(((Richard B. Spencer))) - Child Porn Supporting "Founder" of the "Alt-Right", Cucked by ANTIFA, Soyboy, ALLEGED Wife Beater

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I disagree with your belief in the similarity of Enoch's and Spencer's beliefs, because it's plainly obvious Powell is much more moderate and more reasonable in conveying his positions.

I'm definitely not arguing for a 1:1 equivocation. Moreso a general similarity in that the Overton Window would now label them both as 'far right'.

I agree that Powell's motivations and rationale differ from Spencer's radically, but I also think these things are impossible to distangle from presentation. If - like Spencer - you arrive at positions either out of contempt for the other or to be a contrarian and rationalise them afterwards without any critical analysis of your fundamental principles, you will come across as a blubbering idiot. It's very evident; post-hoc rationalisations stick out like a sore thumb. No man is free of post-hoc reasoning entirely nor his biases, but men like Powell exhibit in their manners and speech the fact that they have critically assessed their foundations and Socratically analysed themselves.
 
I wish that I could be a tall, handsome white man like Richard Spencer. I'd be the Rolex-wearin', diamond-ring-wearing, Asian woman kiss stealing, SIEG HEIL, wheelin' and dealing, limosuine ridin', jet flying, son of a gun with a hard time keeping these frogs down.

Sadly, I am Black and will therefore never amount to shit in this white man's world.
 
Spencer is the worst sort of inflammatory reductionist. His public content consists of nothing but dog-whistles with the thinnest veneer of intellect over it. He's the worst sort of superficial demagogue; instead of just getting on the soap box and rallying the troops (which, despite the wishes of a platonic autist, is probably a necessary entity in a political society), he's eager to cultivate an image of sophistication that is severely lacking and aspires to be more than a slightly eloquent thug. The impression I have from pieces like this is that while he seeks to shock and cajole rather than explain or persuade, he also wishes to be taken seriously by the very people who he seeks to repudiate.

I think to call Spencer a demagogue is to give him too much credit. Spencer doesn't have the talents befitting of a demagogue, let alone the reputation; he isn't charismatic enough to manipulate significant numbers of people into supporting his cause, and he sure isn't tough or imposing enough to seriously mobilize the people who already agree with him. Coming to think of it, I don't think even the most exceptional among his political opponents really take him seriously or consider him a threat at this point, which is very telling of his effectiveness as a political figure.
 
I wish that I could be a tall, handsome white man like Richard Spencer. I'd be the Rolex-wearin', diamond-ring-wearing, Asian woman kiss stealing, SIEG HEIL, wheelin' and dealing, limosuine ridin', jet flying, son of a gun with a hard time keeping these frogs down.

Sadly, I am Black and will therefore never amount to shit in this white man's world.

At the end of the day, Richard Spencer is a whiny bitchboy who is sad because >tfw no ethnostate and that fleeting brush with prestige will leave him, ignored, irrelevant, and penniless.

You're winning by not being him.
 
I'm definitely not arguing for a 1:1 equivocation. Moreso a general similarity in that the Overton Window would now label them both as 'far right'.

I agree that Powell's motivations and rationale differ from Spencer's radically, but I also think these things are impossible to distangle from presentation. If - like Spencer - you arrive at positions either out of contempt for the other or to be a contrarian and rationalise them afterwards without any critical analysis of your fundamental principles, you will come across as a blubbering idiot. It's very evident; post-hoc rationalisations stick out like a sore thumb. No man is free of post-hoc reasoning entirely nor his biases, but men like Powell exhibit in their manners and speech the fact that they have critically assessed their foundations and Socratically analysed themselves.

Fair enough. I was always under the impression that the West has gotten progressively more left wing, so it's always shocking when someone from today is way more reactionary than someone from 50 years ago, despite both of them being far right.

To be honest, I'm not entirely unconvinced that Spencer isn't a plant by the powers that be, as unlikely a scenario as that may be. You're also failing to account for the fact that Richard Spencer is not very smart, especially when compared to Enoch Powell. A more apt comparison to Powell would probably be Jared Taylor, and I think we can both agree that both in demeanor as well as substance they are exceedingly similar.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Syaoran Li
3782.jpg
 
https://thepointmag.com/2017/politics/i-see-a-darkness

Like me, Richard had moved to New York after college. He had interned at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, and was interested in studying philosophy and opera—he particularly loved the work of Wagner.
So often the way.

He was something of a dandy, fond of ascots and all things Viennese, and he spoke with an almost British lilt to his voice.
Gay.

He referred to the MAPH soccer team as “landed gentry” and the business school’s as “new money.”
GAY!

He once approached me in the weight room at the university gym and, with a little wink, said, I just come to watch.
HOLY FUCK TURBO GAY!
 
This partially describes Jim Goad, but the fundamental difference between him and Dicky Boy is that Jim radiates charm and sincerely means what he says without subscribing to some disingenuous ideological platform in spite of sharing some of their beliefs. He's intentionally funny, too.

Dicky Spencer has the charisma of an ant and is hilariously pretentious to boot.
Not only that, no future celebrity is going to willingly associate themselves with Spencer. Patton Oswalt has been friends with Goad and the guy who did the A. Wyatt Mann comics going back to the 90s.
 
I wish that I could be a tall, handsome white man like Richard Spencer. I'd be the Rolex-wearin', diamond-ring-wearing, Asian woman kiss stealing, SIEG HEIL, wheelin' and dealing, limosuine ridin', jet flying, son of a gun with a hard time keeping these frogs down.

Sadly, I am Black and will therefore never amount to shit in this white man's world.
Is this a bit or something? Every time I see you, it's "Woe is me, I'm just a pathetic nigger ape monkey, I wish I could be a sexy alt-right macho man like (insert alt-right lolcow here)." Are you trying to get the Uncle Ruckus award for achievements in self-loathing or something?
 
This guy tries to explain Spencer's ideology.

Seems like Ricky trying to distance himself from the salt-right frankenstein he in large part created, and rather conveniently now that its starting to blow trouble his way. I always had a bit of a theory that he never really gave a fuck about any of it. That it was just elaborate political daydreaming to him. It's kind of disappointing in a weird way to me. The lack of conviction I suppose.
 
Richard Spencer: U.S. Military Should Have Enslaved Haitians After Hurricane Instead Of Providing Relief

Richard Spencer, the infamous alt-right figurehead, said on a podcast earlier this year that he believed the United States military should have enslaved Haitians after a hurricane struck the island, rather than provide humanitarian aid.

On his Altright.com podcast in February, Spencer lamented that the United States military never engages in war “for the right reasons,” which he said are when “you want to dominate someone, you want to take their territory, you want to take their women.” And if those reasons don’t suffice, Spencer said, he believes it is acceptable to go to war simply for “vainglory.”

When one of his guests began to complain that the United States Navy sent ships to provide humanitarian aid to Haitians after a hurricane devastated the country last year, Spencer had another idea for what the military should have done.

“Exactly, no. You should go enslave them. That would actually be a proper war aim,” Spencer said, before apologizing for “really going nuts” and then retracting that apology because “you need to go nuts in order to prove a point.”

Spencer said he hoped white people in America get so frustrated with the military’s humanitarian efforts that they “flip over into this domineering type, and I obviously hope that happens.”

“This is the kind of thing that’s truly traditional and historical. You display your power. Phallic symbols in the center of the capital city. That’s what it’s all fucking about,” Spencer said.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/...-after-hurricane-instead-of-providing-relief/

Prove a point about what? Not experiencing earthquakes?

Take that Haitians! That'll teach you for having earthquakes! Also lol to that last quote
 
Back