- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
Bob is a perfect example of what I like to call woke fishing; pretending to be woke in order to get pussy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But that's the point! Blob's definition of 'stupid' is 'anyone who disagrees with me' and his definition of 'smart' is 'anyone who agrees with me or forwards progress in the direction I would like, specifically in regards to less white people and more space exploration'.Bobs definition of stupid and smart changes on the context he's arguing in. Dumb actually usually just means "people I don't like or think are mean" and smart means "a person that supports space and technology/liberal woman/person or color".
But that's the point! Blob's definition of 'stupid' is 'anyone who disagrees with me' and his definition of 'smart' is 'anyone who agrees with me or forwards progress in the direction I would like, specifically in regards to less white people and more space exploration'.
Space exploration is actually one of the only issues he seems to genuinely care about. I'd go so far as to say that it's the most important political issue for him. He was pissed when Obama defunded NASA and most of his measurements of 'progress' are linked in some way to how far space exploration has gotten.
So what is he going to think about Werner von Braun, card-carrying nazi (stupid and evil) and also one of the most brilliant and important minds in the field of space exploration (smart and good)?
I think he ultimately will come down on the side of Werner von Braun being stupid. We can sort of see the same thing with Elon Musk and SpaceX. Bob is always lamenting the fact that Elon Musk is PrObLeMaTiC and that he wishes it was someone else who was the face of space exploration in the modern age. Lately he's been saying that Elon Musk actually doesn't know anything about science and is just "buying his way in" and that he's also a bad businessman actually.
Yes, Bob thinks a multi-billionaire who is sending people into space is bad at both business and science. Just because he doesn't agree with all of Bob's politics.
He won't. He'll bend over backwards to find reasons why Von Braun's contribution was negligible and the Nazis did not get anything done. Von Braun married his cousin, so he must be a stupid hick!I would pay cash money to see Bob defend von Braun with some variation on "He was just following orders."
I genuinely think Trump being elected has affected him, because he wasn’t this cruel or hateful of say, Republicans, in 2015. I think if Trump is reelected Bob may spiral into Holocaust denial territory with the Nazi scientist and eugenics stuff. I half expect him to be like “glad that n!gger Herman Cain is dead” entirely un-ironically and he’s be surprised when the backlash hits.
Openly gravedancing on two recent deaths on your "professional" business account. If he wasn't such a nobody he would have gotten canceled years ago, him and his mongoloid followers.This all that I've seen him say about Herman so far.
View attachment 1484531
He was far less kind to the co founder of Turningpoint USA
View attachment 1484546
I don't think hes pretending to be woke to get pussy, he legitimately believes in the nonsense he rambles on about. He's not like your usual Male Feminist who tweets out standard woke talking points on Twitter in order to hide that they are a creep and pervert. Bob really does believe that Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren would have transformed America overnight into a Star Trek-like utopia or that uneducated third-world immigrants will become the new working class in America, building the robots that will replace all Blue-Collar jobs, unlike other people who say it for brownie points on Twitter and deep down know its all nonsense. Bobs method of getting pussy is old school Nice-Guy behavior where he puts women on a pedestal, acts like he genuinely cares about them, but is really waiting for them to turn to him in a time of crisis and use him for re-bound sex while wishing the Chad she was dating suffers a horrific fate.Bob is a perfect example of what I like to call woke fishing; pretending to be woke in order to get pussy.
Why do people think that wearing a mask will provide any protection? The paper and cotton masks being pushed don't provide any personal protection. They can't even filter out pollen, and COVID is significantly smaller than tree semen. And the bandannas are just a joke. The whole point of wearing a facial covering is to block large droplets, and that's the only thing it can do. N95 masks do significantly cut the risk if you can fit them properly, but good luck buying any now. I wonder if anyone has been exceptional enough to walk around with a scuba re-breather.He was high risk because of his previous cancer and chemotherapy and chose not to wear a mask (although in large crowds I seriously question how protective masks actually are) and to travel a lot, to various events, which while it's sad it turned out this way, is on him. He might even have been okay with that risk considering he was a devout Christian and was in his older years. An "If I go it was my time" sort of thing. Anyway, there's no proof that he contracted COVID at the rally.
Most people who hype up the protection of masks haven't even read what the doctors who vouched for them actually said about them beyond "Mask good." Their paper basically said that masks might help the people wearing them prevent spreading the disease to to others by redirecting their breath back over themselves instead of outward into the air in front of them. So masks aren't even to protect the people who are wearing them, they're supposed to protect everyone else from them. Even then, the study basically ended with "Well it can't hurt so do it!" and there was a group of scientists who issued a counter statement that it's doubtful masks do anything.Why do people think that wearing a mask will provide any protection? The paper and cotton masks being pushed don't provide any personal protection. They can't even filter out pollen, and COVID is significantly smaller than tree semen. And the bandannas are just a joke. The whole point of wearing a facial covering is to block large droplets, and that's the only thing it can do. N95 masks do significantly cut the risk if you can fit them properly, but good luck buying any now. I wonder if anyone has been exceptional enough to walk around with a scuba re-breather.
I don't trust the Wu Flu death reports, for one simple reason: deaths WITH Covid are being counted as deaths BY Covid. The CDC lists deaths with Covid, or with presumed Covid infections, as opposed to by Covid.This all that I've seen him say about Herman so far.
View attachment 1484531
He was far less kind to the co founder of Turningpoint USA
View attachment 1484546
The thing about the masks, however, is that the mass media whipped many people up into a hysteria. And in that hysteria, they're not thinking rationally and are behaving like lunatics (presenting Exhibit A and Exhibit B.)Most people who hype up the protection of masks haven't even read what the doctors who vouched for them actually said about them beyond "Mask good." Their paper basically said that masks might help the people wearing them prevent spreading the disease to to others by redirecting their breath back over themselves instead of outward into the air in front of them. So masks aren't even to protect the people who are wearing them, they're supposed to protect everyone else from them. Even then, the study basically ended with "Well it can't hurt so do it!" and there was a group of scientists who issued a counter statement that it's doubtful masks do anything.
So everyone treating masks like they render you invulnerable to COVID is just as guilty of possibly endangering people by giving them a false sense of security as any Trump supporter or conspiracy theorist they'd care to name. The experts and politicians who do it are just using it as a tool to manipulate the public. The only real protection is to avoid group gatherings and disinfect when you come in contact with anything you even suspect might have been touched by a sick person.
Don't even get me started on that "BLM protests are safe" bullshit. That alone renders everything Rob the Blob and everyone he RT's say about Cain and Montgomery disgustingly hypocritical.
I'm quite a paranoid and taking every precaution, thus using masks and avoiding large crowds primarily, but people who complain about having to use a mask and not being able to handle it or breathe correctly when they're perfectly healthy are just pussies.Most people who hype up the protection of masks haven't even read what the doctors who vouched for them actually said about them beyond "Mask good." Their paper basically said that masks might help the people wearing them prevent spreading the disease to to others by redirecting their breath back over themselves instead of outward into the air in front of them. So masks aren't even to protect the people who are wearing them, they're supposed to protect everyone else from them. Even then, the study basically ended with "Well it can't hurt so do it!" and there was a group of scientists who issued a counter statement that it's doubtful masks do anything.
So everyone treating masks like they render you invulnerable to COVID is just as guilty of possibly endangering people by giving them a false sense of security as any Trump supporter or conspiracy theorist they'd care to name. The experts and politicians who do it are just using it as a tool to manipulate the public. The only real protection is to avoid group gatherings and disinfect when you come in contact with anything you even suspect might have been touched by a sick person.
Don't even get me started on that "BLM protests are safe" bullshit. That alone renders everything Rob the Blob and everyone he RT's say about Cain and Montgomery disgustingly hypocritical.
“Intelligence is the only real human virtue,” Bob claims.
What the fuck broke his brain so completely?
Look no further than how many pages this thread has grown since the 2016 election. Yeah, four years have passed, but the two years this thread existed before Trump’s election did not suggest such a dramatic increase.I genuinely think Trump being elected has affected him,
I would have figured that Gamergate might have been the breaking point and the 2016 election was just an extent of that.Look no further than how many pages this thread has grown since the 2016 election. Yeah, four years have passed, but the two years this thread existed before Trump’s election did not suggest such a dramatic increase.
As far as we know -- although it is under contest -- covid is transmitted through droplets, not airborne virus particles. That's why surgical masks are effective against it. A truly airborne pathogen, like the tuberculosis bacilli, will require an N95.Why do people think that wearing a mask will provide any protection? The paper and cotton masks being pushed don't provide any personal protection. They can't even filter out pollen, and COVID is significantly smaller than tree semen.
Out of curiosity, has anyone identified the younger woman to the immediate right of Chris and behind his mom? One of Blob's fleeting "relationships" perhaps?
lol as if. It’s Angela, Sarah Chipman’s sister.Out of curiosity, has anyone identified the younger woman to the immediate right of Chris and behind his mom? One of Blob's fleeting "relationships" perhaps?
"A fetus isn't a person" is not a scientific statement, Bob. Science can't tell you whether someone's a "legal person" or not, only if someone is human. It's a legal opinion, which is very different, and thus can be subject to change. Don't forget, at some point Black people weren't considered full 'Persons under the Law', so um, yeah. Just because something isn't considered a person under the Law, doesn't mean it's absolutely definitively not a (human) "person". It's awfully regressive to redefine clear human entities as non-persons. I think there's a term for it too, isn't there? And I'm pretty sure, doing the thing the term describes, doesn't make you SMRT. Damn, I just about had it...I'll keep this pic on hand for the next time Bob starts stanning forpoor people cullingabortion.
View attachment 1484985
Really, its a metaphysics, or a philosophical question. We can say for sure that a fetus is human, as in it has human features and dna. But my hand is human too. Whether something is a “person” or not is entirely philosophical. You can’t use some psuedo-scientific standard like “conscious” or “self-sufficient” because then everytime you went to sleep you would stop being a person. The only way to resolve this is metaphysics, which of course doesn’t prove anything. We can debate back and forth what a “person” actually is until the end of time, but science can’t tell us that anymore than science can tell us what is ethical. Its why science and ethics are different fields."A fetus isn't a person" is not a scientific statement, Bob. Science can't tell you whether someone's a "legal person" or not, only if someone is human. It's a legal opinion, which is very different, and thus can be subject to change. Don't forget, at some point Black people weren't considered full 'Persons under the Law', so um, yeah. Just because something isn't considered a person under the Law, doesn't mean it's absolutely definitively not a (human) "person". It's awfully regressive to redefine clear human entities as non-persons. I think there's a term for it too, isn't there? And I'm pretty sure, doing the thing the term describes, doesn't make you SMRT. Damn, I just about had it...