(((Richard B. Spencer))) - Child Porn Supporting "Founder" of the "Alt-Right", Cucked by ANTIFA, Soyboy, ALLEGED Wife Beater

For all of his great education (and he clearly knows a lot of information), he just talks like a garden-variety conspiracy nut to support his views.

I remembered intellectual yet stupid term, while reading this. Does describe many people in this sphere, does it not?
 
I feel like trying to create an explicit Religion might have been the wrong move. It would have been better to not call it a Religion in the first place. If you think about it Ancient Pagans didn't have a "religion". If you asked a Germanic "Pagan": "So your ethnic identity is being a Saxon, part of the Germanic people, but what is your religion?" He wouldn't have understood what you meant. His "religion" was his culture. It wouldn't have made sense for him to consider his "religion" a seperate identity. And Paganism also wasn't something dogmatic that wouild necessitate you to rebel against it. If you believed Thor creating Thunder was just a metaphor, then there was no Pagan Inquisition that burned you at the stake for it.

So it's weird that you would try to compete with the religious identity "slot" of people that is currently filled by Christianity. Why make it an issue? The Woke Religion doesn't require people to give up their religious identity slot (which also has become a second ethnic identifier at this point). And the woke Religion obviously reigns supreme. If you are woke and christian, then all of your beliefs are dictated by your wokeness and none by being Christian. Christianity is just an aesthetic at this point for them. But there is also a signficant overlap, because Liberal Humanism is just Secular Christianity.

Anyway. I like Richard Spencer, because he has good takes on a lot of stuff, but I don't think trying to go explicit with his Apollo Cult was the right move.
 
Interesting thoughts, I wonder when we got this big gap between religion and culture? Did it start with separation of the church and state or earlier?
 
Interesting thoughts, I wonder when we got this big gap between religion and culture? Did it start with separation of the church and state or earlier?
Liberalism and Secularism broadly, but there's a whole area of study that lays out arguments for how we lack the metaphysical awareness or even the language to grapple with these concepts in everyday life. In a lot of ways it is tied to the very concept of progress that Liberalism has been pushing for centuries; we are on a linear trajectory towards a superior future, everything that came before is inferior, everything we are doing right now exists because it defeated everything from the past which means it is better. This is why the concept of progress is pretty fucking stupid and everyone secretly knows it, but nobody actually has the tools or knowledge to unwork this fucked up tangle we call a society so they just hang around and hope for the best.

Thomas Carlyle had a good book about Heroism and Hero Worship, explaining that the types of heroes we have change throughout time and we can't really bring them back. It started out with Man as God, using the example of Odin (at least the story, although he could very well have been a real man who was mythologized.) Which then goes to Man who Communicates with God, as in the Abrahamic Prophets. In this epoch they completely reject the notion of man as a God himself. And then as you go forward you have Man as King, not really in contact with God but adjacent to Him, and also representing higher civilizational ideals. And there's a few more in there but then we end up at the modern era with Man as Philosopher. We get to this area because of the commonalities among all of these Heroes throughout time: they are men on a mission, not of ambition, who seek to interface directly with the unknown. Then, they seek to communicate this knowledge to the people with language. In the case of Odin, he was the one who invented runes and the actual language. And you can see the same with the prophets and everywhere else. Even Kings were men of letters, and we still read guys like Marcus Aurelius to this day.
The case is made that philosophers are the only men of letters trying to interface with the metaphysical unknown and communicate it to the people, and it is these people across time who actually change the people in society; more than soldiers, more than inventors, more than economics and merchants, etc. In fact a lot of the scientists we do know about have that element where they cross over into the realm of the philosophical and the spiritual to make it relevant to people.
The reason I am saying this is because I think it is a good way to measure the value of what is being propagated in society. You can also use this to ascertain when a religious institution has become ossified and useless. Are you actually trying to make the universe make sense and have a complicated and perhaps violent relationship with the unknown, or are you just telling people to relax and not worry about anything and never change?

I think it was Evola who said that once a civilization is in its 4th phase and starting to decline - people can easily mistake the peak of a civilization for the beginning of its downfall - values do not become destroyed, they become inverted. A good example would be freedom. You can spend months researching the historical shift in the definition of freedom going back to Pre-Christendom, but to an American living in 1850 it is inconceivable that freedom would just be synonymous with hedonism and propping up antisocial freaks. To watch child pornography drawn by Japanese people. This is why on the surface, to the average person nothing has changed. It's about freedom like it's always been, that's what America is about! But it's that the definitions and value sets have become completely inverted so now that same man from the 1850s now has to argue against freedom, which is Unamerican, which makes him less of a citizen than the illiterate Mexican who got there 5 minutes ago who has nothing but contempt for America and its history. In the name of American freedom, you must defend this man who would celebrate your annihilation, and persecute that man who can probably trace his ancestry back 5 generations.

In short I'm not sure how to undo the civilizational inversion, and I don't know how to get your average person to understand that just because something has been defeated does not mean it has been disproven.
 
I forgot to say that 1. teaching kids homosexuality and transgenderism is no different from sex ed in the classroom to make them obsessed with regular sex and 2. using kids as human shields is weak. if you cannot protect yourself, your macro culture from X (casual sex, race mixing, homosexuality, transgenderism, drug usage, w/e) then you cannot protect kids and trying to use kids as human shields is destined to fail because you raise kids into the macro culture. There is no such thing as "macro culture is horrible and degenerate but kids as young and innocent." No, if homosexuality is normalized then kids MUST be raised into a culture where having sex with the same sex is normal and refusing is homophobic hence you have no moral argument to stop teaching kids about gay sex.
Huge fax right there
 
Richard still angry about MAGAts not accepting that Trump caused the chaos on 1/6 .

also Brahmin retweeted this old thread about Kek, and its meaning as a pagan symbol. also seems to be presently losing his mind over whether Groyper is a real word or a misspelling. how he can care this much about a frog is beyond me.
bonkers.jpg

kike kek.jpg
 
Last edited:
Richard still angry about MAGAts not accepting that Trump caused the chaos on 1/6 .

also Brahmin retweeted this old thread about Kek, and its meaning as a pagan symbol. also seems to be presently losing his mind over whether Groyper is a real word or a misspelling. how he can care this much about a frog is beyond me.

"It was a tradition of mythographers to hypothesize randomly about words" what a gay and dumb thing to think and do.
 
What’s the QRD on this Apollonian shit anyway?
Brahmin (spencer's butt buddy and cow-in-training) burned bridges with all christian or christian-adjacent alt righters (keith woods, nick fuentes etc) and increasingly both of them seem to be trying to distance themselves from the AR altogether. Apollo is a greek god he wants Aryans to worship but there is no information about people ever doing so, no holy book, etc.
Why Apolloism?

Brahmin has a show about this where he goes into absurd overanalysis of films he deems to be insufficiently Aryan.

Brahmin is also the target of recent ridicule for marrying a feminist divorcee with children, which groypers think is "cringe".
 
Spencer came out in favor of reforming the Latin Mass yesterday. His argument is complete gibberish, and seems to to only be constructed in an attempt to have a fight with conservative writer Matt Walsh who had argued against what Pope Francis is doing.

It is the fifth tweet that really has me laughing.
Screen Shot 2021-07-17 at 10.38.44 AM.png

Screen Shot 2021-07-17 at 10.39.08 AM.png

Screen Shot 2021-07-17 at 10.39.25 AM.png


So when I see these “trads”—to a man: short, overweight, and unmanly
EIj-upDX0AEiV6_.jpg
C_0NxadVYAAgFQG.jpg
richard-spencer-weeping-sidebar.jpg
 
Spencer came out in favor of reforming the Latin Mass yesterday. His argument is complete gibberish, and seems to to only be constructed in an attempt to have a fight with conservative writer Matt Walsh who had argued against what Pope Francis is doing.

It is the fifth tweet that really has me laughing.
View attachment 2355194
View attachment 2355196
View attachment 2355197

So when I see these “trads”—to a man: short, overweight, and unmanly
View attachment 2355207View attachment 2355213View attachment 2355209
Why not rehash transubstantiation or the nature of Christ too why he's at it? Why is he stating this argument like it's an original thought and not something Tyndale would have thought trite?

Can't wait for his critique of Piers Plowman.
 
Last edited:
Spencer came out in favor of reforming the Latin Mass yesterday. His argument is complete gibberish, and seems to to only be constructed in an attempt to have a fight with conservative writer Matt Walsh who had argued against what Pope Francis is doing.

It is the fifth tweet that really has me laughing.
View attachment 2355194
View attachment 2355196
View attachment 2355197

So when I see these “trads”—to a man: short, overweight, and unmanly
View attachment 2355207View attachment 2355213View attachment 2355209
"What's wrong with separating the doctrine from the traditional interpretation, history, and aesthetics?"

I dunno faggot, why do you want everyone to worship Apollo instead of just telling everyone to be strong and cool? Just go be a more pretentious Jordan Peterson then you niggerbrained nerd.
 
I recently decided to check out the National Policy Institute website to see if it was online again; it was not, and has not been up this whole year. The last working archived version is from late 2020, with the latest articles being from the summer of 2020.

I also remember once stumbling on something called the Geopolitical Studies Institute (GSI), which hosted / hosts the same articles as the NPI website. It's website is still up, though there hasn't been new articles since mid-2020, and the site is somewhat unfinished. I tried googling for more information, but I wasn't able to find any on it. Was this GSI going to be a rebranding of NPI? It's very similar in style, hosting the same articles by the same writers and trying to implement a high-brow-viewpoint of white nationalism, though with Spencer's name being associated with it, that's not gonna happen. Seems to me that Richard failed at it and / or lost interest, like at everything he's done in life. What a joke.
 
Brahmin (spencer's butt buddy and cow-in-training) burned bridges with all christian or christian-adjacent alt righters (keith woods, nick fuentes etc) and increasingly both of them seem to be trying to distance themselves from the AR altogether. Apollo is a greek god he wants Aryans to worship but there is no information about people ever doing so, no holy book, etc.
Why Apolloism?

Brahmin has a show about this where he goes into absurd overanalysis of films he deems to be insufficiently Aryan.

Brahmin is also the target of recent ridicule for marrying a feminist divorcee with children, which groypers think is "cringe".
this is one of the most autistic people I've seen in any far-right space online. pretty surprised to see spencer associating with him at all
 
I recently decided to check out the National Policy Institute website to see if it was online again; it was not, and has not been up this whole year. The last working archived version is from late 2020, with the latest articles being from the summer of 2020.

I also remember once stumbling on something called the Geopolitical Studies Institute (GSI), which hosted / hosts the same articles as the NPI website. It's website is still up, though there hasn't been new articles since mid-2020, and the site is somewhat unfinished. I tried googling for more information, but I wasn't able to find any on it. Was this GSI going to be a rebranding of NPI? It's very similar in style, hosting the same articles by the same writers and trying to implement a high-brow-viewpoint of white nationalism, though with Spencer's name being associated with it, that's not gonna happen. Seems to me that Richard failed at it and / or lost interest, like at everything he's done in life. What a joke.
I find that weird as Alexander Dugin(Russians also iirc) had a strong tie to the specific term 'geopolits/geopolitical', even having it prominently in the title of his book. I know there's more to it then just that also, but it's been too long since I listened to the dude who discussed the implications of it all. Mainly, though, I would've just figured Spencer would want to distance himself as much as possible from Dugin after his divorce. Maybe this is a subtle way of someone fucking with him.
It's also pretty funny that Spencer is closely allied with a dude trying to start a pagan cult after people found out that his fiance is a satanist.
Anyway, if I was just a normal pleb citizen with an autistic interest in politics, and desire to join a political group, the last one I'd get involved with is one with such prominent occult paganism in it's branding and founding principles, considering how heavily intelligence glowy types have been involved with occult groups throughout history.
 
Last edited:
Give me a fucking break with this cancelling bullshit. Conservatards have been historically as cancel-happy as the modern lefty faggots. Video games "cause violence", "Satanic" rock bands, "Satanic" goth emo faggotry,
A month late, but hey dumbass? Look at who headed the PMRC, or held Congressional hearings on Mrotal Kombat and Night Trap.
The women who founded the PMRC are Tipper Gore, wife of Senator and later Vice President Al Gore
During the U.S. Congressional hearing on video game violence, Democratic Party Senator Herb Kohl, working with Senator Joe Lieberman,
 
I know that there are some spergs going on about how Spencer and his merry men are all Douginists, and how the kremlin is using the some of these dissidents to try fracture America. I remember seeing a guy on youtube who had several videos "exposing" this. Anyone who has listened Dougin talk for an extended periods of time would know that he is about as far-right as Sargon, and pretty much as basic bitch. Him being capable of concocting some sort of a master plan is implausible.

The more plausible theory for bad actors is that there is no financial interest for these fringe movements getting big. The divisives aren't necessarily feds, but for the sake of the grift are able to be divisive and catty enough to be left alone from deplatforming. If you can make yourself useful to the powers that be, you are generally left alone. Their purpose isn't to fracture America, but to keep America stable. I find this to be true in all fringe political movements, not just the far-right. Even if these people didn't start as grifters, the dopamine hits from financial gain molded them to be ones over time.
 


Richard Spencer exposed completely.
 
Back