🐱 Reddit Moderator Getting a PhD in Online Moderation

CatParty
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/...-moderator-getting-a-phd-in-online-moderation

Much of the internet runs on volunteer labor performed by people who are often unnoticed, such as online community moderators. When these people are recognized, it’s usually because they’ve become a target of harassment, are involved in a flamewar, or are accused of abusing their power.

Moderators make message boards, Reddit, Facebook groups, email listservs, and many other online communities function, and yet not a whole lot of time has been spent by mainstream academics understanding good internet moderation, or the psyche of a moderator. Kat Lo, a PhD student at the University of California Irvine, is bridging that gap by researching online communities at a time when most major platforms are trying reckon with widespread harassment.


“Eight years ago I started moderating communities, especially the girlgamer subreddit,” Lo told me. “I was so interested in thinking about making policies that people can believe in and helping people enforce those policies in their own communities so it’s not a top-down decree.”

There is no unified theory of community management or moderation, but platforms are currently trying to balance keeping themselves open and as impartial as possible, while reckoning with various harassment campaigns, be they GamerGate, the alt-right, neo-Nazis, or more run-of-the-mill flamewars that have long been a part of internet culture.

What’s largely happened is that people who have traditionally been marginalized by society have been marginalized online, too.

On large online platforms, harassers “feel safe because they are safe,” Lo said. “There aren’t a lot of consequences. We talk about anonymity, but that’s a misdirection: Look at Facebook comments—there’s a lack of consequences and people aren’t buying into the norms of a community and are imposing their own thoughts on what’s possible.”

On a day-to-day basis, unpaid moderators are often those who end up having to deal with keeping toxicity out of an online community. Moderators are often tasked with deleting graphic images and videos, deflecting vitriol, enforcing rules, and ensuring their communities continue to function. Then, in the act of moderating, they’re often shamed by the community for censorship. It’s a thankless, difficult job.


“It’s a far more complex job than just banning people,” Lo said.

“A lot of moderators burn out. Well, we call it ‘burning out’—they’re fatigued, they’re demoralized, and they have an aversion to doing it,” she added. “But the things people are describing are symptoms of trauma. Moderators determine a lot of culture that happens on the internet and they do hold a lot of power, but simultaneously they hold a lot of trauma.”

Besides her research, Lo has begun doing volunteer crisis counseling for moderators, streamers, YouTubers, developers, and academics who have been harassed or have otherwise experienced online trauma.

“Almost everyone I’ve counseled has said ‘I didn’t know a person like you existed,’ or ‘I didn’t know anybody else could understand these problems,’” she said. “I am trying to empower people on an individual level and I’m hoping those people can use those skills to build their own communities. When you have these moments with people on a smaller scale, it makes doing this work feel sustainable.”

It’s not all bleak, of course. It’s important that academics are beginning to take these jobs seriously, and online platforms are beginning to hire community experts who can offer support for moderators and enact changes that can make entire platforms safer for everyone. Five years ago, it might have seemed crazy that a Reddit moderator would pursue a doctorate in, broadly speaking, Reddit moderation. Now, it seems absolutely imperative that more people do the same.
 
I'd feel a lot more comfortable here if the moderator button on their profiles were renamed "hotPhockeD" tbqh
 
I wonder if the Universal Theory of Internet Moderation™ covered getting doxed by sperglords on other forums?

I guarantee anyone who spends 5 minutes poking through those user histories will find her pretty fast, because I bet she doesn't shut the fuck up about her college and/or degree.

Much like most non-STEM grad students tbh.

Edit: This isn't really fair, I should have said much like most grad students in general. STEM grad students aren't really any better.
 
It's not really a fun or particularly active job, you won't want it unless you're absolutely autistic and obsessive over seeing the cows you like get made fun of effectively. Our mods are just that autistic.

Tbh we haven't had any good mods since Sam Smith had Vitriol killed.
 
Actually, it took about 90 seconds:

upload_2017-12-13_14-14-7.png
 
lol this chick is going to UCI, too.

For those of you who don't live in California, there's the big-name UC schools (Cal, UCLA), and then there's all the rest. The big-name schools are fantastic. The rest range between mediocre and fucking awful. If you ever hear someone bragging about going to a UC (but not specifically naming UCLA or Cal), ask them which one, I guarantee it's something absolutely mediocre like UC Merced or UC Riverside.

UCI, for the record, is a weird mix, their STEM classes are typically pretty good, almost on par with UCLA. However, their non-STEM classes are pretty much exactly what you'd think of when you'd think of California.

Cal is for people who couldn't get into UCLA. UC Davis is for people who couldn't get into Cal.

Everywhere else is just a dumping ground for losers who insist they didn't wanna be an Aggie anyways.
 
Cal is for people who couldn't get into UCLA. UC Davis is for people who couldn't get into Cal.

Hey, I went to UCLA so I like this characterization, but to be honest, I actually went to UCLA because I couldn't get into Cal. Berkeley is a good school despite their deserved reputation for being raging liberals.

(you're 100% correct about Davis though, I think it's also the official UC for beastiality)
 
Congrats, you just blew your college education on telling people what they can and cannot say in your pathetic corner of the internet. GG

The Proper Mod serves one purpose: clean up blatant shitposting and bait threads which clutter up the board/site, and ban anyone posting illegal content. They're not conflict managers. They aren't enforcement officers. They're not social scientists, community managers, or "policymakers". Anyone who wants to be a mod on any site and thinks it involves doing anything but sweeping out the trash is a power hungry faggot and should not only not be a mod but should also be banned from the site entirely.


(USER HAS BEEN BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Exactly, exactly this. A good mod is going to do very little other than get rid of shit that no one wants to see. Too many places are polluted with mods that will ban you because you don't fit their idea of what someone in their "Community" should look like.
 
Exactly, exactly this. A good mod is going to do very little other than get rid of shit that no one wants to see. Too many places are polluted with mods that will ban you because you don't fit their idea of what someone in their "Community" should look like.

I wish I could "agree" this multiple times. The Tao art of letting things be and acting as a janitor and not a nanny is a lost one these days.
 
I'd pay money when this bitch has to defend her dissertation and flips her shit she can't ban the panel not understanding it's their job to try to trip you up and find flaws.

It's the fucking humanities , they (excepting philosophy and economics) play the game of you scratch my back, I scratch yours. You ever wonder why Real Peer Review never runs out of shit? Because the scam is they publish and cite each other so they can pad their CVs and get tenured and shit. That's why it's always ridiculous, low effort bullshit, they don't want to or need to put any work in. They're all in a circle giving each other handjobs. She'll have the right buzz words and agenda and they'll give her a high five and expect her to pay it back some day.

You ever read Anita Sarkeesian's master's thesis? Fucking wretched. Her "methodology" wouldn't pass in any rigorous psychology department, and hell, probably not even in most sociology departments. I think I remember even catching a few grammatical mistakes.
 
The article said she moderated /r/girlgamers, so she's in this list:

MODERATORS
it's Lingrush
http://www.klols.com/
https://twitter.com/lawlkat
https://www.instagram.com/lingrush/

daughter of a billionaire tycoon
https://www.forbes.com/sites/hengsh...illionaires-langham-hotel-chain/#75081d8f4834
 
It's the fucking humanities , they (excepting philosophy and economics) play the game of you scratch my back, I scratch yours. You ever wonder why Real Peer Review never runs out of shit? Because the scam is they publish and cite each other so they can pad their CVs and get tenured and shit. That's why it's always ridiculous, low effort bullshit, they don't want to or need to put any work in. They're all in a circle giving each other handjobs. She'll have the right buzz words and agenda and they'll give her a high five and expect her to pay it back some day.

You ever read Anita Sarkeesian's master's thesis? Fucking wretched. Her "methodology" wouldn't pass in any rigorous psychology department, and hell, probably not even in most sociology departments. I think I remember even catching a few grammatical mistakes.
Sadly you are right, but I can only dream.

Now let me be dead honest and play devils advocate, aside nepotism there's a lot of pressure on the schools I feel. My class was very small, we had literally one girl. Now she's a dear friend and good person who worked hard.. I read her paper it sucked. How do you think the school feels and looks when you fail the only girl who applied ? It's not right but it's real and she worked her butt off for sub par work. I don't mean she's not good at what she does, but she doesn't work in the field. I'm not justifying the pressure externally and internally but it's there.

There used to be a term called EBD, and they were pretty common from what I was told, where you did everything you needed to earn a PhD but just couldn't make it past a defense. Now, I can't say I've met one, it's like if you apply and don't drop it's a give me. It shouldn't be that way, in any field.
 
Back