Musashi's Son
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2023
The supposed PI doesn't seem to address all of the screenshots in the pedophilia section of the original doc. He/She addresses only these 2:
Screenshots that aren't addressed:
Sections of the documents which aren't addressed:
Even in the summary the above screenshots and sections of the original doc aren't addressed:
One of the mods of Taiga made their own google doc:
Let's see how they respond it to the commissions of shota art by Taiga:
According to one mod of Taiga's. Taiga likes to share the degenerate art he commissions in DMs or on private channels.
Rev never once brings up the original document with the accusations and uses the deflection of "they were just disgruntled ex members of Taiga's community". He says the screenshots are out of context, completely faked (he doesn't explain how or why they are out of context or faked) and his classic cope of "muh fictional characters" (but he never shows them weird). Also, Rev lies about Taiga being accused of grooming when he was accused of pedophilia in the original document:
(A)The supposed "private investigator" also made a twitter puff piece thread in which he/she reveals that Taiga was groomed as a way to gain sympathy and says "Taiga has been upfront and honest, even about the more uncomfortable things and mistakes he has made and grown from, this is something I have never witnessed a pedophile do, and do not believe he is one, or any threat to minors or anyone else":
(https://archive.fo/3pdui)
(A)This burnbern8 person is also associated with Frederik Brennan (Hotwheels, Former Owner of 8chan) and was in a group chat with Keffals. Another post on the Mr Cynical thread where this guy made a twitter thread to defend Keffals.
TLDR: Rev Says Desu used a document made by one "private investigator" ,who associated with Keffals and Frederik Brennan, which doesn't address sections and/or screenshots from the pedophilia part of the original google document which was by Taiga's ex mods. He uncritically repeats the "private investigator's" document without presenting evidence from the original document or says that the screenshots in it are faked or out of context without explaining why.
