Culture Roald Dahl books given inclusive overhaul by 'sensitivity readers' - Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute.

Augustus Gloop is no longer fat, Mrs Twit is no longer fearfully ugly, and the Oompa-Loompas have gone gender-neutral in new editions of Roald Dahl’s beloved stories.

The publisher, Puffin, has made hundreds of changes to the original text, removing many of Dahl’s colourful descriptions and making his characters less grotesque.

The review of Dahl’s language was undertaken to ensure that the books “can continue to be enjoyed by all today”, Puffin said.

References to physical appearance have been heavily edited. The word “fat” has been removed from every book - Augustus Gloop in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory may still look like a ball of dough, but can now only be described as “enormous”.

In the same story, the Oompa-Loompas are no longer “tiny”, “titchy” or “no higher than my knee” but merely small. And where once they were “small men”, they are now “small people”.

Passages not written by Dahl have also been added. In The Witches, a paragraph explaining that witches are bald beneath their wigs ends with the new line: “There are plenty of other reasons why women might wear wigs and there is certainly nothing wrong with that.”

In previous editions of James and the Giant Peach, the Centipede sings: “Aunt Sponge was terrifically fat/And tremendously flabby at that,” and, “Aunt Spiker was thin as a wire/And dry as a bone, only drier.”

Both verses have been removed, and in their place are the underwhelming rhymes: “Aunt Sponge was a nasty old brute/And deserved to be squashed by the fruit,” and, “Aunt Spiker was much of the same/And deserves half of the blame.”

References to “female” characters have disappeared - Miss Trunchbull in Matilda, once a “most formidable female”, is now a “most formidable woman”.

“Boys and girls” has been turned into “children”. The Cloud-Men in James and the Giant Peach have become Cloud-People and Fantastic Mr Fox’s three sons have become daughters.

Matilda reads Jane Austen rather than Rudyard Kipling, and a witch posing as “a cashier in a supermarket” now works as “a top scientist”.

Mrs Twit’s “fearful ugliness” is reduced to “ugliness”, while Mrs Hoppy in Esio Trot is not an “attractive middle-aged lady” but a “kind middle-aged lady”.

One of Dahl’s most popular lines from The Twits is: “You can have a wonky nose and a crooked mouth and a double chin and stick-out teeth, but if you have good thoughts they will shine out of your face like sunbeams.” It has been edited to take out the “double chin”.

An emphasis on mental health has led to the removal of “crazy” and “mad”, which Dahl used frequently in comic fashion. A mention in Esio Trot of tortoises being “backward” - the joke behind the book’s title - has been excised.

The words “black” and “white” have been removed: characters no longer turn “white with fear” and the Big Friendly Giant in The BFG cannot wear a black cloak.

The changes were made by the publisher, Puffin, and the Roald Dahl Story Company, now owned by Netflix, with sensitivity readers hired to scrutinise the text.

The review began in 2020, when the company was still run by the Dahl family. Netflix acquired the literary estate in 2021 for a reported £500 million.

Sensitivities over Dahl’s stories were heightened when a 2020 Hollywood version of The Witches led to a backlash over its depiction of the Grand Witch, played by Anne Hathaway, with fingers missing from each hand.

Warner Bros was forced to make an apology after Paralympians and charities said it was offensive to the limb difference community.

That same year, the Dahl family and the company apologised for the author’s past anti-Semitic statements.

Matthew Dennison, Dahl’s biographer, said that the author - who died in 1990 - chose his vocabulary with care. “I’m almost certain that he would have recognised that alterations to his novels prompted by the political climate were driven by adults rather than children," he said.

 
Minor updates to children's books may be fairly common. Publishers are aiming at a moving target, and things that were recognizable to one generation will be unrelatable to the next. Look at the Hardy Boys--depending on when you grew up and when your local library made its purchases, your copy of "The Tower Treasure" could have been written or substantially rewritten in the 1920s, the 1960s, or even later. (Please don't fact check, I don't know the complete publication history.) As patterns of living, technology, and speech changed, the stories were modified so they would still be current to young readers. They weren't trying to sell kids historical novels about their grandparents' youth.

But the nature of these edits to Dahl is clearly wokism. Kids and still relate to things like beauty and ugliness, they can still appreciate the alliteration of a formidable female, etc.
 
Unless this is another Mandela Effect, this happened to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory once already.

As a kid, I had a old hardback copy of the book where the Oompa-Loompas were unequivocally black, in description and art.

Later I wound up with a newer copy of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (we got a lot of books for presents) and the Oompa-Loompas were physically more like the (original) movie. Nothing really changed that mattered: they were still tribespeople and still under dubious contract, but no longer explicitly black.

That change was made while Dahl was alive. I'd assumed that someone suggested the revision to him around the time of the movie. In retrospect it might have been an American localization (I don't remember if my hardback was an import), though, like how And Then There Were None got its name in the States,

It’s not a Mandela effect. Later versions of Dahl books were illustrated by Quentin Blake who cleaned up the “offensive” characters. *

I recall that during his life, a lot of women were not so keen on Dahl because of his “colourful” attitude towards women.

It was a bit like a proto-cancel-Rowling, but with much less screeching but more justification.

Dahl would be absolutely fucking furious about this and would thrash the perpetrators with his stick.
Chauvinist or no, he was an absolute hero in WW2, part of this special intelligence unit which also included Christopher Lee and Ian Fleming and was literally the inspiration for James Bond.

When it comes to ugly women, Dahl allegedly fucked Eleanor Roosevelt in the process of convincing the US to join the war.
Perhaps she was who he was writing about when he described skin deep beauty in the Twits.

What’s next? Editing the Canterbury Tales, because of immorality and adultery? Removing references to God as the constant preachiness might upset non Christians?

Make Cathy and Linton a cute non binary couple and call Heathcliffe out for his toxic masculinity?

At this rate “Mien Kampf” will be edited for modern sensibilities so much that it will be a hippy trippy self help book.

* Edit. Got caught up in my own rant and forgot to point this out, Dahl frequently wanted his name removed from movie versions of his books. He usually hated the changes, especially ones designed to make the story more palatable to the current audience standards.
He was a bit of a cantankerous character like Alan Moore in this regard.
 
Last edited:
It’s not a Mandela effect. Later versions of Dahl books were illustrated by Quentin Blake who cleaned up the “offensive” characters. *
Aw, I thought Blake's art was great for Dahl's gleefully hideous characters. I mean, he drew the Twits.

I held my nose and checked Wikipedia, and the reason for the original edit was surprisingly wholesome:

Race and editing​

Dahl's widow said that Charlie was originally written as "a little black boy." Dahl's biographer said the change to a white character was driven by Dahl's agent, who thought a black Charlie would not appeal to readers.[10][11]

In the first published edition, the Oompa-Loompas were described as African pygmies, and were drawn this way in the original printed edition.[10] After the announcement of a film adaptation sparked a statement from the NAACP, which expressed concern that the transportation of Oompa-Loompas to Wonka's factory resembled slavery, Dahl found himself sympathising with their concerns and published a revised edition.[10] In this edition, as well as the subsequent sequel, the Oompa-Loompas were drawn as being white and appearing similar to hippies, and the references to Africa were deleted.[10]

In 2023, publisher Puffin made changes to the original text of the book, such as making the Oompa-Loompas gender-neutral, and removing every occurrence of the word "fat."[12]
 
Tick tock
lovecraft-and-a-cat.jpg
 
We should never have left the oceans.
I did not need to get more black pilled than I already am about western society.
I think Clown World may have been founded on 3 pillars: "social media", "Whig History"*, and that one manifesto by Karl Marx.

*(@Syaoran Li described that as history being seen by SJWs as the one-way path of linear "progress" to "The End of History".)
 
Last edited:
Aw, I thought Blake's art was great for Dahl's gleefully hideous characters. I mean, he drew the Twits.

I held my nose and checked Wikipedia, and the reason for the original edit was surprisingly wholesome:

Race and editing​

Dahl's widow said that Charlie was originally written as "a little black boy." Dahl's biographer said the change to a white character was driven by Dahl's agent, who thought a black Charlie would not appeal to readers.[10][11]

In the first published edition, the Oompa-Loompas were described as African pygmies, and were drawn this way in the original printed edition.[10] After the announcement of a film adaptation sparked a statement from the NAACP, which expressed concern that the transportation of Oompa-Loompas to Wonka's factory resembled slavery, Dahl found himself sympathising with their concerns and published a revised edition.[10] In this edition, as well as the subsequent sequel, the Oompa-Loompas were drawn as being white and appearing similar to hippies, and the references to Africa were deleted.[10]

In 2023, publisher Puffin made changes to the original text of the book, such as making the Oompa-Loompas gender-neutral, and removing every occurrence of the word "fat."[12]

Well he always had that English Public School sense of fair play and “What What”.

He was also fond of his African manservant, who murdered a nearby German when WW2 broke out. The fellow did it with the best intentions. Germans were now Dahl’s foes of course.

The issue these days is that people don’t widely understand that old school empire Brits, which Dahl very much was, were not racist in our modern conception.

They did believe the Africans by and large were more like children, but they didn’t exactly hate them, they regarded them in need of education and development.

Treating them like stock was indeed offensive and terrible by their standards, so yes I can understand that Dahl would agree to change the Oompa Loompas on that basis.

What is the most annoying about this kind of edit is that these stories offer an insight into childhood in different periods.

Plus, as has been pointed out, kids are not dumb. They know the difference between stories and reality.
 
I hope there can be an end in sight someday. It's already been around a decade.
I'm very black pilled and I feel like at this point society can only go back to normal over a drastic reset. In my mind there's only 2 things that will happen.

My belief in God's Kingdom is correct and he burns these freaks with fire.

Or if that doesn't happen the people will finally reach a breaking point and a civil war breaks out.

What I worry though is that these things won't happen in my lifetime or when it does I will be old. I really do not want to spend my young adult life living in clown world. I could have lived in worse time periods sure but I feel envious because I was born literally 1 generation away from having a normal adult life.
 
I feel envious because I was born literally 1 generation away from having a normal adult life.
Unfortunately that seems to be the case in the Current Year West. A "Gen Xer" born in 1980 could become a young adult by the late '90s, and be in their prime when the Internet was still "The Wild West" in the '00s. Yet a "Zoomer" born in 2000 couldn't grow up until TDS, "social justice", and excess censorship were already mainstream.
 
Last edited:
How long before they get their grimy child touching paws on proper old rip roaring yarns like Allan Quartermain, Flashman, Indiana Jones, or hilarious tales of mischief like Just William and Pippi Longstocking?

The Moomins hopefully will be safe as Tove Jansson based Too-Ticky on a woman artist she “shared a studio” with.
Then again, if it comes out that neither of them were transbians then poor Moomin will be burned at the stake. :(
 
Back