Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know that this is a bit of a Karen take but Bob really is the embodiment of the saying "Hate is like acid. It can damage the vessel in which it is stored & destroy the object on which it is poured". You can see how a life of constant, non stop bitching and hating, combined with an insufferable smugness and superiority complex can affect you phisically.
Nah man, that's not a Karen take at all. If anything I'd call it sensible life advice. Bob is a grotesque example of what happens when you allow hate to control your every decision.
 
I feel like I'm having a stroke while reading this, did Bob actually, unironically compare a comic-book movie character to a pagan Scandinavian deity that people actually venerated?
Honestly, I come to this thread to laugh at Bob saying dumb shit but whenever I try to decipher what Bob is actually trying to say I end up feeling like the apes from Space Odyssey, I'm scared and confused, when I see Bobs twitter I see a monolith, I don't know what any of it means but it scares me.
We're dealing with the same individual who thinks that the people of the far future will believe that Captain America spearheaded Operation Cobra and the liberation of Paris because of all the film clips and comic book articles about him. This Loki shit has turned me around to a dreadful thought: he wants this to happen. He wants the media he voraciously consooms to become intertwined with actual historical events and culture. The guy is beyond hopeless.
when bob talks about drumpf victory being down to "Geography" he's talking about electoral college votes. This is why he wants to get rid of the EC, because then it'll be straight "Popular Vote" so that California can overwhelmingly dictate to Wyoming who is going to be President without even needing 55 electoral votes to do it; it will just do it by sheer force of population density. Bobbert will happily point out the population density (or lack thereof) in Flyover Mayoghoul Wasteland Country in contrast to the super-dense Coastal Blue areas, and then use this as an argument about a small number of people (in Flyover Ghoulistan) dictating things for a large number of people (People's REEEEEpublic of California).

One wonders how Bob would feel if the situation was inverted and the Flyover midwest was all blue but with low density and all the coastal high density bastions were red.
Then he'd be for the EC 100%. The only thing that matters to him is destroying the mayghouls. They aren't going away on their own despite his lunatic ramblings about "natural selection." So, the only way to speed up this non-existent process is to disenfranchise them while the Dems hold the reigns.

To put it another way, if we were having a conversation about the filibuster two years ago, Bob would screech that it must be preserved so the Dems could use it against Trump. Now that Biden was installed into the White House and Congress shifted, the filibuster now must be removed for good to preserve that majority.

Bob has no morals despite his claims to have a world view that revolves around good and evil. Power is what matters most. The end of attaining it justifies all means.
 
To put it another way, if we were having a conversation about the filibuster two years ago, Bob would screech that it must be preserved so the Dems could use it against Trump. Now that Biden was installed into the White House and Congress shifted, the filibuster now must be removed for good to preserve that majority.

Bob has no morals despite his claims to have a world view that revolves around good and evil. Power is what matters most. The end of attaining it justifies all means.
This is a question that has come up a lot in my mind the past decade. Why is it that the left seems incapable of conceiving of their own failure? No movement or individual is successful forever. Sooner or later you'll be out of power and your ideological opponent will take control for a time.

When Harry Reid tried to nuke the filibuster a few years back this question was all I could think of. If I was a democrat senator at that time I would've been shitting my pants, because as soon as the GOP had a majority again this tool would've been turned against my party.

I chalk it up to poor impulse control I guess. The left attracts people with poor long term planning. All they see is the win now instead of the failure next month.
 
The fact that Bob can thrive (relatively speaking) is proof that Natural Selection is no longer in play.
If Bob Chipman had plenty of kids you would be entirely right.
The fact he is still a seething virgin likely to die without passing his "superior" genes on means that Natural Selection still has some skin in the game.
 
The fact that Bob can thrive (relatively speaking) is proof that Natural Selection is no longer in play.
I think natural selection didn't function properly and our people have been carrying Chipman ilk on our backs ever since.

Long ago, prehistoric Chipman endlessly shilled the virtues of the cave painting cinematic universe to the disgust of every disinterested female. Our ancestors didn't kick him out of the tribe because he served a secondary purpose. In the event of being overrun by predators, prehistoric Chipman waddled so slowly that he'd be ganked while the rest of the tribe fled to safety.

The predators never came. Prehistoric Chipman managed to climb on an undefended slumpbuster that was passed out from eating fermented berries, and the non-consentual union left us where we are today.

Regarding obsolescence, society doesn't have much need for fat decoys anymore. Shame, really.
 
This is a question that has come up a lot in my mind the past decade. Why is it that the left seems incapable of conceiving of their own failure? No movement or individual is successful forever. Sooner or later you'll be out of power and your ideological opponent will take control for a time.

When Harry Reid tried to nuke the filibuster a few years back this question was all I could think of. If I was a democrat senator at that time I would've been shitting my pants, because as soon as the GOP had a majority again this tool would've been turned against my party.

I chalk it up to poor impulse control I guess. The left attracts people with poor long term planning. All they see is the win now instead of the failure next month.
It's an old saying: liberals design government assuming they are in charge. conservatives design government assuming their enemies are in charge.

And had it proven when I posted that saying on a board full of liberals and they went on to argue about how it made no sense. Why wouldn't you assume you were in charge...
 
So is Bob getting worse?
Well, I mean, money state, it's the same. For some reason he is a magnet for sexual deviants and retards. I'm kinda shocked the patreon dollars didn't dry up during lockdown from covid.

Brain, still the same. Fat retard angry all the time because he thinks Republicans are stopping him from moon wheat and robot butlers. Death will be via heart attack or stroke shortly.

No super embarrassing tweet burns or anything. But its only a matter of time until breadtube decapitates him and start calling him a Nazi amass.
 
There are a lot of (supposedly) educated people that have lost their goddamn minds over this shit.

For me, it's even simpler than all of this. Is it possible to have a conversation about? Of course - I've been vaccinated, and was happy to show up to work after my second shot to show everybody that it wouldn't necessarily put you in a near-coma. But the thing is, I feel like a lot of people who are pro-vaccination don't want to have that conversation. I feel like they come in either spoiling for a fight or thinking that people who haven't been vaccinated are just imbeciles/unwilling Russian agents. And if it's a situation like that, where somebody who clearly doesn't care about you or think of you as a person worth any amount of respect wants you to do something that you might believe puts you and your family at risk... Why on Earth would you want to even consider it?
 
Well, I mean, money state, it's the same. For some reason he is a magnet for sexual deviants and retards. I'm kinda shocked the patreon dollars didn't dry up during lockdown from covid.
When 80% of his consumer base already live off the dole it isn't hard to imagine him losing any income. After all, the pansexual, metrosexual diaper, piss fetish furry would have been living off autism bux covid or not. And that's Blob's audience.

Or people with fibro, autism, are in a phd program or other diseases that keep them in a playground while the grown ups go to our 8 to 6.
 
So is Bob getting worse?
Bob seems to have changed over to posting his film theories more on Twitter. Mostly "here is what the MCU is building up to!" shit. I think writing for MattPat went to his head, since he probably views it as validation. This has leeched over to him also thinking his political opinions are big brained (more so than usual) and him having tsun-tsun senpais that haven't blocked him yet.
 
Bob seems to have changed over to posting his film theories more on Twitter. Mostly "here is what the MCU is building up to!" shit. I think writing for MattPat went to his head, since he probably views it as validation. This has leeched over to him also thinking his political opinions are big brained (more so than usual) and him having tsun-tsun senpais that haven't blocked him yet.

He is getting more and more open about how he has replaced religion with worshipping MCU characters, and how he thinks it's just fucking dandy and that everyone else should worship corporate product too.
 
when bob talks about drumpf victory being down to "Geography" he's talking about electoral college votes. This is why he wants to get rid of the EC, [...] it'll be straight "Popular Vote" so that California can overwhelmingly dictate to Wyoming who is going to be President [...] just [...] by sheer force of population density.
As someone who was born in and currently lives in California, the Molden State already has too much electoral power.



One wonders how Bob would feel if the situation was inverted and the Flyover midwest was all blue but with low density and all the coastal high density bastions were red.

Then he'd be for the EC 100%. The only thing that matters to him is destroying the mayghouls. They aren't going away on their own despite his lunatic ramblings about "natural selection." So, the only way to speed up this non-existent process is to disenfranchise them while the Dems hold the reigns [sic].
Moviebob sees people--or, in Bob's writing, "people" in quotation marks--are little more than a means to an end.

In all honesty, I would imagine that Bob's ideal Electoral College involves a total 1,077 electoral votes: The fifty states share 538; Bob's home state of Assholechusetts (population: Just Moviebob) gets 539.



[...] if we were having a conversation about the filibuster two years ago, Bob would screech that it must be preserved so the Dems could use it against Trump. Now that Biden was installed into the White House and Congress shifted, the filibuster now must be removed for good to preserve that majority.
Yep. If you expect victory through the filibuster, you should also expect failure through the filibuster. It's a concept that, using Bob's own words, even a 3-year-old could grasp.



Bob has no morals despite his claims to have a world view that revolves around good and evil. Power is what matters most. The end of attaining it justifies all means.
E-X-ACTLY! Using Bob's own words (and you might want to get comfy here, because there are a LOT of Bob's own words here):

2012.03.05: "Imagine what humans would be capable of if they held reason and intelligence as equal or even SUPERIOR to 'morality.'"

2014.11.16: "2 fundamental questions underline 90% of my decisions: 'Does this get us closer to a better world?' 'Is this morally correct?' in that order. [...] at the end of the day a tangible superior future has to sometimes 'win out' over 'how does this square with some largely subjective social concept of right or wrong?'"

2017.12.21: "[...] MOST people are simply intellectually incapable or navigating moral complexity. [...] they'll NEVER accept that 'good' (them, now) can have 'evil' foundation."

2017.12.21: "I'm a cynic [...] I don’t [...] 'do' philosophy or idealism or moral righteousness, I do goals and results. [...] and I'm on the Progressive side because it gets me to my better tomorrow on my preferred terms."

2019.02.11: "At a certain point, you need to [...] look at behavior or moral-outlook [sic] and be able to recognize that it's [...] beneath standards of modern civilized humanity [...]"

2019.02.21: "Politics is moneyball and machinery, and people who attach morality to it are almost as tiresome as the idiots [...] who think 'morality' exists in the first place."

2019.05.23: "I don’t [...] ‘do’ a moral/ethical distinction just for expediency’s sake [...] I've got ZERO ethical/moral issue harming someone who deserves it."

2019.05.31: "You can [...] make a FORTUNE ripping [Christians] off—they're religious AND Republican [...] it's not even *wrong* to take advantage of them [..] It’s [...] a moral good TO rip them off [...]" (Side note: A Christian is more likely to forgive someone for ripping them off; Bob never will.)

2020.01.31: "Morals are made up [...] and 'value' is subjective."

2020.01.31: "the rejection of moral *superstition* is the most important step to the embrace of moral *reality.*"

2020.03.02: "It's not about a preferred choice, it's about the smarter choice […] There's no moral dimension to this for me [...]"

2020.03.10: "The worst thing about viruses is they [...] are amoral. Sure, it's fun to think about, say, [Fox News anchors] and literally ALL their viewers collapsing into coughing fits in the street—but it might also happen to the 20-25% of the country that DOESN’T deserve to be in pain."

2020.03.18: "In my view, intelligence and morality aren't [...] separate things […] if you're dumb enough to be taken in by cons of this nature you're a danger to yourself and others and not a good person."

2020.08.20: "'Is X person human or not?' isn’t a political difference, it’s an intellectual and MORAL one." (Side note: Just look at how frequently Bob refers to those he hates as "people", quotes included.)

2020.09.06: "[…] I'm NEVER under any illusion that my enjoying bad things happening to people I dislike is A.) sadism and B.) 'unvirtuous'--I'm at 'morally comprised peace' with it […]"

2020.09.06: "[…] I've become [...] persuaded that the 21st Century presents us with opportunity to revisit notions that failed the moral but not logistical test in ages past with fresh intellectual and empathetic precision."

2020.09.24: "I’m results oriented. Tools don’t have a moral dimension, only people and results do." (Side note: I probably didn't need this one, but I did because let's be honest: Moviebob truly is a tool.)

2020.12.16: "I would really, GENUINELY *love* to hear […] people […] morally lecture me about my indifference to the lives/comfort of the specific subgroup(s) of terrible humans who do nothing but make this world worse and harm decent people […]" (Side note: Bob literally is one of those"terrible humans who [...] make this world worse and harm decent people".)

2021.03.23: "True evil is a function of moral ignorance, as good is the manifestation of moral intelligence."

YICK! Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna need AT LEAST a gallon of Listerine in order to get that shit-flavored Moviiebob aftertaste out of my mouth. UGH!
 
Last edited:
Bob seems to have changed over to posting his film theories more on Twitter. Mostly "here is what the MCU is building up to!" shit. I think writing for MattPat went to his head, since he probably views it as validation. This has leeched over to him also thinking his political opinions are big brained (more so than usual) and him having tsun-tsun senpais that haven't blocked him yet.
We all know how this plays out.

>"Here's what the MCU is leading to!"

>Proceeds to be unable to write anything even remotely coherent and proceeds to try and smear the 50 or so comic book channels that cover this kinda speculation by implying he has dirt on them.

>Proceeds to whine when someone brings up Avengers issue 200.
 
I feel like I'm having a stroke while reading this, did Bob actually, unironically compare a comic-book movie character to a pagan Scandinavian deity that people actually venerated?
Honestly, I come to this thread to laugh at Bob saying dumb shit but whenever I try to decipher what Bob is actually trying to say I end up feeling like the apes from Space Odyssey, I'm scared and confused, when I see Bobs twitter I see a monolith, I don't know what any of it means but it scares me.
same here, except instead of György Ligeti's "Kyrie", the soundtrack is a chorus of window-lickers going "mnnnnnnnngh"
 
We all know how this plays out.

>"Here's what the MCU is leading to!"

>Proceeds to be unable to write anything even remotely coherent and proceeds to try and smear the 50 or so comic book channels that cover this kinda speculation by implying he has dirt on them.

>Proceeds to whine when someone brings up Avengers issue 200.
I think one of the best MCU suggestions he's ever done was that time he wanted an all-female Avengers movie with the villain being Starfox because he assumed he's a villain since he's Thanos' brother and google told him there was a She-Hulk story where he was brought to court for rape accusations. Bob having never read it, assumed the character was a rapist. Bob's lack of knowledge shows more and more as the more obscure stuff needs to be dug up.

I'd actually love to see Bob make that movie just to see the blowback on the galaxy brain idea of "Yes, I will make a feminist movie with gratuitous rape" with no self-awareness.
 
I think he saw the Season 2 Transformers episode "Autobot Spike" and like the autist he is, thought that a human's mind could literally be uploaded into a robot (without taking the brain out and putting it in the robot itself).
Didn't the transfer mess with Spike's mind and almost drove him insane?
The world can never have enough feature-length toy commercials:
Barbie.png
How can you give Barbie a movie?
When Wonder Woman 1984 came out, a saw leftists on social media who's biggest problem with the movie was the message that you can't have the thing you want the most without consequences.

Really telling.
Seriously? Any sources?
It was unfortunately not done properly in the comics so I'd be okay with a TV show exploring the concept. But I doubt the movies would do it justice.

Bob would lap it up though.
Wasn't House of M all about Scarlet Witch screwing with reality like she did in Wandavision?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back