Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do these people think they’re the main character or rather why do they want to be the main character?

Any thoughts?

Because the "hero" or "main character" of the show always prevails in the end, gets the scholarship, wins the big game, humiliates the bully, gets the girl, lives happily ever after, whatever the final end goal is, the hero ultimately achieves it.

Yeah, there might be some loss or a moment of darkest hour along the way, but, by the end of Act III, the protagonist is in a better place than they were to start.

The autists and misanthropes of the world take the wrong message from this and assume that this is how it works for everyone, or if aware the hero is one of a select few, a "Chosen One"? Then they feel they OBVIOUSLY are part of such a group. Whatever defines the protagonist in fiction, they assume they have the same qualities because they WANT to be the hero, or more directly, want heroic-level success in life.

Since they've put themselves on the self-appointed heroes journey, then reality itself MUST bend to their inherent moral righteousness and gift them the happy ending, even if they don't TRY or make any concrete moves of their own volition.

The same plot-critical-existence that means Luke is the only one of 2 surviving Rebel strike craft from the Death Star attack?

The same force that means the hero doesn't get shot no matter how many goons are shooting at him? And that he'll never take a fatal bullet, but only a flesh wound? Even if they DO hit?

People like Bob think this is a REAL representation of how the world works: those who are pure of motive and above the sheep simply can't fail, any setback or humiliation they suffer? It's just temporary and adds to the sweet triumph at the end as the "payoff" will be HUGE for all this artful suffering.

They see themselves as the hero staring down the monster in the street, and not the extras running for their lives on the sidewalk.

The TL : DR is that the beloved fictional hero, possessed of unique skill and destined to win? It's who they WANT to be or ALREADY SEE THEMSELF as. You or I watch a movie and think "Boy, I wish I could be like them.. It'd be special." but Bob says "Wow, he's so much like ME!!! I must be special"

And while mythology has been around for all of human existance, it's kind of understood as a reader that the hero is someone you should ASPIRE to be like.

Bob thinks he's' ALREADY THERE and the "proof" is that he exists - history is vindicated by virtue of having produced HIM.

Where does this come from? Stunted maturity, never being told "no" growing up, narcissism and unwarranted self-appointed importance of your place in the world. You never mature past being 8 - 12 years old.
 
Last edited:
What's the comparison supposed to be between Snyder and Boorman or Milius, exactly? Is it positive or negative? Who knows, this is Bob and it's probably something he half remembers an Official Smart Person said once anyway. I doubt that he could defend any comparison that he claimed a position on, but it's twitter, he doesn't have to.
 
Milius has writing credits for Dirty Harry, Magnum Force, and Jaws. While he directed Red Dawn and Conan the Barbarian.

Boorman directed Deliverance and Excalibur.

I'm not a Snyder fan but if Blobby was trying to insult him I'd say major fail especially given Snyder himself would probably take it as a compliment hell in BvS Excalibur was the film the Wayne family saw the night Thomas and Martha died.

What's the comparison supposed to be between Snyder and Boorman or Milius, exactly? Is it positive or negative? Who knows, this is Bob and it's probably something he half remembers an Official Smart Person said once anyway. I doubt that he could defend any comparison that he claimed a position on, but it's twitter, he doesn't have to.

Robert wasn't really comparing Snyder to Boorman and Milius, but more insulting Snyder's audience.

Boorman and Milius are both film makers seen as a accessible "big idea" directors for the main stream audience, both make flawed movies, but with a very distinctive style and personalities. So even duds like Zardoz are regarded to cult classic, or otherwise unremarkable scrits like "Excalibur" are elevated by Boorman's authorship to be better regarded in the public's eye.

And so, according to Robert, the illiterate dummies who don't know who Boorman and Milius are (you know, the gamer gate Bros Robert keeps imagining in his head), regard Snyder in that same authorship quality that gives people foundness for Boorman's movies (Milius too I guess, I've only seen Conan from the guy as a director)., because they are stupid and don't know what good movies are

it's the infantile shit Robert likes to pull every now and then "I know who these director are, and yoou doon't, lalalala!" :smug:
 
Seriously Movie Bob is like that Christian fanatic who claimed that Frozen was promoting lesbianism. Except Movie Bob is actually for lesbianism even if it is only in his head
Nigger.jpg


 
The way I see it there's a difference between ”the Jews of Jerusalem” and ”the Jews”. The first group beared collective guilt for the murder of Jesus, the second not so. Another argument for Jewish guilt is ”His blood be upon us and our children”, but for me that curse was carried out when the Temple was destroyed when their children rebelled against Rome.
Had a priest point out to me recently that that line is in the most "jew-centric" gospel of the 4 we have. So does it make sense to be a blood-libel?

No. We should take a step back and remember that the blood of Christ being upon us is a good thing. His blood being on us is what purifies us, sanctifies us, and saves us. It's something we want and something we do with the ritual of baptism. While the crowd may have intended the cry to be a curse, God ultimately made it into a blessing.

So I decided to do some preliminary searching for Bob's original cable access show. I have some ideas on possible threads. Anyway I happen to check the amazon preview of Bob's "Reel Breakdown."
1621737635664.png

We'll have to figure out some system for who's going to tackle his next book once @Adamska finishes BBB. Unless you all just want me to hit up the intros. Apparently you can get all of that from the amazon previews at least.
 
Robert wasn't really comparing Snyder to Boorman and Milius, but more insulting Snyder's audience.

Boorman and Milius are both film makers seen as a accessible "big idea" directors for the main stream audience, both make flawed movies, but with a very distinctive style and personalities. So even duds like Zardoz are regarded to cult classic, or otherwise unremarkable scrits like "Excalibur" are elevated by Boorman's authorship to be better regarded in the public's eye.

And so, according to Robert, the illiterate dummies who don't know who Boorman and Milius are (you know, the gamer gate Bros Robert keeps imagining in his head), regard Snyder in that same authorship quality that gives people foundness for Boorman's movies (Milius too I guess, I've only seen Conan from the guy as a director)., because they are stupid and don't know what good movies are

it's the infantile shit Robert likes to pull every now and then "I know who these director are, and yoou doon't, lalalala!" :smug:
The only thing I remember about John Boorman (apart from Zardoz) is that he tried making a trippy adaptation of Lord of the Rings that had Frodo having sex with Galadriel and Gimli getting put into a hole and beaten with sticks in order to get him to remember the password into the Mines of Moria. Boorman eventually took many of the ideas that he had brainstormed for LOTR and put them to use in making Excalibur. (Which, frankly, turned out for the better since Boorman had wanted to make a movie about Merlin all along and had chosen to do LOTR because it'd had a Merlin figure in Gandalf. Also, the story of King Arthur was much more suited to Boorman's sexual weirdness than LOTR was.)

Bob insulting Milius, Boorman and Snyder is laughable. All three men are wildly successful, made movies that will be beloved by people for decades to come, and have probably had sex with lots of hot women. Bob himself has to settle for a female relative or friend of the family making him a plate of food at a barbeque to get him to shut his big knowitall mouth by stuffing it full of grilled chicken.
 
Bob picks a fight with an anon, goes on to say if you call something a certain name eventually it will become that, and declares that drone strikes are peak manliness.
This quote tweet is referring to the comparison of the Russian hardcore army recruitment ad with the American I'm a woman with disabled lesbian mom and I went to college first before joining the army because I don't know how finances work army ad
View attachment 2193215
View attachment 2193217
Shout to up and comer Bob coomer, The Impossible Fapper!
View attachment 2193222
View attachment 2193218
View attachment 2193220
"Especially if I can do it to fundies here AND muzzies over there"
I don't know who originally said it but you cannot patrol a street corner with a fighter jet. You need MEN on the field because they can go places and do things a Harrier, or Abrams, or Kodiak cannot go. This idea that everything's gonna be cyber attacks and drone strikes is asinine. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that we are hit with a massive cyber attack. Then what? US has been Iranian super hacked and now there's no power to Philadelphia. Then what? The IRS is compromised and all tax returns are set loose. Then what? The plot of the second shittiest Die Hard movie happens IRL. THEN WHAT? I do not believe for a second America is going to be destroyed because of cyber shit. Would it hurt? Yeah, probably very much so. One thing I can almost guarantee is that they will not go after the financial sector like Wall Street because that's where all the world's money goes and that would be hurting them too. Once the deadly computer varrus goes forth and bricks all the Apple products the next step is invasion. You need strong people to, one, make the trip over here to our, essentially, island nation and, two, they need to be ready for the fight after that. In a fight between Russian skin head recruit and dykey, lesbian moms having staff sergeant, I'm putting my cheeki on the breeki. That's what people are having a problem with Bob. We are putting sissified faggots in our armed forces while ignoring the entirety of human history and please don't quote me any Sun Zu. They've read the Art of War as well.

Secondly, no. No matter how many times you say something it does not become truth. No matter how many times Bob's angels say their a woman does not get them one step closer to suddenly dropping their Y chromosome. No matter how much he and they scream "CLAP OR ELSE ALL THE TRANS KIDS WILL DIE FROM LACK OF PUBERTY BLOCKERS!" will not make it happen, either way. That's Tinkerbell logic. Did ya get that Bobbyboi? I used a Disney reference to make a point

Lastly, Bob's technically lying. Bob does not want war. He just want total eradication.
Boob's use of emojis always cracks me up. I cannot tell if he views them as some own or if he needs us all to know how exasperated basic explanations cause him to be.
 
If AOC suddenly was like "Hey, Israel is really good and I love Gamergate." Bob would instantly flock over to her and be like "Agreed, there were some ASPECTS (random bullshit long ass paragraph that makes no sense) with Gamergate and that your viewpoints are valid but visa vie est ouevure the body of gaming culture and a plethora of difference in our pop-culture and women in gaming." or some other nonsensical simp bullshit.
Not so sure; Bobby didn't exactly start condemning Amazon for ripping off their workforce. Perhaps if AOC addressed him directly (perish the thought) he'd go Yesss Kween.

This is what Chris considers a "great tweet":
Back.jpg

Back.jpg
E2C4nb1WQAsYTQ0.jpg

Back.jpg
Oh really?

E2Bg6Q5WEAQ3xkJ.jpg

Back.jpg
More Bobby coming up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back