Lovequest Relationship is now "It's complicated" - But Jessica's status says single

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hate using strong language and obscenity in my comments, but this "relationship" humbug is wearing on me. It is a load of horse feathers! They have never met. They probably will never meet. It is 99% not funny. Worse, the stuff that "Jessica" is mad at Chris for doing is the stuff that s/he was defending last week. Chris was not stalking or harassing Doopie. Chris was not looking to suck Doopie's peepee. Chris was not flirting by constantly tweeting to the ladies who voice the horses. "Jessica" wrote that. "Jessica" defended it all.

Now it is all wrong? Knock off the blarney, sweet cheeks. You have had your ten minutes of attention for making a mentally differently advantaged tranny with the intellectual ability of a 5 year old* the subject of fun.

*Is there any other kind of tranny?
 
If Jessica is a white knight trying to change Chris's online behavior, then it will be interesting to see her self-righteous altruism blow up in her face, cus she should know better by now.

I think she's cultivated a simmering hatred of trolls. Maybe the Doopie/VA debacle inspired her to concoct a scheme to engage the fray. She strikes me as the type who thinks she's always right. Whatever her motive is, my interest in the whole thing is to see her take a fall.
 
I think she might be a (possible troll) white knight that is trying to get him to change his behavior. Why else would she give a fuck if he follows a Youtube account?
 
And there you have it the real motivation behind this "relationship" I've seen tard wranglers call themselves a lot of things but never a girlfriend. Either way it's all about keeping Chris on a tight leash by holding the threat of a break up over his head. To bad she'll fail like every other white knight who's tired to fix him.
 

TONIGHT IS JESSICA A TROLL? WILL NULL FINALLY LOSE HIS MIND? IS THE STIG REALLY CLYDE CASH AND WILL JAMES MAY SHOVE HAMMOND UP HIS ASS?
 
Last edited:
I don't care what anyone says, I'm content with this. Must be the bad day for me, that and @Null making some wall of texts calling everyone a jealous, bitch ass nigga.
 
I hate using strong language and obscenity in my comments, but this "relationship" humbug is wearing on me. It is a load of horse feathers! They have never met. They probably will never meet. It is 99% not funny. Worse, the stuff that "Jessica" is mad at Chris for doing is the stuff that s/he was defending last week. Chris was not stalking or harassing Doopie. Chris was not looking to suck Doopie's peepee. Chris was not flirting by constantly tweeting to the ladies who voice the horses. "Jessica" wrote that. "Jessica" defended it all.

People in contact with Chris have no obligation to do things for our entertainment. They interact with him for their own reasons and it's pretty exceptional to demand that their interactions should be "funny".
 
Well if they are back together again it's going to be interesting finding out what happens on Monday. Will the date occur as planned or will it be called on account of the drama that happened today? Will Jessica, troll or not, brave a darkened movie theater with Chris?
:popcorn:
 
Literally nothing about my interactions with this person have indicated they are anything other than who they are.
That's good to hear, especially the part about how they tried to help him get to the ER. But I still have doubts about Jessica Quinn. She knew him for two years, living within an hour of him and they never met IRL. And then she decides now she's going to sweetheart Chris knowing how seriously he'd take that. I just don't think any woman - even any same-level autistic woman - would ever seriously be interested in Chris on a romantic level. So because of that I'm going to remain doubtful, but thanks for the backstory which shows another side.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom