe,” Lo said. “There aren’t a lot of consequences. We talk about anonymity, but that’s a misdirection: Look at Facebook comments—there’s a lack of consequences and people aren’t buying into the norms of a community and are imposing their own thoughts on what’s possible.”

On a day-to-day basis, unpaid moderators are often those who end up having to deal with keeping toxicity out of an online community. Moderators are often tasked with deleting graphic images and videos, deflecting vitriol, enforcing rules, and ensuring their communities continue to function. Then, in the act of moderating, they’re often shamed by the community for censorship. It’s a thankless, difficult job.


“It’s a far more complex job than just banning people,” Lo said.

“A lot of moderators burn out. Well, we call it ‘burning out’—they’re fatigued, they’re demoralized, and they have an aversion to doing it,” she added. “But the things people are describing are symptoms of trauma. Moderators determine a lot of culture that happens on the internet and they do hold a lot of power, but simultaneously they hold a lot of trauma.”

Besides her research, Lo has begun doing volunteer crisis counseling for moderators, streamers, YouTubers, developers, and academics who have been harassed or have otherwise experienced online trauma.

“Almost everyone I’ve counseled has said ‘I didn’t know a person like you existed,’ or ‘I didn’t know anybody else could understand these problems,’” she said. “I am trying to empower people on an individual level and I’m hoping those people can use those skills to build their own communities. When you have these moments with people on a smaller scale, it makes doing this work feel sustainable.”

It’s not all bleak, of course. It’s important that academics are beginning to take these jobs seriously, and online platforms are beginning to hire community experts who can offer support for moderators and enact changes that can make entire platforms safer for everyone. Five years ago, it might have seemed crazy that a Reddit moderator would pursue a doctorate in, broadly speaking, Reddit moderation. Now, it seems absolutely imperative that more people do the same.
 
A good staffmember should act more like a DM than a cop, and this goes double for less content moderated mediums. Whether it's a forum, a board, or a game server, you find that the most harmonious and well-functioning outlets are the ones where the mods actually contribute something positive rather than exclusively acting as arbiters of 'law'- even punishments should have an innate humor to them, as you're a digital whipmaster cracking on the back of a digital criminal who committed imaginary offenses and is liable to come back from the trivial sentence either instantly due to proxy-hopping or in an hour/day's time. The absurdity of that whole system should shock anyone silly, but exceptional individuals take up the duty of moderating with the solemnity of an 18th-century executioner.
Also, it's OK to be a Furry.

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
A common problem with many communities is the mods wind up acting like the site exists for them, rather than the other war around. What you get then is basically a hyper autistic mean girls clique but composed of the people who were probably theater geeks.

>inb4 some fag mod bans me again
 
Pretty crafty. She found a major where the coursework is bound to be nothing but dicking around online, and for only tens of thousands times the cost of doing it by yourself. And that's to say nothing of the potential return on that investment, which is somewhere around like...I dunno, nothing.

I guess that's why she'll get to be a doctor.
 
If the Reddit servers are in one centralized location, I think some angry Muslim driving a Truck of Peace® should make a good run at destroying the whole building.

They’d ruin Hannukah and Christmas, which pleases Allah.


Do it, MujaDiucheafir III. 72 virgins in it for you.
 
Watch this go into some kind of internet law where they make it to where moderators must be paid or some shit.

It's like either, you're a mod on an Internet forum and you aren't paid and it's because you're a pathetic NEET in a basement full of piss bottles and you do it for free.

Or you're actually paid to do it and in that point you're being paid by the fucking Nazi/SJW/faggot/fuck/cock/cunt/REEEEEEEE monsters and you're the enemy.

And you know, if paid mods became a thing, people would hate them even more than the 4free cucks.
 
Lol why do you need a PhD? You learn this shit easily.

Like, OMG, this attitude is just GROSS. You totes need a PhD to pick up all the subtleties and nuances of proper moderation. For instance, you NEED to learn about intersectionality and queer theory in order to properly deal with complicated issues and the moral quagmires related to the plight of minority people and people of all sexual orientations that aren't white and straight. As a moderator, you are the Gatekeeper of Morality and must battle daily the evils of minority marginalization and microaggressions. The field of Forum Moderation Studies is hella complicated and I'm sorry if your bigotted dudebro ass thinks you can just moderate a forum without a healthy dose of deconstructing what it means to be a moderator and the privilege naturally afforded to white, straight male posters versus trangendered handicapped midgets of color. Otherwise you're just reinforcing patriarchy, cissexism, and all the other sorts of nasty, devious evils you learn within the hallowed halls of your Forum Moderation Studies Department.
 
Lol why do you need a PhD? You learn this shit easily.
The purpose of a PhD isn't to educate the person receiving it. PhDs are meant to advance human knowledge. The person receiving the PhD is providing the education, not vice versa.

So basically this person claims to be providing newfound knowledge that humanity has not covered yet, and thus their brilliance should be recognized with a doctorate.
 
"harassment campaigns, be they GamerGate, the alt-right, neo-Nazis"
Truly, the wisdom of a phd. Who will ever be able to argue against it? She is an academic, in internet moderation, surely she will know the ins and out of these harassment campaigns better than any plebians.

Also, rate me :late:, but I just realized I could drag my own icon into the text box to add my icon to the post.
17198.jpg
 
The purpose of a PhD isn't to educate the person receiving it. PhDs are meant to advance human knowledge. The person receiving the PhD is providing the education, not vice versa.

So basically this person claims to be providing newfound knowledge that humanity has not covered yet, and thus their brilliance should be recognized with a doctorate.

Actually the purpose of a Ph.D. is to serve as a fartsniffer for your advising professor, be his little hunchback research Igor and to agree with his pet theories until you "advance human knowledge" with a doctoral thesis that reinforces the pet theories of whomever is reviewing/judging it.
 
Back