Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bobs definition of stupid and smart changes on the context he's arguing in. Dumb actually usually just means "people I don't like or think are mean" and smart means "a person that supports space and technology/liberal woman/person or color".
But that's the point! Blob's definition of 'stupid' is 'anyone who disagrees with me' and his definition of 'smart' is 'anyone who agrees with me or forwards progress in the direction I would like, specifically in regards to less white people and more space exploration'.

Space exploration is actually one of the only issues he seems to genuinely care about. I'd go so far as to say that it's the most important political issue for him. He was pissed when Obama defunded NASA and most of his measurements of 'progress' are linked in some way to how far space exploration has gotten.

So what is he going to think about Werner von Braun, a card-carrying nazi (stupid and evil) and also one of the most brilliant and important minds in the field of space exploration (smart and good)?

I think he ultimately will come down on the side of Werner von Braun being stupid. We can sort of see the same thing with Elon Musk and SpaceX. Bob is always lamenting the fact that Elon Musk is PrObLeMaTiC and that he wishes it was someone else who was the face of space exploration in the modern age. Lately he's been saying that Elon Musk actually doesn't know anything about science and is just "buying his way in" and that he's also a bad businessman actually.

Yes, Bob thinks a multi-billionaire who is sending people into space is bad at both business and science. Just because he doesn't agree with all of Bob's politics.
 
Last edited:
But that's the point! Blob's definition of 'stupid' is 'anyone who disagrees with me' and his definition of 'smart' is 'anyone who agrees with me or forwards progress in the direction I would like, specifically in regards to less white people and more space exploration'.

Space exploration is actually one of the only issues he seems to genuinely care about. I'd go so far as to say that it's the most important political issue for him. He was pissed when Obama defunded NASA and most of his measurements of 'progress' are linked in some way to how far space exploration has gotten.

So what is he going to think about Werner von Braun, card-carrying nazi (stupid and evil) and also one of the most brilliant and important minds in the field of space exploration (smart and good)?

I think he ultimately will come down on the side of Werner von Braun being stupid. We can sort of see the same thing with Elon Musk and SpaceX. Bob is always lamenting the fact that Elon Musk is PrObLeMaTiC and that he wishes it was someone else who was the face of space exploration in the modern age. Lately he's been saying that Elon Musk actually doesn't know anything about science and is just "buying his way in" and that he's also a bad businessman actually.

Yes, Bob thinks a multi-billionaire who is sending people into space is bad at both business and science. Just because he doesn't agree with all of Bob's politics.

I would pay cash money to see Bob defend von Braun with some variation on "He was just following orders."
 
I genuinely think Trump being elected has affected him, because he wasn’t this cruel or hateful of say, Republicans, in 2015. I think if Trump is reelected Bob may spiral into Holocaust denial territory with the Nazi scientist and eugenics stuff. I half expect him to be like “glad that n!gger Herman Cain is dead” entirely un-ironically and he’s be surprised when the backlash hits.

My theory is that Bob seems like hes getting meaner because Bob wants the aesthetics of the 'online left' but not the actual politics that have created those aesthetics. Leftists of the kind that you find most often on Twitter have always been angry and irreverent when it comes to politicians or political enemies they hate dying or suffering tragedy because they don't allow for the idea that a person who pushed politics that they view have harmed regular people in their class should be able to be viewed separate from those decisions for any reason. You see it all the time how desperate Bob is to be appreciated and accepted by the 'cool' anti-liberal/idpol skeptical left and thinks if he can just affect their aesthetic in just the right way than they will ignore the fact that he has the exact kind of liberal identity essentialist politics they fucking hate.

A problem with Bob is that he wants to have his cake and eat it too. When a socialist or commie or Chapo dirtbag or whoever makes some off-color joke about Herman Cain or Thatcher or that TPUSA dipshit dying its consistent with their politics, and any attempts to try and shame them or call out their hypocrisy over it are meaningless because they either A) don't believe in PC tone policing and cancel culture shit and are just going to send you a picture of Wolverine showing you his dick or B) do believe in policing speech and cancel culture but don't hide that they think its a political tool to use against their enemies who they feel would, or have, done the same to them and are just going to send you a gif of a guillotine. Bob, however, believes in political correctness and cancel culture because to him he thinks its "just" and "logical" and clearly only applies to the redneck racists who are so below him. And Bob clearly does believe that politicians should be viewed as people removed from their decisions as he has made that exact argument about looking past Obama's selling out the progressive left part of his electoral base. so when he says something that is clearly mean or shitty hes being a through and through dickhead hypocrite, and its obvious to everybody who isn't also entrenched in that type of liberal hypocrisy just what a dickhead hypocrite he is, which just makes him double down because he doesn't know how to do anything else.

Which just leads to everybody to this left using him as the two airplane ticket needing butt of all their jokes;
55321515.JPG


Honestly I think if Trump gets elected again Bob won't change at all or he will start becoming a Bari Weiss reply guy. Whatever takes the least effort and keeps him from having to admit that his political understanding is entirely fucking wrong.
 
Openly gravedancing on two recent deaths on your "professional" business account. If he wasn't such a nobody he would have gotten canceled years ago, him and his mongoloid followers.


Bob is a perfect example of what I like to call woke fishing; pretending to be woke in order to get pussy.
I don't think hes pretending to be woke to get pussy, he legitimately believes in the nonsense he rambles on about. He's not like your usual Male Feminist who tweets out standard woke talking points on Twitter in order to hide that they are a creep and pervert. Bob really does believe that Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren would have transformed America overnight into a Star Trek-like utopia or that uneducated third-world immigrants will become the new working class in America, building the robots that will replace all Blue-Collar jobs, unlike other people who say it for brownie points on Twitter and deep down know its all nonsense. Bobs method of getting pussy is old school Nice-Guy behavior where he puts women on a pedestal, acts like he genuinely cares about them, but is really waiting for them to turn to him in a time of crisis and use him for re-bound sex while wishing the Chad she was dating suffers a horrific fate.
 
He was high risk because of his previous cancer and chemotherapy and chose not to wear a mask (although in large crowds I seriously question how protective masks actually are) and to travel a lot, to various events, which while it's sad it turned out this way, is on him. He might even have been okay with that risk considering he was a devout Christian and was in his older years. An "If I go it was my time" sort of thing. Anyway, there's no proof that he contracted COVID at the rally.
Why do people think that wearing a mask will provide any protection? The paper and cotton masks being pushed don't provide any personal protection. They can't even filter out pollen, and COVID is significantly smaller than tree semen. And the bandannas are just a joke. The whole point of wearing a facial covering is to block large droplets, and that's the only thing it can do. N95 masks do significantly cut the risk if you can fit them properly, but good luck buying any now. I wonder if anyone has been exceptional enough to walk around with a scuba re-breather.
 
Why do people think that wearing a mask will provide any protection? The paper and cotton masks being pushed don't provide any personal protection. They can't even filter out pollen, and COVID is significantly smaller than tree semen. And the bandannas are just a joke. The whole point of wearing a facial covering is to block large droplets, and that's the only thing it can do. N95 masks do significantly cut the risk if you can fit them properly, but good luck buying any now. I wonder if anyone has been exceptional enough to walk around with a scuba re-breather.
Most people who hype up the protection of masks haven't even read what the doctors who vouched for them actually said about them beyond "Mask good." Their paper basically said that masks might help the people wearing them prevent spreading the disease to to others by redirecting their breath back over themselves instead of outward into the air in front of them. So masks aren't even to protect the people who are wearing them, they're supposed to protect everyone else from them. Even then, the study basically ended with "Well it can't hurt so do it!" and there was a group of scientists who issued a counter statement that it's doubtful masks do anything.

So everyone treating masks like they render you invulnerable to COVID is just as guilty of possibly endangering people by giving them a false sense of security as any Trump supporter or conspiracy theorist they'd care to name. The experts and politicians who do it are just using it as a tool to manipulate the public. The only real protection is to avoid group gatherings and disinfect when you come in contact with anything you even suspect might have been touched by a sick person.

Don't even get me started on that "BLM protests are safe" bullshit. That alone renders everything Rob the Blob and everyone he RT's say about Cain and Montgomery disgustingly hypocritical.
 
I don't trust the Wu Flu death reports, for one simple reason: deaths WITH Covid are being counted as deaths BY Covid. The CDC lists deaths with Covid, or with presumed Covid infections, as opposed to by Covid.
So if Herman Cain had Covid, but died from something else, it's counted as a Covid death.
Of course, Bob, the much-vaunted intellectual that he is, can't be arsed to look up something that may go against the prevailing Left-Wing sentiment.

Most people who hype up the protection of masks haven't even read what the doctors who vouched for them actually said about them beyond "Mask good." Their paper basically said that masks might help the people wearing them prevent spreading the disease to to others by redirecting their breath back over themselves instead of outward into the air in front of them. So masks aren't even to protect the people who are wearing them, they're supposed to protect everyone else from them. Even then, the study basically ended with "Well it can't hurt so do it!" and there was a group of scientists who issued a counter statement that it's doubtful masks do anything.

So everyone treating masks like they render you invulnerable to COVID is just as guilty of possibly endangering people by giving them a false sense of security as any Trump supporter or conspiracy theorist they'd care to name. The experts and politicians who do it are just using it as a tool to manipulate the public. The only real protection is to avoid group gatherings and disinfect when you come in contact with anything you even suspect might have been touched by a sick person.

Don't even get me started on that "BLM protests are safe" bullshit. That alone renders everything Rob the Blob and everyone he RT's say about Cain and Montgomery disgustingly hypocritical.
The thing about the masks, however, is that the mass media whipped many people up into a hysteria. And in that hysteria, they're not thinking rationally and are behaving like lunatics (presenting Exhibit A and Exhibit B.)
To keep this discussion on Bob, he would probably support the perpetrators in my examples, simply because thinking rationally is a completely foreign concept to him.
 
Most people who hype up the protection of masks haven't even read what the doctors who vouched for them actually said about them beyond "Mask good." Their paper basically said that masks might help the people wearing them prevent spreading the disease to to others by redirecting their breath back over themselves instead of outward into the air in front of them. So masks aren't even to protect the people who are wearing them, they're supposed to protect everyone else from them. Even then, the study basically ended with "Well it can't hurt so do it!" and there was a group of scientists who issued a counter statement that it's doubtful masks do anything.

So everyone treating masks like they render you invulnerable to COVID is just as guilty of possibly endangering people by giving them a false sense of security as any Trump supporter or conspiracy theorist they'd care to name. The experts and politicians who do it are just using it as a tool to manipulate the public. The only real protection is to avoid group gatherings and disinfect when you come in contact with anything you even suspect might have been touched by a sick person.

Don't even get me started on that "BLM protests are safe" bullshit. That alone renders everything Rob the Blob and everyone he RT's say about Cain and Montgomery disgustingly hypocritical.
I'm quite a paranoid and taking every precaution, thus using masks and avoiding large crowds primarily, but people who complain about having to use a mask and not being able to handle it or breathe correctly when they're perfectly healthy are just pussies.
I have step 2 asthma and can breathe seamlessly trough a mask all day, which sometimes I have to, in my city is mandatory out in public transport and stores, then again I'm the kind of guy who cleans the ATM keyboard with alcohol before using it.
Though I still wouldn't use a basic filter paper mask in a place with +10 people around me and yeah those aren't some magical shield that deflect all attacks, I do hope that after the pandemic's over people still use at least basic paper masks in public, that's a positive change for sure.
 
I genuinely think Trump being elected has affected him,
Look no further than how many pages this thread has grown since the 2016 election. Yeah, four years have passed, but the two years this thread existed before Trump’s election did not suggest such a dramatic increase.
 
Look no further than how many pages this thread has grown since the 2016 election. Yeah, four years have passed, but the two years this thread existed before Trump’s election did not suggest such a dramatic increase.
I would have figured that Gamergate might have been the breaking point and the 2016 election was just an extent of that.
 
Why do people think that wearing a mask will provide any protection? The paper and cotton masks being pushed don't provide any personal protection. They can't even filter out pollen, and COVID is significantly smaller than tree semen.
As far as we know -- although it is under contest -- covid is transmitted through droplets, not airborne virus particles. That's why surgical masks are effective against it. A truly airborne pathogen, like the tuberculosis bacilli, will require an N95.

Biden has become Bobby's wish-granting genie:
53.png

73.png
If Bobby had what it takes to "escape to a smart country", why hadn't he done so before 2020?

A long political screed about Biden and Kamala Harris; my brain shuts down for my protection.
3.png
In the end, their point of reference is always Hollywood.

+ + + +
Bobby's heart is with the Poland gays:
734.png

Bizarre fedora bullshit (Sheriff Mark Curran's tweet has been deleted.)
64.png

+ + + +

Two birds with one stone: sucking up to Abortion and Breadtube at the same time:
67.png

Ollie Thorn shills a tranny's money-grab. Of course Bobby has to be a good ally:
542.png

Wikipedia magic:
9.png
 
I'll keep this pic on hand for the next time Bob starts stanning for poor people culling abortion.

View attachment 1484985
"A fetus isn't a person" is not a scientific statement, Bob. Science can't tell you whether someone's a "legal person" or not, only if someone is human. It's a legal opinion, which is very different, and thus can be subject to change. Don't forget, at some point Black people weren't considered full 'Persons under the Law', so um, yeah. Just because something isn't considered a person under the Law, doesn't mean it's absolutely definitively not a (human) "person". It's awfully regressive to redefine clear human entities as non-persons. I think there's a term for it too, isn't there? And I'm pretty sure, doing the thing the term describes, doesn't make you SMRT. Damn, I just about had it...
 
Last edited:
"A fetus isn't a person" is not a scientific statement, Bob. Science can't tell you whether someone's a "legal person" or not, only if someone is human. It's a legal opinion, which is very different, and thus can be subject to change. Don't forget, at some point Black people weren't considered full 'Persons under the Law', so um, yeah. Just because something isn't considered a person under the Law, doesn't mean it's absolutely definitively not a (human) "person". It's awfully regressive to redefine clear human entities as non-persons. I think there's a term for it too, isn't there? And I'm pretty sure, doing the thing the term describes, doesn't make you SMRT. Damn, I just about had it...
Really, its a metaphysics, or a philosophical question. We can say for sure that a fetus is human, as in it has human features and dna. But my hand is human too. Whether something is a “person” or not is entirely philosophical. You can’t use some psuedo-scientific standard like “conscious” or “self-sufficient” because then everytime you went to sleep you would stop being a person. The only way to resolve this is metaphysics, which of course doesn’t prove anything. We can debate back and forth what a “person” actually is until the end of time, but science can’t tell us that anymore than science can tell us what is ethical. Its why science and ethics are different fields.

One particularly persuasive (imo) argument for allowing abortion is that we don’t allow organ harvesting without consent, even from dead people. This avoids the fetus question. Liberals and boomer cons will never understand this because they’ve never read a nonfiction book. Bob is worse because he is *just* well read enough to know this, but doesn’t care. He has said before he doesn’t “do” philosophy, which explains why his morals are so shit. He also thinks science can tell us right from wrong, which again, as Nazis and many others have demonstrated, isn’t the case. Like, no shit he ends up running afoul of leftists, ya need to actually think about stuff in order to get your beliefs in order. His only idea of “good” is what gives him a hard on.
 
Really philosophy is just thinking, nearly everyone does it at some point even if they don’t realize it or have the terms to describe it. Bob thinks he is some bastion of logic and truth that doesn’t so any of that nonsense, and thats absurd. Its just as absurd as an author saying “my books are completely devoid of politics, religion, or philosophy”. He doesn’t realize his own worldview is seeping into the work, because its just background noise to him. If you don’t think about what’s moral vs immoral and why, you’ll end up doing heinous shit without realizing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back