Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[The Nothingness]

Bob and Nash will never have kids (unless the latter is actually a father).

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

Bob and Nash will never have kids (unless the latter is actually a father).

Both of them would be too busy flinging shit on Twitter, and Bob would eat everyone's meal, leading to everyone being famished.

 

[AnOminous]

And sperging about board game movies with Nash, featuring stanning for The Rock.

When and why did this Nash cuck show up and just start incessantly gobbling Bob's nads?

 

[Gununu]

Is this the same Nash that was in Tuesday Tech Talk with @LordKaT ?

 

[AF 802]

Regulations can go both ways, Bob.

 

[A Random]

I mean, she's a Twitter sperg just like him so, more projection?
View attachment 335351

Someone's disagreeing with me, here we go...
View attachment 335350

And sperging about board game movies with Nash, featuring stanning for The Rock.
View attachment 335352 View attachment 335353 View attachment 335354

"where were"

Is this the same Nash that was in Tuesday Tech Talk with @LordKaT ?

Fairly sure that's a yes.

 

[AngeloTheWizard]

Is this the same Nash that was in Tuesday Tech Talk with @LordKaT ?

Sadly yes.

 

[Gordon Cole]

I've read your pitches. What makes you better?

P.S. This the article where we were namedropped.

 

[KO 864]

I've read your pitches. What makes you better?
View attachment 335610 View attachment 335611 View attachment 335613 View attachment 335612

P.S. This the article where we were namedropped.
View attachment 335609

We know that Bob is a king of projection, right? So, is it possible that on a subconscious level he knows that his movie ideas are crap and that he shouldn't be listened to?

As a movie reviewer himself, Blob should be at least somewhat interested in why the opinions of critics and the general public differ if for no other reason than to grow his craft. Being able to understand an audience and listen to different opinions should allow him to be more objective in his criticism and thus be a better reviewer.

Also do you think that Manchips might find our massive thread on him? If so he'll likely dismiss us as alt-right plebeians but it would be pretty great to debate the Chipmonster in a forum where he doesn't hold the power.

 

[RockVolnutt]

We know that Bob is a king of projection, right? So, is it possible that on a subconscious level he knows that his movie ideas are crap and that he shouldn't be listened to?

As a movie reviewer himself, Blob should be at least somewhat interested in why the opinions of critics and the general public differ if for no other reason than to grow his craft. Being able to understand an audience and listen to different opinions should allow him to be more objective in his criticism and thus be a better reviewer.

Last time someone said that, he posted this. General public does not matter as they are plebs and not elites with a title and everything. You need a job in the industry (or at very least a vagina or a certain level of melanin) to even think about being considered worthwhile.

Spoiler

 

[TonyTopps]

I feel like this The Last Jedi review is very relevant:

 

[Doug_Hitzel]

I hope so. Metokur would have a gold mine worth of stuff to dig from Bob. Also, who wants to bet that someone will mail him a copy of Mein Kampf and The Satanic Verses in the event that he gets doxed?

We need a Baaston kiwi fruit to doublecheck the addresses on whitepages. Or just have someone call the phone numbers. Not it, btw. Can’t stand Baaston accents.

 

[Positron]

Bobby's idea of character development and story structure: makes protagonist a female pee o'sea genius. Makes her face obsolete white male opponents. Makes her crushes said opponents and their obsolete white male cohorts. Makes wheat sprout on the Moon. Everyone lives happily ever after.

"Audience vs critics", implying critics are not audience. Ha ha my sides.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

Bobby's idea of character development and story structure: makes protagonist a female pee o'sea genius. Makes her face obsolete white male opponents. Makes her crushes said opponents and their obsolete white male cohorts. Makes wheat sprout on the Moon. Everyone lives happily ever after.

"Audience vs critics", implying critics are not audience. Ha ha my sides.

Also known as the most boring film ever made, because she cannot lose.

 

[Pokemonquistador]

Also known as the most boring film ever made, because she cannot lose.

That's okay, because it's a masturbatory power fantasy for losers who get triggered when they see people they identify with suffering on screen. It reminds said losers of the time the captain of the football team shoved them into their locker or called them a fat ugly pig in the lunchroom while everyone was watching.

Let's say, a movie features a woman or a POC character getting kidnapped, enduring a setback, or finding themselves outclassed in a fight. To us, normal people, it would be a chance for a filmmaker to show the woman or POC escaping or overcoming the setback using intelligence, determination, or skills that they have gained during the course of the movie. By the time the movie ends, we would gain a healthy respect for the woman or POC because they managed to win despite having a handicap (less physical strength, fewer resources, less institutional power, etc.)

But to an SJW, showing the woman or POC suffering a setback is unthinkable. It's traumatic and it triggers their Post "Being Shoved Into a Locker and/or Called Fat" Stress Disorder. To them, it's unfair to show a member of the Oppressed Class (tm) outclassed in any genuine way. In order for the Power Fantasy to work, the woman or POC must be confronted with the danger, and then easily dispatch it using Magical Instant Skills and Strength, (obtained from the Plot Goddess of Infinite Sassiness.) To an SJW, boring invincible Women and POCs are a blow against the RL Patriarchy. They don't care if it makes for a crappy story. People shouldn't be watching movies for Entertainment ANYWAY. They should be watching them to become ED-CHU-CAYTED on how to be better Social Justice Drones.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

That's okay, because it's a masturbatory power fantasy for losers who get triggered when they see people they identify with suffering on screen. It reminds said losers of the time the captain of the football team shoved them into their locker or called them a fat ugly pig in the lunchroom while everyone was watching.

Let's say, a movie features a woman or a POC character getting kidnapped, enduring a setback, or finding themselves outclassed in a fight. To us, normal people, it would be a chance for a filmmaker to show the woman or POC escaping or overcoming the setback using intelligence, determination, or skills that they have gained during the course of the movie. By the time the movie ends, we would gain a healthy respect for the woman or POC because they managed to win despite having a handicap (less physical strength, fewer resources, less institutional power, etc.)

But to an SJW, showing the woman or POC suffering a setback is unthinkable. It's traumatic and it triggers their Post "Being Shoved Into a Locker and/or Called Fat" Stress Disorder. To them, it's unfair to show a member of the Oppressed Class (tm) outclassed in any genuine way. In order for the Power Fantasy to work, the woman or POC must be confronted with the danger, and then easily dispatch it using Magical Instant Skills and Strength, (obtained from the Plot Goddess of Infinite Sassiness.) To an SJW, boring invincible Women and POCs are a blow against the RL Patriarchy. They don't care if it makes for a crappy story. People shouldn't be watching movies for Entertainment ANYWAY. They should be watching them to become ED-CHU-CAYTED on how to be better Social Justice Drones.

Or they can watch Neil Breen's Double Down and watch their brain melt from trying to comprehend the damn film.

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

"Audience vs critics", implying critics are not audience. Ha ha my sides.

Man, if that Yelp! episode of South Park had been movie critic instead, it would have had nailed Bob perfectly.

Still works as is though.

 

[Gordon Cole]

Ladies should turn to Bob. He won't ignore you just to further his own career!

The projection is strong with this one.

Glad to know that even after a relatively quiet day, he can still sound like a condescending prick.

 

[RockVolnutt]

Continuity is for losers or something, I don't know.

 

[Emperor Julian]

I got the impression that they didnt like it because it wasnt very good and falls apart in the second act.