Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Train robberies have been on reported recently in the Los Angeles area. Given Bob's past support for criminal activity (including BLM and Antifa riots, because "no bad tactics"), it's difficult to determine if Bob's being sarcastic or if he's genuinely happy that these robberies are actually taking place:

We just need one more big score! And then, Tahiti.
 
Train robberies have been on reported recently in the Los Angeles area. Given Bob's past support for criminal activity (including BLM and Antifa riots, because "no bad tactics"), it's difficult to determine if Bob's being sarcastic or if he's genuinely happy that these robberies are actually taking place:

He'll be pro train robberies if Republicans complain about them.

That's literally the only thing his moral compass is based on: Being contrary to whatever Republicans say.
 
Fellow Bob scholars, after conducting "extensive" research and countless minutes hours of analysis I would like to present to this symposium my humble offering to the Bobian academic literature.

The Science Of MovieBob: Pathways In Objective Science To The Future (draft submitted to The Epistemological Journal of Bobian Thinking)

The core of Bob's objectively proven scientific finding is that Natural Selection favors the 2% of the population that is smart like him and not the 98% of the population that relies on physical strength. As such, the scientific process of evolution will result in latter dying off in the next few decades and leaving The Future for the smart. Since society also evolves following a scientific process it too will cease to favor physical strength and instead begin rewarding intellectual capacity which will hasten the transition to The Future.

Recognizing this established evolutionary path early in his life Bob chose to focus his formal education (Multimedia Art, Salem State, 2003-ish) and his career path (popular film reviewing and Super Mario Bros. 3 analysis) to select for the development of intellectual capital. Bob considers the fact that he was able to achieve this path to accessing The Future a moral condemnation of those who refuse to do likewise. As they could have also positioned themselves for access to The Future, Bob does not feel that he should concern himself with their scientifically determined fate. Further, Bob contends that anything that advances to The Future is Good and anything that slows or retards that process is Bad. This objective and scientifically supported moral framework helps to inform Bobian reasoning.

Bob rejects democracy in favor of a Science Council with absolute power that decides all things for the planet. The basis of policy on science and reason will help advance to The Future rather than being held up by concerns traditional to democratic governance. The flaws of democracy are quite evident when one recognizes that such a system will cater to the 98% of the population that rejects Thinking in favor of Belief in physical strength. Since they will always be the majority in any kind of majoritarian system they will be able to sway policy to their interests rather than towards the objective Good of pursuing The Future. However, this does not lead Bob to despair as while the length of the process may test his enormous patience the scientific fact of Natural Selection will ensure that the backwards 98% of the population will die off soon and eventually leave the 2% of the population prepared for The Future able to implement Good policy even in a democratic system.

Bob also rejects Marxian economics for its backwards Belief in physical strength and its desire to maintain a system of labor. Instead Bob supports global capitalism as the path scientifically proven to lead to The Future as best exemplified by the People's Republic of China. It is on these grounds that Bob rejected both the racist backwards policies of Donald Trump as well as the equally racist backwards policies of Bernie Sanders. Bob found that both were rejecting science and reason by appealing to the unevolved 98% of the population rather than endorsing The Future as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton repeatedly did in 2012 and 2016 respectively. While Bob is not opposed to the welfare state in the short term he considers it a distraction from simply advancing to The Future where such problems do not exist due to the elimination of scarcity and even physical bodies.

Although Bob may find history personally interesting its only true objective value lies in how it progresses to The Future. Similarly, philosophy and sociology provide little value as they often raise objections to the pursuit of The Future in favor of unreasoning Belief. Bob condemns both "ideology" and "principle" for the restrictions they place on the scientific advancement to The Future as proven by Natural Selection. Thwarting evolutionary processes like Natural Selection has no basis in science and reasoning for evolution is a scientific fact and to oppose it is to elevate Belief over Thinking. This is not to say that all uses of science are praiseworthy, as an objective reasoner Bob understands that the 98% of the population that refuses to evolve can manipulate science into supporting its goals of opposing The Future. For example, medical advancements that are intended by the evolutionary process to support the 2% of the population chosen by Natural Selection may also extend the life of the Believers despite the wishes of Natural Selection. While under a proper governmental system there would be objectively Good policies based on science and reason in place to prevent this misusage of science but under a democratic form of government this manipulation may find itself support by Bad policy.

As we can see, in Bobian ethics there is a strong scientific case for the state to use force to prevent the violence of the Believers from being imposed on the scientifically superior Thinker class. However, while Bob concedes the science and reason of this objective conclusion he appeals to our greater nature for a more humble policy. Instead, Bob advocates that we simply remove civilization from those areas where Believers live and allow Natural Selection to operate without any thumb on the scale. Despite this objectively humane policy working for the Good of pursuing The Future it may find opposition within democratic systems. With all of these concerns in mind we must ask if science and reason do not demand that action be taken so that the suffering of those denied The Future comes to an end and the misery that is seeing the continued existence of 98% of the population also come to a humane and scientific end as demanded by Natural Selection.

As for The Future itself, Bob generally describes it in terms of uploading the brain into various robot bodies on nearby objects (the Moon, Mars) and then watching Disney films.
 
Second, of all, does Bob know that natural selection has nothing to do with intelligent and is more about how adaptable an individual is to a situation?
His position is that being more intelligent and working in intellectual/cultural capital like he does is being more adaptable to how society is already evolving. His theory really does seem to me to be centered around the idea that Natural Selection is evolving all aspects of reality from what he claims is the current and past favoring of physical strength towards an empowering of the mind that will leave bodies behind. With those who are currently intellectual superiors being looked down upon and abused and oppressed by the system favoring the majority. (As a Bobian Thinker I reject any psychoanalysis of this as a non-science.)

And that actually reminds me of something that I totally forgot to expand on but meant to. I'm like 99.9% sure he believes that evolution/Natural Selection/etc. can happen in a single generation.
 
His position is that being more intelligent and working in intellectual/cultural capital like he does is being more adaptable to how society is already evolving. His theory really does seem to me to be centered around the idea that Natural Selection is evolving all aspects of reality from what he claims is the current and past favoring of physical strength towards an empowering of the mind that will leave bodies behind. With those who are currently intellectual superiors being looked down upon and abused and oppressed by the system favoring the majority. (As a Bobian Thinker I reject any psychoanalysis of this as a non-science.)
It sounds to Blob is a believer than a thinker. Because only an fool would believe that.

Natural Selection does not evolve reality. It only effects organisms. It’s the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring.

And we know all Bob is none of those things. This is a 40 year old man who still lives in his mama’s basement,
 
Last edited:
Second, of all, does Bob know that natural selection has nothing to do with intelligence and is more about how adaptable an individual is to a situation?
It also has the most to do with reproduction.
You could be the objectively most well-adapted organism and if you can't pass those traits on to your offspring its all for not.
Having more offspring also increases the odds that those offspring will pick up an advantageous trait that allows them to adapt.

Of course reproduction will be useless once Bob's conscience is uploaded to his robot body for all eternity. Any day now...
 
It also has the most to do with reproduction.
You could be the objectively most well-adapted organism and if you can't pass those traits on to your offspring its all for not.
Having more offspring also increases the odds that those offspring will pick up an advantageous trait that allows them to adapt.

Of course reproduction will be useless once Bob's conscience is uploaded to his robot body for all eternity. Any day now...
Right, in The Future (which in 2016 he suggested was just between 10-40 years away), The Thinkers will apparently have an eternal existence. Reproduction isn't really involved in the theory because it's probably like one day you just don't have a body anymore, The Thinkers are all just Raptured into The Future.

For all his talk about The Future he's constantly being denied he's never really all that specific about what it will entail. I don't know if there's more on his old blog but the minds in robot bodies thing is the most he's elaborated on it on Twitter that I've seen other than off hand complaints about not being on the Moon or not having rocket ships. Although he really doesn't like ideas so it's not too surprising that he's never grappled with even common in movies type futuristic speculation about things like eternal minds detached from physical bodies or whatever. Typically futurists love to engage in all this stuff and sketch out what their theoretical future looks like. Although in a way I'm glad he's spent less time on fleshing out his utopia compared to his scientific theory of change that leads there because he's so irrationally committed to forcing all of reality to fit his long held theory.
 
Bob: Religion don't reals and thinkers are superior to believers!

Also Bob: The SUPERIOR FUTURE is inevitable and the Power of Science (tm) will give us all robot bodies!

It doesn't occur to Bob that physical immortality might come with some problems. Like becoming bored of a life of unbridled hedonism. Even Christians like myself recognize that immortality isn't something ideally experienced in a fallen physical world, but instead, in a world that has been redeemed and transformed, where boredom and entropy aren't possible. I imagine Bob's afterlife to be something like that Euphoric Hell in that one episode of the Twilight Zone, where a criminal gets everything his heart desires at first, but he soon gets sick of it because he has nothing to challenge or stimulate him, (plus he's alone so there's no one to share anything with). Bob thinks that MCU Movies and Bing Bing Wahoo will be enough to entertain him for eternity, but after 100 years of tweeting into the void and getting no replies, he's going to start crawling the walls.
 
Bob thinks that MCU Movies and Bing Bing Wahoo will be enough to entertain him for eternity, but after 100 years of tweeting into the void and getting no replies, he's going to start crawling the walls.
Hell, he has all of that RIGHT NOW and he's a miserable asshole. Maybe he figures that after a few thousand years an attractive woman will get bored enough to sleep with him.
 
For all his talk about The Future he's constantly being denied he's never really all that specific about what it will entail. I don't know if there's more on his old blog but the minds in robot bodies thing is the most he's elaborated on it on Twitter that I've seen other than off hand complaints about not being on the Moon or not having rocket ships. Although he really doesn't like ideas so it's not too surprising that he's never grappled with even common in movies type futuristic speculation about things like eternal minds detached from physical bodies or whatever. Typically futurists love to engage in all this stuff and sketch out what their theoretical future looks like. Although in a way I'm glad he's spent less time on fleshing out his utopia compared to his scientific theory of change that leads there because he's so irrationally committed to forcing all of reality to fit his long held theory.
He doesn't know what it will look like, but, he's got a crystal clear idea of what it WON'T look like. And it WON'T look like Red Murrica' (tm) , that's for sure! And anything that won't be in it deserves nothing but eradication.

At best, it's just speeding up the inevitable fate of obsoletes, a mercy, if you will, to kill them before they have to just starve to death on the margins.

And at worst, they're actively holding humanity back.

So, that's why Bob is always on board with the idea of massive, unilateral disenfranchisement/dissolution of large swaths of his own country: they don't exist in "his" glorious future, so, by either cause or effect, the future can't get here until they're gone.
 
Last edited:
@AirdropShitposts That was an excellent manifesto, collecting all of Robert's core political, social, and economic beliefs in one place. If it weren't so articulate and grammatically correct it could've been written by the man himself.

I hereby dub this ideology "Diabetian Dialectic."
if you throw in Bob's wokeness and CRT-loving ways and attempts to purge his Racist Thetans, I'd alter that to "Diabetonetics".
 
Train robberies have been on reported recently in the Los Angeles area. Given Bob's past support for criminal activity (including BLM and Antifa riots, because "no bad tactics"), it's difficult to determine if Bob's being sarcastic or if he's genuinely happy that these robberies are actually taking place:
View attachment 2888230
And here's a bonus for you: Given Moviebob is regularly uptight about leaving a clean environment for his Hitlerian utopia the future, he doesn't seem to be upset about all those boxes and plastic bubble envelopes lying around this stretch of railroad tracks.

I think he's upset because his pea brain hasn't fully grasped that it's niggers doing the robbing.

Game studios look for people with lateral thinking skills. Women and nu-males don't understand.
View attachment 2888122
Here's a good article on LinkedIn that tells you about these questions. For the windows in Manhattan, for example, you need to get some clarification before you attempt to solve it: all the windows, or just the ones in cars?

Simply looking up one of the questions would've shown you this, Bob. For such a smart guy, you sure behave like an idiot.
 
Why are Russians the only one of America's "enemies" that leftists are okay with openly hating?

Is it because they are white, and thus fair game?

I think the answer is more simple than that.
It's because they don't fully obey the globo homo and Putin isn't a member of the global elite club.
Anything that cannot be fully controlled is a potential threat.
 
@AirdropShitposts

First, let me congratulate you on how good your Bob impression was. You sounded just as crazy as he does. Seriously, well done.

Second, of all, does Bob know that natural selection has nothing to do with intelligence and is more about how adaptable an individual is to a situation?
I think we can safely say that Bob doesn't understand the concept of natural selection at all, and what he calls Natural Selection is basically a religious concept in a religion I dub Moviebobism. It doesn't have much to do with actual natural selection. Based on reading him it is more like the invisible hand of a deity striking down any who mildly annoy him. (Bob is a Believer, despite his claims of being a Thinker.)
 
1642254188779.png
 
Ok to any Troons out there and their cheerleader Blobby when a Caterpillar transforms into a Butterfly it doesn't need make up, hair extensions/wigs, pharmaceuticals, and hours of surgery to do so. It just can do it on it's own and be its "true self" unlike you "girls".

Question for Blobby's Angel's if you were meant to be a "woman" than why does your body see your "vagina" (inverted ballsack) as an open wound? This is true to any who don't know Troons call it "Terf Talk" but seriously they have to put a dildo regularly into their "vagina" unless they're getting fucked regularly or else their Male bodies will see this an open would and want to close it like earing holes.
 
I think the answer is more simple than that.
It's because they don't fully obey the globo homo and Putin isn't a member of the global elite club.
Anything that cannot be fully controlled is a potential threat.

It's still ironic that the country the left simped hardest for in the 60's and owe a fair chunk of their bad governmental decisions to by trying to emulate the sociopolitical dogma of, became their bitterest enemy.

Not because those policies failed and not because the country fell apart as a result, but because the Russians didn't "love them back" by going full progressive. And modern hard leftists in the US treat it like an embarrassing racist old Uncle at the family reunion.... ashamed at what he became because he used to "be somebody they (sic) admired" .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back