Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[StraightShooter2]

Between Ralph and Moviebob, who's the bigger piece of fat white trash?

 

[A Watchful Ghost]

All this Disney Sperging. I'm almost glad I only come sparsely to this thread.

Between Ralph and Moviebob, who's the bigger piece of fat white trash?

I say Bob. His smugness and ego are so big that it blinds him to see why Ellis, and other members of his political side hate his guts.

 

[thismanlies]

Between Ralph and Moviebob, who's the bigger piece of fat white trash?

Ralph. For all the (numerous) times Bob has shown his ass, it was on the Internet and the only person who was negatively affected was Bob. When Ralph shows his ass, you have to think to yourself "Gee, this could have been on an episode of Cops."

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Between Ralph and Moviebob, who's the bigger piece of fat white trash?

Frankly it’s not even close. Ethan Oliver Ralph is a proud wigger who openly smokes meth and mixes it with booze and molly because he thinks it makes him a badass. If Robert had the opportunity to act like that, even he would know it’s trashy and shameful.

 

[Chad Holdenford]

Bob isn't going to jail, mix hard drugs with his cheap booze or pass his worthless genes to a piece of trashy ass to be as much of a deadbeat dad as his own was, so yeah, I also agree Guntasaurus is the worst of both. There is a reason the latter has his own subforum now.

Then again, the Blobbenführer would be just as bad if he was more assertive and went out more often. And could hide his genocidal tendencies a little better to his Twitterati peers.

 

[Mola Ram]

If Robert had the opportunity to act like that, even he would know it’s trashy and shameful.

Robert might do well with meth. It was originally intended as an appetite suppressant, after all. Either he loses weight, drops dead of a heart attack, or goes on a rampage and gets shot down by Boston PD. All good outcomes.

 

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

Well, Spiderman does have that lesson about power and responsibility. Batman also kind of addresses how the extreme pursuit of good can turn you into somewhat of a villain. I'm sure there are other classic lessons in superhero stories (I wonder what Bob thinks of the original Watchmen? I have no doubt he's a simp for the HBO sequel which generally fell flat, but I bet he's ranted multiple times over the years about Rorschach fanboys as alt-right...)

But, yeah, the blockbuster MCU movies are morally vacuous corporate enterprises. Viewing them as having any deeper meaning to teach viewers is retarded. At best, they're fun and have impressive cinematography—though I generally think CGI is not worth praising.

Raimi Spiderman yes. Even Mark Webb Spiderman had it. MCU Spidey lives under the shadow of Tony Stark though. I completely agree with Nerdrotic in calling him Iron Lad, because he really is a sidekick character for Stark to have a personal stake in later MCU movies. Batman is all over the place these days even though he could be a consistent character under Synder.

 

[Druveer]

I love the turn that this thread has taken. We've gone from constantly shitting on Bobert to giving him compliments.
And because it's Bobert and he's a bottom of the rung human being, the compliment is, "He may be a fat piece of shit and a shitty person but at least he's not Ethan Ralph."

Warms the heart it does.

though I generally think CGI is not worth praising.

I think it should be praised from a technical standpoint. Rocket and Groot wouldn't be as popular as they are if they were animated poorly. IMO.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Robert might do well with meth. It was originally intended as an appetite suppressant, after all. Either he loses weight, drops dead of a heart attack, or goes on a rampage and gets shot down by Boston PD. All good outcomes.

I thought it was invented by the Nazis as a stimulant for soldiers fighting on the Eastern Front.

 

[Jacques Strap]

Ralph is definitely worse because he has actually done bad things rather than just said them. His actions have tangible effects on other people IRL whereas our rotund eugenicist just tweets from his basement.

I love the turn that this thread has taken. We've gone from constantly shitting on Bobert to giving him compliments.
And because it's Bobert and he's a bottom of the rung human being, the compliment is, "He may be a fat piece of shit and a shitty person but at least he's not Ethan Ralph."

I think 'not as bad as Ethan Ralph' is pretty much the definition of damning with faint praise.

 

[AnOminous]

Well what nobody wants to admit (and the films try and ignore) is that wiping out half of humanity at random would have a MUCH higher death toll than just half of us. For example... if it was purely random, how many air plane pilots would be taken? So even though several dozen folks on the plane may be left alive, they won't be much longer...

There's also just the fact that society would immediately and catastrophically collapse as lines of supply and logistics and all the shit necessary to maintain existence as we currently enjoy it would instantly disappear. You'd be looking at more like 99%+ of all of humanity dying, and the rest would be desperate, violent dregs living in Hell.

This is what subhuman turds like Bob Chimpman actually want. Even though he'd be one of the first ones dead.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

This is what subhuman turds like Bob Chimpman actually want. Even though he'd be one of the first ones dead.

Does that matter to him, so long as the mayonnaise ghouls also kick the bucket?

 

[Chad Holdenford]

Does that matter to him, so long as the mayonnaise ghouls also kick the bucket?

Once he begins starving, he'd regret it and he'd cry out in agony. Because it hit him as well, of course.

 

[Mola Ram]

I thought it was invented by the Nazis as a stimulant for soldiers fighting on the Eastern Front.

Well, that fits too.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

I think it should be praised from a technical standpoint. Rocket and Groot wouldn't be as popular as they are if they were animated poorly. IMO.

I just find it hard to praise CGI when its quality is so tied to the amount of money available in the movie's production. Sure, the practical effects of The Road Warrior required a lot of money, but in the end it consists of real effects. A good film shouldn't need to have a multimillion dollar budget to be considered cinematographically or narratively impressive, but it's become a prerequisite for the production of many movies (like all of the MCU). And then you have corporate slaves like CinemaRobert who salivate over it. It just feels...insubstantial, as if it's all a big illusion that never actually existed.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I love the turn that this thread has taken. We've gone from constantly shitting on Bobert to giving him compliments.
And because it's Bobert and he's a bottom of the rung human being, the compliment is, "He may be a fat piece of shit and a shitty person but at least he's not Ethan Ralph."

Warms the heart it does.

This arc started with comparing him to his brother, who has in recent months shown himself to be a complete horror show lolcow, too. The contest is closer between the two Chipman brothers, but Robert is a little less horrifying to me because Chris is a literal child abuser who neglects his small children’s most basic needs while he’s wasting time trying to “save” video stores and exploiting his kids to e-beg.

 

[Flexo]

There's also just the fact that society would immediately and catastrophically collapse as lines of supply and logistics and all the shit necessary to maintain existence as we currently enjoy it would instantly disappear. You'd be looking at more like 99%+ of all of humanity dying, and the rest would be desperate, violent dregs living in Hell.

This is what subhuman turds like Bob Chimpman actually want. Even though he'd be one of the first ones dead.

Exactly. Maybe not quite 99% because humans are adaptable and people will try and figure out what to do, but I'd bet 75%.

You certainly wouldn't see "cities, but with less traffic." Urban centers would be literal decaying ghost towns as all the population centers would undergo massive shifts as people all move to where food and supplies are and animal use became prevalent again until manufacturing and supply chains could be rebuilt. Like you would probably literally see families utilizing horses and cattle for every day activities, only resorting to their cars and tractors as a last resort or for very special projects.

 

[make_it_so]

I love the turn that this thread has taken. We've gone from constantly shitting on Bobert to giving him compliments.
And because it's Bobert and he's a bottom of the rung human being, the compliment is, "He may be a fat piece of shit and a shitty person but at least he's not Ethan Ralph."

Warms the heart it does.

Here's the thing with Bob - if it was just the autistic Mario obsession, it would be funny but understandable, because at the end of the day we all have our hobbies and loves. There have always been people with childish or child-like interests, it's just that the internet has made them more visible.

What makes Bob such a loathsome individual is that he has that childish interest plus his political hot takes on Twitter where he's calling for the cruel suppression and destruction of millions of people due to political differences, while holding a completely and demonstrably unearned sense of intellectual and moral superiority.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Robert takes himself way too fucking seriously. That’s pretty much a cardinal sin in my personal religion. But if it weren’t for spergs taking themselves too seriously, there would be no lolcows and this site wouldn’t exist.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

What makes Bob such a loathsome individual is that he has that childish interest plus his political hot takes on Twitter where he's calling for the cruel suppression and destruction of millions of people due to political differences, while holding a completely and demonstrably unearned sense of intellectual and moral superiority.

I'd say his obsession with Mario is loathsome because he treats everything with such seriousness. If you really love Mario, fine, whatever, better than being a dog fucker. But don't act like it's not inherently wacky or that it demands to be treated with the utmost seriousness. CinemaRobert takes these autistically serious stances about everything in his life, when the vast majority of even somewhat socially adjusted adults realize they're going to have interests that are childish/immature, the appropriate stance to which is to present their interests with levity and a degree of self-deprecation. Even women obsessed with Disney theme parks don't consider their childishness to be above reproach—and those are some of the craziest and most dedicated fans you'll ever meet.

If you consistently treat Mario, lolberal twitter politics, and eugenics with equal degrees of seriousness and consideration, there's clearly something wrong with you. Now that I think about it, has CinemaRobert ever made an irreverent joke on twitter? I don't mean distasteful and ignorant judgements in the guise of cynical jokes, but just, you know, unserious or self-deprecating humour? If not, that's either a sign of autism or of clear personal issues.