What ideas exactly? What's shunned? Video games and violence came far before video games and sexism, it was actually the libtards that pushed back against the former.
Sexism is just cisgenderedism; anti-sexism is attacking 2 gender [cis] norms.
How would you determine what ideas are shunned anyway? Twitter, where 95% of posts comes from 20%, 95% of which are lefty faggots? I'd love to see a metric. When some grifty "tradcon" cunt cries about cancel culture, I can think of a huge list of rubbish they wouldn't mind cancelling if they had the power.
To be fair, some libertarians truly believe anything goes but yes most right wingers complaining about cancel culture themselves want to cancel the other side or gatekeep.
Whatever your basis is, it's probably not real life. You're half correct on the "doesn't care", I can give less of a fuck if a couple fags want a piece of stamped paper, I just want queer shit out of the classrooms of kids (younger than 15), simple. They don't though.
This is your big mistake. Gay Marriage isn't about marriage, it's about acceptance. Homosexuality is an illness and a culture that makes heterosexual people uncomfortable and/or scared. Some homosexuals (log cabin republicans) can accept that their illness will result in a lower quality of life but the liberal homosexuals cannot, they want to be loved, accepted and their goal is to get you to accept them. Gay Marriage is just a trojan horse into brainwashing the public into thinking homosexual is normal. Once they normalize homosexuality that means you have no moral high ground to prevent homosexuals in every TV show, movie or video game, to prevent homosexuals from being your judges, teachers and politicians, nor prevent homosexual content from being taught to children or adults. Once homosexuality is normalize well you're the bigot for refusing gay sex. Your child is a homophobe for refusing to suck dick.
This is exactly what occurred last time when the Feminists won the free love war. Before free love aka casual sex, you were a degenerate, a whore for having sex before marriage and that content was stigmatized. After they won the war you become a prude and a virgin/incel for not "getting laid."
You have to control the actions of other people become those create norms which will be used to judge you and when you say, "I don't care if people do X but..." you've already lost.
That's why I ticked "no".
You don't need a "vision" to laugh at the grift right.
You sound like a teenager who hasn't outgrown his emo edgelord phase.
I just want queer shit out of the classrooms of kids (younger than 15), simple. They don't though.
I forgot to say that 1. teaching kids homosexuality and transgenderism is no different from sex ed in the classroom to make them obsessed with regular sex and 2. using kids as human shields is weak. if you cannot protect yourself, your macro culture from X (casual sex, race mixing, homosexuality, transgenderism, drug usage, w/e) then you cannot protect kids and trying to use kids as human shields is destined to fail because you raise kids into the macro culture. There is no such thing as "macro culture is horrible and degenerate but kids as young and innocent." No, if homosexuality is normalized then kids MUST be raised into a culture where having sex with the same sex is normal and refusing is homophobic hence you have no moral argument to stop teaching kids about gay sex.
