(((Richard B. Spencer))) - Child Porn Supporting "Founder" of the "Alt-Right", Cucked by ANTIFA, Soyboy, ALLEGED Wife Beater

Hence why I said identitarianism deserves its own axis at this point. While most of the world are heavily cultural and some extremely racial, the rise of identitarianism politics is fairly recent. I'm not saying identiautism never exist, it's just that the webs bring people closer and force people to be exposed to a wider variety of autism thought.

Identity politics in the western world goes as far back as the Hundred Years War. England entered that conflict with a French Royal from a cadet branch who spoke primarily Norman-French and who was backed by a primarily Norman-French speaking Aristocracy in order to challenge the edicts of the actual-French king and who's grandfather was dubbed Edward I as if Edward the Great had never ruled over England. They did this at the head of an army that spoke English who had themselves forcefully Anglicized their slice of the British Isles in the Shadow of Rome's collapse 800 years before and who had encouraged. In order to make the whole, miserable affair seem like something other than the succession crisis that it was, the English Aristocracy had to start speaking actual English and appealing to a common Ethnic Identity. And that's just one example.

Nah, that makes you delusional and stupid.
Singapore: Hair cut laws, public canings (men only), basically a Simcity for the Lee family.
Hong Kong: Whines about the chinks, "we love HK" while smashing their own MTR, infrastructure, and engaging in stupid brawls in the streets. It's like they are becoming niggers. Oh and also, commie Shenzhen and other mainland cities are untouched, fucking your own city up sure is superior.
Korea: ??? I guess they have nice food, fake silicone girls, autistic films, and can't stop the corruption?

North Korea is without a doubt superior. Sit aside chinks japs sinkies and not-chink-or-japs.

Singapore: You forgot summary execution for DUIs.
Hong Kong: I am in awe of their sophistication as a resistance movement. They protest under umbrellas because the security cameras are mounted above the crowd. They have a google map overlay that shows Yellow (Hong Kong Aligned) and Blue (Beijing/Police) aligned businesses and they fuck with the latter endlessly in 4chan fashion, by clogging up the automated reservation systems at hospitality industries such as restaurants and hotels. I'm just wondering when they go to the next logical step: Hitting Beijing in the pocketbook by saying fuck work.
Korea: The Korean medieval period ended in 1920. If you haven't seen the transformation that South Korea has undergone in the last 25 years since the death of the military dictator that ruled the country, then you have not been paying attention and you need to...

tenor.gif
 
Last edited:
Cantwell most likely got paid in sweet, delicious freedom

I mean fed in the collaborator and informer sense re: Spenny. I think he started off sincere and was brought under control through some leverage at some point after the meme war gained traction

Considering Spenny's family and connections he probably has more access to feds in one way shape or form than we think. As for him being a fully paid in agent, not sure. I'm more willing to attribute his behaviour to ego and idiocy than malicious intent or being ordered by the glow in the dark's. That said he effectively managed to stifle a potential new political movement conveniently turning it into a boogeyman for the media and the government.
 
Identity politics in the western world goes as far back as the Hundred Years War. England entered that conflict with a French Royal from a cadet branch who spoke primarily Norman-French and who was backed by a primarily Norman-French speaking Aristocracy in order to challenge the edicts of the actual-French king and who's grandfather was dubbed Edward I as if Edward the Great had never ruled over England. They did this at the head of an army that spoke English who had themselves forcefully Anglicized their slice of the British Isles in the Shadow of Rome's collapse 800 years before and who had encouraged. In order to make the whole, miserable affair seem like something other than the succession crisis that it was, the English Aristocracy had to start speaking actual English and appealing to a common Ethnic Identity. And that's just one example.
Aware of that, but even back then indentitarianism wasn't really reflected. It's just something everyone accepts. Then comes the Nazis which made nationalism somehow bad, and the idea of an identity was quickly regarded as undesirable. Either way, identity politics isn't represented anywhere on the two dimensional political axis, both the left and right consist of people who embrace it or are against is, there's literally no distinction.

Singapore: You forgot summary execution for DUIs.
Hong Kong: I am in awe of their sophistication as a resistance movement. They protest under umbrellas because the security cameras are mounted above the crowd. They have a google map overlay that shows Yellow (Hong Kong Aligned) and Blue (Beijing/Police) aligned businesses and they fuck with the latter endlessly in 4chan fashion, by clogging up the automated reservation systems at hospitality industries such as restaurants and hotels. I'm just wondering when they go to the next logical step: Hitting Beijing in the pocketbook by saying fuck work.
Korea: The Korean medieval period ended in 1920. If you haven't seen the transformation that South Korea has undergone in the last 25 years since the death of the military dictator that ruled the country, then you have not been paying attention and you need to...
There's a lot more about Sinkies that make them exceptional as a state.

HK: Apps like Waze does that already with coppers, it's very basic, it's not even original. Ideally I want to see absolute anarchy, it's fun. Point is, Beijing doesn't give a shit, so called "commie territory" such as Shenzhen is unaffected. All they've done is smash up their own city like a pack of wild niggers. I do support the umbrellas and the first couple weeks of the recent protest, beyond that, fuck it. I'll just have fun and laugh. Closed all my HK services, I'll route stuff through Taiwan or Macau for work, more expensive but whatever. This is referencing the "protesters" setting fire to numerous forwarding warehouses, which also doesn't remotely affect Beijing.

Yeah I've seen the transformation of South Korea alright...
ttt.jpg

The Kimchigook-Nip relationship is now tighter than the Chink-Nip relationship. Pretty darn funny if you ask me.
The 25-year is really just as amazing as what China has done in multiple cities and Japan's recovery after war. All eastern slants are capable in this, if that's the standard of superior (instead of normal), then there's some priority issues...

Oh right... woops...
hsr.jpg
jpn.gif
ko.jpg

576567.jpg

(All the maps of USA are projected/masturbatory, the China and Japan ones are reality, and why does China and Japan show up when I specifically search for USA? Just show 404 lol)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...high-speed-rail-plan-bullet-train/2861594002/

I mean, I guess trasngender babies, very late abortions, and eating bugs is more important.
Even eurofags have the rights to laugh for once. But we all know, feeding babies hormones is more important than fast travel which stimulates the economy.
 
I think people who accuse Spencer of being a fed don't realize the wider implications of that statement. I'm not saying that he is or isn't a Fed, but if he is a Fed that means this whole "Alt-Right" thing was a government op all along.

People now like to downplay his role in the formation of the Alt-Right, largely because they fell into it in 2015 or 2016. Spencer at least planted the seedling of the concept which acted as an meeting point for various outsider intellectual movements that were active in the earlier part of the decade. It's quite possible without Spencer pushing this meme of an "Alt-Right" the various then-factions of White Nationalist, Libertarians, Men's Rights/Issue types, and Neo-Reactionaries would just be doing their own thing largely unrelated to each other. I made a long effort post going over the origins of the Alt-Right awhile back.

Why glow-in-the-darks would try to manufacture an united right-wing front leads to more speculation that is just rooted in speculation about Spencer to begin with.

I'm going to add more speculation to the Spencer-Speculation soup. Perhaps its not the goverment he is working on behalf of, but a NGO of sorts, if you catch my drift.

Can someone explain why "Men Rights" anything continues to get lumped into "muh right wing"? I'm tying to figure out how trying to get circumcision banned (for example) is conservative, in the manner that the other groups are portrayed as conservative. Also note, right/left and progressive/conservative binaries are basically useless, because neocons and neolibs exist.

Except the IoM isn't racist. They hate literal, actual aliens and mutants with three heads, but if you're human, that's where the questions stop.

They'll even tolerate deviations in genetics that offer value to the Imperium (like ratlings and ogryns), and work around different mythos, by making sure that whether it's a sun-god, or whatever, it's still the Emperor of Mankind being deified.
 
Can someone explain why "Men Rights" anything continues to get lumped into "muh right wing"? I'm tying to figure out how trying to get circumcision banned (for example) is conservative, in the manner that the other groups are portrayed as conservative. Also note, right/left and progressive/conservative binaries are basically useless, because neocons and neolibs exist.
Sure. While logically Men's Right would be considered a moderate or even left wing movement, since Feminism and Feminist are so entrenched in left-wing establishments, and they don't like the idea of Men having their own mirror of feminism, especially one that is out of their control, they get branded as extremest and right wing. Since no one wants to question Feminist for fear of ostracisation and being branded as a MRA, they get pushed out and mocked. This leaves the MRA with only centrist or right wingers to associate with, and this relationship has been rocky to say the least.

I'm coming more and more over to the idea that "right wing" and "left wing" are in and of themselves meaningless, and only exist because there is always going to be disagreements and fracture points within a society or culture, especially if technological advancement are consonantly changing the shape of the societ in radical was. What you get is a coagulation of loosley related ideas and values,that can switch back and forth depending on who is in power and where, and seemly random chaning of winds usually brought on by technological changes.
 
Sure. While logically Men's Right would be considered a moderate or even left wing movement, since Feminism and Feminist are so entrenched in left-wing establishments, and they don't like the idea of Men having their own mirror of feminism, especially one that is out of their control, they get branded as extremest and right wing. Since no one wants to question Feminist for fear of ostracisation and being branded as a MRA, they get pushed out and mocked. This leaves the MRA with only centrist or right wingers to associate with, and this relationship has been rocky to say the least.

I'm coming more and more over to the idea that "right wing" and "left wing" are in and of themselves meaningless, and only exist because there is always going to be disagreements and fracture points within a society or culture, especially if technological advancement are consonantly changing the shape of the societ in radical was. What you get is a coagulation of loosley related ideas and values,that can switch back and forth depending on who is in power and where, and seemly random chaning of winds usually brought on by technological changes.

In exactly the same way that denouncing AntiFa's violence doesn't make me a fascist, denouncing bad feminist theory or activism, or advocating for laws to be applied equally (as the 14th Amendment requires), doesn't make me "right-wing", especially when discussing a movement that has embraced intersectionalism so aggressive that it's functionally paleoconservative, in it's demands to make heritable characteristics the primary metric of human value.

Mind you, the majority of people that I see pushing intersectionalism seems to also be socialists/DSA-exceptional at a minimum, and I consider the overwhelming majority of such people to be a net environmental negative, with their aggressive waste of oxygen.
 
(I was gonna post it here, but you beat me to it.)
LOL what a little bitch. He sounds like a 12 year old kid on COD who just had his K/D fucked up.
View attachment 996517
Syndrome, from the Incredibles, right down to the Machiavellian speech and I RULE THIS FUCKING WORLD screeching.
This is a really great summarization of the Alt-right.
Whiny manbabies that pretend to act calm, intellectual, and collected, who feel an overstated sense of entitlement simply because their ancestors held power at one point.

It shouldn't surprise anyone that Spencer says things like this. But goddamn, if it isn't funny to have it in a solid audio format for all the world to listen to.


Entitled to what your parents built? Seems legit to me honestly. I just wish white people would start living up to our ancestors instead of being whiny retarded faggots like Richard Spencer.
 
One of my friends from the Corps is entranced by this guy. I don't get it.
My younger brother inadvertently revealed why (not when discussing his support for Spencer, but for Trump):

People like Trump and Spencer make people feel like they have permission to be gigantic pieces of racist shit. They make people feel like it's okay for them not to have empathy for others, that they're not wrong to ignore the suffering that the policies they champion will cause. Of course they'll dress it up as "we don't have to apologize for being white/American" but the above is what they really mean.
 
My younger brother inadvertently revealed why (not when discussing his support for Spencer, but for Trump):

People like Trump and Spencer make people feel like they have permission to be gigantic pieces of racist shit. They make people feel like it's okay for them not to have empathy for others, that they're not wrong to ignore the suffering that the policies they champion will cause. Of course they'll dress it up as "we don't have to apologize for being white/American" but the above is what they really mean.
I support him mainly because he is shockingly much better than I expected, even with his many warts, actually sticks by what he says for the most part, has actually not thrown us into a war, managed to actually get the Koreas to haltingly talk and open negotiations with the DPRK, and well... the alternative are the assholes who want to win via internal coup and who unironically channel their ancestors' bigotry... the only difference being the target.

Literally, even if he sucked, the Dems' lunacy makes me not want to back them until they die or throw out the Strasserists in denial and illiterate 'fuck you dad' socialists from the eaves of power.
 
My younger brother inadvertently revealed why (not when discussing his support for Spencer, but for Trump):

People like Trump and Spencer make people feel like they have permission to be gigantic pieces of racist shit. They make people feel like it's okay for them not to have empathy for others, that they're not wrong to ignore the suffering that the policies they champion will cause. Of course they'll dress it up as "we don't have to apologize for being white/American" but the above is what they really mean.

Let's be frank here, freedom of political speech isn't about being rude it's about expressing your feelings and thoughts into issues and hopefully having a dialogue.

The Left has for years been calling people evil for not going along with their agenda. Hell they had to force gay marriage in America 5 years ago despite what the people voted. Then they go around and threaten to fire people who go against their agenda.

Someone like Trump or Spencer gives you plausible deniability when you accidentally express your feelings or thoughts in front of someone who may try to harm you. That's what your brother really means and maybe he feels like you're going to be someone who may harm him even if it's only socially.

The mainstream Right is getting worse but they don't have any real cultural power. If people couldn't get fired for saying "I don't like being around blacks/women/homosexuals/transsexuals/Asians/Illegals" etc or suffer any major consequence for it then you wouldn't have people like Trump or Spencer blow up into something.

It's even worse that you're allowed to say "I don't like being around Whites/men/heterosexuals/Cis-genders/rednecks/patriotards" and sometimes even get praised.
 
Let's be frank here, freedom of political speech isn't about being rude it's about expressing your feelings and thoughts into issues and hopefully having a dialogue.

The Left has for years been calling people evil for not going along with their agenda. Hell they had to force gay marriage in America 5 years ago despite what the people voted. Then they go around and threaten to fire people who go against their agenda.

Someone like Trump or Spencer gives you plausible deniability when you accidentally express your feelings or thoughts in front of someone who may try to harm you. That's what your brother really means and maybe he feels like you're going to be someone who may harm him even if it's only socially.

The mainstream Right is getting worse but they don't have any real cultural power. If people couldn't get fired for saying "I don't like being around blacks/women/homosexuals/transsexuals/Asians/Illegals" etc or suffer any major consequence for it then you wouldn't have people like Trump or Spencer blow up into something.

It's even worse that you're allowed to say "I don't like being around Whites/men/heterosexuals/Cis-genders/rednecks/patriotards" and sometimes even get praised.
Frankly, while all of this sounds fair for Trump, it really doesn't apply to Spencer. There's a qualitative difference of several orders of magnitude between Trump's behavior (which I would describe as being casually bigoted, like most older people across party lines) and Spencer's (who is literally a Neo-Nazi). I don't believe you can have a meaningful dialogue with someone who comes from the position of "blacks are subhuman, Jews should be killed, and my race should rule the world". In general, those sorts of people actively resist any attempt to reason with them. I'm not saying that all Trump supporters think like this, but cows like Spencer and Christopher Cantwell show that these people exist.
 
You can't rule the world from your basement but anyways if this is the face of white supremacy, why should I be scared? If it wasn't for social media and 24/7 news networks, no one would care about him except the SPLC and NAACP. The ruling class along time ago may have believed in these views till they realized they need cheap labor and didn't want to pay higher wages so a compromise was made to bring in the third world masses.
 
Frankly, while all of this sounds fair for Trump, it really doesn't apply to Spencer. There's a qualitative difference of several orders of magnitude between Trump's behavior (which I would describe as being casually bigoted, like most older people across party lines) and Spencer's (who is literally a Neo-Nazi). I don't believe you can have a meaningful dialogue with someone who comes from the position of "blacks are subhuman, Jews should be killed, and my race should rule the world". In general, those sorts of people actively resist any attempt to reason with them. I'm not saying that all Trump supporters think like this, but cows like Spencer and Christopher Cantwell show that these people exist.

Even Spencer has never called for the extermination of any group of people. He wants a European centred America. This is just rhetoric that’s been used to attack him. Spencer isn’t bad because he’s le evil nazi, he’s bad because he’s a narcissistic, unstable man who possibly beat his wife.
 
Back