(((Richard B. Spencer))) - Child Porn Supporting "Founder" of the "Alt-Right", Cucked by ANTIFA, Soyboy, ALLEGED Wife Beater

I actually agree that Spencer is toxic, in the true sense. I fully agree. Though I do like him somewhat based on his debate with Sargon and other certain moments he's had. I actually do kind of get why people bash him now.

That said I do still ultimately have to stand on the side of Spencer in this trial. It's hard to do, because it's a complicated situation given all the confusing factors at play.

But if you zoom out and just disregard the people involved and see the case in purely abstract sense, this trial is essentially "Should people who are Racist, White Nationalist, or Neo-Nazi be extended less rights by a jury than others"

They're trying to set a moral precedent. That matters even if you despise Spencer for whatever reason. You need to realize that you could be tomorrow's Spencer. That's why they do this. They want to set a precedent that if you have the wrong ideas about race, white identity, or "muh Nazis" or anything like that, that the justice system can deny you a fair trial and openly treat you with total disregard for your rights as a citizen. That's extremely dangerous and it seems very likely that this trial will successfully set that precedent.

That's why I'm not joining the point and laugh at Spencer thing. This isn't fucking about Spencer. The right wing has a real issue where it's basically terrified and ashamed of daring to defend its "extreme" side. The left doesn't shy down from defending literal pedophiles and terrorist communists. But the right wing shies away from getting dirty by having to defend "muh neonazis."

Then right wingers or conservatives tell themselves that the reason they're not defending "muh neonazi" is because said neonazi is a fed, or a bad person, or a glowie. The reality is that said conservatives and right wingers are psychologically and politically repressed by the social apparatus and moral system of the current regime.

It's a pretty big uphill battle to defend these guys. Just the cold reality of the situation. Still, we shouldn't normalize the idea that we needn't defend such people in these situations. The right wing needs to have a broader sense of moral duty to recognize that these things are not about our personal relationships and details along those lines. I fucking despise Heimbach and always have. It's absolutely not about that.

The question is this: Why would we cede even an inch of territory to the enemy, ever? Fuck the enemy. Fuck antifa. I say these men are innocent. I dont give a fuck if saying that makes me a "nazi sympathizer" or something. Maybe I myself am a White Supremacist Racist Nazi. Oh no, not that! Anything but that! Commie, child rapist, Bolshevik, pedophile, murderer... but not White Supremacist Racist Nazi!

I sometimes think you could really just do a skit about these people fighting some kind of extremely brutal, genocidal war basically all stopping fighting and then unanimously joining together to "kill a neoNazi" like Spencer. It's like a Hollywood trope kind of thing you see a lot. Pulp Fiction, even Falling Down has a similar scene. It's in thousands of films, probably. The message is basically that whenever racism or Nazis enter the film, the normal rules of morality and narrative break down completely. Suddenly the audience, the main characters, and even the villain of the film who may be a mass murdering child rapist, all somehow become unanimous moral allies and then murder or obliterate the "racist" or the "white supremacist Nazi" from the film. This is modern religious indoctrination essentially programming the population to equate "White Racism" with "Pure Evil" or "Satanic Evil" in the same way that old religions might have done. There is nothing more morally abhorrent, more untouchable, more taboo, more Evil and Demonic, than white racism. It is this long term brainwashing that has resulted in the modern world and these kinds of situations.

A lot of us have a shame-response that tells us you can't even consider defending "neo-nazis" or "white racists." You're supposed to grovel. You're supposed to feel bad. You're supposed to shamefully and submissively let the Jew destroy whatever and whichever neo-nazi she decides must be destroyed on the altar of sacrifice. Well fuck that. Fuck their shame. I don't answer to leftist moral principles. I don't subscribe to the leftist moral order. That moral order is destroying everything I love. That moral order has caused my own personal life untold misery and pain that should never have happened. These are the people fucking the world up.

So no, I don't feel any shame. You don't disproportionally and unfairly punish or assault somebody because they're racist or a skinhead. It's not complicated. It's easy to understand. Reject leftist moral shame that is used to drive you into psychological and political submission. There's no other way to win.
 
These guys are jackasses, but they're getting railroaded. Here's one of many examples from the Identity Evropa thot who gave a deposition.

Spencer: can I ask the court why Ms. Froelich isn’t available as a witness, why we’re watching a deposition?

Judge Moon: I have no idea… the court only has subpoena power within a limited jurisdiction
 
They're trying to set a moral precedent. That matters even if you despise Spencer for whatever reason. You need to realize that you could be tomorrow's Spencer. That's why they do this. They want to set a precedent that if you have the wrong ideas about race, white identity, or "muh Nazis" or anything like that, that the justice system can deny you a fair trial and openly treat you with total disregard for your rights as a citizen. That's extremely dangerous and it seems very likely that this trial will successfully set that precedent.

That's why I'm not joining the point and laugh at Spencer thing. This isn't fucking about Spencer. The right wing has a real issue where it's basically terrified and ashamed of daring to defend its "extreme" side. The left doesn't shy down from defending literal pedophiles and terrorist communists. But the right wing shies away from getting dirty by having to defend "muh neonazis."

Then right wingers or conservatives tell themselves that the reason they're not defending "muh neonazi" is because said neonazi is a fed, or a bad person, or a glowie. The reality is that said conservatives and right wingers are psychologically and politically repressed by the social apparatus and moral system of the current regime.

It's a pretty big uphill battle to defend these guys. Just the cold reality of the situation. Still, we shouldn't normalize the idea that we needn't defend such people in these situations. The right wing needs to have a broader sense of moral duty to recognize that these things are not about our personal relationships and details along those lines. I fucking despise Heimbach and always have. It's absolutely not about that.

The question is this: Why would we cede even an inch of territory to the enemy, ever? Fuck the enemy. Fuck antifa. I say these men are innocent. I dont give a fuck if saying that makes me a "nazi sympathizer" or something. Maybe I myself am a White Supremacist Racist Nazi. Oh no, not that! Anything but that! Commie, child rapist, Bolshevik, pedophile, murderer... but not White Supremacist Racist Nazi!

I sometimes think you could really just do a skit about these people fighting some kind of extremely brutal, genocidal war basically all stopping fighting and then unanimously joining together to "kill a neoNazi" like Spencer. It's like a Hollywood trope kind of thing you see a lot. Pulp Fiction, even Falling Down has a similar scene. It's in thousands of films, probably. The message is basically that whenever racism or Nazis enter the film, the normal rules of morality and narrative break down completely. Suddenly the audience, the main characters, and even the villain of the film who may be a mass murdering child rapist, all somehow become unanimous moral allies and then murder or obliterate the "racist" or the "white supremacist Nazi" from the film. This is modern religious indoctrination essentially programming the population to equate "White Racism" with "Pure Evil" or "Satanic Evil" in the same way that old religions might have done. There is nothing more morally abhorrent, more untouchable, more taboo, more Evil and Demonic, than white racism. It is this long term brainwashing that has resulted in the modern world and these kinds of situations.

A lot of us have a shame-response that tells us you can't even consider defending "neo-nazis" or "white racists." You're supposed to grovel. You're supposed to feel bad. You're supposed to shamefully and submissively let the Jew destroy whatever and whichever neo-nazi she decides must be destroyed on the altar of sacrifice. Well fuck that. Fuck their shame. I don't answer to leftist moral principles. I don't subscribe to the leftist moral order. That moral order is destroying everything I love. That moral order has caused my own personal life untold misery and pain that should never have happened. These are the people fucking the world up.

So no, I don't feel any shame. You don't disproportionally and unfairly punish or assault somebody because they're racist or a skinhead. It's not complicated. It's easy to understand. Reject leftist moral shame that is used to drive you into psychological and political submission. There's no other way to win.
Here's the problem I have with this: Spencer is not against what is happening to him. He is against it happening to him. You are correct in saying that you, I or anyone could be the next Richard Spencer. But if we were, he would not give two shits. He would throw you to wolves tomorrow after you fought for him today.

You bring up Sargon of Akkad. Should we have rallied behind Mr. "Depends on the age of the child" because he was undergoing a smear campaign? Or should we have laughed at the fact that the guy that spent months helping dox, deplatform and smear others got a taste of his own medicine?

You are right that we should be worried about what is happening and prepare for when it comes for us. But Spencer is not a person to fight for. He is a two-faced snake that doesn't stand for anything but propping up his own ego. Whether it be him, Sargon or Cantwell, I have no sympathy for con-artists who try targeting others for meaningless crimes only to find their weapon turned against them.

I can feel sympathy for Spencer if he takes this is a learning experience as to how dangerous the people he pretends to rally against actually are and apologizes for how he has acted towards others. But I know he isn't going to. He is going to go the path of Sargon and be incredibly bitter over the experience, holding a grudge against everyone else for not getting behind his dumb antics.
 
“When you win, you lose!!!”

66CC7F51-1976-4339-99A8-D03FEFFC118D.png

I don’t care - I hope they take everything from him in this trial.
 
“When you win, you lose!!!”

View attachment 2738596

I don’t care - I hope they take everything from him in this trial.
You missed the first half of this spergout where he attacked somebody more popular than he is for saying that there is still hope.
Screen Shot 2021-11-21 at 7.09.14 PM.png


Ironically enough, I remember him saying something vaguely similar earlier this year...
Screen Shot 2021-11-21 at 7.25.09 PM.png

If there is anyone still holding onto the belief that the trial is going well and Spencer isn't losing his shit over his impending ruination, there could not be any more clearer evidence to the contrary.
 
With that response it feels like he's angry because he doesn't get to speak at AmRen (or similar events) anymore, but Kevin* does.

* Kevin DeAnna uses the pen names "Gregory Hood" and "James Kirkpatrick" on dissident right publications.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2740841
Spencer completely vindicated on the Rittenhouse question.
Ice cold take.

This whole Kenosha scandal would have never happened if Rittenhouse was not white[-ish] (half white is white enough for them), period. It doesn't have much to do with ideology--we knew Rittenhouse was not a 14/88 Stormfront guy from the beginning. Spencer has basically said "fuck you" to any white man who is the victim of this kind of scandal. Spencer has forfeited whatever claim he had to being an advocate for whites, revealing what he really is: A callous, self-involved snob with a silver spoon in his mouth. Just like the elites he's supposed to not like.

Mocking Kyle Rittenhouse is probably the stupidest decision I've seen from anyone associated with the "Alt Right," and that is really saying something.
 
With that response it feels like he's angry because he doesn't get to speak at AmRen (or similar events) anymore, but Kevin* does.

* Kevin DeAnna uses the pen names "Gregory Hood" and "James Kirkpatrick" on dissident right publications.
Hood is Kirkpatrick? I quite like Hood's work. He's a sharp writer.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Windmill
Hood is Kirkpatrick? I quite like Hood's work. He's a sharp writer.
Yeah, he's a good writer, and a profilic one. He's got literally thousands of articles under different names. It wasn't initiallly known, but in early 2020 some emails were leaked where his identity was revealed. I guess he has leaned in, and he was just featured as a speaker at AmRen, though he uses the name Gregory Hood irl.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hüftpriester

Verdict is in.

$500,000 punitive on count 3, $250k + another 200k for "inciting racial intimidation." on count 4.
To be fair, the decision isn't a be all end all. If any of these guys forks over the money for competent legal defense they could potentially appeal and win. I know Spencer doesn't personally have much income (relative to these fines and the costs of raising children), but his rich family could conceivably cover the costs of lawyers to assist him, without directly giving him money to lose if the appeal fails. Inevitably the courts aren't going to be able to collect on the poorer people involved, but I highly doubt even those with wealthy families will have to pay so long as their lawyers can get them off.
 
Back