[Resolved] Domain Registrar & Epik's Seizure

Should we sue Epik LLC?

  • Yes, I'll chip in.

    Votes: 1,709 55.2%

  • Yes, but I'm broke.

    Votes: 1,220 39.4%

  • No.

    Votes: 79 2.6%

  • No, but I'll chip in regardless.

    Votes: 86 2.8%
  • Total voters
    3,094
It's crazy to me still how the bigger websites get away with hate campaigns, revenge porn and 11 year olds posting dancing videos. Reddit hosted jailbait, pornhub refuses to take down revenge porn and tiktok is built for pedophiles.

Don't even get me started on discord and roblox.

Why is all of this okay? Getting banned off the clearweb for pointing out that the mentally ill are mentally ill. That seems not in proportion.

Why do they care so much about this?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Pimozide, I'm Really Feeling It and 14 others
George Lucas said:
Well, Epik removed the original X posts and recognizes the error they made. It also looks like people covering the story no longer lend any credence to Epik's original claims. I think this is over.
Click to expand...
They didn't remove them. And even if they did it wouldn't be enough since the lie that they were forced to drop KF because of CP is now out there and people can and will use it against the site
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, derpherp2, Coal Burner Account and 4 others
unexpected onions said:
They didn't remove them. And even if they did it wouldn't be enough since the lie that they were forced to drop KF because of CP is now out there and people can and will use it against the site
Click to expand...
They deleted all the posts and put out their poll about no hate. It isn't working for them.

Someone tagged a competitor and that's the top response as of 6:35 EST.
 
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: Piggle Rick and Ebonic Tutor
The Connected Nose said:
As has been said many, many times on here (by myself and others), and referencing the Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, in an action of libel per se, malice is presumed, and damages may be recovered without the plaintiff having to plead or prove special damages. An example of libel per se would include stating a site hosts CSAM, as that falls under falsely claiming a person committed "a crime of moral turpitude."

TL;DR - The false statement is so heinous that it is the damage in and of itself.
Click to expand...
As is the case with this Xitter account, he wasn't even being subtle or professional about it which is the most shocking thing. The xeets indicate this is straight up a culture war fight and Epik believes they are on the side of the "good." It's baffling. Insane, to be frank.

1706188671648.png

What @Tasty Tatty says here is on point. These people think they're righteous superheroes waging war against villainous neo-Nazis. It's color-coded into their speech on Reddit and other websites. They don't live in the real world and their government has only aided in substantiating that fantasy. This Epik faggot is either trying to martyr himself for his social activism or he truly believes the establishment overlords will bail him out for bravely standing up to those evil free speech absolutists on the KiwiFarms.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Pimozide, Coal Burner Account and 10 others
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Piggle Rick, murph and 4 others
VitaminDsupplements said:
It's crazy to me still how the bigger websites get away with hate campaigns, revenge porn and 11 year olds posting dancing videos. Reddit hosted jailbait, pornhub refuses to take down revenge porn and tiktok is built for pedophiles.
Click to expand...
Child abuse victims don't have an army of autistic troons fighting on their behalf like their abusers do.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Pimozide, Botchy Galoop and 12 others
unexpected onions said:
No they didn't, they only deleted the one with the pictures. Others are still up, like this one for example
Click to expand...
And I bet the only reason they did that is because they realized it's probably not a good look to post what they think is child porn publicly.

That or Twitter Jannied their post, which is more likely.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Pimozide, Iwasamwillbe and 8 others
mindlessobserver said:
because they realized it's probably not a good look to post what they think is child porn publicly.
Click to expand...
If they believed that, it wouldn't have happened in the first place. All of this is egregious af. We should not, even for a moment, want to give these fuckers the benefit of the doubt on anything they're doing. I wholly and sincerely believe they simply do not care and moreover they believe they are obligated to do what they are doing out of sheer spite and will to power.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Iwasamwillbe, Coal Burner Account and 7 others
Cheeseknife said:
If they believed that, it wouldn't have happened in the first place. All of this is egregious af. We should not, even for a moment, want to give these fuckers the benefit of the doubt on anything they're doing. I wholly and sincerely believe they simply do not care and moreover they believe they are obligated to do what they are doing out of sheer spite and will to power.
Click to expand...
Yep, and I that is why I think Xitter deleted that post and not Epik. They've also gone strangely silent, so it's possible their account was put into the "Time Out" corner for a few days.

Will make an interesting discovery question at least. Maybe Nulls lawyer could just straight up ask Xitter if that is what happened. In which case the Complaint can say something along the lines of "and the defamation was continuing right up until X suspended Erik's account for rules violations".
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Pimozide, Iwasamwillbe and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back