Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
img_1939-jpg.243102
My reaction to Bob's reaction to the CNN stuff:

 
Just when I thought Bob couldn't be more of reprehensible human being, I'm sadly proven wrong. Does this fat fucker even realize that if he endorses these tactics, people have cartè blanche to use them right back at him?

He doesn't and in fact believes you are out of line if you do so. Remember: "no bad tactics, only bad targets". CNN can do this because the target is a racist misogynist internet troll. If they did this to a black single mother, or a mentally disabled transwoman, then that's when they're in the wrong.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ravelord and delboy
Bob shouldn't talk about bad targets.

He is, himself, a great target, largely because you couldn't possibly miss this fat fuck the size of a mountain of lard.
You could even get all pellets from buckshot to hit him from 300 meters. :story::story:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AnOminous
Bob shouldn't talk about bad targets.

He is, himself, a great target, largely because you couldn't possibly miss this fat fuck the size of a mountain of lard.

Moviebob could have potentially been the only person Randy Stair wouldn't need to fire 50+ rounds for.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AnOminous
Bob blocking someone for "not knowing what words mean" :story::
image.jpeg

Me: Just got back from chilling on the beach all afternoon with friends drinking Vodka Screwdrivers and swimming in the ocean.

Bob & Co.: Trying to trot out Goobergrape 2.0 for asspats because their lives are in "literal danger".

Yeah, I'm the real loser:
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
:late:, but I'm just now seeing Bob's later #CNNBlackmail tweets, arguing that whether he supports it or not depends entirely on who the "good guy" is. Laying aside for the moment that, for all his Roget's approved verbal spinach, Bob's worldview is incredibly, childishly Manichean, he's also revealing how profoundly ignorant he is of the principles of free speech. Simply put: free speech martyrs are often unpleasant people.

For every Times v. Sulivan you've got a bunch more Skokie Nazis, Klansmen, and Larry Flynts, for the simple reason that inoffensive speech or actions most people agree with aren't the ones that need 1st Amendment protections. Who the "good guy" is -- which is obviously subjective at any rate -- is totally irrelevant.

Never mind that the WWE gif was about as offensive or inflammatory as your average editorial cartoon (and a lot less so than some of them!), and forget whatever else HanSoloAsshole put on reddit (apart from not being germane to the subject, I don't think anyone has seen them, so who knows how offensive they are?), Bob is so fucking stupid -- or arrogant -- or fanatical, take your pick -- that he completely fails to grasp that approving of this behavior today means that sooner or later it will be employed against someone he agrees with or even Bob himself ... which, given the incredibly nasty shit he posts on Twitter every day, is more likely than he would ever believe.

It'll be your turn soon, Bob. And hopefully someone will defend you, because the 1st Amendment applies equally to total shitbags like yourself. Choose which bridges you dynamite carefully.
 
What exactly is the point that the hambeast in the red hat's trying to make? "If they just outright did this shitty thing people would still be upset, so it's stupid that people are getting upset about threatening to do that shitty thing?" Legitimately don't understand what they're trying to say here.

Like... are they trying to make it out to be a catch-22 where they were fucked no matter what choice they made? Because that doesn't work when the choice to not dox/openly threaten to dox someone over a wrestling meme was always available.

I feel like Bob and co. don't quite understand that you can sympathize with someone or think they're getting a bad rap without agreeing with everything they say or believe. I can say that I think the guy's anti-Semitic views are shitty while still thinking it's massively fucked up that he's getting openly blackmailed by a news agency for making fun of them. I can also say I think sending death threats and harassment to journalists is a terrible thing to do while still acknowledging that those journalists' actions were reprehensible.

It's some of the most black-and-white thinking I think I've ever seen. You're either wholly good or wholly bad. How do you reach adulthood and still maintain such a stunted view of the world?

Bob is so fucking stupid -- or arrogant -- or fanatical, take your pick -- that he completely fails to grasp that approving of this behavior today means that sooner or later it will be employed against someone he agrees with or even Bob himself ... which, given the incredibly nasty shit he posts on Twitter every day, is more likely than he would ever believe.

It'll be your turn soon, Bob. And hopefully someone will defend you, because the 1st Amendment applies equally to total shitbags like yourself. Choose which bridges you dynamite carefully.
Basically my thoughts on this. As far as I'm concerned, everyone should be worried about what sort of precedent this sets, regardless of how unpleasant you think HanAssholeSolo's posts and views are. I'm actually impressed how hard Bob managed to miss the point when that person tried to explain this to him. It's like he needs someone to hold his hand and walk him to the final point (implying Bob walks anywhere).
 
Last edited:
I don't care if some neckbeard troll gets doxed. He was a moron for giving his personal information on plebbit of all places. I'm just glad that the progressives have finally lost their claimed moral superiority on the matter.
 
It's some of the most black-and-white thinking I think I've ever seen. You're either wholly good or wholly bad. How do you reach adulthood and still maintain such a stunted view of the world?
:autism:.

And being bullied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BR55 and Mola Ram
Basically my thoughts on this. As far as I'm concerned, everyone should be worried about what sort of precedent this sets, regardless of how unpleasant you think HanAssholeSolo's posts and views are. I'm actually impressed how hard Bob managed to miss the point when that person tried to explain this to him. It's like he needs someone to hold his hand and walk him to the final point (implying Bob walks anywhere).

Bob doesn't see HanAssholeSolo as deserving of rights due to his political views and the memes. Bob would likely enjoy seeing him punished openly, because of the precedent being set; that those who go against the grain of the Superior Future get ground down into nothing and are soon tossed aside.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back