Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
The essay was fine! I have no strong feelings about Filoni's work or the recent TV shows which I have not watched anyway. I was more interested to pointing to why Filoni gets more of a pass than the filmmakers have. I know some of it is simply because he has more of Lucas' blessing (even if solely by implication) than Abrams ever got. Lucas sorta went out of his way to express his displeasure in the latter case.
I think in Abram's case it was because they threw out some initial treatments that George wrote completely, since he apparently had a loose sort of trilogy guideline set for any successors to crack at.

He had a lot of those, but this one was based on around the time of the buy out. And Kennedy and Abrams yeeted it and the writer who made the full script for TFA out the window.

So that is likely why George hates them a lot more.
 
you should always look somber and gloomy when visiting any WW2 historical site, no liberal would ever crack a smile anywhere in Europe
Libs can't smile even when they're happy (the soyface anyone?)

Firmly entrenched in "if you aren't outraged you weren't paying attention" thinking, they get irrationally hostile at anyone who smiles in contentment for not getting the seriousness of the situation.
 
This book was pretty highly Lucas and Abrams skeptical but had a more favorable view of Filoni, lots of the internet seems to like or at least prefer the Filoni stuff so I probably gave it too much heft as to the fandom's view:
1643839114901.png
 
This book was pretty highly Lucas and Abrams skeptical but had a more favorable view of Filoni, lots of the internet seems to like or at least prefer the Filoni stuff so I probably gave it too much heft as to the fandom's view:
View attachment 2946381
Oh no, there's a genuine Filoni base. It's just I genuinely feel it's mostly a mix of coomers for Ahsoka, corporate astroturfing (fun fact: three of the mod accounts for Wookiepedia are on all the time, and likely are owned by LFL as a shared account as a result), or by kids who never watched either the OT or the PT.

I feel like he gets a pass because "hey, He (and Lucas, people always forget this part), made this childhood cartoon I liked", and they ignored how they thought Rebels was blandish, Resistance sucked, Bad Batch is bleh, and so on. Or "hey, He (and Favreau, people always forget this part), made the Baby Yoda and Mando show I liked." And ignoring how Borba Fett sucks to the point they had to make it Mando season 2.5

There's just this weird cult of worship on Dave and it only makes sense when you remember that there are retards who are sitting right now and watching the Cookbook of Boba Fatt and groaning in pain, but expecting it's gonna get good. You can burn down a Star Wars fan's house, and rape their cat in front of them, and they will cheer for you since you did it in a Mando costume or dressed as a Filoni OC and promised them the next episode was going to be good.

Bobby though cheers brainlessly because he too wants to fuck a loli Togruta tho. Seriously, the number of sex pests and pedos he defends is very concerning.
 
It is kinda funny how Jon Favreau gets shoved aside from a lot of the credit for Disney things despite being so prominent in the genesis of these successes, Bob did it while praising up Feige for the MCU even though a lot of Favreau's decisions on the first two Iron Man films established now well worn MCU conventions. You can look at the the contemporary Hulk, Thor and Captain America films and little of the alternate ways made it past The Avengers while most everything Favreau (and Whedon and later the Russo Bros.) did survived and continued on. Certainly Feige deserves credit for noticing what worked and what didn't and for allowing the freedom to pursue different ideas to begin with, but things would have been radically different had Favreau not insisted on things like Downey Jr. and allowing the cast to improvise.

I admit I'm quite a fan of the first Iron Man simply as a movie but even the second one seemed to have some very clear notions of how to do a superhero movie that the MCU has just photocopied over and over again with some minor exceptions. (Gunn's Guardians for both good and ill being maybe another branch.) I know Favreau has always been pretty respected within the industry itself but at least in the fanboys it seems like the Feige Cult allows no other gods except maybe Gunn.

To bring it back to Bob, this is how he views Jon Favreau in the handful of times he's mentioned him ever:
1643840535205.png1643840502755.png1643840512129.png

Also, a prediction:
1643840638641.png

1643840647253.png
 
Brainless Bobby's just seething that someone would want to diversify their films and possibly get laid. Ignoring of course that Chef may just be a case of "the fucking curtains are blue dipshit", since the people who tell him to watch curtains made him think there's always more to it than that.

Besides, if he wanted to duck out after 2? Fair enough. A lot of artists like to move on to other mediums and venues so they don't feel tired. Brainless Bobby proves how fake his nerd cred is by forgetting the only reason Stan Lee stayed in comics was because he could finally write something different with heroes. He didn't want to do a standard "love each udder" comic; he got sick of that shit and wanted to quit. But the Fantastic Four allowed him to make a flawed cast of heroes.

Fucking christ Bobby you're so fake I can see the wires.
 
FWIW, there's ample evidence that Lucas retconned his own history here, with the idea for a prequel trilogy not really forming until later during the creation of Star Wars, and him not really having any idea what the plot of it would be beyond "where Darth Vader came from" (with "Vader is Luke's father" not really coming up until they were brainstorming for Empire) for years and years.
It's also worth mentioning that the 1977 release of Star Wars did not have "Episode IV" or "A New Hope" in the title crawl.

Bob is still fat and stupid.
Both true, but that doesn't change the fact that Lucas still put a lot of thought into the overall structure of the Star Wars universe even before the first film released. The mouthbreathers' insistence that Lucas didn't care at all about the lore of his creative world flies in the face of pretty much everything we know about him.
 
It is kinda funny how Jon Favreau gets shoved aside from a lot of the credit for Disney things despite being so prominent in the genesis of these successes, Bob did it while praising up Feige for the MCU even though a lot of Favreau's decisions on the first two Iron Man films established now well worn MCU conventions. You can look at the the contemporary Hulk, Thor and Captain America films and little of the alternate ways made it past The Avengers while most everything Favreau (and Whedon and later the Russo Bros.) did survived and continued on. Certainly Feige deserves credit for noticing what worked and what didn't and for allowing the freedom to pursue different ideas to begin with, but things would have been radically different had Favreau not insisted on things like Downey Jr. and allowing the cast to improvise.

I admit I'm quite a fan of the first Iron Man simply as a movie but even the second one seemed to have some very clear notions of how to do a superhero movie that the MCU has just photocopied over and over again with some minor exceptions. (Gunn's Guardians for both good and ill being maybe another branch.) I know Favreau has always been pretty respected within the industry itself but at least in the fanboys it seems like the Feige Cult allows no other gods except maybe Gunn.

To bring it back to Bob, this is how he views Jon Favreau in the handful of times he's mentioned him ever:
View attachment 2946474View attachment 2946469View attachment 2946471

Also, a prediction:
View attachment 2946484
View attachment 2946485
Pretending Chef is just some power fantasy is needlessly reductive, unless we're defining power fantasy as "the hero wins". Chef literally starts with Favreau, divorced, kid doesn't particularly like him, getting fired due to wanting to expand his interests outside of his restaurant owners menu, and gets made a public laughing stock for blowing up at a critic, looking like a pathetic manchild to the entire world.

The rest is about a master of a craft rediscovering the joy he lost in his chosen field and trying to reclaim the things that really matter, his son's respect and the love of his (ex)wife.

I've seen it twice, its a fine film, not mindblowing, but I'd recommend it if you hadn't seen it and wanted something to throw on.
 
To bring it back to Bob, this is how he views Jon Favreau in the handful of times he's mentioned him ever:View attachment 2946469
A fat fuck like Blob criticizing the idea that other people get horny over good, carby food? You can't write this shit. No one would believe it.

For the record, aglio olio is really good and easy to make. I've cooked it for date nights before after coming home late. Comes together in minutes and gets about the same response that Scarlet's character gave.
 
I'm going to float this idea to you fellow Bobologists.

The original Biden Mega Thread was about this size when it was shut down because it was so slow for the mods to do their thing. Do you think we should retire this one and open a new one?
Um. No. The only reason the Biden thread was shut down was because it was in A&N and some tranny janny was looking for an excuse to shitcan it for some reason. The thread wasn't slow at all, in fact it was so fast I gave up trying to keep up with it. There's no reason for a new Moviebob thread.
 
What I mean by slow is slow for the mods to use their moderation tools. Not slow in terms of the speed of the thread.
Okay, and so what if it does? How much moderation does this thread need? It's mostly just retards and conservacucks sperging about some fat never was who lives in his mother's basement (not to be confused with the Jeff Thew thread). Not much need for a janny to use his tools, whatever that means. At least in the Biden thread they had the (flimsy) excuse of potential fedposting.
 
Regardless of who wins this battle, everyone else loses.



A medical doctor and clinical researcher wrote on Substack about Big Pharma and Big Government's pervasive campaign to suppress any information about the use of Ivermectin for covid (archive; Twitter thread about it). Bobby is too deep in the Fauci Cult to care.
View attachment 2944885
And Moviebob is no expert in anything. Remember that when taking any advice from Bob.



World Wildlife Fund is evil: they were founded by imperialists and true-and-honest eugenicists, and now, scandalously, they even raise funds through NFT!
View attachment 2945045
It is so cute that Bobby blames environmentalism based on things that happened 30 years ago, when he refused to feel shame for what he said about the "Trump vaccine" 2 years back.
Environmentalism was bad pre-1990s. It's even worse today.



Speaking of dogwhistles, Bobby can sniff them out from a mile off. And he offers his "service" even when no one asksfor it.
View attachment 2944875
According to Moviebob, it's only antisemitic if you're attacking Jews who support Leftist and Democrat agendas. Jews who adhere to the other teams' princibles are fair game because "no bad tactics".



Neither is Moviebob.



Shut up, Racistbob.
 
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Someone was triggered by Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood:
stupid.png
Cool sorty Bob, what was the episode about? Can you tell me the plot? You know, what happened? Can you tell me why it's infamous, I mean, why it resonates so hard?
Jesus fuck, this is elevator talk, "have you seen the sportsball yesterday? oh yeah, man we're having a rough season", "did you hear about so and so? oh yes, politicians are all the same".

I have re-read his take for 10 minutes now and I just don't know where to start. What fans asume this? This is not a remake, it's a closer adaptation of the manga when the original run went off the rails. The second a certain character appeared on screen, anyone who had seen the original run knew how this would end so, Bob, you're NOT talking about the fans. And anyone who was not a fan of fullmetal and started the series with brotherhood couldn't have known that:

"What does the cow say? Moo; What does the cat say? Meow; What does the dog say? Ed....ward"

Don't you sometimes hate when a complete outsider gets in your hobby and talks down to you without having any idea? That's my brain aneurysm right now.

As for Mr. Hernandez, I am going to have to ask you to lower your soy intake and start eating red meat. You are a grown man reacting like a histrionic teenager to a children's cartoon.
 
Brainless Bobby's just seething that someone would want to diversify their films and possibly get laid. Ignoring of course that Chef may just be a case of "the fucking curtains are blue dipshit", since the people who tell him to watch curtains made him think there's always more to it than that.

Besides, if he wanted to duck out after 2? Fair enough. A lot of artists like to move on to other mediums and venues so they don't feel tired. Brainless Bobby proves how fake his nerd cred is by forgetting the only reason Stan Lee stayed in comics was because he could finally write something different with heroes. He didn't want to do a standard "love each udder" comic; he got sick of that shit and wanted to quit. But the Fantastic Four allowed him to make a flawed cast of heroes.

Fucking christ Bobby you're so fake I can see the wires.
That's the thing people forget about Marvel: it got popular because it was subversive and different. Hulk, Fantastic Four and Spider-Man were all vastly different than other superhero stories you out at the time, and took bold risks where others didn't. My dad said as much: as a kid who grew up reading Marvel, he liked them because they were complex and mature whereas DC had silly kid stuff. I was actually the one who told him Jack Kirby left Marvel for DC and shook it up like crazy.

Now, movie-wise at least, it's completely inverted. Marvel movies tend to be safe, kid-friendly and almost silver age style. DC is the one making "dark" movies. Probably because they had success doing that with Batman. It doesn't always work. As much as Avengers 2 gets shit for being generic and forgettable, I'd watch that over the four-hour stress nightmare that was Batman V Superman. But if you try to tell me Captain Marvel or Eternals is a bolder artistic statement than Joker, you might be a Bob.
 
Don't you sometimes hate when a complete outsider gets in your hobby and talks down to you without having any idea? That's my brain aneurysm right now.
I'm just going to say you all are lucky Bob hasn't said anything about Jojo yet because the effort post I would unleash would shake the heavens. But yes, I noticed that. Every time Bob posts about anime it's literally a vague .post that could be talking about anything, yet he expects us to take him seriously.

I mean, I know why. He's a pissbaby who bought into the geek culture lark and subsequently ruined it with stupid fandom bullshit.
As for Mr. Hernandez, I am going to have to ask you to lower your soy intake and start eating red meat. You are a grown man reacting like a histrionic teenager to a children's cartoon.
I would've suggested suicide if a cartoon triggered him that bad. He clearly should not breed.
 
I'm going to float this idea to you fellow Bobologists.

The original Biden Mega Thread was about this size when it was shut down because it was so slow for the mods to do their thing. Do you think we should retire this one and open a new one?
my name is jacob dyer and i live in bristol. it is fantastic. i sound like barnaby bear. i like barnaby bear. one time he went to france. i went to france. but some kid burnt my neck. i didnt like it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back