(((Richard B. Spencer))) - Child Porn Supporting "Founder" of the "Alt-Right", Cucked by ANTIFA, Soyboy, ALLEGED Wife Beater

View attachment 2043235
"I've had some good burgers in my time."
-
Richard B. Spencer
Burgers are one of the best foods, if you disagree, you're just wrong.

And who won in wignats vs. amnats? As far as I can tell amnats are doing better, and he absolutely hates them. In fact he hates wignats as well.
We won.

Anyway, smugness aside. I agree with the common ground found in all this autism. Spencer is just some rich White kid, above average looks, with a degree and he's well spoken. He's assmad at Fuentes probably because he is no longer that relevant. Isn't Spencer also an atheist? Or at least, he's one of these cringe spiritual pagan larpers (correct me if I'm wrong).

a 99.8% survival rate
Yes, 99.8% (which is wrong, more like 98%, whatever).
0.2% is 665,055 dead. The size of small countries. (575,829 as of now, just shows how wrong this retarded number is, oh and not everything is linear, maybe people should listen in their high school mathematics classes)

Among the 331,862,563 alive, 95% has permanent damage to organs. So only shy of 17 million are fully healthy.
A good half of the 95% will suffer heart and brain problems, severe enough to lower their life expectancy.
A good 75% now have liver, lung, and kidney issues, potentially left infertile.

Yeah, 99.8% will live, 95% of which will be miserable. This is assuming there's enough fucking hospitals for an entire nation, which there isn't, so a nation-wide infection will probably decrease that 99.8% of yours (again, wrong) to 96%. Oh, what about remote locations without adequate hospitals, they rely on farming... which provides us with you guessed it, fucking food. What about a rona infection there?

Keep telling us how it's not worth fucking up the economy that will be fucked anyway and how covid-19 is just some nothingburger chinkflu commievirus. The second worst and only choice beside a national infection leaving 95% miserable is nuking the economy while a shitty, unsafe, but very high chance of working jab is rushed out. It'll leave 0.1% with blood issues and maybe 0.2% in total will suffer major illnesses, but compared to over 50 holocaust units of miserable shits?

I thought conservatives were meant to conserve, what's left to conserve if over 300,000,000 now have fucked organs? This isn't doomer talk, this is very simple division a primary school child can do.
 
Burgers are one of the best foods, if you disagree, you're just wrong.


We won.

Anyway, smugness aside. I agree with the common ground found in all this autism. Spencer is just some rich White kid, above average looks, with a degree and he's well spoken. He's assmad at Fuentes probably because he is no longer that relevant. Isn't Spencer also an atheist? Or at least, he's one of these cringe spiritual pagan larpers (correct me if I'm wrong).


Yes, 99.8% (which is wrong, more like 98%, whatever).
0.2% is 665,055 dead. The size of small countries. (575,829 as of now, just shows how wrong this retarded number is, oh and not everything is linear, maybe people should listen in their high school mathematics classes)

Among the 331,862,563 alive, 95% has permanent damage to organs. So only shy of 17 million are fully healthy.
A good half of the 95% will suffer heart and brain problems, severe enough to lower their life expectancy.
A good 75% now have liver, lung, and kidney issues, potentially left infertile.

Yeah, 99.8% will live, 95% of which will be miserable. This is assuming there's enough fucking hospitals for an entire nation, which there isn't, so a nation-wide infection will probably decrease that 99.8% of yours (again, wrong) to 96%. Oh, what about remote locations without adequate hospitals, they rely on farming... which provides us with you guessed it, fucking food. What about a rona infection there?

Keep telling us how it's not worth fucking up the economy that will be fucked anyway and how covid-19 is just some nothingburger chinkflu commievirus. The second worst and only choice beside a national infection leaving 95% miserable is nuking the economy while a shitty, unsafe, but very high chance of working jab is rushed out. It'll leave 0.1% with blood issues and maybe 0.2% in total will suffer major illnesses, but compared to over 50 holocaust units of miserable shits?

I thought conservatives were meant to conserve, what's left to conserve if over 300,000,000 now have fucked organs? This isn't doomer talk, this is very simple division a primary school child can do.
95% have permanent damage to organs? I’m going to need to see a source for that.
 
Richard "Smack my kids around to own the browns" Spencer
Richard "She walked into a door so I'll start a race war" Spencer
Richard "I hate jews so I made her black and blue" Spencer
Richard "She spoke to a rabbi so I gave her a black eye" Spencer
Richard "Great optics but I broke my wife's lip" Spencer
Richard "Domestic violence laws are a Jewish psy-op" Spencer
Richard "I'm hitting you to fight the eternal jew" Spencer
Richard "I wish I owned slaves so I could beat them like my wife" Spencer
Richard "For every live kike, my wife gets a strike" Spencer
Richard "Punch your wife in the face to save the white race" Spencer
 
I'm actually surprised this thread has almost no info about his Phalanx scam and the lore behind it. I remember hearing a lot of stuff about it and the different tiers and practices that were planned, when it first came to light.
Here's some info about Phalanx
https://archive.md/EAfko
Enjoy the read lmao.
If some info there is useful, we could update the OP.
 
Richard "inject silicone into my booty to fight the Jewish Zionist lobby" Spencer
Richard "LGBTQ, Kikes and niggers get in the camp's queue" Spencer
Richard "praise Winnie the Pooh, erase Kikes in a coup" Spencer
Richard "take the Pzifier, hits spiks with delouser" Spencer
Richard "unsubscribe from NetFlix, reopen Camp Auschwitz" Spencer
Richard "ridin' with Biden, gassin' with Eichmann" Spencer
Richard "you're not as smart as you think you are, my butthole is as wide as the Vredefort Crater" Spencer
Richard "I rule the Jews, dump niggers in zoos" Spencer
 
Keep telling us how it's not worth fucking up the economy that will be fucked anyway and how covid-19 is just some nothingburger chinkflu commievirus.
It's not worth fucking the economy over a flu.

I thought conservatives were meant to conserve, what's left to conserve if over 300,000,000 now have fucked organs? This isn't doomer talk, this is very simple division a primary school child can do.

Because the current covid restrictions are doing wonders for conservatives.
 
Can't be bothered to scroll all the thread pages but what was the source Richard Spencer supports or wants to legalize child pornography? Can someone provide the source or quotes?

Anatoly_Karlin_and_Richard_Spencer.jpeg


Here's a photo of Spencer with an alt-right guy named Anatoly Karlin who is alleged to have self-described as a hebephile and on his social media has called 14 year old girls "hot".

The alt-right seems to be a magnet to perverts.

"you are talking about a 14 yrs old child you freaking weirdo"
 
Can somebody give me a QRD on why these idiots seem to like Macron so much? Because to me he doesn’t seem to anything other than a typical Western Neoliberal politician.
 
Can somebody give me a QRD on why these idiots seem to like Macron so much? Because to me he doesn’t seem to anything other than a typical Western Neoliberal politician.
The same reason they adore every Western Neoliberal politician: they've pivoted to hating conservatives more than anything. They have nothing but bile for Tucker Carlson saying something they said in 2017, and nothing but love for Liberals doing what Trump wanted a few years ago, while also hating Trump. Like Macron suddenly getting tough on Islam.
The plan appears to be hoping Neoliberals become racist communists and spending the rest of their time saying the Right is irredeemable.
 
The same reason they adore every Western Neoliberal politician: they've pivoted to hating conservatives more than anything. They have nothing but bile for Tucker Carlson saying something they said in 2017, and nothing but love for Liberals doing what Trump wanted a few years ago, while also hating Trump. Like Macron suddenly getting tough on Islam.
The plan appears to be hoping Neoliberals become racist communists and spending the rest of their time saying the Right is irredeemable.
it's also because richard is terrified of appearing low-status (which is absurd as being "racist" is the lowest status thing in 2021). he wants to come across as being "above" maga.
 
Can't be bothered to scroll all the thread pages but what was the source Richard Spencer supports or wants to legalize child pornography? Can someone provide the source or quotes?
OK, now found it: https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/k06ghxe37di2gcxz-mp4.361623/

Yea, this is disgusting also there's no reliable evidence whatsoever for the claim giving pedophiles access to child pornography will reduce child molestation.

Richard Spencer's website has also published some strange articles on pedophilia, one by Edward Dutton.

In the article Dutton makes the dubious claim that homosexual pedophilia "is not really pedophilia" because "homosexual pedophiles prefer significantly older children, often those that are already pubescent, and the abusers themselves are also more feminine than heterosexual abusers."

So gay men fucking pubescent 12 or 13 year old boys is somehow not "really pedophilia" according to Dutton.

And yes, this appears as an article on Spencer's website:

Dutton is the alt-right's favourite "scientist" and regularly writes for Spencer's National Policy Institute, I highlight that word because his PhD is in Religious Studies and he has no credentials or expertise in any science field. He also calls himself a professor of evolutionary psychology at a university but it turns out the "university" is a private business school. In Poland, of all places.

Edward Dutton entry on Trollpedia:

I've probably got enough info to create a thread on Dutton here.
 
Last edited:
Yea, this is disgusting also there's no reliable evidence whatsoever for the claim giving pedophiles access to child pornography will reduce child molestation.
Correct. Correlational studies are pretty bullshit and shouldn't be used to make policies.

I'd love to look deeper into this so called correlation that paedophilia normalisers love to bring up and falsely equate to porn's correlation with rape, but it's treacherous territory. I have access to all major databases for peer reviewed studies but I don't want to get put on a watchlist for these unimaginable and disgusting phrases I must put in to bring them up.

As for the debate, there's three camps as anyone would expect. First is viewing this shit substitutes urges, thus decrease the rates, and they argue for simulations. Second is viewing this shit normalises the acts and increases the rates. Third is my position as well, correlation studies are very weak and a link is hard or impossible to be established. Ethically, I'll go with the second, pornography is basically one step towards normalisation.

There's so many problems with correlation studies. Child molesters aren't necessarily paedophiles because some fall under the "control and manipulation" bracket, where they seek the defenceless, which are kids, women, and the elderly. They won't get shit from consuming CP, they probably don't consume that stuff. Then there's a strong correlation between viewing extreme and illegal pornography and the obviously illegal CP, these people also view snuff films, gore, and consume zoosadism material, are they more or less likely to act on it, are they actually paedophiles, or are they just sick fucks with bloodlust towards innocence (kids, animals)?
 
In the article Dutton makes the dubious claim that homosexual pedophilia "is not really pedophilia" because "homosexual pedophiles prefer significantly older children, often those that are already pubescent, and the abusers themselves are also more feminine than heterosexual abusers."

So gay men fucking pubescent 12 or 13 year old boys is somehow not "really pedophilia" according to Dutton.
I'm reading the article and I think you're really reaching with that interpretation. The entre article is about the extreme overlap between homosexuality and child abuse and pedophilia, I don't think the takeaway should be that he is a child rape apologist.
 
For context, this is due to numerous contracts that are being fulfilled. For instance, the steel for the border “wall” slats are sourced from Roman Abramovich. The wall is less to do with border security than it is a subsidy to a Russian-Israeli business magnate.
 
Back