Good riddance, no more neo-nazi scum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
shut the fuck up cringelord.Its hard to find holocaust jokes online because the damn kikes are always fucking sueing people for holocaust insensitivity. They can afford.
Niggers usually cannot sue people online. They don't have money for that shit.
Well if 203 is repealed then niggers get to have their day. They will have their cake and eat it too. Back to knocking people out on the street for saying nigger in front a nigger. I guess that shit just won't happen online. Cops may look the other way if a nigger knocks someone out in front of them for saying nigger in front of them. But a cop cant look the other way online. When you are online nothing happens.
So with 203 repealed cops are just helping the black race take a little more pride and dignity. Its your risk to say nigger on the street. Or in jail. Or in front of a cop. But no longer online.
Its not PC to not be a fucking cop on the internet anymore. Drive like your kids live here. Or we call the cops. Well you cannot drive a car online.
So talking about running people over online will now be banned. It won't be pc.
Unless 203 isn't repealed. Then we can all continue saying whatever the fuck we want like the responsible adults we are. Real talk
All good things, in this case autistic things, must come to an end.So I know that section 230 is unlikely to be repealed right now, but that doesn't mean it won't in the future, or null won't get (more) sick of the site.
I'll be pretty upset if the site disappears. I was fine with it the first time, but that was years ago. I've been on this site for six years now. It's the only outlet I have for a lot of the craziness I see. This year just sucks.
Democrats have been REEEing about 230 for a while, but they want to "reform" it instead of sperging and throwing it out completely like Trump wants. Some propositions are terrible, some are alright, and some are super narrowly tailored to only apply to platforms that have millions of users. The last is probably the best case scenario since it's protect any smaller site that could just set a hard user account limit and then the big sites could fight in court to have 230 enshrined into law by SCOTUS since 230 is essentially the 1st amendment saying that private businesses can choose to or refuse to host speech freely.When Biden enters office, I think he’ll be too focused on foreign policy and “muh racism” than to care about Section 230, apparently he hasn’t mentioned it since January, so it could’ve been one of those promises he ended up forgetting about. Either way, Trump is either an absolute retard who can’t criticism, or a genius who’s using his influence to rile up grifters on social media into supporting this. Either way, the internet is fucked, the only “edgy” website I can see coming out from this is 4chan, but that’s because it’s ISPs are no longer based in the United States but rather Japan and France.
Either way, we have about a month and a half left and I think Trump is only saying this shit to remain optimistic to his supporters. Even if Biden is against section 230, most democrats are still supportive of it. So he probably won’t even try to repeal it as he wouldn’t have enough power as opposed to most republicans siding with Trump on that issue.
To all of the people who unironically “memed” Trump, congraulations we didn’t get the badass leader who was going to build the wall, but rather an emotionally stunted manchild.
The problem with never moderating anything is that you're legally required to moderate CP and Copyright infringement. Yes the law considers those mostly interchangeable and yes that's fucked up. Not to mention you can't even moderate for spam or even language filters. Remember milk being autocorrected into tard cum on here? That's moderation according to Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co. That case was so broad that had 230 not been passed, every user generated website would have been drowned in spam or run by an old media conglomerate that could afford to moderate everything.To those who think axing Section 230 will be the end of the internet, please consider Cubby vs. Compuserve. This was the case law that applied prior to Section 230, and will remain such (probably) if Section 230 is repealed.
To summarize: Cubby Inc. sued Compuserve for defamation because an unspecified user (Compuserve couldn't locate them, apparently) slandered Cubby. In the end, Compuserve was found innocent because they didn't moderate their forum in any capacity. The overall impact of the law essentially states that "if your website has jannies and tries to act like publishers, moderating content, then you are responsible for all content featured on your website. If you don't have those things and don't act like a publisher, you aren't responsible."
This is good news for you for two reasons.
- Should Section 230 be repealed, the reigning hydra of Silicone Valley will no longer have any freedom to moderate in an unbiased way (because it would, legally, behoove them to not moderate anything at all.) This is bad news for Null because he satisfies the role of 'publisher', chiefly by employing jannies and otherwise editorializing what's posted on Kiwifarms. The site will probably die.
- You won't need Kiwifarms. The moment Twitter (or whoever) ignores the letter of the law, tries to moderate, is found to be a publisher and takes a blow to the kidneys over the decision, all of these other censorship-prone platforms will throw up their hands and stop moderating anything. All the content this community compiles regarding their preferred lolcows may be freely hosted across numerous different websites. If the law can't find the original poster, there won't be any real way to take that content down.
Theoretically, Null can repurpose Kiwifarms into a sort of 'scrolling' website, not unlike a yotsuba imageboard. Conceptually, popular content would stay active; dead or floundering content would sink down the tubes and will delete itself automatically. This system would be automatic and thus not qualify as editorializing, nor would it require jannies (nor anyone besides Null, behind the scenes.) That's up to him however.
The point I'm making is this sensationalism over Section 230 is yet another redux of what we were fretting over in 2014. It will have a tangible effect, but your internet isn't going to die.
The kiss of death...peterbaloonsI just came here
bruh
Vordy.You might be right, Joe Biden has to deal with fixing racism and the whole Pandemic thing so this could be forgotten and buried.
If we do go down who wins? MAGA bros? SJWs? CWC? TJ Church?
KF2.0 should just images entirely.You need autism containment on any serious site, though. If I started up “freedom farms” tomorrow, I’d be swamped with loli and gore (cp and vore?) and that’s just the obviously bannable stuff. Null has a good thing going here and I don’t think I’d be able to strike that moderation balance easily.
Twitter got a fresh infusion from the Tumblr exodus.Twitter was in decline before POTUS started using it, meaning it would've died without his actively pumping numbers into it with his presence. If he migrated to something else or created his own and attached it to the government, we wouldn't be having these problems.
I’d rather have unmoderated Kiwi Chan than the site disappearing all together, but I can see how others would disagree.Oh well I guess it's fine if KF can maybe still exist if it's a completely unmoderated and usable 4chan clone. At least we owned Google epic style.
lolno, it got constant resurgance because ironically a lot of older sites kept getting fucked over turning twitter/facebook into a faggot singularity.Twitter was in decline before POTUS started using it, meaning it would've died without his actively pumping numbers into it with his presence. If he migrated to something else or created his own and attached it to the government, we wouldn't be having these problems.
You are as retarded as the bloody boomers who want this. If they pass the repeal, it will do exactly the opposite of what you say cunt. AS long as it is "acceptable" and encourage by the small hats, it will not only be pushed but no one will be able to combat it in the open for fear of reprisal. It would actually also let (((big tech))) censor us harder under the guise of new liability and all your autistic shit, regardless of how milk-toast, will open you you for an ass whooping from any imbecile who decides you committed some sort of thought crime. Anonymity and boards like this, have allowed for people to voice opinions, valid or otherwise, that would cause you real loses in life. With it gone, so is to you ability to larp or attempt any change on anything you find relevant. Trump was a major cancer, and so is Biden, but of all the stupid shit he has ever "envisioned" this is by far the worst. I rather give basketball "Americans" 500 billion in reparations than push this fucking bill one millimeter forwards. I end up my post with this, and hopefully it gets it through some people's head, Trump is doing this in a feeble attempt at causing damage to big tech, but in reality all he has done is play right into their hand.Boohoo, at least big tech won't be able to spread their globohomo garbage and make everything worse.
It's a tolerable sacrifice.