Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
As someone who has put bleach in his mouth, (it was a dare i was young drunk and stupid also like 50 bucks) ive always wondered how these fucking loons drink bleach or MMS or whatever the fuck they call it it burns immediately its incredibly bitter and you immediately fucking hate yourself
Based explosives aussie shows off what chlorine dioxide does.
I remember in high school the stoners believed you could scam a drug screening by drinking bleach. I worked with one that swore you could drink it straight and would be fine as long as it was just sips. He also swore that he knew it worked because he did it and passed all his tests. He didn't last long doing something as simple as stocking shelves. If I knew then what I know now I probably would've encouraged them all to drink deep.
 
I've meant to say something when I posted this, but then though it would lead us too far afield. The Bible quote gives me the opportunity.

There was recently a series of three sermons in my Church on James 1:20 "for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God." Many (all?) Christians have instances that they'd call "righteous anger", and they feel that God would justify them to act on such anger. But the preacher (not a Reverend in our church but a Doctor of Theology that I respect a lot) points out that there is not one single instance of angry act of man that God approves -- Moses's frustration, for example, precluded him from entering Canaan. Balaam's anger towards his donkey who saved his life earned him a disgraceful verbal rebuke from the dumb beast. Jonah's anger was revealed by God to be the tantrum of a petulant child. Wrath may be "natural" as per Bobby, and that's because we are sinful creatures. If we refrain from holding back, we risk giving an opportunity to the evil one.
Even ignoring the bible and its lessons, the dangers of uncontrolled anger is one of the oldest ideas in human history, just about every culture I can think of has stories warning people to never be consumed by anger. Because shockingly, making it your goal in life to ruin the lives of others won't end well for you or society at large.
 
just about every culture I can think of has stories warning people to never be consumed by anger.
But does MCU?

Bobby the Believer believes that Snowden has really committed sex crimes.
k;kl;.png

jyyr.png
(The whole thing and the archive of the article Armstrong writes)
 
Bobby the Believer believes that Snowden has really committed sex crimes.
k;kl;.png
I'd say I don't know how but it is Bob. He's somehow mixing Assange and Snowden together. I say Snowden because he's the only whistleblower that bob has ever seemed to have had a problem with. The alternative is that Bob made up whole cloth that Snowden is a rapist. Either is equally possible.
 
I'd say I don't know how but it is Bob. He's somehow mixing Assange and Snowden together. I say Snowden because he's the only whistleblower that bob has ever seemed to have had a problem with. The alternative is that Bob made up whole cloth that Snowden is a rapist. Either is equally possible.
Oh perhaps it was me who got them mixed up because, as you said, Bobby mentions Snowden much more often.
 
I'd say I don't know how but it is Bob. He's somehow mixing Assange and Snowden together. I say Snowden because he's the only whistleblower that bob has ever seemed to have had a problem with. The alternative is that Bob made up whole cloth that Snowden is a rapist. Either is equally possible.
I'd say it's likely he got them mixed up, and didn't catch or bother to correct himself because 1. Bob is only interested in getting a "win" over whoever he's arguing with on Twitter and 2. Bob is a fucking retard.
 
But does MCU?

Bobby the Believer believes that Snowden has really committed sex crimes.
View attachment 2609529

View attachment 2609536
(The whole thing and the archive of the article Armstrong writes)
Why should Bob care about that? He himself regularly uses his twitter to stalk women, defiantly continues to talk at them even when they soft block him, uses his fans to brigade them, dehumanizes them if they disagree with a point he thinks he believes in, and defended several actual sex pests and pedophiles.

Oh wait, because he's a crayon eating retard desperately trying to ignore how he's just as cancelled as Snowden at this point; he's just missing the prison threats really.
 
But does MCU?
Funny enough yes because there are many moments where characters in the MCU have done tremendously reckless things with their anger not being kept in check and I’m not talking about just the Hulk. So Bob even ignores morals from the movies he considers “Modern Greek Mythology”
 
So what would you consider an entertaining lolcow?
For Bob, some of the funnier shit that will come from him is arguably when irony hits him like a sack of bricks. Like when he found out a some ethot he liked was horrified to find out he followed her. Bob is only capable of being annoying and insufferable on his own
 
Last edited:
It actually doesn't matter because Assange isn't "ducking extradition for a sex crime" anyway, he's sitting in a maximum security prison in the U.K. (despite his prison term ending two years ago) facing U.S. charges he has yet to be tried for.

Which btw, is exactly what Glenn predicted would happen if he left the Ecuadorian embassy. There's plenty to dunk on Greenwald for, this really isn't one of them.
 
They didn't have a written language, Bobby. Their "apocalyptic" ignorance is the reason why you don't know all about them and their illustrious history of accomplishing fuck all.

Mexico, Central and South America got injuns who could build shit and record their deeds. There was nothing superior about our shortbus natives. The very thing you advocate to happen to anyone who votes GOP happened to them. According to your philosophy, they deserved it.
Well, to be fair, the northern american tribes didn't really have much to "write" on (aside petroglyphs/cave walls/totem poles/etc), and as they were for the most part nomadic hunter-gatherers, they'd long ago either forgotten that they could write shit down before their ancestors crossed the bering land bridge or whatever, or it was never written down to begin with because nobody thought of it. A nomadic lifestyle tends to leave available few options for writing shit down anyways that wouldn't break down in a few years, not to mention the tribe would have other priorities, such as survival. Instead of writing shit down they relied on oral tradition and stories around the campfire, which as anyone who knows anything about that at all knows it's one huge game of telephone, and we're not sure which part is legit and which part is either made up completely, or so badly distorted from the original that the original got lost in the shuffle. In Central and South America it was a bit of a different story since those tribes (Aztecs, Mayans,Inca, etc) had agriculture due to superior climate and far more permanent settlements, leading to a huge empire and the means to write shit down, by carving it into stone and whatnot.

Bob the Stupid would like you to believe that something existed among the Northern Tribes but that the big bad whitey burned it all down or made it disappear or whatever. But what Bob doesn't realize is that some Tribal Traditions are fucking secret, and they'll never ever tell anyone, certainly not outsiders. I mean, we're talking about beliefs where, if someone found out what someone's spirit guide was, they'd be able to identify that spirit guide and a shaman could commit spiritual hacking/hijacking of the person through this knowledge, somehow. And they STILL don't like it for pictures to be taken at their ceremonies such as legit native funerals, for reasons I don't understand because people are invited to attend this event and see it for themselves, and the tribes sure as shit didn't have cameras back in the day to prohibit in the first place. I mean, maybe some latter-day Shaman post-introduction-of-the-camera had a "vision" about it, but whatever.

So no, the Lord of Lynn cannot know all the knowledge and history of the North American Tribes. Even if he wanted to.
 
I think we should teach the true story of Thanksgiving. A bunch anarchists fled to New England tried to coexist with the short bus indians partially because of ideals and partially because they werent soldiers like the Spanish. Then they were betrayed by the Indians and nearly lost, the fearsome settlers from Siberia were the first and last people to ever lose to anarchists after initial success.
 
So what would you consider an entertaining lolcow?
Chris Chan. For his sins, Chris is actually entertaining and does different things in his career as a lolcow. Bob just wakes up, eats some Mountain Dew chicken, takes a can of PBR out the fridge, and spends the day politisperging.
 
Chris Chan. For his sins, Chris is actually entertaining and does different things in his career as a lolcow. Bob just wakes up, eats some Mountain Dew chicken, takes a can of PBR out the fridge, and spends the day politisperging.
I don't really see Bob as a lolcow on par with Chris. Chris has sagas and changed to where he is differant from 10 years ago. Bob for all of his faults is Bob.
 
I've meant to say something when I posted this, but then though it would lead us too far afield. The Bible quote gives me the opportunity.

There was recently a series of three sermons in my Church on James 1:20 "for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God." Many (all?) Christians have instances that they'd call "righteous anger", and they feel that God would justify them to act on such anger. But the preacher (not a Reverend in our church but a Doctor of Theology that I respect a lot) points out that there is not one single instance of angry act of man that God approves -- Moses's frustration, for example, precluded him from entering Canaan. Balaam's anger towards his donkey who saved his life earned him a disgraceful verbal rebuke from the dumb beast. Jonah's anger was revealed by God to be the tantrum of a petulant child. Wrath may be "natural" as per Bobby, and that's because we are sinful creatures. If we refrain from holding back, we risk giving an opportunity to the evil one.

He's mostly rationalizing his toxic behavior, Bobs anger has been a massive liability for his entire life. This has directly damaged his career and probably personal life. Bobs naturally hot blooded but doesnt want to take this flaw into account so will resist reality. anger might be righteous but his isnt-it's seething, corrosive, toxic and he is dominated by it.

Weirdly I can kind of understand his mindset since I'm pretty hot blooded irl. I think the break point with Bob is im aware how destructive it can and while exerting control can be frustrating and difficult the alternative is a red abyss were the few terrible moments when you're not angry you realize how empty and tired you are.
 
Last edited:
Would you expect anything less from a man who acts like this?
View attachment 2606383
R5wUryJ7_400x400.jpg

View attachment 2606385
View attachment 2606391
and the pink cherry on top
View attachment 2606400
View attachment 2606403
and that BabaYaga?
View attachment 2606412
the beast needs safe abortion to sate it's hunger. Click on it to make it bigger. I dare ya!
View attachment 2606461
tqYl7tpD_400x400.jpg


It's like a rabbit hole of insanity and Bob will, for some reason, proudly lift them up as pillars of reason and say we should listen to them.
Dear God, does that thing have Progeria, or is it cosplaying as Adrian Brody from the last half of The Pianist?

Also, I'll admit that I watched Bob in his Overthinker days. He was like that one nerd friend of yours that's really enthusiastic about media, and knows a lot of obscure movies, but one day he starts dating a hyper-religious girl and joins her church, which he tries to convert you to every time he visits, so you just start ghosting him. Only in Bob's case, it wasn't a hyper-religious girl, it was Anita Sarkeesian, and he wasn't dating her, just standing next to her in a picture and (probably) getting soft-blocked by her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back