Coleslaw
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
Normal appropriation bills as well as those for the Department of War/Defense.This might be a stupid question, but if NDAAs only started being used in 1967, how was the military funded before then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal appropriation bills as well as those for the Department of War/Defense.This might be a stupid question, but if NDAAs only started being used in 1967, how was the military funded before then?
And i just got finished making an account and posting on there.Does this mean the OnionFarms will be less of a priority now?
One of the few times I'm happy Trump doesn't get his way.Veto-proof majorities (more than 2/3rds) of both the House and Senate have passed the NDAA. If Trump chooses to veto anyways and is rebuked by these same numbers, it will be the first veto override of his presidency. Getting overriden by congress during the lame duck would be perhaps the most humiliating way possible to end his presidency.
There's a lot of "ifs".
He could try to introduce new legislation and have it forced through before the 20th, but that'd be unlikely.
He could also veto and then congressmen who voted to pass the bill could decide not to override. This would restart negotiations on defense spending.
i.e. not over yet, but if I gave this a 70% chance of working when I wrote OP, I'd give it a 30% chance now. The GOP is peeling away from him more strongly than I expected.
Erm... ixnay on the esslay osynay overnmentgayThe USA hosts most of the places I like. Probably because it traditionally has a less nosy government, although that seems to be changing.
It's funny though.Fact: slandering people nonstop gets you nowhere.
Who dis? I’m out of the loop here.
No. Except maybe direct military aid. A bunch of other committees are responsible for foreign aid which mostly goes through the State Department, not the military.I may be a retard but doesn't this include the annual 40 billion we give to Israel?
This is (highly suspected to be) Onision’s sock account DMing one of the KF users he hates the most, a Canadian moose bitch by the name of @heatboss , soon after Null announced the possibility of Section 230 being repealed. He has a thread in the beauty parlor, you should check it out if you want to burn your eyes out of your skull.Who dis? I’m out of the loop here.
HAHAHAHA I was skimming over that, then saw the end with heatboss and knew exactly what it was. Stay mad Onision.
Gay shit. The warmongers are protecting their media whores.
Revoke 230 now.