- Joined
- Aug 13, 2017
With your $5000 admission you get a free copy of our booklet, " How The Ethnostate Will Make Child Porn Great Again" Tickets on sale now at your local vender.
(((Richard B. Spencer))) - Child Porn Supporting "Founder" of the "Alt-Right", Cucked by ANTIFA, Soyboy, ALLEGED Wife Beater
- Thread starter Feline Darkmage
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
With your $5000 admission you get a free copy of our booklet, " How The Ethnostate Will Make Child Porn Great Again" Tickets on sale now at your local vender.
- Joined
- May 26, 2016
that's karmapolitical, she was in effect a fully into it until it backfired with someone from her college doxing her and then it became I WUZ INFILITRATING BLUH BLUH to save herself.
also claims to come from an abusive home with either rape/molestation occurring; she was riding the tradwife trend for some time.
she's been banned from twitter a few times. She used to have her nudes all over her tumblr until she deleted them.
https://www.instagram.com/karmalorrey/?hl=en
https://archive.is/uugbO - voter records
She actually talked to her city council about it (5:13 onwards)
http://olympia.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=8&clip_id=1735&meta_id=142563
there used to be a lot more but DELETEEVERYTHING applies
She may try to delete everything but the internet never forgets: http://www.tumbex.com/chivuron.tumblr/photo/page/1?tag=thevirginwhore
That link has about 5 or more pages of her nude. She used to go as thevirginwhore on tumblr. I can't find it now(prob because she deleted everything) but she used to pick fights with other anti-sjw tumblr women in the past. I'm pretty sure she was larping as a nazi/trad woman at the time y'know before that became a popular thing to get noticed.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
Toward the end is where Spencer shucks and jives his way around explicitly saying "Fuck yes I'd kill them negroes!"
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
This is why my personal theory is that he's just a fucking spastic, the media saw it, and then thought giving him attention would be good to stop the alt-right.
And while it hasn't quite worked yet, it definitely worked in showing a lot of them are absolute dipshits.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
Richard Spencer is like a dog in that he just sort of does things arbitrarily without really thinking it through
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
He can't even be forthcoming about his ideology smh what a cuck
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2017
i didn't think anime nazism was a legitimate ideology people were trying to bring into the world until richard spencer appeared on TV
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
Richard Spencer is a braying jackass and the fact that the SJW's and the media think he's some big threat is laughable.
Also, water is wet and Liberace was very, very gay. More news at 11!
Also, water is wet and Liberace was very, very gay. More news at 11!
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2017
Isn't that video made by an unironic ancom? Using a sperg to insult a sperg from the other side of the spectrum, nice.
As long as you are not black, but if you are white or a little boy he'd be all over you
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
Actually, they're on the same side of the spectrum. The :autism: spectrum, that is.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
https://twitter.com/RichardBSpencer/status/989876461128617984
https://www.fundedjustice.com/Spencer-legal?ref=tw_87FGG2_ab_8PzCvXW0kAb8PzCvXW0kAb
I’m under attack. And I need your help.
Some of the biggest, baddest law firms in the country are suing me, along with other prominent figures, in civil court (Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00072-NKM). They are going after those who organized—or, in my case, attended—the Unite The Right rally on August 12 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
We shouldn’t underestimate the challenge of this lawsuit—and future ones like it. This is warfare by legal means, designed to be debilitating and consuming, regardless of the facts and regardless of the ultimate judgement.
The other side includes powerful firms like Cooley and Boies Schiller Flexner, as well as activist Roberta Kaplan and Karen Dunn; the latter was a former associate counsel to Barak Obama and was reported to be one of Hillary Clinton’s choices for general counsel. The Plaintiffs have not yet revealed the damages they are seeking, but we can only assume they will be substantial.
The good news is that the Plaintiff’s case is rather absurd and deserves to be dismissed—particularly in my case. No criminal charges against me for anything related to Charlottesville have been filed; indeed, no plausible criminal accusations have been made. The Plaintiffs’ argument is a “conspiracy theory” in the true sense of the word—that the Charlottesville rally was my secret plan to inspire violence.
The reality is that this mockery of justice is an example of “lawfare”—an attempt to use the justice system for personal destruction and political ends.
Put simply, they want to shut us down.
As Roberta Kaplan (unwisely) confessed on a Washington Post podcast, the purpose of the suit is to ensure that identitarian activists are intimidated from holding public events. How better than to take down Alt-Right’s most widely recognized activist. And we must be realistic. Lawfare like this will not stop with Charlottesville. Our adversaries don’t just want to stop large public rallies; they will likely ultimately go after any expression of White identity, or really any expression that challenges hegemonic discourse.
Knowing what the Plaintiffs are trying to accomplish, my strategy, up to this point, has been to defend myself pro se. I have invested my own time and energy, but not depleted funds.
It is now time for me to lawyer-up. And I’m asking for your help.
As has been reported, I had a terribly difficult time finding a proper representative—someone who is licensed in Virginia, adequate for the job, and willing to represent one of the most controversial men in the country (namely, me).
I have now found such a man. And I have already begun the initial engagement with my own funds. I’m raising $25,000 for him to represent me at the trial (and beyond if necessary).
A May 24 deadline approaches, when Judge Norman Moon will hear the various motions to dismiss. I want my lawyer to speak on my behalf.
Your contribution is not a donation to The National Policy Institute, or any other organization I’m involved with, nor is it a personal gift that I could use at my discretion. One hundred percent of the funds (minus the fees, of course) will be used for my legal defense. And I will document this for contributors. If the case is dismissed (which is certainly possible), the money will be saved for future legal defense on my behalf.
I will not abandon our cause. I will continue to be outspoken and bold. We have to win this right here and right now. We cannot let the precedent be set that dissidents can be financially destroyed if enough well-connected and influential lawyers and activists deem it desirable.
Throughout my career, I’ve only raised money for institutions and projects that raise consciousness and bring new ideas to the mainstream. Today, however, I’m calling on you for help. I’m being attacked by powerful people, and we must respond. Losing this case would be catastrophic—particularly when we the truth is on our side.
With gratitude,
Richard Spencer
P.S. If you would like to donate by crypto currency, my Bitcoin address is:
17weovvcSuHMBmQLdWTc5Lt3jEEDm2q44f
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
lol i hope he gets fucked
Q
QT 219
Guest
kiwifarms.net
That works in favor of probability alone.
The longer you have idiots in the spotlight, the higher the chance to record them doing the dumbest shit. It doesn't help that his ideology is completely flawed but he handles confrontation and counterpoint like a moron.
Take for instance Louis Farrakhan, who believes in the same racial divide. That dude believes in space alien negroes and that white people are all genetically engineered devils but he'd wipe the floor with Dicky Bitchtits because he knows how to properly present an argument.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
Its all cool and good to see major league law firms suing people because of thoughtcrimes regardless of whether the person is a shithead or not. I would bet dollars to donuts that Soros is putting the money behind the lawfirms to do so.
Economic warfare is what all the cool kids are doing these days.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
Oh of course it's Soros. To that motherfucker, top tier law firms cost him only peanuts.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2018
I'm writing as someone who opposes large-scale migration, considers ethnic homogeneity to be ceteris paribus preferable to ethnic heterogeneity, and is in favour of a socioeconomic programme to maximise national and local self-sufficiency and work against the globalist tenets.
Spencer is the worst sort of inflammatory reductionist. His public content consists of nothing but dog-whistles with the thinnest veneer of intellect over it. He's a superficial demagogue; instead of just getting on the soap box and rallying the troops (which, despite the wishes of a platonic autist, is probably a necessary entity in a political society), he's eager to cultivate an image of sophistication that is severely lacking and aspires to be more than a slightly eloquent thug. The impression I have from pieces like this is that while he seeks to shock and cajole rather than explain or persuade, he also wishes to be taken seriously by the very people who he seeks to repudiate.
It's a desire we all share. But I believe most mature people accept that you have to either work on doing more than vacuously provoking (either through mixing it with genuine insight or dropping the provocations altogether) or accept that said vacuous provocation isn't going to net you that respect you crave.
Compare Spencer to another popular icon who shared many of his political stances: Enoch Powell. Whether or not you agree with Powell, he was at least willing and capable of cogently expressing his ideas and doing more than merely provoking the establishment. Spencer? If he were in front of Buckley he would scarcely be able to rattle off a 'children of the sun' line before sweating for an hour and being demolished as nothing but a propagator of memes and provocation.
Spencer is the worst sort of inflammatory reductionist. His public content consists of nothing but dog-whistles with the thinnest veneer of intellect over it. He's a superficial demagogue; instead of just getting on the soap box and rallying the troops (which, despite the wishes of a platonic autist, is probably a necessary entity in a political society), he's eager to cultivate an image of sophistication that is severely lacking and aspires to be more than a slightly eloquent thug. The impression I have from pieces like this is that while he seeks to shock and cajole rather than explain or persuade, he also wishes to be taken seriously by the very people who he seeks to repudiate.
It's a desire we all share. But I believe most mature people accept that you have to either work on doing more than vacuously provoking (either through mixing it with genuine insight or dropping the provocations altogether) or accept that said vacuous provocation isn't going to net you that respect you crave.
Compare Spencer to another popular icon who shared many of his political stances: Enoch Powell. Whether or not you agree with Powell, he was at least willing and capable of cogently expressing his ideas and doing more than merely provoking the establishment. Spencer? If he were in front of Buckley he would scarcely be able to rattle off a 'children of the sun' line before sweating for an hour and being demolished as nothing but a propagator of memes and provocation.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2017
This partially describes Jim Goad, but the fundamental difference between him and Dicky Boy is that Jim radiates charm and sincerely means what he says without subscribing to some disingenuous ideological platform in spite of sharing some of their beliefs. He's intentionally funny, too.
Dicky Spencer has the charisma of an ant and is hilariously pretentious to boot.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2018
Watching Powell you can clearly tell the difference between him and (((Richard))): one is a highly accomplished and well educated person with developed aristocratic refinement of speech and the other is a whiny and overall effeminate person hoping to gild his lack of intellectual substance with a false sense of respectability. Richard clearly tries to emulate a more patrician manner of conduct but not only does it just make him look effeminate, it's also clearly forced. Say what you will of Powell, but he seems principled in his beliefs and willing to stand for them, something you can't say of most modern politicians.
I disagree with your belief in the similarity of Enoch's and Spencer's beliefs, because it's plainly obvious Powell is much more moderate and more reasonable in conveying his positions.