[Resolved] Domain Registrar & Epik's Seizure

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Should we sue Epik LLC?

  • Yes, I'll chip in.

    Votes: 1,709 55.2%
  • Yes, but I'm broke.

    Votes: 1,220 39.4%
  • No.

    Votes: 79 2.6%
  • No, but I'll chip in regardless.

    Votes: 86 2.8%

  • Total voters
    3,094
the seething has already started on twitter. https://nitter.net/search?q=kiwifarms&src=typed_query

everyone say hi to john

IMG_2574.jpeg

Looks like they’ve got some Trump Derangement goober pulling a vordrak over the terrible news people on the internet can say things he doesn’t like.

It reflects what has been suggested about LFJ and his cronies spreading stories associating Kiwi Farms with CSAM.

Edit: that Winthrop guy is an absolute schizo.
 
Last edited:
Man the modern internet really is just gay as fuck.
"What's wrong CHUD you don't like the fact you're getting you're hateful ass pushed in yes I can't wait for the farms to go down "*screams in reddit soy and dyed hair sounds*

Okay jokes aside the modern internet is fake and gay because the powers all across the globe are seeing the dangers of a free and open internet to the rule of governments and institutions. In many ways the Internet can bring down world leaders faster than things can be deleted.
Whoever was behind this (and I'm betting it's Ethan "Consent Accident" Fong again) assumes the Farms can crack easily.
He doesn't know the Farms are a diamond, and everybody knows diamonds never crack.
The Sneed will never stop no matter how hard you try.
Maybe they're the ones bad jacketing the farms or maybe there are other factions at play. it's sad Jersh has to play a commander but he has to look out for Liz dong gone, several governments and governmental agencies, a whole heap of tards who range from stalker to enemies, and to top it off he's got the scummiest and most faggiest of journalists going after him to smear the farms and get him destroyed.
On the bright side Christmas is coming soon and at least I can enjoy the fudge.
 
the seething has already started on twitter. https://nitter.net/search?q=kiwifarms&src=typed_query

everyone say hi to john

Here is one of the bigger threads.
View attachment 5562948

Looks like they’ve got some Trump Derangement goober pulling a vordrak over the terrible news people on the internet can say things he doesn’t like.

It reflects what has been suggested about LFJ and his cronies spreading stories associating Kiwi Farms with CSAM.

Edit: that Winthrop guy is an absolute schizo.
I'm not saying touch the cow, however, if you got a Xitter account and time the viewing windows are in the replies feed. It is, honestly, a very good example of what Late stage TDS looks like, please do not touch the cow and ruin this specimen of the Internet Zoo. I am a cow activist and we must protect the stock so it may continue producing udders full of kiwis.
 
"your website violates the rules of posting rule violating content"

bro chat gpt would write better shit
Considering most TOS now has weasel words that say the companies have full discretion to determine what if anything is a violating, we probably did break their TOS. The part of the TOS that says "Fuck you, that's why".

Youtube, Twitter and Facebook got away with thrse shit for years. What's alarming is the bullshit rules used to silo Social Media are now being applied to critical internet architecture. There really is no easy fix for this, especially since Oabama decided to hand ICANN over to the UN, that fucker. At least before that the beating heart of the Internet was answerable to the US constitution since it was a quasi government entity.
 
We need a double printed "Its So Over//We're So Back." shirt that you flip inside out to change the message.
Ying/Yang symbol with "So erverr" and " So bACK" in the eye of each?

Edit: Perhaps a talented artist could make the "tadpoles" of the Ying-Yang be little Kiwi birds, or at least the head & beak of one.
 
Last edited:
Here's hoping that it works out.

Namesilo has been pretty solid for me for domains and has a reputation for upholding free speech and hosting blackhat sites, so if they end up folding, I would look to a Chinese registrar that are much less likely to cave to mob pressure.

Eranet/Nicenic have been good as well for us. Nicenic and Eranet being in Hong Kong makes it a decent choice.

It's a shame that there's not many registrars with a backbone anymore.
 
Did not know that gandi were such faggots, I use a fake name with them and used to pay with crypto but I guess the farms are a bit more high profile then I am.
 
I feel like if I hadn't written the SS thread, you wouldn't have been able to find NameSilo. :) Nice job @afounder
Troons: "Excuse me NameSilo, don't you know you're hosting a forum responsible for 3 suicides!!??"

SanctionedSuicide : "seems low"
I think troons don't go after SS despite them being "responsible" for over 50 deaths because they're pro-tranny. The owner right now is even a tranny too.
 
Here's hoping that it works out.

Namesilo has been pretty solid for me for domains and has a reputation for upholding free speech and hosting blackhat sites, so if they end up folding, I would look to a Chinese registrar that are much less likely to cave to mob pressure.

Eranet/Nicenic have been good as well for us. Nicenic and Eranet being in Hong Kong makes it a decent choice.

It's a shame that there's not many registrars with a backbone anymore.
I decided to check Namesilo's Terms and found this:
Namesilo said:
We may reject your domain name registration application or elect to discontinue providing Services to you for any reason within 30 days of a Service initiation or a Service renewal. Outside of this period, we may terminate or suspend the Services at any time for cause, which, without limitation, includes (i) registration of prohibited domain name(s)
[...]
Prohibited domain names and illegal activities which may be subject to these provisions include, but are not limited to:
[...]
Domains and web sites that are tortious or invasive of the privacy of a third party
 
Back