Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Shane is taking the place of aimee terese
View attachment 1109761

Roberts giga-brain reply to a very accurate point
View attachment 1109762

Joe rogaine is bad! So bad that Bernie, who blob has zero problems with and would totally support, should be over!
View attachment 1109763
View attachment 1109776

He doesn't understand why his word mountain dew salad is called pretentious
View attachment 1109766

Joker is problematic
View attachment 1109767

And Roberts specific explanation
View attachment 1109769

More proof that Roberts litmus test for intelligence amounts to agreeing with him
View attachment 1109773
Bob's acting like the movie treats Artur becoming the Joker as a positive and not an avoidable tragedy.

Just because a movie follows a character doesn't mean the character's the hero of the story, nor do they condone his actions, but I shouldn't expect a professional film critic to understand this basic concept.
 
Bob's acting like the movie treats Artur becoming the Joker as a positive and not an avoidable tragedy.

Just because a movie follows a character doesn't mean the character's the hero of the story, nor do they condone his actions, but I shouldn't expect a professional film critic to understand this basic concept.
Painted Johnny Cash is white, which makes your attempts at nuance for the character and the story irrelevant. It teaches whitey to fight, when he should be rolling on the floor in a helpless cuck ball, and there's nothing superior about that.
 
And Roberts specific explanation
View attachment 1109769

I think its telling that the first movie Bob mentions in his "very good films" list is fucking Salo. A movie famous for having a girl being forced to eat shit with a spoon. Even if you're of the opinion its some artistic masterpiece its not one you bring up in public.
 
I can understand people who say car travel is bad (I don't think it's the great Satan, but I will admit it's not perfect), but how does this person get from living in suburbia to abusive relationships? I've never lived in a city and I apologize for my ignorance, but what is so good about cities? You got crime, trash everywhere, and you have to live in close proximity to many people. The only real upside as far as I'm concerned is that you can walk or take public transit to places.

Link somewhat related:
Our troon probably imagines that the choice is between NYC and some hamlet in bumfuck-nowhere (population 1000) where there's only one person in the whole town who you might be compatible with, so if he or she turns out to be abusive you just have to grin and bear it. Also for troons that situation is probably true for cities with 50,000 people, chasers and other troons can't be all that common. While a city slicker can just dump anyone who isn't exactly perfect and move on to the next date.

King Dead said:
It's telling how this troon describes rural areas, and it sure makes sense that Bob retweeted him, because it's clear he feels the same way. They want everyone evicted from rural areas and the whole landscape returned to wilderness for posh cityfolk to visit because they have such disdain for the people who live there. They stereotype rural people as wife-beaters and methheads, ignoring the huge amounts of crime and drug abuse in cities.
Seems this troon & Bob are part of a movement that I stumbled upon in National Geographic months earlier.

Jarolleon said:
It's not just Moviebob advocating this. National Geographic had an issue about "cities of the future" which envisioned entire countries crammed into dense hives of bugmen (in which all transport is public of course), surrounded by intensive farms, with 1/2 of the landmass banned from all development to preserve the natural environment (and prevent those peksy Trump voters from building enclaves presumably).
www.nationalgeographic.com

This is what the future’s sustainable cities could look like
A next-generation metropolis will need to serve people and nature, while letting ecology guide its development.
www.nationalgeographic.com
www.nationalgeographic.com
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
That is because it is all many of them really are, They have become so embittered by their world view that they can't actually have fun anymore.

Here is the series of Events that happens when I bought my Switch and Breath of the wild

I played it, put 80 hours into it got my Money's worth and had lots of fun, a while later I returned to it and play it on break at work in 15 minute bites because I am doing 100% Playthrough on mastermode finding Korok seeds/Shrines is a good "break fun" activity, and no matter how awful my work day is, no matter what shit gets dropped in my lap on that day..I break that day up with little chunks of Happiness.

Here is what happened when Bob bought his switch and Breath of the wild

He played it..and the entire time he was thinking about GAMERGATE! TRUMP! ALT-RIGHT!!!!!!! NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZIIIIII! so he didn't have fun and runs back to twitter to get his dopamine hits from REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEing about Politics and evil Nazis. Then he sees the "NEW HOTNESS" game and instantly goes to buy that thinking that maybe this thing will make his brain not obsess over Orange Man, He invests all his hopes and dreams into "The Next thing that will actually make me happy" so he shills it.

But it never does..not because The product is flawed..but because he is flawed, and that is the difference between a "Hobbist" and a "Consumer" a Hobbist buys something because it legit makes them happy..a Consumer buys because they are told it makes them happy.

Man, I don't think this dawns on me enough. It reminds me of a prison documentary I saw, where a guard said "It's harder for us to keep track of drama, because we get to go home to our families and forget about it all. But these guys are locked up 23 hours a day, all they can do is stew over who wronged them and how to get revenge"

I get to come into threads like these, laugh and be morbidly amused. Then I close the tab and go back to doing the stuff I love, having fun conversations with friends and working on my hobbies and crafts. But cows like Bob stay behind, they don't get a break from their madness. They're eternally drowning in the hell of other people they've made for themselves. That's some existential horror to think about.
 
Bob's acting like the movie treats Artur becoming the Joker as a positive and not an avoidable tragedy.

Just because a movie follows a character doesn't mean the character's the hero of the story, nor do they condone his actions, but I shouldn't expect a professional film critic to understand this basic concept.
Aside from the fact he does get paid for doing it, Robert’s criticism is always amateur at best.

I think its telling that the first movie Bob mentions in his "very good films" list is fucking Salo. A movie famous for having a girl being forced to eat shit with a spoon. Even if you're of the opinion its some artistic masterpiece its not one you bring up in public.

It’s also about the degeneracy of fascists, but Robert sees it as a playbook for how to treat his ideological enemies.
 
Robert DESTROYS re.tarded commie, who claimed he wants to kill people who disagree with him.
1579730458712.png

1579730618401.png

1579730900224.png


(Archive)
(Archive)
(Archive)
Also, why would anyone think that Robert stereotypes people from the south/ midwest?
OK.PNG


Archive
 
Robert DESTROYS re.tarded commie, who claimed he wants to kill people who disagree with him.
View attachment 1110246
View attachment 1110248
View attachment 1110251

(Archive)
(Archive)
(Archive)
Also, why would anyone think that Robert stereotypes people from the south/ midwest?
View attachment 1110260

Archive
Bobbo's such an intellectual coward. You don't need to do much reading between the lines in those tweets to understand exactly what he means, but doesn't have the gumption to outright admit. To be fair, "terrible things" in that second tweet could refer to just about anything, but given his frequent expressions of disdain for Republicans, rural people, and pretty much anyone he thinks is standing in the way of his robot body and spaceship, it's not much of a leap to assume what he'd like to do.

God, how vile is that third tweet anyway? "There's no separation on shades between the ignorant and the wicked." Holy fucking shit, he's literally saying that even the people who haven't heard of the Gospel of Woke are evil and should be condemned to death. For a fedora-tipper, he's even more judgmental than God.

And then when anyone points out the clearly obvious fact of his genocidal fantasies to him, he immediately backpedals and claims that he'd never go out and kill his ideological opponents, but if something bad were to happen to them, well that's just fine by him. He wants bad things to happen to them, but he doesn't want to get his hands dirty. Let the brownshirts go out and do the hard work while he fires off tweets in his basement and stuffs his gob with his latest culinary abomination.

Of course, that's assuming he doesn't use the old "who are you?" defense to completely avoid this unpleasant truth. Stay classy, Robert.
 
Bobbo's such an intellectual coward. You don't need to do much reading between the lines in those tweets to understand exactly what he means, but doesn't have the gumption to outright admit. To be fair, "terrible things" in that second tweet could refer to just about anything, but given his frequent expressions of disdain for Republicans, rural people, and pretty much anyone he thinks is standing in the way of his robot body and spaceship, it's not much of a leap to assume what he'd like to do.

God, how vile is that third tweet anyway? "There's no separation on shades between the ignorant and the wicked." Holy fucking shit, he's literally saying that even the people who haven't heard of the Gospel of Woke are evil and should be condemned to death. For a fedora-tipper, he's even more judgmental than God.

And then when anyone points out the clearly obvious fact of his genocidal fantasies to him, he immediately backpedals and claims that he'd never go out and kill his ideological opponents, but if something bad were to happen to them, well that's just fine by him. He wants bad things to happen to them, but he doesn't want to get his hands dirty. Let the brownshirts go out and do the hard work while he fires off tweets in his basement and stuffs his gob with his latest culinary abomination.

Of course, that's assuming he doesn't use the old "who are you?" defense to completely avoid this unpleasant truth. Stay classy, Robert.
I find it both sad and hilarious that he doesn’t realize that he’s just going from psychopathic to sociopathic AND psychopathic. It feels worse that he falsely admits that he wouldn’t feel bad if something bad to those he hated, instead of just commuting the bad thing.
 
Bobbo's such an intellectual coward. You don't need to do much reading between the lines in those tweets to understand exactly what he means, but doesn't have the gumption to outright admit. To be fair, "terrible things" in that second tweet could refer to just about anything, but given his frequent expressions of disdain for Republicans, rural people, and pretty much anyone he thinks is standing in the way of his robot body and spaceship, it's not much of a leap to assume what he'd like to do.

God, how vile is that third tweet anyway? "There's no separation on shades between the ignorant and the wicked." Holy fucking shit, he's literally saying that even the people who haven't heard of the Gospel of Woke are evil and should be condemned to death. For a fedora-tipper, he's even more judgmental than God.

And then when anyone points out the clearly obvious fact of his genocidal fantasies to him, he immediately backpedals and claims that he'd never go out and kill his ideological opponents, but if something bad were to happen to them, well that's just fine by him. He wants bad things to happen to them, but he doesn't want to get his hands dirty. Let the brownshirts go out and do the hard work while he fires off tweets in his basement and stuffs his gob with his latest culinary abomination.

Of course, that's assuming he doesn't use the old "who are you?" defense to completely avoid this unpleasant truth. Stay classy, Robert.
How shitty must one’s words be when the only way they can conceive of to defend them is to say “I am not actively advocating their death, I’m just expressing depraved indifference toward them!”?
 
Last edited:
I always love when people try to pull this card, the whole "haha wow those losers are so obsessed with you, how pathetic" deal. They act like people are taking massive chunks of time out of their day to stalk Bob and harass him. In actuality, it's as easy as clicking the follow button, finding something stupid in your feed (doesn't take long), and firing off a quick shitpost. Even something with little effort behind it can result in long-winded diatribes from Bob.

These are often the same sorts who claim to be living rent-free in their opponents' heads, when the opposite is true.
Hell, I pop in maybe once or twice a week whenever I’ve got nothing going on to see if anything notable happened in the autistic world of chipman. Basically no time wasted at all
 
And then when anyone points out the clearly obvious fact of his genocidal fantasies to him, he immediately backpedals and claims that he'd never go out and kill his ideological opponents, but if something bad were to happen to them, well that's just fine by him. He wants bad things to happen to them, but he doesn't want to get his hands dirty. Let the brownshirts go out and do the hard work while he fires off tweets in his basement and stuffs his gob with his latest culinary abomination.
"Will no one rid me of these meddlesome trump voters?"
 
Nobody who isn’t a sociopath would publically advocate for genocide with a straight face.
Allow me to bring a little Christfag perspective into this, because there are a couple things I hadn't considered about Bob before.

I think @FriendlyManbaby makes a good point with regards to Bob having a fear of death. It's something that everyone has to wrestle with at some point, and it can become painfully clear to you when a loved one is at death's door. We fear that this is all there is, that when our life passes, that's it for us. It's a perfectly rational fear to have.

Bob also believes that good things should happen to good people, bad things to bad, and he even claims that you're a "moral or intellectual weakling" if you can't determine an objective quantification for these obviously subjective, unquantifiable things. But even putting aside that good and bad people are all relative to one's point of view, he wants those he hates to suffer, even if their only crime is disagreeing with him. He believes that he should be living in a utopia where he and his ilk get all the rewards, and everyone he hates is thrown into the pit.

For someone with a supposedly Christian upbringing (lol jesuit scholar), it's funny how he rejects Christian teaching on the former part while embracing the concept of God's judgment in the second.

Obviously, Christianity (and many other religions) has the concept of life after death, a better life for those who believe. It is this belief that helps those who are religious with their fear of death. Sure, doubts may remain, but their faith keeps them going.

Then there's the ol' "why do bad things happen to good people" question that Bob brings up. His answer is "they shouldn't, that's not fair, if i were in charge my enemies would get shipped to the gulags, reeeeeee." I'm not sure if all denominations have the same teaching, but from how my pastor described it, Christian teaching on the reason bad things happen to good people is because this isn't the world we were meant to inhabit. Due to the original sin, humanity was cast out from God's perfect world to the imperfect world beyond, where there is pain and suffering for everyone regardless of their morality. Only after the end times will believers enter the new heaven and new earth, the perfect world reborn. Bob would certainly love to see himself in the role of God in the end times, casting the heretics (i.e., anyone who disagrees with him) into the pit.

I think this is also part of what makes Bob so angry. He may rail against believers all he wants, but in his rejection of Christian teachings (or any religion, for that matter), he's cut himself off from a belief system that could help him with his anger at the world and its imperfections. Death loses its sting when you believe that it isn't the end, and bad times are easier to cope with when you realize they're just gonna happen no matter what. On top of that, returning to the church would offer a support network of fellow churchgoers, routine services to give him a reason to get out of the house, and (perhaps most importantly) a lot of potluck dinners. Instead, he embraces the most euphoric fedora-tipping anti-religious stance possible, deriding anyone of faith as a smooth-brained mongoloid, unable to compare with his galaxy-brain intellect.

Is belief irrational? Of course it is, and I certainly don't claim otherwise. But Bob's full of plenty of irrational beliefs as it stands, so he really shouldn't use that as an excuse.
Speaking as an atheist who considers the problem of evil to be an unsolvable one for people who believe in an omnipotent and omnibenevolent singular deity and thus considers all the explanations put forward in response by said people to be unsatisfactory, I can honestly tell you that Blobbo's problem is much more simple; the guy's an asshole who never stopped being an asshole.

Far as I can tell, fatass never really developed a sense of empathy like other people do, and he therefore only really thinks of himself and his own concerns. Cinema Roberto is a sociopath, in other words. Religion or the lack thereof wouldn't fix that.
 
I just leave a tab up while I configure, organize, and add to my media server (that I solely created via an old Windows 7 tower, a new SSD, and a USB drive with a minimal installation of CentOS 7 (so while there was a graphical interface for the installation process, everything else had to be done via Terminal) via SSH in a Terminator terminal.
How shitty must one’s words be when the only way they can conceive of to defend them is to say “I am not actively advocating their death, I’m just expressing depraved indifference toward them!”?
I fail to see the difference between either of those.
 
Speaking as an atheist who considers the problem of evil to be an unsolvable one for people who believe in an omnipotent and omnibenevolent singular deity and thus considers all the explanations put forward in response by said people to be unsatisfactory, I can honestly tell you that Blobbo's problem is much more simple; the guy's an asshole who never stopped being an asshole.

Far as I can tell, fatass never really developed a sense of empathy like other people do, and he therefore only really thinks of himself and his own concerns. Cinema Roberto is a sociopath, in other words. Religion or the lack thereof wouldn't fix that.
You're gay!
 
Speaking as an atheist who considers the problem of evil to be an unsolvable one for people who believe in an omnipotent and omnibenevolent singular deity and thus considers all the explanations put forward in response by said people to be unsatisfactory, I can honestly tell you that Blobbo's problem is much more simple; the guy's an asshole who never stopped being an asshole.

Far as I can tell, fatass never really developed a sense of empathy like other people do, and he therefore only really thinks of himself and his own concerns. Cinema Roberto is a sociopath, in other words. Religion or the lack thereof wouldn't fix that.
I get it, believe me, even I have doubts about aspects of Christian faith. And I'm not the sort who would ever force religion on anyone; my best friend is an atheist, but we have enlightening discussions about religion together without my ever trying to convert him.

I find you 100% correct in that he never developed empathy, but I think it's funny that someone who was supposedly raised in a Christian household never took any of the most basic lessons of the faith to heart. Hell, you can even approach this from a perspective that's not strictly religious: Bob doesn't even agree with the notion that all human lives have value. He literally believes that there are people who objectively have no worth and are safe for humanity as a whole to discard. The idea of redemption is anathema to his ideology.

There's real irony in obnoxious fedora-tippers like Bob who follow a more rigid fundamentalist mindset than many fundies. If you sin in the eyes of the Church of Social Justice, there's not a damn thing you can do to be forgiven, subject to witch hunts and Twitter mobs until you disappear entirely or kill yourself (either of which are an admission of guilt, of course).
 
And Roberts specific explanation
View attachment 1109769
"A work is 'problematic and irresponsible' if it shows a socially aggravated white guy trying to achieve some semblance of goals by going on a self-rightous murder spree."
Does that include Bobby's own revenge fantasies?

I think its telling that the first movie Bob mentions in his "very good films" list is fucking Salo. A movie famous for having a girl being forced to eat shit with a spoon. Even if you're of the opinion its some artistic masterpiece its not one you bring up in public.
Bobby's reference pool is very small. He could have named any Korean revenge films, but then I guess if the protagonist isn't a "white guy" it doesn't count as "problematic and irresponsible"?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back