Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[glib]

The same reason he uses hyphens and quotation marks so inappropriately: he's an idiot who doesn't think he needs to learn basic rules of grammar or editing.

I write on the internet without proper punctuation, or capitalization because it is the literary equivalent of casual conversation for me.

That said, it is telling that Bob writes in the same manner as he speaks. He has a tendency to interrupt his own sentences with em dashes.

I believe the em dash typically represents breaking a thought to iterate on it in a different direction. I don't think theyre necessary. I don't know where I would use one. I'm not an english language expert, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

I believe Bob thinks the way he speaks, and thus writes. His work is that of a manic individual blurting out whatever he thinks. However, he interrupts his own thought process to clarify or alter the thought while he is still attempting to carry through on his initial thought.

It's like hes arguing with himself while trying to always say the right thing.

 

[TowinKarz]

I write on the internet without proper punctuation, or capitalization because it is the literary equivalent of casual conversation for me.

That said, it is telling that Bob writes in the same manner as he speaks. He has a tendency to interrupt his own sentences with em dashes.

I believe the em dash typically represents breaking a thought to iterate on it in a different direction. I don't think theyre necessary. I don't know where I would use one. I'm not an english language expert, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

I believe Bob thinks the way he speaks, and thus writes. His work is that of a manic individual blurting out whatever he thinks. However, he interrupts his own thought process to clarify or alter the thought while he is still attempting to carry through on his initial thought.

It's like hes arguing with himself while trying to always say the right thing.

And once he's said it, he never goes back and corrects.

1. That'd imply imperfection
2. That'd be work
3. Something something "Joss Whedon's Buffy-speak that eschewed traditional dialogue rules for slang and vernacular being the main way a non-gimmicky main character spoke was a transformative moment in entertainment! I can't believe you can't recognize it in literary form and give it the respect it deserves! Obsolete! "

 

[Adamska]

I write on the internet without proper punctuation, or capitalization because it is the literary equivalent of casual conversation for me.

That said, it is telling that Bob writes in the same manner as he speaks. He has a tendency to interrupt his own sentences with em dashes.

I believe the em dash typically represents breaking a thought to iterate on it in a different direction. I don't think theyre necessary. I don't know where I would use one. I'm not an english language expert, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

I believe Bob thinks the way he speaks, and thus writes. His work is that of a manic individual blurting out whatever he thinks. However, he interrupts his own thought process to clarify or alter the thought while he is still attempting to carry through on his initial thought.

It's like hes arguing with himself while trying to always say the right thing.

You forget my least favorite thing he does (Because of course there's more).

If you couldn't guess, it's his abuse of parentheses to insert random non-sequiturs and gibberish he has while typing a sentence. Rather than let the sentence flow (like a river), he does what the fuck I just did, thus making it far harder to read.

These things more than anything are why I don't think he reads all that much. A person who reads a lot would at least have a decent grip on writing structured sentences for others to look at. But Bob, being Bob, only writes for himself.

Bob only became "bookish" because of Nintendo power, and those alongside his capeshit comics and strategy guides to beat Bing Bing Wahoo are probably the only books he willingly reads.

 

[Jacques Strap]

I would confidently suggest this boss-eyed thumb has never read a book aimed at anyone over the age of 10

 

[glib]

Bob only became "bookish" because of Nintendo power, and those alongside his capeshit comics and strategy guides to beat Bing Bing Wahoo are probably the only books he willingly reads.

You are what you read.

 

[Dr. Henry Armitage]

Any sanity I had has been dead for decades. Also note I wasn't stupid enough to seriously read through his attempt to summarize the history of Mario in part 1, mainly because his failed attempt to be wikipedia is boring and no one wants to read that.

I'll be kind and state the only funny thing in the sections before his manifesto is he spends a page and a half arguing with himself on why did he even make it. Besides proving his "Bookishness" by confusing Harry Potter with Twilight again, it's not that noteworthy beyond mentioning that if you have to rationalize in your own book its purpose then it's shit. I mean, I guess I can say that Bob thinks his book is unique. I mean it is, but only for his insane manifesto; the actual concept is just a written Let's Play of a game.

I mean, if you guys really want to, I can actually go through his History of Mario. I found it dull as dogshit, but I think I could find a fleck of gold or two there.

Anyways, since Bob's being a whiny mentally ill cunt who again proves he has others fight his own battles for him, here's more of his retarded manifesto.

After ripping off one of my favorite school assigned book for his segment title, Bob throws some more nuggets that I feel get missed sometimes.

It's actually telling by the way how rarely he ever brings up the Game Boy, and again he believes that adults still playing Nintendo are just as mentally ill and obsessive as he is.

Fuck you Gunpei Yokoi and Yoshio Sakamoto. You heard Bob.

Bob is such a gaming "nerd" that he forgot the Sega CD was a Genesis peripheral, not its own console. And Genesis still did amazing for Sega and its lifespan, but Bob is a retard who pins his success on the success of his creepy obsessions.

This of course is utter horseshit given that a lot of 3rd party developers left Nintendo during this gen, and this is the console that had both Resident Evil, Final Fantasy VII, and even platformers like Crash. But again, Bob doesn't pay attention to anything and downplays things that are not his obsession.

This is a statement I'm surprised didn't make the cut. This is Bob trying to really rationalize why Bing Bing Wahoo is cutting edge.

Reminder Bubsy 3D came out first btw, thus proving Bob's tardery wrong.

So anyway, Bob also remembers games had 3d and googles names to prove he totally knows this, leading to the Most Insulting Thing Ever (tm).

Yes. Bob fucking mispelled Doom in his book, and either thought it was the series name due to being that out of touch, or was too stupid to catch this.

You can start screaming now.

So here's another hint that Bob was and is a retard who dreamed of joining the Mushroom Kingdom until he was 15, because here's probably the birth of his desperate desire to join a Matrioshka Brain and Bing Bing Wahoo for eternity.

Hope for the fucking future people.

Here's more yandere Bob. Seriously, I don't even have to say more than that.

Again, since Bob didn't get Bing Bing Wahoo 64 first and it didn't make him popular again, then Bing Bing Wahoo 3: the Search for More Money is still his favorite.

Also I guess we know what Bob's fursona is now.

What can I say that Bob himself didn't?

Oh I know: fucking go to therapy you anti-therapist!

Bob, proving me right and desperate for people to ignore he still wants this, dreams of a future where he's put into a dream pod and can Bing Bing Wahoo for eternity in the Mushroom Kingdom.

Because of course the only reason Mario is good is because it's the most popular.

Riddle me this viewers, is Bob Quinton 1.0? Or is Quinton Bob 2.0?

Anyways, I think I'll do more later, since I need a slight break from this, especially since while we're getting to Bob's imagined low point, he'll get smugger later and that makes me shiver.

If we combine this with his hatred of everyone he considers sub human I think it paints a pretty hilarious picture. Bob in his mind is mad at the "mayo ghouls" because he can't upload his mind to a computer and bing bing wahoo forever. And this is somehow their fault? Bob is not just a retard, he's King Retard.

 

[HarblMcDavid]

View attachment 2141434
I'd like to know when did science learn that men and women are interchangable.

Science does not "lie" because only an agent with intention can lie. Science is merely a coherent collection of worldviews that are more or less compatible with reality (By the same token, neither Religion nor Politics can lie, because they too are presentations of worldviews that is more or less compatible with reality). Scientists, however, make mistakes all the time. And of late people are becoming increasingly aware that some scientists deliberately lie.

Well and this entire discussion ignores that "science" and public policy should not be joined at the hip as they are at counter purposes.

Sane public policy is there to ensure a stable set of rules which everyone follows which in theory are there to benefit society.

Science is just a process to figure shit out, and without explicit ethical limitations it will literally end with a eugenics moon base. See also: a bunch of shit scientists did in the past which is explicitly unethical or extremely grey....but contributed to scientific understanding.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

View attachment 2141434
I'd like to know when did science learn that men and women are interchangable.

Science does not "lie" because only an agent with intention can lie. Science is merely a coherent collection of worldviews that are more or less compatible with reality (By the same token, neither Religion nor Politics can lie, because they too are presentations of worldviews that is more or less compatible with reality). Scientists, however, make mistakes all the time. And of late people are becoming increasingly aware that some scientists deliberately lie.

The Chippa should explain how the noble scientists working for the petroleum industry have devoted study after study proving auto emissions help keep the environment clean while also improving erection frequency and longevity.

Or how, after the same scientist worked out how to destroy humanity with both tetraethyl and CFCs, petrol and chemical companies hurled a barrage of scientists and their studies truthfully showing that, no, that isn't lead particulate blowing out the back of that car. It's love. And that ozone was created by the devil, who is real and hates air conditioning.

 

[Quixotic Man]

Does Bob realize how terrifying the implication is that a bunch of super humans running around with no loyalty to any group other than themselves would be? Already stretching their extranational morality thin when the first two things they have shown is the ubermensch family enslaving a small town and breaking a mass murdering terrorist out of jail.

Also not sure how his "no borders, no countries" thing is supposed to work when one of the movies is titled "Wakanda Forever."

 

[King Dead]

What really sticks out to me in these quotes is Bob conflating his deranged mental state with the average person's and assuming that everyone else was making as big a deal out of Mario as he was.

Now, I wasn't really a console gamer growing up, as Mom and Pop Dead didn't want me wasting my time on a Nintendo (although PC games were A-OK, go figure). I was aware of consoles, of course, but I wasn't consumed by a desire to know everything there was to know. At most, I played around on demo units at stores or with my friends whenever I went over to their houses, or borrowed a Game Boy here and there. Mario was obviously a character I knew about, but I don't recall kids at school being obsessed by the bing bing wahoo games. My memory is naturally foggy, but I know for a fact that Pokemon was the craze in my younger years.

Bob, meanwhile, seems to have been completely unaware of any developments in gaming beyond his beloved plumber, and his ignorance remains on display in his book. He dismisses the earliest examples of 3D graphics off-hand, and then completely ignores all the other examples of 3D games, not just on the PC, but other consoles as well (3D is in the name of the 3DO, for fuck's sake!). He claims that the PS1 hadn't found its killer app, but failed to see that it was already trouncing Nintendo by the time the N64 came out; look up both consoles on the bizarrely-specific Video Game Sales Wiki and you'll see what I mean. He brushed off hot new series like Crash Bandicoot and Tomb Raider as mere fads, all because they weren't on his beloved Nintendo machines. Put simply, if it didn't have a fat Italian eating shrooms and stomping animals to death, it was as good as nonexistent to young Bobby, and presumably old Bobby as well.

And finally, lest we forget, Bob was 16 when Super Mario 64 came out, yet he's writing about being blown away by the game like he was actually 6. Really says a lot, doesn't it?

 

[blablabla]

What really sticks out to me in these quotes is Bob conflating his deranged mental state with the average person's and assuming that everyone else was making as big a deal out of Mario as he was.

Now, I wasn't really a console gamer growing up, as Mom and Pop Dead didn't want me wasting my time on a Nintendo (although PC games were A-OK, go figure). I was aware of consoles, of course, but I wasn't consumed by a desire to know everything there was to know. At most, I played around on demo units at stores or with my friends whenever I went over to their houses, or borrowed a Game Boy here and there. Mario was obviously a character I knew about, but I don't recall kids at school being obsessed by the bing bing wahoo games. My memory is naturally foggy, but I know for a fact that Pokemon was the craze in my younger years.

Bob, meanwhile, seems to have been completely unaware of any developments in gaming beyond his beloved plumber, and his ignorance remains on display in his book. He dismisses the earliest examples of 3D graphics off-hand, and then completely ignores all the other examples of 3D games, not just on the PC, but other consoles as well (3D is in the name of the 3DO, for fuck's sake!). He claims that the PS1 hadn't found its killer app, but failed to see that it was already trouncing Nintendo by the time the N64 came out; look up both consoles on the bizarrely-specific Video Game Sales Wiki and you'll see what I mean. He brushed off hot new series like Crash Bandicoot and Tomb Raider as mere fads, all because they weren't on his beloved Nintendo machines. Put simply, if it didn't have a fat Italian eating shrooms and stomping animals to death, it was as good as nonexistent to young Bobby, and presumably old Bobby as well.

And finally, lest we forget, Bob was 16 when Super Mario 64 came out, yet he's writing about being blown away by the game like he was actually 6. Really says a lot, doesn't it?

bob chipman is a deeply disturbed individual he has always been. 40 years of hate and jacking off totally fried his brain

 

[Adamska]

bob chipman is a deeply disturbed individual he has always been. 40 years of hate and jacking off totally fried his brain

His parents failed when they gave up on therapy.

He's little better than an anti-vaxxer given his clear hatred of the idea he has a problem and needs help.

 

[blablabla]

His parents failed when they gave up on therapy.

He's little better than an anti-vaxxer given his clear hatred of the idea he has a problem and needs help.

but you see he was so smart*
insert the picture of a fat piece of shit teen hunchback retard reading some crap

this guy´s brain is totally rotten, hope he doesnt rape or murder anyone

 

[MirrorNoir]

Maybe, but a more parsimonious explanation is that the Occupiers are college-educated dumb, drunk on leftism, hence inclusive to a fault.

One big thing that gets lost in the discussion of the Occupy Wall Street movement's genesis, is that it came out around the same time that the Tea Party was at it's zenith power-wise and in it's first couple of months of existence, there was a strong as fuck vibe that OWS WAS a sort of Obama type psy-ops designed to hijack the basic bitch populist elements of the Tea Party from the right since Obama and the DNC were pretty livid at the speed THAT populist movement was hijacked by the GOP/the right and the fact that they were unable to kill the conservative media promotion of the Tea Party as working class populism going against the big bad Obama administration, even after the Tea Party movement kept fucking up on the optics front to give the DNC countless counter fodder to label the Tea Party a racist hate group and not real populism.

Right before the movement "debuted" in the public, there was a LOT of bitching on the left and among Democrats and the left wing media, that Democrats "should be ashamed of themselves" for allowing the Tea Party to claim the populist mantle as the face of the common man's anger at the way Wall Street nuked the economy and got away with it while the working/middle class got told to fuck off and die by Obama. And that the DNC/left needed to get off their butts, stop kissing Obama's ass and acknowledge that he was a whore for Wall Street and take to the streets to make it clear that the Tea Party didn't speak for all working/middle class folks who wanted Wall Street to pay the iron price for their evil.

I don't think anyone has really ever actually done any real investigation towards the identity of who was actually behind those original OWS rallies and all. But the whole movement's launch always came across to me as being something that may or may not have been set into motion by elements on the left with money and resources to launch their own "grass roots astroturf" group to counter the Tea Party message. And in turn, as a result when OWS became too much of a threat for the Obama administration to allow to live, were able to explicitly kill it via a switch to anti-life politics as the new watchword to kill OWS and poison the well on any similar populist movement on the left.

 

[Positron]

Well if you can get your HIGH PROFILE brother to talk about Tiananmen Square...

 

[UserAccess]

What really sticks out to me in these quotes is Bob conflating his deranged mental state with the average person's and assuming that everyone else was making as big a deal out of Mario as he was.

Now, I wasn't really a console gamer growing up, as Mom and Pop Dead didn't want me wasting my time on a Nintendo (although PC games were A-OK, go figure). I was aware of consoles, of course, but I wasn't consumed by a desire to know everything there was to know. At most, I played around on demo units at stores or with my friends whenever I went over to their houses, or borrowed a Game Boy here and there. Mario was obviously a character I knew about, but I don't recall kids at school being obsessed by the bing bing wahoo games. My memory is naturally foggy, but I know for a fact that Pokemon was the craze in my younger years.

Bob, meanwhile, seems to have been completely unaware of any developments in gaming beyond his beloved plumber, and his ignorance remains on display in his book. He dismisses the earliest examples of 3D graphics off-hand, and then completely ignores all the other examples of 3D games, not just on the PC, but other consoles as well (3D is in the name of the 3DO, for fuck's sake!). He claims that the PS1 hadn't found its killer app, but failed to see that it was already trouncing Nintendo by the time the N64 came out; look up both consoles on the bizarrely-specific Video Game Sales Wiki and you'll see what I mean. He brushed off hot new series like Crash Bandicoot and Tomb Raider as mere fads, all because they weren't on his beloved Nintendo machines. Put simply, if it didn't have a fat Italian eating shrooms and stomping animals to death, it was as good as nonexistent to young Bobby, and presumably old Bobby as well.

And finally, lest we forget, Bob was 16 when Super Mario 64 came out, yet he's writing about being blown away by the game like he was actually 6. Really says a lot, doesn't it?

And he glosses over history he doesn't like. Nintendo ate huge fines for anticompetitive practices which doesn't make a good case for being this altruistic factory of love and fun for children of all ages.

It makes them a business. Nothing more. They make product. Any inference beyond that is dogmatic projection. Joining the corporate cult is what "thinkers" do, right?

 

[MirrorNoir]

Does Bob realize how terrifying the implication is that a bunch of super humans running around with no loyalty to any group other than themselves would be? Already stretching their ultra national morality thin when the first two things they have shown is the ubermensch family enslaving a small town and breaking a mass murdering terrorist out of jail.

Also not sure how his "no borders, no countries" thing is supposed to work when one of the movies is titled "Wakanda Forever."

That's one of the things I hate about modern Avengers and Bendis's rape of the franchise: the Avengers no longer are a team of morally righteous super-heroes who walk the walk, but a group of fuck-ups that cause more harm than good and the main roster raped repeatedly by Bendis and his ilk to make their own biased "we hate heroes and stan villains as the "real heroes" we should admire" anti-life worldview onto them in a Toohey-esque hatre of the very concept of heroism.

 

[glib]

Mario was obviously a character I knew about, but I don't recall kids at school being obsessed by the bing bing wahoo games. My memory is naturally foggy, but I know for a fact that Pokemon was the craze in my younger years.

Mario games are Nintendo's flagship series because they are the main mascots. Mario can be use in many different game genres. The aesthetic doesnt require high definition rendering, and its kid friendly. Nintendo used to prioritize gameplay over story since they had a system to sell. Tennis game? make it mario. Golf? make it mario. Party game? mario.

The weird thing is how Bob cared about the story and lore of the mushroom kingdom. The story never really mattered. It wasn't much more than a way to get the player going. Mickey mouse isnt really a character people obsess about lore wise. Yet, if disney were to make a family friendly game mickey would be at the center of it.

TLDR: Mario = Brand Mascot

 

[TowinKarz]

I don't think anyone has really ever actually done any real investigation towards the identity of who was actually behind those original OWS rallies and all. But the whole movement's launch always came across to me as being something that may or may not have been set into motion by elements on the left with money and resources to launch their own "grass roots astroturf" group to counter the Tea Party message. And in turn, as a result when OWS became too much of a threat for the Obama administration to allow to live, were able to explicitly kill it via a switch to anti-life politics as the new watchword to kill OWS and poison the well on any similar populist movement on the left.

There's no doubt the TEA party was labeled "racist, obsolete rust-belt hicks upset that you can't kick black folks out of town no more" by the mass media so it could be ignored with a clean conscious by the political elite, who were pushing the "Obama did nothing wrong, it's the backwards folk from 1990 who ruined it all" narrative, and they kinda did oblige by not being choosy with their spokespersons. Leading to sane people being chased off by overly-inflammatory rednecks wanting to march on Washington.

Meanwhile, OWS was TOO choosy and picked the most intersectional/feeling-the-hardest-feelings/I-just-found-30-new-kinds-of-racism-to-hate of the bunch to do the same, leading to sane people being chased off by overly-inflammatory junior socialist kids wanting to burn Washington.

I really don't think OWS was controlled opposition, but rather, proof of how badly the neocon/neolib alliance had sold the nation down the river, when the economy crashed, it took EVERYONE out, bankers AND customers. So much so that BOTH sides were pissed off enough to hit the bricks.

If the left supported OWS (at first) it was only because they were "D" voters.

 

[MirrorNoir]

Mario games are Nintendo's flagship series because they are the main mascots. Mario can be use in many different game genres. The aesthetic doesnt require high definition rendering, and its kid friendly. Nintendo used to prioritize gameplay over story since they had a system to sell. Tennis game? make it mario. Golf? make it mario. Party game? mario.

The weird thing is how Bob cared about the story and lore of the mushroom kingdom. The story never really mattered. It wasn't much more than a way to get the player going. Mickey mouse isnt really a character people obsess about lore wise. Yet, if disney were to make a family friendly game mickey would be at the center of it.

TLDR: Mario = Brand Mascot

To be fair, Mario being from Earth, not the Mushroom Kingdom was his default canon for ages. Yoshi's Island did muddy shit up though it should be noted that it came AFTER the double flop that was Super Mario World cartoon (the last official Mario cartoon of the DIC era of having the cartoon rights) and the Super Mario Brothers movie. And later attempts to make a canon/world for Mario tend to be convoluted affairs and filled with retcons and a lot of new flat characters that don't add much to the lore.

You could make the case that Yoshi's Island and it's retcons were Nintendo trying to reclaim the franchise via a HARD reset of the lore. IE humans exist in the Mushroom Kingdom and Mario/Luigi are lifetime residents of it. And given that post-YI games have amped the stereotype factor for Mario up to eleven, plus the notion that the first two DIC cartoon shows (Super Show and SMB3) were tolerable and offered a decent base for Nintendo to create and expand the lore, I can see why there is a generation that prefers the DIC lore as the default lore for Mario since it's simpler, offers the unrealized potential of Mushroom Kingdom interacting with the real world, and doesn't raise all sorts of unanswered questions about Mushroom Kingdom and Mario's past that Nintendo doesn't care about answering, even if it's "Yoshi's Island is it's own canon" sort of deal.