Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • Happy Easter!

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
So I was reminded of that girl who did the whole "why is Bob following me?" thing. I decided to see if there was any follow-up.

Some fun quote tweets.
image (10).png

And now Bob defends himself.
image (9).png

I've sperged in the past about Philip K Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" and how for Dick the "androids" were a metaphor for people who lacked empathy and had extremely self-centered and pathological personalities - @glib and I had a small exchange on this thread comparing said androids to Bob and other "Consoomer" types that populate social media.

I don't know how much of all this is said writers correctly predicting and warning about the rise of Bob-like personalities in the future, and how much of it is that the modern convergence of social media and mass entertainment has allowed for such personalities to both emerge and have a very loud voice.
As I've said before, Bob has probably done more to convince me of my faith than most preachers I've heard. For example, when I was listening to this podcast by these orthodox priests and they were talking about "monsters" in the Bible, I couldn't help but think of Bob during their conclusions:
And you see this even in what we talked about tonight. Werewolfism doesn’t start with that; werewolfism ends with that. Werewolfism starts with being greedy and gluttonous, with always wanting more, with being ravenous, with wanting to devour, and devouring other people metaphorically, a long time before you get to literally. But those aren’t two different things; those are on a continuum. Those are on a continuum.

And so we need to take every choice we make and how we live and what we do and what we pursue very seriously. There isn’t neutral. There isn’t: well, I didn’t do anything all that significant either way. All of these things are on one continuum or the other. All of these things are leading us closer to Christ and becoming more human and more like God, or they’re leading us in the opposite direction, to become less human and more bestial and more of a monster.
Now I'm on this board just to watch Bob sell more and more of his humanity each day. He is scarcely more than beast now indeed.
 
bobstupid.jpg


Following Robert's logic, I can say people who don't like mustard are bigots.

it is pretty easy to throw labels at everything when you see the world being populated by strawmans.

I think it is pretty useless to explain why Robert is being stupid here, but just for the sake of being throughout, the label of bigot has no meaning anymore, not when it is used at a drop of a hat, when it used to be something to describe someone with a pretty heinous attitude and opinions.

Not to mention this crazy logic Robert has that you need to agree with his assertions otherwise you are a bigtot. If a person thinks his position isn't being harmful to any group of people, that is being the opposite of being bigot, a bigot WANTS to be belligerent against a group of people, it is about hating and being intolerant against a group of people.

Yeah, bigots justify their hatred against a group of people with their own arguments ("they are weak", "lack morals", etc), but they don't deny they hate 'em.

But if you get to the point of here Robert is, when you can call someone a bigot "because I said so", then there is no more discussion.

The funny thing, when this sort of talk reaches this level of moral grandstanding, it becomes less about the fucking subject and more so about petty little nothings getting high on passing judgement on people who have far, far more than they will ever have.

That is pretty much on what Robert subsists on twitter right now.
 
Last edited:
The irony here: No matter how much money Moviebob makes on YouTube, Patreon, et. al., he's still grossly over-paid.



Doomscrolling Twitter makes Bobby feels certain he is on The Right Side of History:
View attachment 3102727
The only way Moviebob is on the right side of anything is if he's physcially standing to the right side of any tangible object, like a buffet cart. Moviebob will never be on the correct side of any philosophical concept.



View attachment 3102733
That affirmative-action sheboon still cannot explain why she sentenced a child pornographer three mere months.
Really? Moviebob's actually interrogating Kentaji Brown Jackson in regards to her "qualification" for being a SCOTUS Justice?



View attachment 3102583
Someone in academia hire this redskin.
Fuck that!



Since I am a native-born American citizen, I will not be doing business with this hotel.



Bobby wants Putin assassinated, because No Bad Tactics.
View attachment 3102808
Looks like those playing today's edition of Moviebob Bingo can mark down "Blatant TOS Violation"!



And Moviebob's lucky to win at Ludo.



Yes, Cowardbob.



The only thing having Moviebob as a guest on your is that it guarantees that I will never watch/listen or subscribe to it. And I was an avid watcher/listener, I'd unsubscribe ASAP.



There are not "good" genuinely stupid people, people's exhibit "Moviebob":
Screen Shot 2022-03-24 at 15.30.54.png
 
There are not "good" genuinely stupid people, people's exhibit "Moviebob":
View attachment 3105083
Bob equating intelligence with good moral character will never stop being funny to me. Bob thought it was a good idea to paint his wall green rather than buying a green screen. He makes multiple tweets a day about how all the MAGAs and their children need to be gassed ASAP. The irony of a this vile oaf beleiving the notion of "a good person is a smart person" is not lost on me for a second.
 
View attachment 3104199

Following Robert's logic, I can say people who don't like mustard are bigots.

it is pretty easy to throw labels at everything when you see the world being populated by strawmans.

I think it is pretty useless to explain why Robert is being stupid here, but just for the sake of being throughout, the label of bigot has no meaning anymore, not when it is used at a drop of a hat, when it used to be something to describe someone with a pretty heinous attitude and opinions.

Not to mention this crazy logic Robert has that you need to agree with his assertions otherwise you are a bigtot. If a person thinks his position isn't being harmful to any group of people, that is being the opposite of being bigot, a bigot WANTS to be belligerent against a group of people, it is about hating and being intolerant against a group of people.

Yeah, bigots justify their hatred against a group of people with their own arguments ("they are weak", "lack morals", etc), but they don't deny they hate 'em.

But if you get to the point of here Robert is, when you can call someone a bigot "because I said so", then there is no more discussion.

The funny thing, when this sort of talk reaches this level of moral grandstanding, it becomes less about the fucking subject and more so about petty little nothings getting high on passing judgement on people who have far, far more than they will ever have.

That is pretty much on what Robert subsists on twitter right now.
According to Merriam-Webster.com, a bigot is:
a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices
especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
Hmm. This sounds a lot like Robert, wouldn't you agree?
 
View attachment 3104324

Bob is a bigot.

And he can't complain if the search engines pick this up because it's true.
I imagine that this is something that Heydrich would have said under interrogation if those Chad Czech assassins hadn't managed to take him out. It's the exact same language used by every modern regime that carried large scale massacres.
Some people are not meant to get social media. They don’t need it because it will destroy their lives and careers.

Bob is one of them, but sadly his head is shoved up his ass and with him getting fatter, he’ll never pull it out.
Social media has been a net negative for the world for a multitude of reasons. Of course, as you point out, it is a vehicle for quick self-destruction. The other issue, especially pertaining to Bobert, is that it reinforces their delusional behavior.

First, Big Tech is incredibly selective about what they ban or allow. The fact that Bob, a man who would elicit nods from Pol Poy, is still on and has a blue check mark while others have been banned for far milder comments is the summit of absurdity. It only gives him license to keep up his ways.

Second, it's easy to block put dissenting voices. You can't just easily do that in a regular work environment with actual colleagues. But to Bob, these people are not "people" because he can just press a button and they're out of his sight for good. He'll never have to acknowledge those he does not want to give time to (which is a gigantic chunk of the population when one thinks about it).

Third, the fact that Bobby spends his days perpetually affixed to the screen gives credence, in his mind, to calling for genocide. He doesn't see the real world, so those he derides as "not people" are not flesh and blood entities that deserve the gift of human rights. If the robot and drone army of his twisted fantasies went on a killing spree across every Red county across the country, he'd never have to see the bodies or carnage. He could just view the sanitized version of the footage through Facebook or Twitter or whatever other Silicon Valley hell site he frequents.

It all feeds back into a loop of his: his detachment and desensitization leads to him making stupid statements and then showing more of his true colors when anyone dares speak against it. This then pushes him even further away from normalcy and acceptance and then deeper into his delusions which starts the process all over again.
 
God, I hate the underdog trope. It’s a load of bullshit.

You know, I like seeing people overcome their challenges but the way they portray it in media is just stupid.

You know what I mean?
The underdog trope appeals to lazy, antisocial people because it says that all of the bad treatment they receive at the hands of others isn't their fault. It's a lot easier to never improve and to just claim victimhood than it is to work on oneself and become the kind of person who gets respect and deference. It's no surprise that the ranks of media creators and consoomers are filled with the kinds of gamma males who would buy into the underdog trope.
 
Bob equating intelligence with good moral character will never stop being funny to me. Bob thought it was a good idea to paint his wall green rather than buying a green screen. He makes multiple tweets a day about how all the MAGAs and their children need to be gassed ASAP. The irony of a this vile oaf beleiving the notion of "a good person is a smart person" is not lost on me for a second.
By his logic, it's fine since his morality is centered exclusively around what he thinks is good, followed by what can score him good guy points with his particular brand of political activists. Unless you follow this retarded brand of MovieBob centered morality, you can see how fucking stupid his rationing is. For all he talks, he seriously can't grasp how utterly similar his ideology is to Nazism, with a constant focus on exterminating the undesirables and no tolerance for dissent. In fact, you could call him the inverted version of Pol Pot: Long live the "intellectuals", death to the working men and all who wear the symbols we hate. For all it's worth, this is below what a Child would think, as children usually do not believe in genocide and hurting people over beliefs!

The underdog trope appeals to lazy, antisocial people because it says that all of the bad treatment they receive at the hands of others isn't their fault. It's a lot easier to never improve and to just claim victimhood than it is to work on oneself and become the kind of person who gets respect and deference. It's no surprise that the ranks of media creators and consoomers are filled with the kinds of gamma males who would buy into the underdog trope.
The one thing I agree with Bob at is that antisocial people should be treated with dignity, but this goes for anyone that isn't an irredeemable asshole. In fact, they should be included so that they don't get become MovieBob's in the future, we don't need more petty, lazy, vindictive narcissistic assholes with delusions of grandeur!

It all feeds back into a loop of his: his detachment and desensitization leads to him making stupid statements and then showing more of his true colors when anyone dares speak against it. This then pushes him even further away from normalcy and acceptance and then deeper into his delusions which starts the process all over again.
Precisely. He is so deep in his delusions of being an enlightened thinker that it isn't far fetched to picture him as a hermit in Boston some years on, he never accepts any form of criticism. In fact, the one thing that saves him from losing it all is the fact that is is utterly fucking irrelevant, if he had a higher profile, people on Twitter would take notice of him repeatedly breaking the platform's T.O.S. and ban him, but he is a blip on the radar so this isn't happening any time soon, unless he pisses off some poster child over there!
 
Social media has been a net negative for the world for a multitude of reasons. Of course, as you point out, it is a vehicle for quick self-destruction. The other issue, especially pertaining to Bobert, is that it reinforces their delusional behavior.

First, Big Tech is incredibly selective about what they ban or allow. The fact that Bob, a man who would elicit nods from Pol Poy, is still on and has a blue check mark while others have been banned for far milder comments is the summit of absurdity. It only gives him license to keep up his ways.

Second, it's easy to block put dissenting voices. You can't just easily do that in a regular work environment with actual colleagues. But to Bob, these people are not "people" because he can just press a button and they're out of his sight for good. He'll never have to acknowledge those he does not want to give time to (which is a gigantic chunk of the population when one thinks about it).

Third, the fact that Bobby spends his days perpetually affixed to the screen gives credence, in his mind, to calling for genocide. He doesn't see the real world, so those he derides as "not people" are not flesh and blood entities that deserve the gift of human rights. If the robot and drone army of his twisted fantasies went on a killing spree across every Red county across the country, he'd never have to see the bodies or carnage. He could just view the sanitized version of the footage through Facebook or Twitter or whatever other Silicon Valley hell site he frequents.

It all feeds back into a loop of his: his detachment and desensitization leads to him making stupid statements and then showing more of his true colors when anyone dares speak against it. This then pushes him even further away from normalcy and acceptance and then deeper into his delusions which starts the process all over again.
What’s most alarming is that these people are two delusional to see that their lives and career prospects are slim because of their actions and behavior on social media. They don’t care if they can’t get hired because their social media attitude reflects poorly on them.

I can’t guess how much money Bob made on The Escapist from 2008-2015, but I imagined it was enough to sustain a roof under his head and cover some of his bills. Then Goobergate happened and wanting to have a piece of that SJW pie just to get some feminist’s attention, he began to sperg out like a moron and well, we know what happened next. He lost a substantial amount of cash flow and connections, and he even got diabetes in the process.
 
The underdog trope appeals to lazy, antisocial people because it says that all of the bad treatment they receive at the hands of others isn't their fault. It's a lot easier to never improve and to just claim victimhood than it is to work on oneself and become the kind of person who gets respect and deference. It's no surprise that the ranks of media creators and consoomers are filled with the kinds of gamma males who would buy into the underdog trope.
When even was the underdog trope last used well? Maybe in Rocky because he wasn't even trying to win, he was just only attempting to go the distance to prove he wasn't another bum destined to be forgotten like sewage down the Philly sewers.
 
Following Robert's logic, I can say people who don't like mustard are bigots.
If, as per Bobby's logic, not caring a group of people makes you a bigot, then Bobby is a proud exemplar.

And denying some group's personhood won't change that.
fun.png
So did Bobby have any "fun" lately? Or have we surrendered our tradition in vain?

Bobby thinks casual "transphobes", unlike "progressive transphobes" such as Rowling, will soon "get on board". And today's obnoxious dudebros will obey their balls and learn to love girldick.
terf.png

Charlie Kirk thinks that, Ketanji Brown Jackson, the affirmative-action supreme-court sheboon who doesn't even know what a woman is, is "an embodiment of the tyranny that we currently live under" (Archive)
kirk.png
I bet Ted Cruz -- or any "MAGA trash" on the street -- can instantaneously give us a perfectly valid definition of "woman", so who is the lower life form?

kkk.png

Matt Walsh has been traveling around the globe just to ask people a question: "What is a woman". Bobby responds with another of his non-sequiturs.
woman.png
I'm absolutely sure that Matt Walsh doesn't think there is no such thing as "a grain of sand" or "a woman"; this kind of language game is the leisurely pursuit of pseudointellectual liberals.

hamster.png

We are fighting a civil war on behalf of the gays and the trans. Brian Webber wants to punch people.
lgbt.jpg

Luke on civil war, particularly in Texas.
luke.png


Another piece of Supreme Court bullshit:
court3.png
I bet Bobby would be SUPER comfortable too, if his brother is fired for what Bobby himself posted on Twitter.

court.png

court2.png
Archive of The New Yorker article.


Biden answered a chain of queries concerning his previous reactions about the Russian situation (which admittedly take some effort to parse) from a reporter with three words: "No and no".
1.png
People on Twitter praise Biden, but I've watched the video five times and I can't even figure out what the two nos answer to.

g7.png

nato.png

Peter Coffin. How is Bobby so sure that kike scums aren't trying to take over the world?
coffin.png

Glenn Greenwald:
glenn.png

Hear the plight of the True And Honest Working Class.
glenn.png

The True Working Class is being genocided by jokes as we speak:
jokes.png

7.png

McD.png
The last person just described Bobby's vision of hell.


Trash show courts trash demographic:
oscar.png

Capeshit:
MCUmoon.png

Whenever The Joker appears, Bobby rages.
batman.png
Still, Bobby's animosity toward the movie is easy to understand: this is not Adam West's Batman.

batman2.png

joker.png

superman.png

1.png

review.png


viet.png

1.png

shel.png

kirk.png
Do we really need more Alien films?

Bobby is mystified by the ritual of dudebro bonding.
warrior.png

Hamster soccer on Nintendo Switch:
hamster.png

Finally, more reason to support Ukraine:
creep.png
 
The underdog trope appeals to lazy, antisocial people because it says that all of the bad treatment they receive at the hands of others isn't their fault. It's a lot easier to never improve and to just claim victimhood than it is to work on oneself and become the kind of person who gets respect and deference. It's no surprise that the ranks of media creators and consoomers are filled with the kinds of gamma males who would buy into the underdog trope.
Exactly. The underdog trope was made for people like Bob. A bunch of losers.

When even was the underdog trope last used well? Maybe in Rocky because he wasn't even trying to win, he was just only attempting to go the distance to prove he wasn't another bum destined to be forgotten like sewage down the Philly sewers.
I think you’re right, Rocky was one of the only times, the underdog trope was used well.
 
Last edited:
By his logic, it's fine since his morality is centered exclusively around what he thinks is good, followed by what can score him good guy points with his particular brand of political activists. Unless you follow this retarded brand of MovieBob centered morality, you can see how fucking stupid his rationing is. For all he talks, he seriously can't grasp how utterly similar his ideology is to Nazism, with a constant focus on exterminating the undesirables and no tolerance for dissent. In fact, you could call him the inverted version of Pol Pot: Long live the "intellectuals", death to the working men and all who wear the symbols we hate. For all it's worth, this is below what a Child would think, as children usually do not believe in genocide and hurting people over beliefs!


The one thing I agree with Bob at is that antisocial people should be treated with dignity, but this goes for anyone that isn't an irredeemable asshole. In fact, they should be included so that they don't get become MovieBob's in the future, we don't need more petty, lazy, vindictive narcissistic assholes with delusions of grandeur!


Precisely. He is so deep in his delusions of being an enlightened thinker that it isn't far fetched to picture him as a hermit in Boston some years on, he never accepts any form of criticism. In fact, the one thing that saves him from losing it all is the fact that is is utterly fucking irrelevant, if he had a higher profile, people on Twitter would take notice of him repeatedly breaking the platform's T.O.S. and ban him, but he is a blip on the radar so this isn't happening any time soon, unless he pisses off some poster child over there!
I think Bob's delusion over his nazi-esque beliefs runs even deeper than that. To him, minecrafting the Mayoghoulen is simply an act of protecting the gays, troons, speds, and darkies. To let Mayoghoulen run free and live their lives, is to threaten the minorities, because after all, Mayoghoulen are above all things (according to Bob), bigoted to the point of wanting Ethnic/Moral Cleansing of the "Undesirables" (darkies, troons, speds, gays). So if they are all gone (even the ones that aren't even bigoted, but Bob thinks they can turn on a dime like the scorpion and the frog story), then the formerly Oppressed Minorities ™️ can live freely in peace and without fear that the Mayoghoulen will shove them into minecraft chambers. (And somehow nobody else will once the Mayoghoulen are extinct). Bob believes this to be the highest good, because he thinks doing so would save (as he put it repeatedly) Lives Who Matter ™️ . Anyone who wants to kill The Minorities ™️ , doesn't Matter ™️ . Besides having a massive god complex, Bob also has a really twisted White Savior Complex. It's more cringe than Brian on Family Guy dating Meg's (black) history teacher one time (the date starts timestamp 2:20 ) :
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back